skip to main content
research-article
Honorable Mention

Efficiency and Care in Community-led Initiatives

Published:18 October 2021Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

This paper illustrates the multifaceted aspects of caring practices, and the ways they are entangled with the organizing of community-driven initiatives. Highlighting the situated inter-dependencies between concerns for care and efficiency, and considering caring practices as essential to the practical work that makes communities work, we reflect on how caring and efficiency rationalities frame the use, and scope the design of digital technologies. Drawing on two cases, the analysis shows the ways in which digital technologies oftentimes overshadow communities' key concerns for care, and how attempts to design for community settings can result in anti-designs, that is sociotechnical configurations that can disrupt caring practices. The contribution of the paper is twofold: first, an analysis of the different configurations of caring and efficiency and, second, a focus on care in the design and appropriation of technologies into this space.

References

  1. Cynthia L. Bennett, Daniela K. Rosner, and Alex S. Taylor. 2020. The Care Work of Access. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1--15. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376568Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Katie Berns, Chiara Rossitto, and Jakob Tholander. 2021. Queuing for Waste: Sociotechnical Interactions within a Food Sharing Community. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Yokohama Japan, 1--15. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445059Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Katie Berns, Chiara Rossitto, and Jakob Tholander. 2021. "This is not a free supermarket": Reconsidering Queuing at Food-sharing Events. In C&T '21: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Communities & Technologies - Wicked Problems in the Age of Tech. ACM, Seattle WA USA, 319--331. https://doi.org/10.1145/3461564.3461582Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Lisa L. Borum. 2019. Investigating the relationship between volunteer organization and companies that donate to them. Ph.D. Dissertation. Department of Computer Science, Aarhus University, Denmark.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Lisa L. Borum and Niklas Nørregaard. 2018. Investigating the complex dynamics between various stakeholders to design for a volunteer organization. tex.howpublished: Student report, 2018.06.13.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Claus Bossen, Lars Rune Christensen, Erik Grönvall, and Lasse Steenbock Vestergaard. 2013. CareCoor: Augmenting the coordination of cooperative home care work. International journal of medical informatics 82, 5 (2013), e189--e199. Publisher: Elsevier.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Claus Bossen and Erik Grönvall. 2015. Collaboration in-between: The care hotel and designing for flexible use. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work & social computing. ACM Press, 1289--1301.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Nathalie Bressa, Kendra Wannamaker, Henrik Korsgaard, Wesley Willett, and Jo Vermeulen. 2019. Sketching and ideation activities for situated visualization design (DIS '19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 173--185. https://doi.org/10.1145/3322276.3322326 Number of pages: 13 Place: San Diego, CA, USA.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Susanne Bødker. 2015. Third-wave HCI, 10 years later-participation and sharing. Interactions 22, 5 (Aug. 2015), 24--31. https://doi.org/10.1145/2804405Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Susanne Bødker. 2016. Rethinking technology on the boundaries of life and work. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 20, 4 (Aug. 2016), 533--544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-016-0933--9Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Susanne Bødker, Pelle Ehn, Joergen Knudsen, Morten Kyng, and Kim Madsen. 1988. Computer support for cooperative design (invited paper). In Proceedings of the 1988 ACM conference on Computer-supported cooperative work (CSCW '88). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 377--394. https://doi.org/10.1145/62266.62296Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Susanne Bødker and Erik Grönvall. 2013. Calendars: Time Coordination and Overview in Families and Beyond. In ECSCW 2013: Proceedings of the 13th European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 21--25 September 2013, Paphos, Cyprus, Olav W. Bertelsen, Luigina Ciolfi, Maria Antonietta Grasso, and George Angelos Papadopoulos (Eds.). Springer, London, 63--81. https://doi.org/10.1007/978--1--4471--5346--7_4Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Susanne Bødker, Henrik Korsgaard, Peter Lyle, and Joanna Saad-Sulonen. 2016. Happenstance, Strategies and Tactics: Intrinsic Design in a Volunteer-based Community. In Proceedings of the 9th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (NordiCHI '16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1--10. https://doi.org/10.1145/2971485.2971564Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Susanne Bødker, Henrik Korsgaard, and Joanna Saad-Sulonen. 2016. 'A Farmer, a Place and at least 20 Members': The Development of Artifact Ecologies in Volunteer-based Communities. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (CSCW '16). Association for Computing Machinery, San Francisco, California, USA, 1142--1156. https://doi.org/10.1145/2818048.2820029Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Susanne Bødker, Myriam Lewkowicz, and Alexander Boden. 2020. What's in a word? Platforms Supporting the Platform Economy. In Proceedings of the 11th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Shaping Experiences, Shaping Society (NordiCHI '20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1--10. https://doi.org/10.1145/3419249.3420167Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Lars Rune Christensen and Erik Grönvall. 2011. Challenges and opportunities for collaborative technologies for home care work. In ECSCW 2011: Proceedings of the 12th european conference on computer supported cooperative work, 24--28 september 2011, aarhus denmark. 61--80. tex.organization: Springer.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Victoria Clarke and Virginia Braun. 2016. Thematic analysis. The Journal of Positive Psychology 12 (Dec. 2016), 1--2. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2016.1262613Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Sasha Costanza-Chock. 2020. Design Justice: Community-Led Practices to Build the Worlds We Need. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Carl DiSalvo, Jonathan Lukens, Thomas Lodato, Tom Jenkins, and Tanyoung Kim. 2014. Making public things: how HCI design can express matters of concern. In Proceedings of the 32nd annual ACM conference on Human factors in computing systems - CHI '14. ACM Press, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, 2397--2406. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557359Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Paul Dourish. 2003. The Appropriation of Interactive Technologies: Some Lessons from Placeless Documents. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 12, 4 (Dec. 2003), 465--490. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026149119426Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Berenice Fisher and Joan Tronto. 1990. Toward a feminist theory of caring. Circles of care: Work and identity in women's lives (1990), 35--62. Publisher: State University of New York Press Albany.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Geraldine Fitzpatrick and Gunnar Ellingsen. 2013. A review of 25 years of CSCW research in healthcare: contributions, challenges and future agendas. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 22, 4 (2013), 609--665. Publisher: Springer.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Sarah Fox, Jill Dimond, Lilly Irani, Tad Hirsch, Michael Muller, and Shaowen Bardzell. 2017. Social Justice and Design: Power and oppression in collaborative systems. In Companion of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (CSCW '17 Companion). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 117--122. https://doi.org/10.1145/3022198.3022201Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Batya Friedman and David G. Hendry. 2019. Value Sensitive Design. Shaping Technology with Moral Imagination. The MIT Press. https://mitpress.mit.edu/books/value-sensitive-designGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Eva Ganglbauer, Geraldine Fitzpatrick, and Georg Molzer. 2012. Creating visibility: understanding the design space for food waste. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia - MUM '12. ACM Press, Ulm, Germany, 1. https://doi.org/10.1145/2406367.2406369Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Eva Ganglbauer, Geraldine Fitzpatrick, Özge Subasi, and Florian Güldenpfennig. 2014. Think globally, act locally: a case study of a free food sharing community and social networking. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work & social computing (CSCW '14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 911--921. https://doi.org/10.1145/2531602.2531664Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Lyndon E. Garrett, Gretchen M. Spreitzer, and Peter A. Bacevice. 2017. Co-constructing a Sense of Community at Work: The Emergence of Community in Coworking Spaces. Organization Studies 38, 6 (June 2017), 821--842. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840616685354 Publisher: SAGE Publications Ltd.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Kayleigh Garthwaite. 2016. Stigma, shame and 'people like us': an ethnographic study of foodbank use in the UK. Journal of Poverty and Social Justice 24, 3 (Oct. 2016), 277--289. https://doi.org/10.1332/175982716X14721954314922Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Silvia López Gil. 2007. LAS LÓGICAS DEL CUIDADO. https://www.diagonalperiodico.net/humor/logicas-del-cuidado.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Melissa Gregg. 2018. Counterproductive. Time Management in the Knowledge Economy. Duke University Press. https://www.dukeupress.edu/counterproductiveGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Erik Grönvall, Luigina Ciolfi, Gabriela Avram, Chiara Rossitto, and Louise Barkhuus. 2016. HCI at the boundary of work and life. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 20, 4 (Aug. 2016), 481--485. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-016-0937--5Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Sara Heitlinger, Lara Houston, Alex Taylor, and Ruth Catlow. 2021. Algorithmic Food Justice: Co-Designing More-than-Human Blockchain Futures for the Food Commons. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Yokohama Japan, 1--17. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445655Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Naja Holten Møller, Irina Shklovski, SIx Silberman, Lynn Dombrowski, and Airi Lampinen. 2017. A Constructive-Critical Approach to the Changing Workplace and its Technologies. In Proceedings of 15th European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work - Panels, Posters and Demos, Vol. 1. European Society for Socially Embedded Technologies (EUSSET), Sheffield, UK.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Tim Ingold. 2006. Walking the Plank: Meditations on a Process of Skill. In Defining Technological Literacy: Towards an Epistemological Framework, John R. Dakers (Ed.). Palgrave Macmillan US, New York, 65--80. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403983053_6Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Lilly C. Irani and M. Six Silberman. 2013. Turkopticon: interrupting worker invisibility in amazon mechanical turk. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '13). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 611--620. https://doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2470742Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Victor Kaptelinin and Liam J. Bannon. 2012. Interaction Design Beyond the Product: Creating Technology-Enhanced Activity Spaces. Human--Computer Interaction 27, 3 (July 2012), 277--309. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370024.2011.646930 Publisher: Taylor & Francis _eprint: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/07370024.2011.646930.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. Cayla Key, Fiona Browne, Nick Taylor, and Jon Rogers. 2021. Proceed with Care: Reimagining Home IoT Through a Care Perspective. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Yokohama Japan, 1--15. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445602Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Max Krüger, Anne Weibert, Debora de Castro Leal, Dave Randall, and Volker Wulf. 2021. It Takes More Than One Hand to Clap: On the Role of 'Care' in Maintaining Design Results.. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Yokohama Japan, 1--14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445389Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Airi Lampinen, Moira McGregor, Rob Comber, and Barry Brown. 2018. Member-Owned Alternatives: Exploring Participatory Forms of Organising with Cooperatives. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 2, CSCW (Nov. 2018), 1--19. https://doi.org/10.1145/3274369Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Airi Lampinen, Chiara Rossitto, and Christofer Gradin Franzén. 2019. Scaling Out, Scaling Down: Reconsidering growth in grassroots initiatives. In ETHNOCOL 2019. Edinburgh.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Bruno Latour. 2004. Why Has Critique Run out of Steam? From Matters of Fact to Matters of Concern. Critical Inquiry 30, 2 (Jan. 2004), 225--248. https://doi.org/10.1086/421123 Publisher: The University of Chicago Press.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  42. Christopher A. Le Dantec. 2016. Designing Publics. MIT Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Charlotte P Lee. 2007. Boundary negotiating artifacts: Unbinding the routine of boundary objects and embracing chaos in collaborative work. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 16, 3 (2007), 307--339. Publisher: Springer.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Ann Light and Yoko Akama. 2014. Structuring Future Social Relations: The Politics of Care in Participatory Practice. In Proceedings of the 13th Participatory Design Conference: Research Papers - Volume 1 (PDC '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 151--160. https://doi.org/10.1145/2661435.2661438Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. Ann Light and Yoko Akama. 2017. The Nature of 'Obligation' in Doing Design with Communities: Participation, Politics and Care. In Tricky Design: The Ethics of Things. Bloomsbury, London.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. Ann Light and Clodagh Miskelly. 2019. Platforms, Scales and Networks: Meshing a Local Sustainable Sharing Economy. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 28, 3 (June 2019), 591--626. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-019-09352--1Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. John McCarthy and Peter Wright. 2015. Taking [A]part The Politics and Aesthetics of Participation in Experience-Centered Design. MIT Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. Nel Noddings. 1984. Caring, a Feminine Approach to Ethics & Moral Education. University of California Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. Wanda J. Orlikowski. 2000. Using Technology and Constituting Structures: A Practice Lens for Studying Technology in Organizations. Organization Science 11, 4 (Aug. 2000), 404--428. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.11.4.404.14600 Publisher: INFORMS.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  50. Maria Puig de la Bellacasa. 2011. Matters of care in technoscience: Assembling neglected things. Social Studies of Science 41, 1 (Feb. 2011), 85--106. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312710380301 Publisher: SAGE Publications Ltd.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  51. María Puig de la Bellacasa. 2012. 'Nothing Comes Without Its World': Thinking with Care. The Sociological Review 60, 2 (May 2012), 197--216. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467--954X.2012.02070.x Publisher: SAGE Publications Ltd.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  52. María Puig de la Bellacasa. 2017. Matters of Care: Speculative Ethics in More than Human Worlds (3rd ed. edition ed.). Univ Of Minnesota Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  53. Kingsley Purdam, Elisabeth A Garratt, and Aneez Esmail. 2016. Hungry? Food Insecurity, Social Stigma and Embarrassment in the UK. Sociology 50, 6 (Dec. 2016), 1072--1088. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038515594092 Publisher: SAGE Publications Ltd.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  54. Chiara Rossitto and Airi Lampinen. 2018. Co-Creating the Workplace: Participatory Efforts to Enable Individual Work at the Hoffice. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 27, 3 (Dec. 2018), 947--982. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-018--9319-zGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  55. Daniel Rough, Stefano De Paoli, and Francesco Botto. 2019. Supporting Social Innovation through Visualisations of Community Interactions. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Communities & Technologies - Transforming Communities. ACM, Vienna Austria, 262--272. https://doi.org/10.1145/3328320.3328371Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  56. Kjeld Schmidt and Liam Bannon. 1992. Taking CSCW seriously. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 1, 1 (1992), 7--40. Publisher: Springer.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  57. Andrew Schrock. 2018. Civic Tech: Making Technology Work for People. Rogue Academic Press, Long Beach, CA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  58. Susan Leigh Star and James R. Griesemer. 1989. Institutional Ecology, 'Translations' and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907--39. Social Studies of Science 19, 3 (Aug. 1989), 387--420. https://doi.org/10.1177/030631289019003001 Publisher: SAGE Publications Ltd.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  59. S. L. Star and A. Strauss. 2004. Layers of Silence, Arenas of Voice: The Ecology of Visible and Invisible Work. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008651105359Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  60. Lucy Suchman. 2007. Human-Machine Reconfigurations: Plans and Situated Actions. Cambridge University Press.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  61. Maurizio Teli, Myriam Lewkowicz, Chiara Rossitto, and Susanne Bødker. 2021. Understanding, Promoting, and Designing for Sustainable Appropriation of Technologies by Grassroots Communities. Towards a new wave of technological activism: Sustainable Appropriation of Technologies by Grassroots Communities. In C&T '21: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Communities & Technologies - Wicked Problems in the Age of Tech. ACM, Seattle WA USA, 332--335. https://doi.org/10.1145/3461564.3468163Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  62. Maurizio Teli, Mariacristina Sciannamblo, Marisa Cohn, and Peter Lyle. 2021. Caring and commoning as cooperative work: a case study. In Proceedings of the 24th ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work & social computing. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  63. Austin Toombs, Laura Devendorf, Patrick Shih, Elizabeth Kaziunas, David Nemer, Helena Mentis, and Laura Forlano. 2018. Sociotechnical systems of care. In Companion of the 2018 ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work and social computing. 479--485.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  64. Austin Toombs, Shad Gross, Shaowen Bardzell, and Jeffrey Bardzell. 2017. From empathy to care: a feminist care ethics perspective on long-term researcher--participant relations. Interacting with Computers 29, 1 (2017), 45--57. Publisher: OUP.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  65. Austin L Toombs, Shaowen Bardzell, and Jeffrey Bardzell. 2015. The proper care and feeding of hackerspaces: Care ethics and cultures of making. In Proceedings of the 33rd annual ACM conference on human factors in computing systems. 629--638.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  66. Matthew Evan Vogel, Julie Christa Seto, Daniel Escapa, Hubert Van Hoof, Dheepak Ramaswamy, Brett Daniel Mills, and Joseph Anthony Beernink. 2020. Meeting insight computing system.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  67. Dhaval Vyas. 2019. Altruism and wellbeing as care work in a craft-based maker culture. Proceedings of the ACM on human-computer interaction 3, GROUP (2019), 1--12. Publisher: ACM New York, NY, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  68. Dhaval Vyas and John Vines. 2019. Making at the Margins: Making in an Under-resourced e-Waste Recycling Center. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 3, CSCW (Nov. 2019), 188:1--188:23. https://doi.org/10.1145/3359290Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Efficiency and Care in Community-led Initiatives

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in

          Full Access

          • Published in

            cover image Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
            Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction  Volume 5, Issue CSCW2
            CSCW2
            October 2021
            5376 pages
            EISSN:2573-0142
            DOI:10.1145/3493286
            Issue’s Table of Contents

            Copyright © 2021 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 18 October 2021
            Published in pacmhci Volume 5, Issue CSCW2

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader