skip to main content
research-article

VPS Tactile Display: Tactile Information Transfer of Vibration, Pressure, and Shear

Published:21 June 2019Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

One of the challenges in the field of haptics is to provide meaningful and realistic sensations to users. While most real world tactile sensations are composed of multiple dimensions, most commercial product only include vibration as it is the most cost effective solution. To improve on this, we introduce VPS (Vibration, Pressure, Shear) display, a multi-dimensional tactile array that increases information transfer by combining Vibration, Pressure, and Shear similar to how RGB LED combines red, blue, and green to create new colors. We characterize the device performance and dynamics for each tactile dimension in terms of its force and displacement profiles, and evaluate information transfer of the VPS display through a stimulus identification task. Our results indicate that the information transfer through a single taxel increases from 0.56 bits to 2.15 bits when pressure and shear are added to vibrations with a slight decrease in identification accuracy. We also explored the pleasantness and continuity of VPS and the study results reveal that tactile strokes in shear mode alone are rated highest on perceived pleasantness and continuity.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

References

  1. Mojtaba Azadi and Lynette A Jones. 2014. Vibrotactile actuators: Effect of load and body site on performance. In Haptics Symposium (HAPTICS), 2014 IEEE. IEEE, 351--356.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Karlin Bark, Jason Wheeler, Pete Shull, Joan Savall, and Mark Cutkosky. 2010. Rotational skin stretch feedback: A wearable haptic display for motion. IEEE Transactions on Haptics 3, 3 (2010), 166--176. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Christopher C Berger, Mar Gonzalez-Franco, Eyal Ofek, and Ken Hinckley. 2018. The uncanny valley of haptics. Science Robotics 3, 17 (2018), Art--No.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Stephen Brewster and Lorna M Brown. 2004. Tactons: structured tactile messages for non-visual information display. In Proceedings of the fifth conference on Australasian user interface-Volume 28. Australian Computer Society, Inc., 15--23. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Darwin G Caldwell, N Tsagarakis, and C Giesler. 1999. An integrated tactile/shear feedback array for stimulation of finger mechanoreceptor. In Robotics and Automation, 1999. Proceedings. 1999 IEEE International Conference on, Vol. 1. IEEE, 287--292.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Jacob Cohen. 1988. Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Thomas M Cover and Joy A Thomas. 2012. Elements of information theory. John Wiley & Sons.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Heather Culbertson, Cara M Nunez, Ali Israr, Frances Lau, Freddy Abnousi, and Allison M Okamura. 2018. A social haptic device to create continuous lateral motion using sequential normal indentation. In Haptics Symposium (HAPTICS), 2018 IEEE. IEEE, 32--39.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Nathan Dunkelberger, Joshua Bradley, Jennifer L Sullivan, Ali Israr, Frances Lau, Keith Klumb, Freddy Abnousi, and Marcia K O'Malley. 2018. Improving Perception Accuracy with Multi-sensory Haptic Cue Delivery. In International Conference on Human Haptic Sensing and Touch Enabled Computer Applications. Springer, 289--301.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Benoni B Edin. 2004. Quantitative analyses of dynamic strain sensitivity in human skin mechanoreceptors. Journal of neurophysiology 92, 6 (2004), 3233--3243.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Brian T Gleeson, Scott K Horschel, and William R Provancher. 2010. Design of a fingertip-mounted tactile display with tangential skin displacement feedback. IEEE Transactions on Haptics 3, 4 (2010), 297--301. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Martin Halvey, Michael Henderson, Stephen A Brewster, Graham Wilson, and Stephen A Hughes. 2012. Augmenting media with thermal stimulation. In International Conference on Haptic and Audio Interaction Design. Springer, 91--100. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Gijs Huisman, Aduen Darriba Frederiks, Betsy Van Dijk, Dirk Hevlen, and Ben Krose. 2013. The TaSST: Tactile sleeve for social touch. In World Haptics Conference (WHC), 2013. IEEE, 211--216.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Gijs Huisman, Aduén Darriba Frederiks, Jan BF van Erp, and Dirk KJ Heylen. 2016. Simulating affective touch: Using a vibrotactile array to generate pleasant stroking sensations. In International Conference on Human Haptic Sensing and Touch Enabled Computer Applications. Springer, 240--250.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Alexandra Ion, Edward Jay Wang, and Patrick Baudisch. 2015. Skin drag displays: Dragging a physical tactor across the user's skin produces a stronger tactile stimulus than vibrotactile. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 2501--2504. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Ali Israr and Freddy Abnousi. 2018. Towards Pleasant Touch: Vibrotactile Grids for Social Touch Interactions. In Extended Abstracts of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, LBW131. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Ali Israr and Ivan Poupyrev. 2011. Tactile brush: drawing on skin with a tactile grid display. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 2019--2028. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Ali Israr, Siyan Zhao, and Oliver Schneider. 2015. Exploring embedded haptics for social networking and interactions. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 1899--1904. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Sungjune Jang, Lawrence H Kim, Kesler Tanner, Hiroshi Ishii, and Sean Follmer. 2016. Haptic edge display for mobile tactile interaction. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 3706--3716. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Lynette A Jones and David A Held. 2008. Characterization of tactors used in vibrotactile displays. Journal of Computing and information Science in Engineering 8, 4 (2008), 044501.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Peter Kammermeier, Alexander Kron, Jens Hoogen, and Günther Schmidt. 2004. Display of holistic haptic sensations by combined tactile and kinesthetic feedback. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments 13, 1 (2004), 1--15. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Keehoon Kim, James Edward Colgate, Julio J Santos-Munné, Alexander Makhlin, and Michael A Peshkin. 2010. On the design of miniature haptic devices for upper extremity prosthetics. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics 15, 1 (2010), 27--39.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Lawrence H Kim and Sean Follmer. 2019. SwarmHaptics: Haptic Display with Swarm Robots. In Proceedings of the 201 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 688.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Youngsun Kim, Jaedong Lee, and Gerard Jounghyun Kim. 2017. Design and application of 2D illusory vibrotactile feedback for hand-held tablets. Journal on Multimodal User Interfaces 11, 2 (2017), 133--148.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Jaeyeon Lee and Geehyuk Lee. 2016. Designing a Non-contact Wearable Tactile Display Using Airflows. In Proceedings of the 29th Annual Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. ACM, 183--194. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Line S Löken, Johan Wessberg, Francis McGlone, and Håkan Olausson. 2009. Coding of pleasant touch by unmyelinated afferents in humans. Nature neuroscience 12, 5 (2009), 547.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Francis McGlone, Johan Wessberg, and Håkan Olausson. 2014. Discriminative and affective touch: sensing and feeling. Neuron 82, 4 (2014), 737--755.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Jeremy Miles and Mark Shevlin. 2001. Applying regression and correlation: A guide for students and researchers. Sage.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Kouta Minamizawa, Souichiro Fukamachi, Hiroyuki Kajimoto, Naoki Kawakami, and Susumu Tachi. 2007. Gravity grabber: wearable haptic display to present virtual mass sensation. In ACM SIGGRAPH 2007 emerging technologies. ACM, 8.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Gunhyuk Park and Seungmoon Choi. 2018. Tactile Information Transmission by 2D Stationary Phantom Sensations. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 258.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Evan Pezent, Ali Israr, Majed Samad, Shea Robinson, Priyanshu Agarwal, Hrvoje Benko, and Nick Colonnese. 2019. Tasbi: Multisensory Squeeze and Vibrotactile Wrist Haptics for Augmented and Virtual Reality. In World Haptics Conference (WHC). IEEE.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Ivan Poupyrev and Shigeaki Maruyama. 2003. Tactile interfaces for small touch screens. In Proceedings of the 16th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology. ACM, 217--220. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Ivan Poupyrev, Shigeaki Maruyama, and Jun Rekimoto. 2002. Ambient touch: designing tactile interfaces for handheld devices. In Proceedings of the 15th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology. ACM, 51--60.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Zhan Fan Quek, Samuel B Schorr, Ilana Nisky, William R Provancher, and Allison M Okamura. 2015. Sensory substitution and augmentation using 3-degree-of-freedom skin deformation feedback. IEEE transactions on haptics 8, 2 (2015), 209--221.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Charlotte M Reed, Hong Z Tan, Zach D Perez, E Courtenay Wilson, Frederico M Severgnini, Jaehong Jung, Juan Sebastian Martinez, Yang Jiao, Ali Israr, Frances Lau, et al. 2018. A Phonemic-Based Tactile Display for Speech Communication. IEEE Transactions on Haptics (2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Katri Salminen, Veikko Surakka, Jukka Raisamo, Jani Lylykangas, Johannes Pystynen, Roope Raisamo, Kalle Mäkelä, and Teemu Ahmaniemi. 2011. Emotional responses to thermal stimuli. In Proceedings of the 13th international conference on multimodal interfaces. ACM, 193--196. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Youngbo Aram Shim, Jaeyeon Lee, and Geehyuk Lee. 2018. Exploring Multimodal Watch-back Tactile Display using Wind and Vibration. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 132. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Pratheev Sreetharan, Ali Israr, and Priyanshu Agarwal. 2019. A Compact Skin-Shear Device using Lead-Screw Mechanisms. In World Haptics Conference (WHC). IEEE.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. Evan Strasnick, Jessica R Cauchard, and James A Landay. 2017. BrushTouch: Exploring an Alternative Tactile Method for Wearable Haptics. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 3120--3125.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Ian R Summers. 2000. Single Channel Information Transfer Through The Skin: Limitations and Possibilities. In Proceedings of ISAC.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Juulia T Suvilehto, Enrico Glerean, Robin IM Dunbar, Riitta Hari, and Lauri Nummenmaa. 2015. Topography of social touching depends on emotional bonds between humans. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 112, 45 (2015), 13811--13816.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  42. Hong Z Tan, Charlotte M Reed, and Nathaniel I Durlach. 2010. Optimum information transfer rates for communication through haptic and other sensory modalities. IEEE Transactions on Haptics 3, 2 (2010), 98--108. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Ronald T Verrillo and Georg A Gescheider. 1992. Perception via the sense of touch. Tactile aids for the hearing impaired (1992), 1--36.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Eric Whitmire, Hrvoje Benko, Christian Holz, Eyal Ofek, and Mike Sinclair. 2018. Haptic Revolver: Touch, shear, texture, and shape rendering on a reconfigurable virtual reality controller. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 86.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. Laura Winfield, John Glassmire, J Edward Colgate, and Michael Peshkin. 2007. T-pad: Tactile pattern display through variable friction reduction. In EuroHaptics Conference, 2007 and Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems. World Haptics 2007. Second Joint. IEEE, 421--426. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. Kotaro Yamaguchi, Ginga Kato, Yoshihiro Kuroda, Kiyoshi Kiyokawa, and Haruo Takemura. 2016. A Non-grounded and Encountered-type Haptic Display Using a Drone. In Proceedings of the 2016 Symposium on Spatial User Interaction. ACM, 43--46. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. Steve Yohanan and Karon E MacLean. 2012. The role of affective touch in human-robot interaction: Human intent and expectations in touching the haptic creature. International Journal of Social Robotics 4, 2 (2012), 163--180.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  48. Siyan Zhao, Ali Israr, Frances Lau, and Freddy Abnousi. 2018. Coding tactile symbols for phonemic communication. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 392. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  49. Siyan Zhao, Jill Lehman, Ali Israr, and Roberta Klatzky. 2015. Using haptic inputs to enrich story listening for young children. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children. ACM, 239--242. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. VPS Tactile Display: Tactile Information Transfer of Vibration, Pressure, and Shear

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in

        Full Access

        • Published in

          cover image Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies
          Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies  Volume 3, Issue 2
          June 2019
          802 pages
          EISSN:2474-9567
          DOI:10.1145/3341982
          Issue’s Table of Contents

          Copyright © 2019 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 21 June 2019
          • Revised: 1 April 2019
          • Accepted: 1 April 2019
          • Received: 1 February 2019
          Published in imwut Volume 3, Issue 2

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article
          • Research
          • Refereed

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader