skip to main content
research-article
Public Access

A Dramaturgical Approach to Online Activism within Youth Empowerment Organizations

Published:15 October 2020Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Social Networking Sites (SNS) offer youth activists and youth empowerment organizations (where adults help youth address community issues) opportunities for civic action. Impression management is critical to youth empowerment organizations' work online, as they attempt to influence the opinions of their audience. However, there is a dearth of research characterizing online impression management in the context of youth empowerment organizations. To address this research gap, we conducted a qualitative study investigating the use of SNS in a youth empowerment organization. Using Goffman's dramaturgical model, we characterized how youth tried to hack SNS algorithms, and their desire to better identify their audience. Our findings reveal how youth use SNS to create authentic images and connections with their audience. On the other hand, we discuss adults' desire to convey a curated organizational image and challenges that arose. We conclude with design implications for tools that support impression management online for youth activists.

References

  1. Adriana Aldana, Katie Richards-Schuster, and Barry Checkoway. 2016. Dialogic pedagogy for youth participatory action research: Facilitation of an intergroup empowerment program. Social Work with Groups, Vol. 39, 4 (2016), 339--358.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Eytan Bakshy, Itamar Rosenn, Cameron Marlow, and Lada Adamic. 2012. The role of social networks in information diffusion. ACM Press, 519. https://doi.org/10.1145/2187836.2187907Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Christoph Beckmann and Tom Gross. 2014. Social Computing-Bridging the Gap between the Social and the Technical. In International Conference on Social Computing and Social Media. Springer, 25--36.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. W. Lance Bennett (Ed.). 2008. Civic life online: learning how digital media can engage youth .MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass. OCLC: ocn156975213.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Mark C Bolino. 1999. Citizenship and impression management: Good soldiers or good actors? Academy of Management Review, Vol. 24, 1 (1999), 82--98.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Grant Bollmer. 2012. Demanding connectivity: The performance of 'true'identity and the politics of social media. JOMEC Journal (2012).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Caroline Bradbury-Jones, Julie Taylor, and Oliver Herber. 2014. How theory is used and articulated in qualitative research: Development of a new typology. Social Science & Medicine, Vol. 120 (2014), 135--141.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2013. Successful qualitative research: A practical guide for beginners .sage.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. David G Bromley, Luther P Gerlach, and Diana Gay Cutchin. 1999. Waves of protest: Social movements since the sixties. Vol. 101. Rowman & Littlefield.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Leigh A Clark and Sherry J Roberts. 2010. Employer's use of social networking sites: A socially irresponsible practice. Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 95, 4 (2010), 507--525.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Christopher S Collins and Carrie M Stockton. 2018. The central role of theory in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, Vol. 17, 1 (2018), 1609406918797475.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Jerusha Osberg Conner and Sonia M. Rosen (Eds.). 2016. Contemporary youth activism: advancing social justice in the United States. Praeger, an imprint of ABC-CLIO, LLC, Santa Barbara, California Denver, Colorado. OCLC: 968684497.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Juliet Corbin, Anselm Strauss, and Anselm L Strauss. 2014. Basics of qualitative research .sage.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. John W Creswell and Dana L Miller. 2000. Determining validity in qualitative inquiry. Theory into practice, Vol. 39, 3 (2000), 124--130.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Nicole Ellison, Rebecca Heino, and Jennifer Gibbs. 2006. Managing Impressions Online: Self-Presentation Processes in the Online Dating Environment. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, Vol. 11, 2 (Jan. 2006), 415--441. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083--6101.2006.00020.xGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Paolo Gerbaudo. 2012. Tweets and the streets: social media and contemporary activism .Pluto Press, London.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Erving Goffman et almbox. 1978. The presentation of self in everyday life .Harmondsworth London.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Scott A Golder and Michael W Macy. 2014. Digital footprints: Opportunities and challenges for online social research. Annual Review of Sociology, Vol. 40 (2014), 129--152.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. David Grazian. 2005. Blue Chicago: The search for authenticity in urban blues clubs .University of Chicago Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Jessica Greenebaum. 2012a. Veganism, identity and the quest for authenticity. Food, Culture & Society, Vol. 15, 1 (2012), 129--144.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Jessica B Greenebaum. 2012b. Managing Impressions: 'Face-Saving' Strategies of Vegetarians and Vegans. Humanity & society, Vol. 36, 4 (2012), 309--325.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Oliver L Haimson and Anna Lauren Hoffmann. 2016. Constructing and enforcing" authentic" identity online: Facebook, real names, and non-normative identities. First Monday, Vol. 21, 6 (2016).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Oliver L Haimson and John C Tang. 2017. What makes live events engaging on Facebook Live, Periscope, and Snapchat. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems. ACM, 48--60.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Bernie Hogan. 2010. The Presentation of Self in the Age of Social Media: Distinguishing Performances and Exhibitions Online. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, Vol. 30, 6 (Dec. 2010), 377--386. https://doi.org/10.1177/0270467610385893Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Quy Huy and Andrew Shipilov. 2012. The key to social media success within organizations. MIT Sloan Management Review, Vol. 54, 1 (2012), 73.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Jelani Ince, Fabio Rojas, and Clayton A Davis. 2017. The social media response to Black Lives Matter: how Twitter users interact with Black Lives Matter through hashtag use. Ethnic and racial studies, Vol. 40, 11 (2017), 1814--1830.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Farnaz Irannejad Bisafar, Herman Saksono, Priscilla Baquerizo, Dana Moore, and Andrea G. Parker. 2016. Youth Advocacy in SNAs: Challenges for Addressing Health Disparities. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '16. ACM Press, Santa Clara, California, USA, 3620--3624. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858492Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Yoshitaka Iwasaki, Jane Springett, Pushpanjali Dashora, Anne-Marie McLaughlin, Tara-Leigh McHugh, and Youth 4 YEG Team. 2014. Youth-guided youth engagement: Participatory action research (PAR) with high-risk, marginalized youth. Child & youth services, Vol. 35, 4 (2014), 316--342.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Louise B Jennings, Deborah M Parra-Medina, Deanne K Hilfinger-Messias, and Kerry McLoughlin. 2006. Toward a critical social theory of youth empowerment. Journal of Community Practice, Vol. 14, 1--2 (2006), 31--55.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Hyun Ju Jeong and Mira Lee. 2013. The Effect of Online Media Platforms on Joining Causes: The Impression Management Perspective. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, Vol. 57, 4 (Oct. 2013), 439--455. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2013.845824Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Taemie Kim, Agnes Chang, Lindsey Holland, and Alex Sandy Pentland. 2008. Meeting mediator: enhancing group collaborationusing sociometric feedback. In Proceedings of the 2008 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work. ACM, 457--466.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Ben Kirshner. 2008. Guided participation in three youth activism organizations: Facilitation, apprenticeship, and joint work. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, Vol. 17, 1 (2008), 60--101.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Christine M Kowalczyk and Kathrynn R Pounders. 2016. Transforming celebrities through social media: The role of authenticity and emotional attachment. Journal of Product & Brand Management (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Renaud Lambiotte and Michal Kosinski. 2014. Tracking the digital footprints of personality. Proc. IEEE, Vol. 102, 12 (2014), 1934--1939.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Mark R. Leary and Robin M. Kowalski. 1990. Impression management: A literature review and two-component model. Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 107, 1 (1990), 34--47. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033--2909.107.1.34Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. Simon Lewin and Scott Reeves. 2011. Enacting 'team' and 'teamwork': Using Goffman's theory of impression management to illuminate interprofessional practice on hospital wards. Social Science & Medicine, Vol. 72, 10 (2011), 1595--1602.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. Eden Litt. 2012. Knock, Knock. Who's There? The Imagined Audience. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, Vol. 56, 3 (July 2012), 330--345. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2012.705195Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. Eden Litt. 2013. Understanding social network site users? privacy tool use. Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 29, 4 (2013), 1649--1656.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Anshu Malhotra, Luam Totti, Wagner Meira Jr, Ponnurangam Kumaraguru, and Virgilio Almeida. 2012. Studying user footprints in different online social networks. In Proceedings of the 2012 International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM 2012). IEEE Computer Society, 1065--1070.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Jose Marichal. 2013. Political Facebook groups: Micro-activism and the digital front stage. First Monday, Vol. 18, 12 (2013). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v18i12.4653Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Alice E Marwick. 2013. Status update: Celebrity, publicity, and branding in the social media age .Yale University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Alice E. Marwick and danah boyd. 2011. I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience. New Media & Society, Vol. 13, 1 (Feb. 2011), 114--133. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444810365313Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  43. Melissa Mazmanian and Ingrid Erickson. 2014. The product of availability: understanding the economic underpinnings of constant connectivity. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 763--772.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Sarah McRoberts, Haiwei Ma, Andrew Hall, and Svetlana Yarosh. 2017. Share First, Save Later: Performance of Self through Snapchat Stories. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '17. ACM Press, Denver, Colorado, USA, 6902--6911. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025771Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. Albert Mills, Gabrielle Durepos, and Elden Wiebe. 2019. Encyclopedia of Case Study Research. (Sept. 2019). https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412957397Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. Shelley C Moore. 2012. Digital Footprints on the Internet. International Journal of Childbirth Education, Vol. 27, 3 (2012).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. Egle Oolo and Andra Siibak. 2013. Performing for one?s imagined audience: Social steganography and other privacy strategies of Estonian teens on networked publics. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, Vol. 7, 1 (2013).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. Melissa M Pearrow. 2008. A critical examination of an urban-based youth empowerment strategy: The teen empowerment program. Journal of Community Practice, Vol. 16, 4 (2008), 509--525.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  49. Jennifer Preston. 2011. Social media history becomes a new job hurdle. New York (2011).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. Jane Ritchie, Jane Lewis, Carol McNaughton Nicholls, Rachel Ormston, et almbox. 2013. Qualitative research practice: A guide for social science students and researchers .sage.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. Nicolas Roulin and Julia Levashina. 2016. Impression management and social media profiles. In Social Media in Employee Selection and Recruitment. Springer, 223--248.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  52. Margaret Rundle, Emily Weinstein, Howard Gardner, and Carrie James. 2015. Doing civics in the digital age: Casual, purposeful, and strategic approaches to participatory politics. (2015). https://ypp.dmlcentral.net/sites/default/files/publications/YPP_WorkinPaper_02.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  53. Meredith Salisbury and Jefferson Pooley. 2017. The# nofilter self: The contest for authenticity among social networking sites, 2002--2016. Social sciences, Vol. 6, 1 (2017), 10.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  54. Angel Saz-Carranza. 2012. Uniting diverse organizations: Managing goal-oriented advocacy networks .Routledge.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. Sarita Schoenebeck, Nicole B Ellison, Lindsay Blackwell, Joseph B Bayer, and Emily B Falk. 2016. Playful backstalking and serious impression management: How young adults reflect on their past identities on Facebook. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM conference on computer-supported cooperative work & social computing. ACM, 1475--1487.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  56. Lauren F Sessions. 2009. "You Looked Better on MySpace": Deception and authenticity on the Web 2.0. First Monday, Vol. 14, 7 (2009).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  57. Latisha Asmaak Shafie, Surina Nayan, and Nazira Osman. 2012. Constructing identity through Facebook profiles: online identity and visual impression management of university students in Malaysia. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 65 (2012), 134--140.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  58. Brett Smith. 2018. Generalizability in qualitative research: Misunderstandings, opportunities and recommendations for the sport and exercise sciences. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, Vol. 10, 1 (2018), 137--149.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  59. Sarah Sobieraj. 2010. Reporting conventions: Journalists, activists, and the thorny struggle for political visibility. Social Problems, Vol. 57, 4 (2010), 505--528.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  60. Jennifer Tilton. 2010. Dangerous or endangered? race and the politics of youth in urban America / Jennifer Tilton. New York University Press, New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  61. Penny Trieu and Nancy K Baym. 2020. Private Responses for Public Sharing: Understanding Self-Presentation and Relational Maintenance via Stories in Social Media. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1--13.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  62. Zeynep Tufekci. 2013. 'Not this one' social movements, the attention economy, and microcelebrity networked activism. American Behavioral Scientist, Vol. 57, 7 (2013), 848--870.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  63. Sebastián Valenzuela. 2013. Unpacking the Use of Social Media for Protest Behavior: The Roles of Information, Opinion Expression, and Activism. American Behavioral Scientist, Vol. 57, 7 (July 2013), 920--942. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764213479375Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  64. Martin Webb. 2010. Success stories: rhetoric, authenticity, and the right to information movement in north India. Contemporary South Asia, Vol. 18, 3 (2010), 293--304.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  65. Sherri Williams. 2015. Digital defense: Black feminists resist violence with hashtag activism. Feminist Media Studies, Vol. 15, 2 (2015), 341--344.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  66. Sasan Zarghooni. 2007. A study of self-presentation in light of Facebook. Institute of Psychology, University of Oslo (2007).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  67. Marc A Zimmerman, Andria B Eisman, Thomas M Reischl, Susan Morrel-Samuels, Sarah Stoddard, Alison L Miller, Pete Hutchison, Susan Franzen, and Laney Rupp. 2018. Youth empowerment solutions: Evaluation of an after-school program to engage middle school students in community change. Health Education & Behavior, Vol. 45, 1 (2018), 20--31.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  68. Douglas Zytko, Sukeshini A Grandhi, and Quentin Gad Jones. 2014. Impression management through communication in online dating. In Proceedings of the companion publication of the 17th ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work & social computing. ACM, 277--280.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. A Dramaturgical Approach to Online Activism within Youth Empowerment Organizations

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    Full Access

    • Published in

      cover image Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
      Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction  Volume 4, Issue CSCW2
      CSCW
      October 2020
      2310 pages
      EISSN:2573-0142
      DOI:10.1145/3430143
      Issue’s Table of Contents

      Copyright © 2020 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 15 October 2020
      Published in pacmhci Volume 4, Issue CSCW2

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader