skip to main content
research-article
Public Access

Supporting Youth Activists? Strategic Use of Social Media: A Qualitative Investigation of Design Opportunities

Published:15 October 2020Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Social Networking Sites (SNS) provide a platform for engaging youth in activism (e.g., by helping mobilize civic action). While youth typically employ casual approaches to online activism (i.e., quick actions, such as broadcast posts to advertise social justice events), more strategic practices (i.e., those that are more creative and informed) can increase the likelihood of successful online campaigns. However, little work has examined how youth activists can be supported to use SNS more strategically. To address this research gap, we conducted interviews with youth activists, exploring how youth made sense of social network visualizations and their perspectives on how such tools could support their activism efforts. Our findings characterize how participants made inferences about followers? identities based on their hashtag use, and how they used those inferences in outreach decisions. We conclude with design implications for future research in this area.

References

  1. Cinzia Albanesi, Elvira Cicognani, and Bruna Zani. 2007. Sense of community, civic engagement and social well-being in Italian adolescents. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, Vol. 17, 5 (2007), 387--406.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Eytan Bakshy, Jake M Hofman, Winter A Mason, and Duncan J Watts. 2011. Everyone's an influencer: quantifying influence on twitter. In Proceedings of the fourth ACM international conference on Web search and data mining. ACM, 65--74.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Albert Bandura and Lynne Cherry. 2019. Enlisting the power of youth for climate change. American Psychologist (2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Bernadette Barker-Plummer and David Barker-Plummer. 2017. Twitter as a feminist resource:# YESALLWOMEN, digital platforms, and discursive social change. In Social movements and media. Emerald Publishing Limited, 91--118.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Jeremy Birnholtz, Nicholas Aaron Ross Merola, and Arindam Paul. 2015. Is it weird to still be a virgin: Anonymous, locally targeted questions on facebook confession boards. In Proceedings of the 33rd annual ACM conference on human factors in computing systems. ACM, 2613--2622.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Kirsten Boehner, Janet Vertesi, Phoebe Sengers, and Paul Dourish. 2007. How HCI interprets the probes. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems. 1077--1086.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Petter Bae Brandtzaeg, Ida Maria Haugstveit, Marika Lüders, and Asbjørn Følstad. 2016. How should organizations adapt to youth civic engagement in social media? A lead user approach. Interacting with Computers, Vol. 28, 5 (2016), 664--679.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Devon D Brewer. 2000. Forgetting in the recall-based elicitation of personal and social networks. Social networks, Vol. 22, 1 (2000), 29--43.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Melissa Brown, Rashawn Ray, Ed Summers, and Neil Fraistat. 2017. # SayHerName: a case study of intersectional social media activism. Ethnic and Racial Studies, Vol. 40, 11 (2017), 1831--1846.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Julio Cammarota and Michelle Fine. 2010. Youth participatory action research: A pedagogy for transformational resistance. In Revolutionizing education. Routledge, 9--20.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Pew Reseach Center. 2018. Internet/broadband fact sheet. Internet, Science & Tech (2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Meeyoung Cha, Hamed Haddadi, Fabricio Benevenuto, and Krishna P Gummadi. 2010. Measuring user influence in twitter: The million follower fallacy. In fourth international AAAI conference on weblogs and social media.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Lynn Schofield Clark and Regina Marchi. 2017. Young people and the future of news: Social media and the rise of connective journalism .Cambridge University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Rosemary Clark. 2016. 'Hope in a hashtag': the discursive activism of# WhyIStayed. Feminist Media Studies, Vol. 16, 5 (2016), 788--804.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Jennifer E Cobbina, Soma Chaudhuri, Victor M Rios, and Michael Conteh. 2019. 'I Will Be Out There Every Day Strong!' Protest Policing and Future Activism Among Ferguson and Baltimore Protesters. In Sociological forum, Vol. 34. Wiley Online Library, 409--433.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Jerusha Conner and Sonia M Rosen. 2016. Contemporary Youth Activism: Advancing Social Justice in the United States: Advancing Social Justice in the United States .ABC-CLIO.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Jerusha Conner and Amanda Slattery. 2014. New media and the power of youth organizing: Minding the gaps. Equity & Excellence in Education, Vol. 47, 1 (2014), 14--30.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Michael D Conover, Bruno Goncc alves, Jacob Ratkiewicz, Alessandro Flammini, and Filippo Menczer. 2011. Predicting the political alignment of twitter users. In 2011 IEEE third international conference on privacy, security, risk and trust and 2011 IEEE third international conference on social computing. IEEE, 192--199.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Juliet M. Corbin and Anselm L. Strauss. 2015. Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory fourth edition ed.). SAGE, Los Angeles.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Melvin Delgado and Lee Staples. 2007. Youth-led community organizing: Theory and action .Oxford University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Joseph DiGrazia. 2014. Individual protest participation in the United States: Conventional and unconventional activism. Social Science Quarterly, Vol. 95, 1 (2014), 111--131.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Kitsy Dixon. 2014. Feminist online identity: Analyzing the presence of hashtag feminism. Journal of Arts and Humanities, Vol. 3, 7 (2014), 34--40.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Silvia Dominguez and Celeste Watkins. 2003. Creating networks for survival and mobility: Social capital among African-American and Latin-American low-income mothers. Social problems, Vol. 50, 1 (2003), 111--135.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Nicole B Ellison, Charles Steinfield, and Cliff Lampe. 2007. The benefits of Facebook 'friends:' Social capital and college students? use of online social network sites. Journal of computer-mediated communication, Vol. 12, 4 (2007), 1143--1168.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Invision Enterprise. 2011. The digital product design platform. https://www.invisionapp.comGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Pennie G Foster-Fishman, Kristen M Law, Lauren F Lichty, and Christina Aoun. 2010. Youth ReACT for social change: A method for youth participatory action research. American journal of community psychology, Vol. 46, 1--2 (2010), 67--83.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. James L Furrow, Pamela Ebstyne King, and Krystal White. 2004. Religion and positive youth development: Identity, meaning, and prosocial concerns. Applied Developmental Science, Vol. 8, 1 (2004), 17--26.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Paolo Gerbaudo and Emiliano Treré. 2015. In search of the 'we'of social media activism: introduction to the special issue on social media and protest identities.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Homero Gil de Zú niga, Nakwon Jung, and Sebastián Valenzuela. 2012. Social media use for news and individuals' social capital, civic engagement and political participation. Journal of computer-mediated communication, Vol. 17, 3 (2012), 319--336.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Peter Gundelach and Jonas Toubøl. 2019. High-and Low-Risk Activism: Differential Participation in a Refugee Solidarity Movement. Mobilization: An International Quarterly, Vol. 24, 2 (2019), 199--220.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Jessica Hullman, Matthew Kay, Yea-Seul Kim, and Samana Shrestha. 2017. Imagining replications: Graphical prediction & discrete visualizations improve recall & estimation of effect uncertainty. IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics, Vol. 24, 1 (2017), 446--456.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Jelani Ince, Fabio Rojas, and Clayton A Davis. 2017. The social media response to Black Lives Matter: how Twitter users interact with Black Lives Matter through hashtag use. Ethnic and racial studies, Vol. 40, 11 (2017), 1814--1830.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Farnaz Irannejad Bisafar, Lina Itzel Martinez, and Andrea G Parker. 2018. Social Computing-Driven Activism in Youth Empowerment Organizations: Challenges and Opportunities. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 183.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Farnaz Irannejad Bisafar, Herman Saksono, Priscilla Baquerizo, Dana Moore, and Andrea G Parker. 2016. Youth Advocacy in SNAs: Challenges for Addressing Health Disparities. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 3620--3624.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Sarah J Jackson, Moya Bailey, and Brooke Foucault Welles. 2019. Women Tweet on Violence: From# YesAllWomen to# MeToo. Ada: A Journal of Gender, New Media, and Technology, Vol. 15 (2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Sarah J Jackson and Brooke Foucault Welles. 2015. Hijacking# myNYPD: Social media dissent and networked counterpublics. Journal of Communication, Vol. 65, 6 (2015), 932--952.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. Sarah J Jackson and Brooke Foucault Welles. 2016. # Ferguson is everywhere: Initiators in emerging counterpublic networks. Information, Communication & Society, Vol. 19, 3 (2016), 397--418.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. Louise B Jennings, Deborah M Parra-Medina, Deanne K Hilfinger-Messias, and Kerry McLoughlin. 2006. Toward a critical social theory of youth empowerment. Journal of Community Practice, Vol. 14, 1--2 (2006), 31--55.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. Hao Jiang and John M Carroll. 2009. Social capital, social network and identity bonds: a reconceptualization. In Proceedings of the fourth international conference on Communities and technologies. ACM, 51--60.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Kevin Johnston, Maureen Tanner, Nishant Lalla, and Dori Kawalski. 2013. Social capital: the benefit of Facebook 'friends'. Behaviour & Information Technology, Vol. 32, 1 (2013), 24--36.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  41. Ichiro Kawachi, Lisa Berkman, et almbox. 2000. Social cohesion, social capital, and health. Social epidemiology, Vol. 174, 7 (2000).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Ichiro Kawachi, Bruce P Kennedy, and Roberta Glass. 1999. Social capital and self-rated health: a contextual analysis. American journal of public health, Vol. 89, 8 (1999), 1187--1193.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Alexah Konnelly. 2015. # Activism: Identity, Affiliation, and Political Discourse-Making on Twitter. The Arbutus Review, Vol. 6, 1 (2015), 1--16.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  44. Julie Letierce, Alexandre Passant, John Breslin, and Stefan Decker. 2010. Understanding how Twitter is used to spread scientific messages. (2010).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. Hanlin Li, Disha Bora, Sagar Salvi, and Erin Brady. 2018. Slacktivists or activists?: Identity work in the virtual disability march. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 225.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. Ben Light and Kathy McGrath. 2010. Ethics and social networking sites: a disclosive analysis of Facebook. Information Technology & People, Vol. 23, 4 (2010), 290--311.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  47. Regina Marchi and Lynn Schofield Clark. 2018. Social media and connective journalism: The formation of counterpublics and youth civic participation. Journalism (2018), 1464884918807811.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. Douglas S McCall and Mary M Shannon. 1999. Youth led health promotion, youth engagement and youth participation: a research review. Tobacco Control Unit, Health Canada. https://www. yumpu. com/en/document/view/25946368/youth-led-healthpromotion-youth-engagement-and-youth (1999).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. Kaitlynn Mendes, Jessica Ringrose, and Jessalynn Keller. 2018. # MeToo and the promise and pitfalls of challenging rape culture through digital feminist activism. European Journal of Women's Studies, Vol. 25, 2 (2018), 236--246.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  50. Ellen Middaugh, Lynn Schofield Clark, and Parissa J Ballard. 2017. Digital media, participatory politics, and positive youth development. Pediatrics, Vol. 140, Supplement 2 (2017), S127--S131.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  51. Megan A Moreno, Natalie Goniu, Peter S Moreno, and Douglas Diekema. 2013. Ethics of social media research: common concerns and practical considerations. Cyberpsychology, behavior, and social networking, Vol. 16, 9 (2013), 708--713.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  52. Matthew H Morton and Paul Montgomery. 2013. Youth empowerment programs for improving adolescents? self-efficacy and self-esteem: A systematic review. Research on social work practice, Vol. 23, 1 (2013), 22--33.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  53. Stefanie Mueller, Dustin Beyer, Tobias Mohr, Serafima Gurevich, Alexander Teibrich, Lisa Pfistere, Kerstin Guenther, Johannes Frohnhofen, Hsiang-Ting Chen, Patrick Baudisch, et almbox. 2015. Low-fidelity fabrication: Speeding up design iteration of 3D objects. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 327--330.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  54. Keith V Nesbitt and Carsten Friedrich. 2002. Applying gestalt principles to animated visualizations of network data. In Proceedings Sixth International Conference on Information Visualisation. IEEE, 737--743.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  55. Jeffrey Nichols and Jeon-Hyung Kang. 2012. Asking questions of targeted strangers on social networks. In Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. ACM, 999--1002.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  56. Jelena Obradović and Ann S Masten. 2007. Developmental antecedents of young adult civic engagement. Applied developmental science, Vol. 11, 1 (2007), 2--19.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  57. Daphna Oyserman, Kristen Elmore, and George Smith. 2012. Self, self-concept, and identity. (2012).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  58. Melissa M Pearrow. 2008. A critical examination of an urban-based youth empowerment strategy: The teen empowerment program. Journal of Community Practice, Vol. 16, 4 (2008), 509--525.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  59. Thomas Poell and José van Dijck. 2018. Social Media and New Protest Movements. In The SAGE Handbook of Social Media. SAGE Publications Ltd, 1 Oliver's Yard, 55 City Road London EC1Y 1SP, 546--561. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473984066.n31Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  60. Caroline Queiroz Santos, Holisson Cunha, Carlos Teixeira, Daniele Ramos de Souza, Roberto Tietzmann, Isabel Manssour, Milene Selbach Silveira, Marcelo Tr"asel, Duncan Dubugras Alcoba Ruiz, and Rodrigo Barros. 2017. Media professionals? opinions about interactive visualizations of political polarization during Brazilian presidential campaigns on Twitter. (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  61. Scott Reeves, Mathieu Albert, Ayelet Kuper, and Brian David Hodges. 2008. Why use theories in qualitative research? Bmj, Vol. 337 (2008).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  62. Carrie A Rentschler. 2017. Bystander intervention, feminist hashtag activism, and the anti-carceral politics of care. Feminist media studies, Vol. 17, 4 (2017), 565--584.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  63. V Rideout and M Robb. 2018. Social media, social life: Teens reveal their experiences. San Francisco, CA: Common Sense Media (2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  64. Sherer W Royce, Deborah Parra-Medina, and DeAnne H Messias. 2006. Using Photovoice to Examine and Initiate Youth Empowerment in Community-Based Programs. Californian Journal of Health Promotion, Vol. 4, 3 (2006), 80--91.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  65. Margaret Rundle, Emily Weinstein, C James, and H Gardner. 2015. Doing civics in the digital age: Casual, purposeful, and strategic approaches to participatory politics. Youth and Participatory Politics Research Network (2015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  66. Caroline Q Santos, Roberto Tietzmann, Marcelo Trasel, Silvia Moraes, Isabel H Manssour, and Milene S Silveira. 2016. Can Visualization Techniques Help Journalists to Deepen Analysis of Twitter Data? Exploring the" Germany 7 x 1 Brazil" Case. In 2016 49th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS). IEEE, 1939--1948.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  67. Sanjay Sharma. 2013. Black Twitter? Racial hashtags, networks and contagion. New Formations, Vol. 78, 78 (2013), 46--64.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  68. Herbert A Simon. 1955. A behavioral model of rational choice. The quarterly journal of economics, Vol. 69, 1 (1955), 99--118.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  69. Marko M Skoric. 2012. What is slack about slacktivism. Methodological and conceptual issues in cyber activism research, Vol. 77 (2012), 77--92.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  70. Brett Smith. 2018. Generalizability in qualitative research: Misunderstandings, opportunities and recommendations for the sport and exercise sciences. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, Vol. 10, 1 (2018), 137--149.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  71. Stefan Stieglitz and Linh Dang-Xuan. 2013. Social media and political communication: a social media analytics framework. Social network analysis and mining, Vol. 3, 4 (2013), 1277--1291.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  72. Egemen Tanin, Richard Beigel, and Ben Shneiderman. 1997. Design and evaluation of incremental data structures and algorithms for dynamic query interfaces. In Proceedings of VIZ'97: Visualization Conference, Information Visualization Symposium and Parallel Rendering Symposium. IEEE, 81--86.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  73. Rosemary Thackeray and MaryAnne Hunter. 2010. Empowering youth: Use of technology in advocacy to affect social change. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, Vol. 15, 4 (2010), 575--591.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  74. Jennifer Tilton. 2010. Dangerous or endangered?: Race and the politics of youth in urban America .NYU Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  75. Panayiota Tsatsou and Yupei Zhao. 2016. A ?two-level social capital analysis? of the role of online communication in civic activism: Lessons from the role of Facebook in the sunflower movement. Social MediaGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  76. Society, Vol. 2, 4 (2016), 2056305116671967.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  77. Sebastián Valenzuela. 2013. Unpacking the use of social media for protest behavior: The roles of information, opinion expression, and activism. American Behavioral Scientist, Vol. 57, 7 (2013), 920--942.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  78. Alcides Velasquez and Robert LaRose. 2015. Youth collective activism through social media: The role of collective efficacy. New Media & Society, Vol. 17, 6 (2015), 899--918.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  79. Brooke Foucault Welles and Weiai Xu. 2018. Network visualization and problem-solving support: A cognitive fit study. Social Networks, Vol. 54 (2018), 162--167.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  80. Sherri Williams. 2015. Digital defense: Black feminists resist violence with hashtag activism. Feminist Media Studies, Vol. 15, 2 (2015), 341--344.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  81. Sherri Williams. 2016. # SayHerName: using digital activism to document violence against black women. Feminist media studies, Vol. 16, 5 (2016), 922--925.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  82. Chaolun Xia, Raz Schwartz, Ke Xie, Adam Krebs, Andrew Langdon, Jeremy Ting, and Mor Naaman. 2014. CityBeat: real-time social media visualization of hyper-local city data. In Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on World Wide Web. ACM, 167--170.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  83. Guobin Yang. 2016. Narrative agency in hashtag activism: The case of# BlackLivesMatter. Media and Communication, Vol. 4, 4 (2016), 13.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  84. Wan-Shiou Yang, Jia-Ben Dia, Hung-Chi Cheng, and Hsing-Tzu Lin. 2006. Mining social networks for targeted advertising. In Proceedings of the 39th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'06), Vol. 6. IEEE, 137a--137a.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  85. Sarita Yardi and Amy Bruckman. 2012. Income, race, and class: exploring socioeconomic differences in family technology use. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 3041--3050.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  86. Jonathan F Zaff, Oksana Malanchuk, and Jacquelynne S Eccles. 2008. Predicting positive citizenship from adolescence to young adulthood: The effects of a civic context. Applied Development Science, Vol. 12, 1 (2008), 38--53.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  87. Ethan Zuckerman. 2014. New media, new civics? Policy & Internet, Vol. 6, 2 (2014), 151--168.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Supporting Youth Activists? Strategic Use of Social Media: A Qualitative Investigation of Design Opportunities

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in

      Full Access

      • Published in

        cover image Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
        Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction  Volume 4, Issue CSCW2
        CSCW
        October 2020
        2310 pages
        EISSN:2573-0142
        DOI:10.1145/3430143
        Issue’s Table of Contents

        Copyright © 2020 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 15 October 2020
        Published in pacmhci Volume 4, Issue CSCW2

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader