Sozo Inoue
Paula Lago
Skip Abstract Section
Abstract
In this paper, we introduce a system of integrating activity recognition and collecting nursing care records at nursing care facilities as well as activity labels and sensors through smartphones, and describe experiments at a nursing care facility for 4 months. A system designed to be used even by staff not familiar with smartphones could collected enough number of data without losing but improving their workload for recording. For collected data, we revealed the nature of the collected data as for activities, care details, and timestamps, and considering them, we show a reference accuracy of recognition of nursing activity which is durable to time skewness, overlaps, and class imbalances. Moreover, we demonstrate the near future prediction to predict the next day's activities from the previous day's records which could be useful for proactive care management. The dataset collected is to be opened to the research community, and can be the utilized for activity recognition and data mining in care facilities.
- G. Bahle, A. Gruenerbl, P. Lukowicz, E. Bignotti, M. Zeni, and F. Giunchiglia. 2014. Recognizing hospital care activities with a coat pocket worn smartphone. In 6th International Conference on Mobile Computing, Applications and Services. 175--181.Google Scholar
- U. Blanke, B. Schiele, M. Kreil, P. Lukowicz, B. Sick, and T. Gruber. 2010. All for one or one for all? Combining heterogeneous features for activity spotting. In 2010 8th IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops (PERCOM Workshops). 18--24.Google Scholar
- Andreas Bulling, Ulf Blanke, and Bernt Schiele. 2014. A Tutorial on Human Activity Recognition Using Body-worn Inertial Sensors. ACM Comput. Surv. 46, 3, Article 33 (Jan. 2014), 33 pages. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Larry Chan, Vedant Das Swain, Christina Kelley, Kaya de Barbaro, Gregory D. Abowd, and Lauren Wilcox. 2018. Students' Experiences with Ecological Momentary Assessment Tools to Report on Emotional Well-being. Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol. 2, 1, Article 3 (March 2018), 20 pages. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Yung-Ju Chang, Gaurav Paruthi, and Mark W. Newman. 2015. A Field Study Comparing Approaches to Collecting Annotated Activity Data in Real-world Settings. In Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing (UbiComp '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 671--682. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Basit Chaudhry, Jerome Wang, Shinyi Wu, Margaret Maglione, Walter Mojica, Elizabeth Roth, Sally C Morton, and Paul G Shekelle. 2006. Systematic review: impact of health information technology on quality, efficiency, and costs of medical care. Annals of internal medicine 144, 10 (2006), 742--752.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Pierre Geurts, Damien Ernst, and Louis Wehenkel. 2006. Extremely randomized trees. Machine learning 63, 1 (2006), 3--42. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ann L. Hendrich, Marilyn Chow, Boguslaw A Skierczynski, and Zhenqiang Lu. 2008. A 36-hospital time and motion study: how do medical-surgical nurses spend their time? The Permanente journal 12 3 (2008), 25--34.Google Scholar
- Sozo Inoue and Xincheng Pan. 2016. Supervised and Unsupervised Transfer Learning for Activity Recognition from Simple In-home Sensors. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Systems: Computing, Networking and Services (MobiQuitous 2016). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 20--27. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sozo Inoue, Naonori Ueda, Yasunobu Nohara, and Naoki Nakashima. 2015. Mobile Activity Recognition for a Whole Day: Recognizing Real Nursing Activities with Big Dataset. In Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing (UbiComp '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1269--1280. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ashish Kapoor and Eric Horvitz. 2008. Experience Sampling for Building Predictive User Models: A Comparative Study. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '08). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 657--666. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Narayanan C. Krishnan and Diane J. Cook. 2014. Activity recognition on streaming sensor data. Pervasive and Mobile Computing 10 (2014), 138--154. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Paula Lago, Sayeda Shamma Alia, Shingo Takeda, Tittaya Mairittha, Nattaya Mairittha, Farina Faiz, Yusuke Nishimura, Kohei Adachi, Tsuyoshi Okita, FranÃğois Charpillet, and Sozo Inoue. 2019. Nurse Care Activity Recognition Challenge: Summary and Results. In Ubicomp Workshop on Human Activity Sensing Corpus and Applications (HASCA). 6 pages. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Paula Lago, Fréderic Lang, Claudia Roncancio, Claudia Jiménez-Guarín, Radu Mateescu, and Nicolas Bonnefond. 2017. The ContextAct@A4H Real-Life Dataset of Daily-Living Activities. In Modeling and Using Context, Patrick Brézillon, Roy Turner, and Carlo Penco (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 175--188.Google Scholar
- O. D. Lara and M. A. Labrador. 2013. A Survey on Human Activity Recognition using Wearable Sensors. IEEE Communications Surveys Tutorials 15, 3 (Third 2013), 1192--1209.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jonathan Lester, Tanzeem Choudhury, and Gaetano Borriello. 2006. A Practical Approach to Recognizing Physical Activities. In Pervasive Computing, Kenneth P. Fishkin, Bernt Schiele, Paddy Nixon, and Aaron Quigley (Eds.). Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1--16. Google ScholarDigital Library
- F. Naya, R. Ohmura, F. Takayanagi, H. Noma, and K. Kogure. 2006. Workers' Routine Activity Recognition using Body Movements and Location Information. In 2006 10th IEEE International Symposium on Wearable Computers. 105--108.Google Scholar
- Marilyn Rantz, Marjorie Skubic, Greg Alexander, Myra Aud, Bonnie Wakefield, Colleen Galambos, Richelle Koopman, and Steven Miller. 2010. Improving Nurse Care Coordination With Technology. Computers, Informatics, Nursing 28, 6 (November-December 2010), 325--332.Google Scholar
- Marilyn J Rantz, Marjorie Skubic, Steven J Miller, Colleen Galambos, Greg Alexander, James Keller, and Mihail Popescu. 2013. Sensor technology to support aging in place. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association 14, 6 (2013), 386--391.Google ScholarCross Ref
- D. Roggen, K. Forster, A. Calatroni, T. Holleczek, Y. Fang, G. Troster, A. Ferscha, C. Holzmann, A. Riener, P. Lukowicz, G. Pirkl, D. Bannach, K. Kunze, R. Chavarriaga, and J. d. R. Millan. 2009. OPPORTUNITY: Towards opportunistic activity and context recognition systems. In 2009 IEEE International Symposium on a World of Wireless, Mobile and Multimedia Networks Workshops. 1--6.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Valeria Soto-Mendoza, JosÃľ-Antonio GarcÃŋa-MacÃŋas, Edgar ChÃąvez, Anna Isabel MartÃŋnez-GarcÃŋa, Jesus Favela, Patricia Serrano-Alvarado, and MaythÃľ R. ZÃžÃśiga-Rojas. 2015. Design of a Predictive Scheduling System to Improve Assisted Living Services for Elders. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology 6 (06 2015). Google ScholarDigital Library
- Maja Stikic and Bernt Schiele. 2009. Activity Recognition from Sparsely Labeled Data Using Multi-Instance Learning. In Location and Context Awareness, Tanzeem Choudhury, Aaron Quigley, Thomas Strang, and Koji Suginuma (Eds.). Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 156--173. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Emmanuel Munguia Tapia, Stephen S Intille, and Kent Larson. 2004. Activity recognition in the home using simple and ubiquitous sensors. In International conference on pervasive computing. Springer, 158--175.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Takamichi Toda, Sozo Inoue, and Naonori Ueda. 2016. Mobile Activity Recognition Through Training Labels with Inaccurate Activity Segments. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Systems: Computing, Networking and Services (MobiQuitous 2016). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 57--64. Google ScholarDigital Library
- K. Van Laerhoven, D. Kilian, and B. Schiele. 2008. Using rhythm awareness in long-term activity recognition. In 2008 12th IEEE International Symposium on Wearable Computers. 63--66. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Robert-Andrei Voicu, Ciprian Dobre, Lidia Bajenaru, and Radu-Ioan Ciobanu. 2019. Human Physical Activity Recognition Using Smartphone Sensors. Sensors 19, 3 (2019), 458.Google ScholarCross Ref
- A. Wang, G. Chen, J. Yang, S. Zhao, and C. Chang. 2016. A Comparative Study on Human Activity Recognition Using Inertial Sensors in a Smartphone. IEEE Sensors Journal 16, 11 (June 2016), 4566--4578.Google ScholarCross Ref
Index Terms
- Integrating Activity Recognition and Nursing Care Records: The System, Deployment, and a Verification Study
Recommendations
Nurse care activity recognition challenge: summary and results
UbiComp/ISWC '19 Adjunct: Adjunct Proceedings of the 2019 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing and Proceedings of the 2019 ACM International Symposium on Wearable ComputersAlthough activity recognition has been studied for a long time now, research and applications have focused on physical activity recognition. Even if many application domains require the recognition of more complex activities, research on such activities ...
Nursing Care Quality in Nursing Homes: Cross-Sectional Versus Longitudinal Analysis
This empirical study of the relationship between nursing care adequacy and nursing care quality demonstrates that a positive relationship exists between the process and outcome dimensions of quality of nursing care. The results from the analysis of ...
Using Federated Learning in Anomaly Detection and Analytics on Real-time Streaming Data of Healthcare
ICGSP '23: Proceedings of the 2023 7th International Conference on Graphics and Signal ProcessingIn order to reduce mortality in critical care units, it is essential to monitor a critically ill patient consistently in a hospital's intensive care unit. According to Harvard University research, medical errors cause nearly 5,000,000 deaths in India ...
Comments