skip to main content
research-article
Open Access

Detachable Smartwatch: More Than A Wearable

Published:21 June 2019Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Glanceability and low access time are arguably the key assets of a smartwatch. However, smartwatches are currently limited to micro-interactions. They do not enable complex interactions and, in general, they do not afford continuous use for long. We believe that smartwatches can retain micro-interactions and glanceability, but also get better at long and complex interactions. We propose a smartwatch that a user can detach, and use as more than a wearable depending on their context, requirements, and preference. Detaching the watch enables it to morph into different forms, and thereby become a better interaction device, better display, and a better sensor suite. First, we interview participants to elicit usage themes for a detachable watch. Then, we build applications that showcase the range of use-cases where a detachable smartwatch offers additional functionality compared to an always-worn one, and highlights the affordances and benefits enabled due to detachability.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

References

  1. Youngseok Ahn, Sungjae Hwang, HyunGook Yoon, Junghyeon Gim, and Jung-hee Ryu. 2015. Bandsense: pressure-sensitive multi-touch interaction on a wristband. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 251--254. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Patrick Baudisch and Gerry Chu. 2009. Back-of-device interaction allows creating very small touch devices. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 1923--1932. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Sebastian Boring, Marko Jurmu, and Andreas Butz. 2009. Scroll, tilt or move it: using mobile phones to continuously control pointers on large public displays. In Proceedings of the 21st Annual Conference of the Australian Computer-Human Interaction Special Interest Group: Design: Open 24/7. ACM, 161--168. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Wei-Hung Chen. 2015. Blowatch: Blowable and Hands-free Interaction for Smartwatches. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 103--108. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Rajkumar Darbar, Prasanta Kr Sen, and Debasis Samanta. 2016. PressTact: Side Pressure-Based Input for Smartwatch Interaction. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 2431--2438. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Artem Dementyev and Joseph A Paradiso. 2014. WristFlex: low-power gesture input with wrist-worn pressure sensors. In Proceedings of the 27th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology. ACM, 161--166. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Augusto Esteves, Eduardo Velloso, Andreas Bulling, and Hans Gellersen. 2015. Orbits: Gaze interaction for smart watches using smooth pursuit eye movements. In Proceedings of the 28th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software & Technology. ACM, 457--466. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Jun Gong, Lan Li, Daniel Vogel, and Xing-Dong Yang. 2017. Cito: An Actuated Smartwatch for Extended Interactions. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 5331--5345.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Mitchell Gordon, Tom Ouyang, and Shumin Zhai. 2016. WatchWriter: Tap and gesture typing on a smartwatch miniature keyboard with statistical decoding. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 3817--3821. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Teresa Hirzle, Jan Rixen, Jan Gugenheimer, and Enrico Rukzio. 2018. WatchVR: Exploring the Usage of a Smartwatch for Interaction in Mobile Virtual Reality. In Extended Abstracts of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, LBW634. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Jonggi Hong, Seongkook Heo, Poika Isokoski, and Geehyuk Lee. 2015. SplitBoard: A simple split soft keyboard for wristwatch-sized touch screens. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 1233--1236. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Daniel Kharlamov, Brandon Woodard, Liudmila Tahai, and Krzysztof Pietroszek. 2016. TickTockRay: smartwatch-based 3D pointing for smartphone-based virtual reality. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM Conference on Virtual Reality Software and Technology. ACM, 365--366. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Rushil Khurana, Nikola Banovic, and Kent Lyons. 2018. In only 3 minutes: perceived exertion limits of smartwatch use. In Proceedings of the 2018 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers. ACM, 208--211.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Gierad Laput, Robert Xiao, Xiang'Anthony' Chen, Scott E Hudson, and Chris Harrison. 2014. Skin buttons: cheap, small, low-powered and clickable fixed-icon laser projectors. In Proceedings of the 27th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology. ACM, 389--394.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Andrea Leganchuk, Shumin Zhai, and William Buxton. 1998. Manual and cognitive benefits of two-handed input: an experimental study. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI) 5, 4 (1998), 326--359. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Christian Loclair, Sean Gustafson, and Patrick Baudisch. 2010. PinchWatch: a wearable device for one-handed microinteractions. In Proc. MobileHCI, Vol. 10.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Andrés Lucero, Matt Jones, Tero Jokela, and Simon Robinson. 2013. Mobile collocated interactions: taking an offline break together. interactions 20, 2 (2013), 26--32.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Kent Lyons. 2016. Smartwatch Innovation: Exploring a Watch-First Model. IEEE Pervasive Computing 15, 1 (2016), 10--13. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Kent Lyons and Halley Profita. 2014. The multiple dispositions of on-body and wearable devices. IEEE Pervasive Computing 13, 4 (2014), 24--31.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Uwe Maurer, Asim Smailagic, Daniel P Siewiorek, and Michael Deisher. 2006. Activity recognition and monitoring using multiple sensors on different body positions. In Wearable and Implantable Body Sensor Networks, 2006. BSN 2006. International Workshop on. IEEE, 4--pp. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Jess McIntosh, Charlie McNeill, Mike Fraser, Frederic Kerber, Markus Löchtefeld, and Antonio Krüger. 2016. EMPress: Practical hand gesture classification with wrist-mounted EMG and pressure sensing. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 2332--2342. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. David Merrill, Jeevan Kalanithi, and Pattie Maes. 2007. Siftables: towards sensor network user interfaces. In Proceedings of the 1st international conference on Tangible and embedded interaction. ACM, 75--78. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Sony Mobile. 2016. Sony Smartwatch MN2 Specifications. https://web.archive.org/web/20160219063107/http://www.sonymobile.com/us/products/accessories/smartwatch/specifications/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Stephen Oney, Chris Harrison, Amy Ogan, and Jason Wiese. 2013. ZoomBoard: a diminutive qwerty soft keyboard using iterative zooming for ultra-small devices. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 2799--2802.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Krzysztof Pietroszek, Liudmila Tahai, James R Wallace, and Edward Lank. 2017. Watchcasting: Freehand 3D interaction with off-the-shelf smartwatch. In 3D User Interfaces (3DUI), 2017 IEEE Symposium on. IEEE, 172--175.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Teddy Seyed, Xing-Dong Yang, and Daniel Vogel. 2016. Doppio: A Reconfigurable Dual-Face Smartwatch for Tangible Interaction. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 4675--4686.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Poise Detachable Smartwatch. 2018. Smartwatch with detachable communicator. https://www.indiegogo.com/projects/poise-detachable-smartwatch/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Garmin Smartwatches. 2018. Bicycle Mount Kit. https://buy.garmin.com/en-US/US/p/11078Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Shell Wearables. 2018. Shell Smartwatch. http://shellwearables.com/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Yang Zhang and Chris Harrison. 2015. Tomo: Wearable, low-cost electrical impedance tomography for hand gesture recognition. In Proceedings of the 28th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software & Technology. ACM, 167--173. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Yang Zhang, Junhan Zhou, Gierad Laput, and Chris Harrison. 2016. Skintrack: Using the body as an electrical waveguide for continuous finger tracking on the skin. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 1491--1503. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in

Full Access

  • Published in

    cover image Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies
    Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies  Volume 3, Issue 2
    June 2019
    802 pages
    EISSN:2474-9567
    DOI:10.1145/3341982
    Issue’s Table of Contents

    Copyright © 2019 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 21 June 2019
    • Accepted: 1 June 2019
    • Revised: 1 February 2019
    • Received: 1 November 2018
    Published in imwut Volume 3, Issue 2

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader