skip to main content
research-article

Rethinking Technologies for Behavior Change: A View from the Inside of Human Change

Published:17 June 2019Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Human-Computer Interaction researchers are increasingly designing technologies aimed at supporting “behavior change.” The model of change, which most of these works embrace, focuses on the idea that change occurs on the behavioral level and that it is externalistic, monistic, mechanistic, fragmented, and episodic. We think that a different take, focusing on the internal aspects of change, may integrate and extend what has been done using this behavioral model. We conducted 20 interviews exploring how individuals live, account for, and manage life changes. Then, we outlined five tentative patterns we identified across different kinds of changes reported by the interviewees, pointing out that change might be internalistic, multiple, intentional, holistic, and continuous. This led us to propose a set of design considerations for the evolution of the current behavior change technologies. Finally, we suggested some preliminary lines of future research, which aim to open the design space of technologies for change.

References

  1. Eytan Adar, Desney S. Tan, and Jaime Teevan. 2013. Benevolent deception in human computer interaction. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’13). ACM, New York, NY, 1863--1872.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Alexander T. Adams, Jean Costa, Malte F. Jung, and Tanzeem Choudhury. 2015. Mindless computing: Designing technologies to subtly influence behavior. In Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing (UbiComp’15). ACM, New York, NY, 719--730.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Elena Agapie, Daniel Avrahami, and Jennifer Marlow. 2016. Staying the course: System-driven lapse management for supporting behavior change. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’16). ACM, New York, NY, 1072--1083. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Icek Ajzen. 1991. The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 50, 2 (1991), 179--211.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Paul B. Baltes and Ursula M. Staudinger. 1993. The search for a psychology of wisdom. Current Directions in Psychological Science 2, 3 (1993), 75--80.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Albert Bandura. 1986. Social Foundation of thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Albert Bandura. 1991. Social cognitive theory of self-regulation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 50, 2 (1991), 248--287.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Shaowen Bardzell, Jeffrey Bardzell, Jodi Forlizzi, John Zimmerman, and John Antanitis. 2012. Critical design and critical theory: The challenge of designing for provocation. In Proceedings of the Designing Interactive Systems Conference (DIS’12). ACM, New York, NY, 288--297.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Jeffrey Bardzell and Shaowen Bardzell. 2013. What is “critical” about critical design? In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’13). ACM, New York, NY, 3297--3306.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Jeffrey Bardzell and Shaowen Bardzell. 2016. Humanistic HCI. Interactions 23, 2 (2016), 20--29. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Jeffrey Bardzell, Shaowen Bardzell, and Lone Koefoed Hansen. 2015. Immodest proposals: Research through design and knowledge. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’15). ACM, New York, NY, 2093--2102. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Eric P. S. Baumer, Vera Khovanskaya, Mark Matthews, Lindsay Reynolds, Victoria Schwanda Sosik, and Geri Gay. 2014. Reviewing reflection: On the use of reflection in interactive system design. In Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (DIS’14). ACM, New York, NY, 93--102.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Eric P. S. Baumer and M. Six Silberman. 2011. When the implication is not to design (technology). In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’11). ACM, New York, NY, 2271--2274.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Frank Bentley, Konrad Tollmar, Peter Stephenson, Laura Levy, Brian Jones, Scott Robertson, Ed Price, Richard Catrambone, and Jeff Wilson. 2013. Health mashups: Presenting statistical patterns between wellbeing data and context in natural language to promote behavior change. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 20, 5 (2013), Article 30, 27. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Henri Bergson. 1896/1988. Matter and Memory. Zone Books, New York, NY.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Susanne Bødker. 2006. When second wave HCI meets third wave challenges. In Proceedings of the 4th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Changing Roles (NordiCHI’06). Anders Mørch, Konrad Morgan, Tone Bratteteig, Gautam Ghosh, and Dag Svanaes (Eds.), ACM, New York, NY, 1--8.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Kirsten Boehner, Rogério DePaula, Paul Dourish, and Phoebe Sengers. 2007. How emotion is made and measured. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 65, 4 (2007), 275--291. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Glenn A. Bowen. 2008. Naturalistic inquiry and the saturation concept: A research note. Qualitative Research 8, 1 (2008), 137--152.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Louis Breger. 1974. From Instinct to Identity: The Development of Personality. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Orville G. Brim and Carol D. Ryff. 1980. On the properties of life events. In Life-Span Development and Behavior, Paul B. Baltes and Orvill G. Brim Jr (Eds.), Vol. 3. Academic Press, New York, NY, 367--388.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Adelina Brizio, Maurizio Tirassa. 2016. Biological agency: Its subjective foundations and a large-scale taxonomy. Frontiers in Psychology 7 (2016), 41Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Peter Brusilovsky. 1996. Methods and techniques of adaptive hypermedia. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 6, 2--3 (1996), 87--129.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Hronn Brynjarsdóttir, Maria Håkansson, James Pierce, Eric Baumer, Carl DiSalvo, and Phoebe Sengers. 2012. Sustainably unpersuaded: How persuasion narrows our vision of sustainability. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’12). ACM, New York, NY, 947--956. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Susan Bull and Judy Kay. 2013. Open learner models as drivers for metacognitive processes. In International Handbook on Metacognition and Learning Technologies, Roger Azevedo and Vincent Aleven (Eds.). Springer, New York, 349--366.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Michael Bury. 1982. Chronic illness as biographical disruption. Sociology of Health and Illness 4, 2 (1982), 167--182.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Scott Carter and Jennifer Mankoff. 2005. When participants do the capturing: the role of media in diary studies. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’05). ACM, New York, NY, 899--908.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Federica Cena, Silvia Likavec, and Amon Rapp. 2018. Real world user model: Evolution of user modeling triggered by advances in wearable and ubiquitous computing: State of the Art and Future Directions. Information Systems Frontiers.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Federica Cena, Amon Rapp, Cataldo Musto, and Pasquale Lops. 2018. Towards a conceptual model for holistic recommendations. In Proceedings of the Adjunct Publication of the 26th Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization (UMAP’18). ACM, New York, NY, 207--210.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Federica Cena, Ilaria Lombardi, Amon Rapp, Federico Sarzotti. 2014. Self-monitoring of emotions: A novel personal informatics solution for an enhanced self-reporting. In Proceedings of the UMAP Workshop, CEUR Workshop, Vol. 1181, 72--78.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Beenish M. Chaudhry, Christopher Schaefbauer, Ben Jelen, Katie A. Siek, and Kay Connelly. 2016. Evaluation of a food portion size estimation interface for a varying literacy population. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’16). ACM, New York, NY, 5645--5657.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Hyojin Chin, Hengameh Zabihi, Sangkeun Park, Mun Yong Yi, and Uichin Lee. 2017. WatchOut: Facilitating safe driving behaviors with social support. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA’17). ACM, New York, NY, 2459--2465.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. James Clawson, Jessica A. Pater, Andrew D. Miller, Elizabeth D. Mynatt, and Lena Mamykina. 2015. No longer wearing: investigating the abandonment of personal health-tracking technologies on craigslist. In Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing (UbiComp’15). ACM, New York, NY, 647--658.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Bertram J. Cohler. 1982. Personal narrative and life course. In Life-span Development and Behavior, Vol. 4. Paul B. Baltes and Orvill G. Brim Jr. (Eds.). Academic Press, New York, NY, 205--241.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. John O. Cooper, Timothy E. Heron, and William L. Heward. 2007. Applied Behavior Analysis (2nd ed.). Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Roelof A. J. de Vries, Khiet P. Truong, Sigrid Kwint, Constance H. C. Drossaert, and Vanessa Evers. 2016. Crowd-designed motivation: Motivational messages for exercise adherence based on behavior change theory. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’16). ACM, New York, NY, 297--308.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Carl DiSalvo, Phoebe Sengers, and Hrönn Brynjarsdóttir. 2010. Mapping the landscape of sustainable HCI. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’10). ACM, New York, NY, 1975--1984. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Alan Dix. 2007. Designing for appropriation. In Proceedings of the 21st British HCI Group Annual Conference on People and Computers: HCI but Not As We Know It (BCS-HCI’07), Vol. 2. BCS Learning 8 Development Ltd., Swindon, UK, 27--30. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Paul Dourish. 2001. Where the Action Is: The Foundations of Embodied Interaction. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Per Ehn. 1988. Work-Oriented Design of Computer Artifacts. Arbetlivscentrum, Stockholm. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Glen H. Elder. 1985. Perspectives on the life course. In Life Course Dynamics: Trajectories and Transitions, 1968--1980, Glen E. Elder (Ed.), Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY, 23--49.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Chris Elsden, David S. Kirk, and Abigail C. Durrant. 2016. A quantified past: Toward design for remembering with personal informatics. Human-Computer Interaction 31, 6 (2016), 518--557. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Daniel A. Epstein, Jennifer H. Kang, Laura R. Pina, James Fogarty, and Sean A. Munson. 2016. Reconsidering the device in the drawer: Lapses as a design opportunity in personal informatics. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing (UbiComp’16). ACM, New York, NY, 829--840.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Erik H. Erikson. 1963. Childhood and Society. Norton, New York, NY.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Daniel Fallman. 2003. In Romance with the Materials of Mobile Interaction: A Phenomenological Approach to the Design of Mobile Information Technology. Doctoral thesis. Larsson 8 Co:s Tryckeri, Umea University, Sweden.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. Daniel Fallman and John Waterworth. 2010. Capturing user experiences of mobile information technology with the repertory grid technique. Human Technology: An Interdisciplinary Journal on Humans in ICT Environments 6, 2 (2010), 250--268.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  46. Antonio Fernández-Caballero, Arturo Martínez-Rodrigo, José Manuel Pastor, José Carlos Castillo, Elena Lozano-Monasor, María T. López, Roberto Zangróniz, José Miguel Latorre, and Alicia Fernández-Sotos. 2016. Smart environment architecture for emotion detection and regulation. Journal of Biomedical Informatics 64 (2016), 55--73. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. Barbara H. Fiese, Arnold J. Sameroff, Harold D. Grotevant, Frederick S. Wamboldt, Susan Dickstein, Deborah Lewis Fravel, Kathleen AT Marjinsky, Dean Gorall, Joyce Piper, Martin St. Andre, Ronald Seifer, and Masha Schiller. 1999. The stories that families tell: Narrative coherence, narrative interaction, and relationship beliefs. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development 64, 2 (1999), X--159.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. Jerry A. Fodor. 1980. Methodological solipsism considered as a research strategy in cognitive psychology. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3 (1980), 63--109.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  49. Christopher Frauenberger, Judith Good, and Wendy Keay-Bright. 2010. Phenomenology, a framework for participatory design. In Proceedings of the 11th Biennial Participatory Design Conference (PDC’10). ACM, New York, NY, 187--190. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  50. Christopher Frauenberger, Julia Makhaeva, and Katharina Spiel. 2016. Designing smart objects with autistic children: Four design exposès. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’16). ACM, New York, NY, 130--139.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  51. Shaun Gallagher and Dan Zahavi. 2008. The Phenomenological Mind. Routledge, New York, NY.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  52. Feng Gao, Enrico Costanza, and M. C. Schraefel. 2012. “Honey=sugar” means unhealthy: Investigating how people apply knowledge to rate food's healthiness. In Proceedings of the 2012 ACM Conference on Ubiquitous Computing (UbiComp’12). ACM, New York, NY, 71--80.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  53. William Gaver. 2012. What should we expect from research through design? In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’12). ACM, New York, NY, 937--946. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  54. William W. Gaver, John Bowers, Andrew Boucher, Hans Gellerson, Sarah Pennington, Albrecht Schmidt, Anthony Steed, Nicholas Villars, and Brendan Walker. 2004. The drift table: Designing for ludic engagement. In Proceedings of the CHI’04 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA’04). ACM, New York, NY, 885--900.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  55. Barney G. Glaser and Anselm L. Strauss. 1967. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Aldine Publishing Company, Chicago, IL.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  56. Giampietro Gobo. 2008. Re-conceptualizing generalization. Old issues in a new frame. In The SAGE Handbook of Social Research Methods. Pertti Alasuutari, Leonard Bickman and Julia Brannen (Eds.). Sage, London, 193--213.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  57. Jane Gruning, Julia Bullard, and Melissa Ocepek. 2015. Medium, access, and obsolescence: What kinds of objects are lasting objects? In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’15). ACM, New York, NY, 3433--3442.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  58. Gregory A. Guagnano, Paul C. Stern, and Thomas Dietz. 1995. Influences of attitude-behavior relationships: A natural experiment with curbside recycling. Environment 8 Behavior 27 (1995), 699--718.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  59. Julio Guerra-Hollstein, Jordan Barria-Pineda, Christian D. Schunn, Susan Bull, and Peter Brusilovsky. 2017. Fine-grained open learner models: Complexity versus support. In Proceedings of the 25th Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization (UMAP’17). ACM, New York, NY, 41--49.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  60. Vittorio F. Guidano. 1987. Complexity of the Self: A Developmental Approach to Psychopathology and Therapy. Guilford, New York, NY.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  61. Vittorio F. Guidano. 1991. The Self in Process: Toward a Post-rationalist Cognitive Therapy. Guilford, New York, NY.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  62. Vittorio F. Guidano, and Giovanni Liotti. 1983. Cognitive Processes and Emotional Disorders: A Structural Approach to Psychotherapy. Guilford, New York, NY.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  63. Cathal Gurrin, Alan F. Smeaton, and Aiden R. Doherty. 2014. Lifelogging: Personal Big Data. Now Publishers Inc., Hanover, MA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  64. Oliver L. Haimson, Jed R. Brubaker, Lynn Dombrowski, and Gillian R. Hayes. 2016. Digital footprints and changing networks during online identity transitions. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’16). ACM, New York, NY, 2895--2907.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  65. Sabrina Hauser, Ron Wakkary, William Odom, Peter-Paul Verbeek, Audrey Desjardins, Henry Lin, Matthew Dalton, Markus Schilling, and Gijs de Boer. 2018. Deployments of the table-non-table: A reflection on the relation between theory and things in the practice of design research. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’18). ACM, New York, NY, Article 201, 13.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  66. Jonna Häkkilä and Ashley Colley. 2016. Towards a design space for liquid user interfaces. In Proceedings of the 9th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (NordiCHI’16). ACM, New York, NY, Article 34, 4. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  67. Kirsi Halttu and Harri Oinas-Kukkonen. 2017. Persuading to reflect: role of reflection and insight in persuasive systems design for physical health. Human-Computer Interaction 32, 5--6 (2017), 381--412.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  68. Juho Hamari, Jonna Koivisto, and Tuomas Pakkanen. 2014. Do persuasive technologies persuade?—A review of empirical studies. In Persuasive Technology. Anna Spagnolli, Luca Chittaro, and Luciano Gamberini (Eds.), Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 8462. Springer International Publishing, Switzerland, 118--136.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  69. Steve Harrison, Deborah Tatar, and Phoebe Sengers. 2007. The three paradigms of HCI. In Proceedings of the Alt. Chi. Session at the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems San Jose. California, 1--18.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  70. Martin Heidegger. 1982. The Basic Problems of Phenomenology. Indiana University Press, Bloomington, IN.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  71. Martin Heidegger. 1927/1990. Being and Time. SUNY Press, Albany, NY.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  72. Eric B. Hekler, Predrag Klasnja, Jon E. Froehlich, and Matthew P. Buman. 2013. Mind the theoretical gap: Interpreting, using, and developing behavioral theory in HCI research. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’13). ACM, New York, NY, 3307--3316.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  73. Ravenna Helson and Brent W. Roberts. 1994. Ego development and personality change in adulthood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 66, 5 (1994), 911--920.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  74. Setia Hermawati and Glyn Lawson. 2014. Managing obesity through mobile phone applications: A state-of-the-art review from a user-centred design perspective. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 18, 8 (2014), 2003--2023. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  75. Sander Hermsen, Jeana Frost, Reint Jan Renes, and Peter Kerkhof. 2016. Using feedback through digital technology to disrupt and change habitual behavior. Computers in Human Behavior 57, C (2016), 61--74.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  76. Dize Hilviu and Amon Rapp. 2015. Narrating the quantified self. In Adjunct Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing and Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers (UbiComp/ISWC’15 Adjunct). ACM, New York, NY, 1051--1056.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  77. Edmund Husserl. 1962. Phenomenological Psychology: Lectures from the Summer Semester, 1925. Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, The Netherlands.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  78. Edmund Husserl. 1976. The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology. An Introduction to Phenomenology. Northwestern University Press, Evanston, IL.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  79. Katherine Isbister, Kristina Höök, Michael Sharp, and Jarmo Laaksolahti. 2006. The sensual evaluation instrument: Developing an affective evaluation tool. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’06), Rebecca Grinter, Thomas Rodden, Paul Aoki, Ed Cutrell, Robin Jeffries, and Gary Olson (Eds.). ACM, New York, NY, 1163--1172.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  80. Netta Iivari and Kari Kuutti. 2017. Critical design research and information technology: Searching for empowering design. In Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (DIS’17). ACM, New York, NY, 983--993.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  81. Marina Jirotka, Barbara Grimpe, Bernd Stahl, Grace Eden, and Mark Hartswood. 2017. Responsible research and innovation in the digital age. Communications of the ACM 60, 5 (2017), 62--68. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  82. Toshikazu Kanaoka and Bilge Mutlu. 2015. Designing a motivational agent for behavior change in physical activity. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA’15). ACM, New York, NY, 1445--1450.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  83. Victor Kaptelinin. 2018. Technology and the givens of existence: Toward an existential inquiry framework in HCI research. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’18). ACM, New York, NY, Article 270, 14.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  84. Yamini Karanam, Leslie Filko, Lindsay Kaser, Hanan Alotaibi, Elham Makhsoom, and Stephen Voida. 2014. Motivational affordances and personality types in personal informatics. In Proceedings of the 2014 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing: Adjunct Publication (UbiComp’14 Adjunct). ACM, New York, NY, 79--82.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  85. Robert Kegan. 1982. The Evolving Self: Problem and Process in Human Development. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  86. George A. Kelly. 1955. The Psychology of Personal Constructs. Norton, New York, NY.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  87. Muhammad M. Khan, Roliana Ibrahim, and Imran Ghani. 2017. Cross domain recommender systems: A systematic literature review. ACM Computing Surveys 50, 3 (2017), Article 36, 34. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  88. David Klindt, Marie Devaine, and Jean Daunizeau. 2017. Does the way we read others' mind change over the lifespan? Insights from a massive web poll of cognitive skills from childhood to late adulthood. Cortex 86 (2017), 205--215.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  89. Alexandra Kitson, Thecla Schiphorst, and Bernhard E. Riecke. 2018. Are you dreaming? A phenomenological study on understanding lucid dreams as a tool for introspection in virtual reality. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’18). ACM, New York, NY, Article 343, 12.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  90. David S. Kirk and Abigail Sellen. 2010. On human remains: Values and practice in the home archiving of cherished objects. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 17, 3 (2010), Article 10, 43. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  91. Predrag Klasnja, Sunny Consolvo, and Wanda Pratt. 2011. How to evaluate technologies for health behavior change in HCI research. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’11). ACM, New York, NY, 3063--3072. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  92. Artie Konrad, Ellen Isaacs, and Steve Whittaker. 2016. Technology-mediated memory: Is technology altering our memories and interfering with well-being? ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 23, 4 (2016), Article 23, 29. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  93. Lenneke Kuijer and Conny Bakker. 2015. Of chalk and cheese: Behaviour change and practice theory in sustainable design. International Journal of Sustainable Engineering 8, 3 (2015), 219--230.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  94. Gisela Labouvie-Vief, Lisa M. Chiodo, Lori A. Goguen and Manfred Dhiel. 1995. Representations of self across the life span. Psychology and Aging 10, 3 (1995), 404--415.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  95. Amanda Lazar, Christian Koehler, Joshua Tanenbaum, and David H. Nguyen. 2015. Why we use and abandon smart devices. In Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing (UbiComp’15). ACM, New York, NY, 635--646.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  96. Amanda Lazar, Caroline Edasis, and Anne Marie Piper. 2017. A critical lens on dementia and design in HCI. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’17). ACM, New York, NY, 2175--2188.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  97. Min Kyung Lee, Junsung Kim, Jodi Forlizzi, and Sara Kiesler. 2015. Personalization revisited: A reflective approach helps people better personalize health services and motivates them to increase physical activity. In Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing (UbiComp’15). ACM, New York, NY, 743--754.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  98. Jisoo Lee, Erin Walker, Winslow Burleson, Matthew Kay, Matthew Buman, and Eric B. Hekler. 2017. Self-experimentation for behavior change: Design and formative evaluation of two approaches. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’17). ACM, New York, NY, 6837--6849.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  99. David K. Lewis. 1994. Reduction of mind. In A Companion to the Philosophy of Mind, Samuel D. Guttenplan (Ed.). Blackwell, Oxford, UK, 412--431.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  100. Lassi A. Liikkanen and Paula Gómez Gómez. 2013. Designing interactive systems for the experience of time. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Designing Pleasurable Products and Interfaces (DPPI’13). ACM, New York, NY, 146--155.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  101. Derek Lomas, Anuj Kumar, Kishan Patel, Dixie Ching, Meera Lakshmanan, Matthew Kam, and Jodi L. Forlizzi. 2013. The power of play: Design lessons for increasing the lifespan of outdated computers. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’13). ACM, New York, NY, 2735--2744.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  102. Yuhan Luo, Bongshin Lee, Donghee Yvette Wohn, Amanda L. Rebar, David E. Conroy, and Eun Kyoung Choe. 2018. Time for break: Understanding information workers' sedentary behavior through a break prompting system. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’18). ACM, New York, NY, Article 127, 14.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  103. Kathleen M. MacQueen, Eleanor Mclellan-Lemal, Kelly Bartholow, and Bobby Milstein. 2008. Team-based codebook development: Structure, process, and agreement. In Handbook for Team-based Qualitative Research, Greg Guest, and Kathleen M. MacQueen (Eds.), Altamira Press, Lanham, 119--136.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  104. Bryan Marshall, Peter Cardon, Amit Poddar, and Renee Fontenot. 2013. Does sample size matter in qualitative research? A review of qualitative interviews in IS research. Journal of Computer Information Systems 54, 1 (2013),11--22.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  105. Lara J. Martin, Brent Harrison, and Mark O. Riedl. 2016. Improvisational computational storytelling in open worlds. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Interactive Digital Storytelling. Springer, Cham, 73--84.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  106. Michael Massimi, Jill P. Dimond, and Christopher A. Le Dantec. 2012. Finding a new normal: The role of technology in life disruptions. In Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW’12). ACM, New York, NY, 719--728.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  107. Judith Masthoff, Floriana Grasso, and Jaap Ham. 2014. Preface to the special issue on personalization and behavior change. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 24, 5 (2014), 345--350.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  108. Humberto R. Maturana and Francisco J. Varela. 1980. Autopoiesis and Cognition: The Realization of the Living. Reidel, Dordrecht.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  109. Dan P. McAdams. 1985. Power, Intimacy, and the Life Story: Personological Inquiries into Identity. Guilford Press, New York, NY.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  110. Dan P. McAdams. 2001. The psychology of life stories. Review of General Psychology 5, 2 (2001), 100--122.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  111. Andrew P. McPherson, Alan Chamberlain, Adrian Hazzard, Sean McGrath, and Steve Benford. 2016. Designing for exploratory play with a hackable digital musical instrument. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (DIS’16). ACM, New York, NY, 1233--1245.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  112. Jochen Meyer, Wilko Heuten, and Susanne Boll. 2016. No effects but useful? Long term use of smart health devices. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing: Adjunct (UbiComp’16). ACM, New York, NY, 516--521.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  113. Andrew D. Miller and Elizabeth D. Mynatt. 2014. StepStream: A school-based pervasive social fitness system for everyday adolescent health. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’14). ACM, New York, NY, 2823--2832.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  114. Ine Mols, Elise van den Hoven, and Berry Eggen. 2016. Technologies for everyday life reflection: Illustrating a design space. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (TEI’16). ACM, New York, NY, 53--61.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  115. Ken Nakagaki, Pasquale Totaro, Jim Peraino, Thariq Shihipar, Chantine Akiyama, Yin Shuang, and Hiroshi Ishii. 2016. Hydromorph: Shape changing water membrane for display and interaction. In Proceedings of the TEI’16: 10th International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (TEI’16). ACM, New York, NY, 512--517.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  116. William Odom, Richard Banks, Abigail Durrant, David Kirk, and James Pierce. 2012. Slow technology: Critical reflection and future directions. In Proceedings of the Designing Interactive Systems Conference (DIS’12). ACM, New York, NY, 816--817.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  117. William Odom, Ron Wakkary, Ishac Bertran, Matthew Harkness, Garnet Hertz, Jeroen Hol, Henry Lin, Bram Naus, Perry Tan, and Pepijn Verburg. 2018. Attending to slowness and temporality with olly and slow game: A design inquiry into supporting longer-term relations with everyday computational objects. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’18). ACM, New York, NY, Article 77, 13.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  118. Rita Orji, Julita Vassileva, and Regan L. Mandryk. 2013. LunchTime: A slow-casual game for long-term dietary behavior change. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 17, 6 (2013), 1211--1221.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  119. Rita Orji and Karyn Moffatt. 2016. Persuasive technology for health and wellness: State-of-the-art and emerging trends. Health Informatics Journal 24, 1 (2018), 66--91.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  120. James Pierce. 2014. Undesigning interaction. Interactions 21, 4 (2014), 36--39. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  121. James Pierce and Eric Paulos. 2011. A phenomenology of human-electricity relations. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’11). ACM, New York, NY, 2405--2408. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  122. Charlie Pinder, Russell Beale, and Robert J. Hendley. 2016. Zephyr: Exploring digital behaviour change interventions to treat hoarding. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services Adjunct (MobileHCI’16). ACM, New York, NY, 875--882.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  123. Charlie Pinder, Jo Vermeulen, Benjamin R. Cowan, and Russell Beale. 2018. Digital behaviour change interventions to break and form habits. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 25, 3 (2018), Article 15, 66. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  124. James O. Prochaska, and Wayne F. Velicer. 1997. The transtheoretical model of health behavior change. American Journal of Health Promotion 12, 1 (1997) 38--48.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  125. Stephen Purpura, Victoria Schwanda, Kaiton Williams, William Stubler, and Phoebe Sengers. 2011. Fit4life: The design of a persuasive technology promoting healthy behavior and ideal weight. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’11). ACM, New York, NY, 423--432.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  126. Hilary Putnam. 1975. Robots: Machines or artificially created life? In Mind, Language, and Reality, Hilary Putnam (Ed.). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 386--407.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  127. Amon Rapp. 2017a. Designing interactive systems through a game lens: An ethnographic approach. Computers in Human Behavior 71 (2017a), 455--468. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  128. Amon Rapp. 2017b. Drawing inspiration from world of warcraft: Gamification design elements for behavior change technologies. Interacting with Computers 29, 5 (2017b), 648--678.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  129. Amon Rapp. 2018. Gamification for self-tracking: From world of warcraft to the design of personal informatics systems. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’18). ACM, New York, NY, Article 80, 15. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  130. Amon Rapp. 2019. Design fictions for behaviour change: Exploring the long-term impacts of technology through the creation of fictional future prototypes. Behaviour 8 Information Technology 38, 3 (2019), 244--272.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  131. Amon Rapp and Federica Cena. 2015. Affordances for self-tracking wearable devices. In Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers (ISWC’15). ACM, New York, NY, 141--142. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  132. Amon Rapp, Federica Cena, Romina Castaldo, Roberto Keller, Maurizio Tirassa. 2018. Designing technology for spatial needs: Routines, control and social competences of people with autism. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 120 (2018), 49--65.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  133. Amon Rapp, Alessandra Marino, Rossana Simeoni, and Federica Cena. 2017 An ethnographic study of packaging-free purchasing: designing an interactive system to support sustainable social practices. Behaviour 8 Information Technology 36, 11 (2017), 1193--1217. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  134. Amon Rapp and Lia Tirabeni. 2018. Personal informatics for sport: Meaning, body, and social relations in amateur and elite athletes. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 25, 3 (2018), Article 16, 30. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  135. Amon Rapp and Maurizio Tirassa. 2017. Know thyself: A theory of the self for personal informatics. Human-Computer Interaction 32, 5--6 (2017), 335--380. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  136. Dimitrios Raptis, Rikke Hagensby Jensen, Jesper Kjeldskov, and Mikael B. Skov. 2017. Aesthetic, functional and conceptual provocation in research through design. In Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (DIS’17). ACM, New York, NY, 29--41.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  137. Mark O. Riedl. 2016. Computational narrative intelligence: A human-centered goal for artificial intelligence. In Proceedings of the CHI 2016 Workshop on Human-Centered Machine Learning. San Jose, California, 5.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  138. Milagros C. Rosal and Jamie S. Bodenlos. 2009. Culture and health-related behavior. In The Handbook of Health Behavior Change (3rd ed.). Sally A. Shumaker, Judith K. Ockene, and Kristin A. Rickert (Eds.). Springer, New York, NY, 19--37.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  139. Minna Ruckenstein and Mika Pantzar. 2017. Beyond the quantified self: Thematic exploration of a dataistic paradigm. New Media 8 Society 19, 3 (2017), 401--418.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  140. James F. Sallis and Neville Owen. 2015. Ecological models. In Health Behaviour and Health Education: Theory, Research, and Practice (5th ed.). Karen Glanz, Barbara K. Rimer, and K. Viswanath (Eds.). Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA, 403--424.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  141. Corina Sas, Steve Whittaker, and John Zimmerman. 2016. Design for rituals of letting go: An embodiment perspective on disposal practices informed by grief therapy. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 23, 4 (2016), Article 21, 37.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  142. Corina Sas and Steve Whittaker. 2013. Design for forgetting: disposing of digital possessions after a breakup. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’13). ACM, New York, NY, 1823--1832.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  143. Tobias Schwartz, Gunnar Stevens, Leonardo Ramirez, and Volker Wulf. 2013. Uncovering practices of making energy consumption accountable: A phenomenological inquiry. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 20, 2 (2013), Article 12, 30. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  144. Phoebe Sengers, Kirsten Boehner, Shay David, and Joseph 'Jofish' Kaye. 2005. Reflective design. In Proceedings of the 4th Decennial Conference on Critical Computing: Between Sense and Sensibility (CC’05), Olav W. Bertelsen, Niels Olof Bouvin, Peter G. Krogh, and Morten Kyng (Eds.). ACM, New York, NY, 49--58.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  145. Theodore R. Schatzki. 2001. Introduction: Practice theory. In The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory, Theodore R. Schatzki, Karin Knorr Cetina, Eike von Savigny (Eds.). Routledge, London, UK, 1--14.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  146. Hanna Schneider, Kilian Moser, Andreas Butz, and Florian Alt. 2016. Understanding the mechanics of persuasive system design: A mixed-method theory-driven analysis of freeletics. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’16). ACM, New York, NY, 309--320.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  147. Alfred Schutz. 1970. On Phenomenology and Social Relations: Selected Writings of Alfred Schutz. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  148. John R. Searle. 1983. Intentionality. An Essay in the Philosophy of Mind. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  149. John R. Searle. 2001. Rationality in Action. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  150. Irina Shklovski, Robert Kraut, and Jonathon Cummings. 2008. Keeping in touch by technology: Maintaining friendships after a residential move. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’08). ACM, New York, NY, 807--816.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  151. Elizabeth Shove. 2010. Beyond the ABC: Climate change policy and theories of social change. Environment and Planning A 42, 6 (2010), 1273--1285.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  152. Barrhus F. Skinner. 1938. The Behavior of Organisms. Appleton-Century, New York City.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  153. Petr Slovák, Christopher Frauenberger, and Geraldine Fitzpatrick. 2017. Reflective practicum: A framework of sensitising concepts to design for transformative reflection. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’17). ACM, New York, NY, 2696--2707.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  154. Jonathan Smith, Paul Flowers, and Michael Larkin. 2009. Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis: Theory, Method and Research. Sage, London, UK.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  155. Timothy Sohn, Kevin A. Li, William G. Griswold, and James D. Hollan. 2008. A diary study of mobile information needs. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’08). ACM, New York, NY, 433--442.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  156. Robert Sokolowski. 2000. Introduction to Phenomenology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  157. Jerold M. Starr. 1983. Toward a social phenomenology of aging: Studying the self process in biographical work. International Journal of Aging and Human Development 16, 4 (1983), 255--270.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  158. Anna Ståhl, Kristina Höök, Martin Svensson, Alex S. Taylor, and Marco Combetto. 2009. Experiencing the affective diary. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 13, 5 (2009), 365--378. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  159. Elizabeth Stowell, Mercedes C. Lyson, Herman Saksono, Reneé C. Wurth, Holly Jimison, Misha Pavel, and Andrea G. Parker. 2018. Designing and evaluating mHealth interventions for vulnerable populations: A systematic review. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’18). ACM, New York, NY, Article 15, 17.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  160. Victor J. Strecher, Gerard H. Seijts, Gerjo J. Kok, Gary P. Latham, Russell Glasgow, Brenda DeVillis, Ree M. Meertens, and David W. Bulger. 1995. Goal setting as a strategy for health behavior change. Health Education Quarterly 22, 2 (1995), 190--200.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  161. Minhyang (Mia) Suh and Gary Hsieh. 2016. Designing for future behaviors: Understanding the effect of temporal distance on planned behaviors. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’16). ACM, New York, NY, 1084--1096.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  162. Dag Svanæs. 2013. Interaction design for and with the lived body: Some implications of Merleau-Ponty's phenomenology. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 20, 1 (2013), Article 8, 30.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  163. Maurizio Tirassa, Antonella Carassa, and Giuliano Geminiani. 2000. A theoretical framework for the study of spatial cognition. In Spatial Cognition. Foundations and Applications, S. Ó Nualláin (Ed.). Benjamins, Amsterdam/Philadelphia, 19--31. ISBN:90-272-5146-0Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  164. Daisuke Uriu and William Odom. 2016. Designing for domestic memorialization and remembrance: A field study of fenestra in japan. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’16). ACM, New York, NY, 5945--5957. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  165. Michele Vecchione, Anna K. Döring, Giudo Alessandri, Gilda Marsicano, and Anat Bardi. 2016. Reciprocal relations across time between basic values and value-expressive behaviors: A longitudinal study among children. Social Development 25, 3 (2016), 528--547.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  166. Max Van Kleek, Dave Murray-Rust, Amy Guy, Kieron O'Hara, and Nigel Shadbolt. 2016. Computationally mediated pro-social deception. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’16). ACM, New York, NY, 552--563.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  167. William Von Hippel and Robert Trivers. 2011. The evolution and psychology of self-deception. Behavioral and Brain Science 34, 1 (2011), 41--56.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  168. Joshua H. West, Lindsay M. Belvedere, Rebecca Andreasen, Christine Frandsen, P. Cougar Hall, and Benjamin T. Crookston. 2017. Controlling your “App”etite: How diet and nutrition-related mobile apps lead to behavior change. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 5, 7 (2017), e95.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  169. Terry Winograd and Fernando Flores. 1986. Understanding Computers and Cognition: A New Foundation for Design. Ablex (Repr. 1987. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA), Norwood, NJ. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  170. Steve Whittaker, Vaiva Kalnikaite, Victoria Hollis, and Andrew Guydish. 2016. ‘Don't waste my time’: Use of time information improves focus. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’16). ACM, New York, NY, 1729--1738.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  171. Cornelia Wrzus, Martha Hänel, Jenny Wagner, and Franz J. Neyer. 2013. Social network changes and life events across the life span: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin 139, 1 (2013), 53--80.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  172. Dan Zahavi. 2012. The Time of the self. Grazer Philosophische Studien 84, 1 (2012), 143--159.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  173. Jorge Luis Zapico, Cecilia Katzeff, Ulrica Bohné, and Rebecka Milestad. 2016. Eco-feedback visualization for closing the gap of organic food consumption. In Proceedings of the 9th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (NordiCHI’16). ACM, New York, NY, Article 75, 9 pages.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  174. John Zimmerman. 2009. Designing for the self: Making products that help people become the person they desire to be. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’09). ACM, New York, NY, 395--404.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Rethinking Technologies for Behavior Change: A View from the Inside of Human Change

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in

      Full Access

      • Published in

        cover image ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction
        ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction  Volume 26, Issue 4
        August 2019
        251 pages
        ISSN:1073-0516
        EISSN:1557-7325
        DOI:10.1145/3341168
        Issue’s Table of Contents

        Copyright © 2019 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 17 June 2019
        • Accepted: 1 March 2019
        • Revised: 1 September 2018
        • Received: 1 December 2017
        Published in tochi Volume 26, Issue 4

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      HTML Format

      View this article in HTML Format .

      View HTML Format