skip to main content
research-article

Design of a Predictive Scheduling System to Improve Assisted Living Services for Elders

Published:24 July 2015Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

As the number of older adults increases, and with it the demand for dedicated care, geriatric residences face a shortage of caregivers, who themselves experience work overload, stress, and burden. We conducted a long-term field study in three geriatric residences to understand the work conditions of caregivers with the aim of developing technologies to assist them in their work and help them deal with their burdens. From this study, we obtained relevant requirements and insights to design, implement, and evaluate two prototypes for supporting caregivers’ tasks (e.g., electronic recording and automatic notifications) in order to validate the feasibility of their implementation in situ and their technical requirements. The evaluation in situ of the prototypes was conducted for a period of 4 weeks. The results of the evaluation, together with the data collected from 6 months of use, motivated the design of a predictive schedule, which was iteratively improved and evaluated in participative sessions with caregivers. PRESENCE, the predictive schedule we propose, triggers real-time alerts of risky situations (e.g., falls, entering off-limits areas such as the infirmary or the kitchen) and informs caregivers of routine tasks that need to be performed (e.g., medication administration, diaper change, etc.). Moreover, PRESENCE helps caregivers to record caring tasks (such as diaper changes or medication) and well-being assessments (such as the mood) that are difficult to automate. This facilitates caregiver's shift handover and can help to train new caregivers by suggesting routine tasks and by sending reminders and timely information about residents. It can be seen as a tool to reduce the workload of caregivers and medical staff. Instead of trying to substitute the caregiver with an automatic caring system, as proposed by others, we propose our predictive schedule system that blends caregiver assessments and measurements from sensors. We show the feasibility of predicting caregiver tasks and a formative evaluation with caregivers that provides preliminary evidence of its utility.

References

  1. H. Aloulou et al. 2013. Deployment of assistive living technology in a nursing home environment: methods and lessons learned. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 13, 42.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. N. Archer et al. 2011. Personal health records: A scoping review. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association: JAMIA 18. 4, 515--522.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. A. Bamis et al. 2010. The BehaviorScope framework for enabling ambient assisted living. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 14, 6, 473--487. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. J. E. Bardram. 2008. Pervasive healthcare as a scientific discipline. Methods of Information in Medicine 47, 3, 178--185.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. BeClose. 2013. BeClose. Available at: http://beclose.com {Accessed July 2, 2013}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. D. Blumenthal and M. Tavenner. 2010. The “Meaningful Use” regulation for electronic health records. New England Journal of Medicine 363, 6, 501--504.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. J. Borenstein and Y. Pearson. 2010. Robotic caregivers: Harbingers of expanded freedom for all? Ethics and Information Technology 12, 3, 277--288. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. J. A. Botia, A. Villa, and J. Palma. 2012. Ambient Assisted Living system for in-home monitoring of healthy independent elders. Expert Systems with Applications 39, 8136--8148. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. M. Bourbonniere and L. K. Evans. 2002. Advanced practice nursing in the care of frail older adults. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 50, 12, 2062--2076.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. D. M. Bravata et al. 2007. Using pedometers to increase physical activity a systematic review. American Medical Association 298, 19, 2296--2304.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. P. B. Checkland. 1989. Soft systems methodology. Human Systems Management 8, 4, 273--289.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. M. Coeckelbergh. 2010. Personal robots, appearance and human good: A methodological reflection on robots. International Journal of Social Robots 1, 3, 217--221.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. R. Cornejo, D. Hernández, and J. Favela. 2012. Persuading older adults to socialize and exercise through ambient games. In 2012 6th International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare (PervasiveHealth) and Workshops.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. B. Curtis et al. 1992. Process modeling. Communications of the ACM 35, 9, 79--90. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. S. Czaja et al. 2013. Older adults and the adoption of healthcare technology: Opportunities and challenges. In Technologies for Active Aging. A. Sixsmith and G. Gutman, (Eds.). Boston, MA: Springer, 27--46.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. S. Czarnuch and A. Mihailidis. 2011. The design of intelligent in-home assistive technologies: Assessing the needs of older adults with dementia and their caregivers. Gerontechnology 10, 3, 169--182.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. T. H. Davenport. 1993. Process innovation. Harvard Business School Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. M. Decker. 2008. Caring robots and ethical reflection: The perspective of interdisciplinary technology assessment. AI and Society 22, 3, 315--330. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. I. Fatima et al. 2013. A unified framework for activity recognition-based behavior analysis and action prediction in smart homes. Sensors 13, 2682--99.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. U. Fayyad, G. Piatetsky-Shapiro, and P. Smyth. 1996. From data mining to knowledge discovery in databases. AI Magazine 17, 3, 37--54.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. M. L. Fennell et al. 2010. Elderly Hispanics more likely to reside in poor-quality nursing homes. Health Affairs (Project Hope), 29, 1, 65--73.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. D. Fred. 1989. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly 13, 3, p. 319. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. B. G. Glaser and A. L. Strauss. 2012. The discovery of grounded therory: strategies for qualitative research 7th ed., New York, NY, Aldine Transaction.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. F. Havasi and Á. Kiss. 2008. Ambient assisted living in rural areas: Vision and pilot application. In AmI 2007 Workshops CCIS. 246--252.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. M. A. Hossain. 2014. Perspectives of human factors in designing elderly monitoring system. Computers in Human Behavior 33, 63--68. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. M. A. Hossain and D. T. Ahmed. 2012. A human caregiver support system in elderly monitoring facility. In 2012 IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo Workshops. IEEE, 435--440. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. D.-U. Jeong, S.-J. Kim, and W.-Y. Chung. 2007. Classification of posture and movement using a 3-axis accelerometer. In 2007 International Conference on Convergence Information Technology (ICCIT 2007). IEEE, 837--844. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. B. Kaluža et al. 2012. Context-aware MAS to support elderly people. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AA-MAS 2012). 1485--1486. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. B. Kaluža et al. 2011. Intelligent monitoring of the elderly in home environment. AAAI Spring Symposium: AI and Health Communication.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. E.-H. Kim and Y. Kim. 2010. Digital divide: Use of electronic personal health record by different population groups. In 32nd Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Buenos Aires, Argentina, 1759--62.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. J. P. Lázaro et al. 2010. Ambient assisted nutritional advisor for elderly people living at home. In 32nd Annual International Conference of the IEEE EMBS. Buenos Aires, Argentina, 198--203.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. M. Lexis et al. 2013. Activity monitoring technology to support homecare delivery to frail and psychogeriatric elderly persons living at home alone. Technology and Disability 25, 189--197.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. R. K. Megalingam et al. 2012. Elder health care: Blood Pressure measurement. 2012 Annual IEEE India Conference (INDICON). 747--752.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. C. Misselhorn, U. Pompe, and M. Stapelton. 2013. Ethical considerations regarding the use of social robots in the fourth age. Journal of Gerontopsychology and Geriatric Psychiatry 26, 2, 121--133.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. W. Mortenson et al. 2013. Effects of an assistive technology intervention on older adults with disabilities and their informal caregivers. American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation 92, 4, 297--306.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. D. A. Norman and S. W. Draper. 1986. User centered system design: New perspectives on human-computer interaction. Hillsdale, NJ.: Lawrence Erlbaum. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. O. Onyimadu, F. Harding, and J. Briggs. 2011. Designing a telecare product for the elderly. In Proceedings of the 5th International ICST Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare. IEEE, 336--339.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. J. Parks. 2010. Lifting the burden of women's care work: Should robots replace the “human touch”? Hypatia 25, 1, 100--120.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. A. Piau et al. 2014. Aging society and gerontechnology: A solution for an independent living? Journal of Nutrition, Health & Aging 18, 1, 97--112.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. P. Rashidi and A. Mihailidis. 2013. A survey on ambient-assisted living tools for older adults. IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics 17, 3, 579--590.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  41. S. Rodríguez, J. F. De Paz, G. Villarrubia, C. Zato, J. Bajo, and J. M. Corchado. 2015. Multi-agent information fusion system to manage data from a WSN in a residential home. Information Fusion 23, 43--57.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. L. Rokach and O. Maimon. 2015. Data Mining with Decision Trees: Theory and Applications (2nd. ed.). Series in Machine Perception and Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 81, World Scientific Publishing, 380. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. E. Rosenberg, P. Jullamate, and Z. Azeredo. 2009. Informal caregiving: Cross-cultural applicability of the person-environment model. Health and Sociology 18, 399--411.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  44. K. N. Shankar et al. 2014. Burden in caregivers of cognitively impaired elderly adults at time of hospitalization: A cross-sectional analysis. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 62, 2, 276--284.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  45. J. H. Shin et al. 2011. Detection of abnormal living patterns for elderly living alone using support vector data description. IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine 15, 3, 438--448. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. A. L. Silva et al. 2013. The needs of informal caregivers of elderly people living at home: An integrative review. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences 27, 4, 792--803.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  47. D. J. Skiba. 2014. The connected age: Big data and data visualization. Nursing Education Perspectives 35, 4, 267--269.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. T. Sorell and H. Draper. 2014. Robot carers, ethics, and older people. Ethics and Information Technology 16, 3, 183--195. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  49. V. Soto-Mendoza and J. A. Garcia-Macias. 2014. Lessons learned from a long-running assistive system for geriatric care. In L. Pecchia et al. eds. Ambient assisted living and daily activities. Belfast, Ireland: Springer, 83.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. R. Sparrow and L. Sparrow. 2006. In the hands of machines? The future of aged care. Minds and Machines 16, 2, 141--161. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  51. C. Su and W. Yude. 2012. The care of the elderly with chronic disease based on electronic health records. In 2012 International Symposium on Information Technology in Medicine and Education. 760--763.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  52. H. Sun et al. 2010. The missing ones: Key ingredients towards effective ambient assisted living systems. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Smart Environments 2, 2. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  53. N. K. Suryadevara, M. T. Quazi, and S. C. Mukhopadhyay. 2012. Intelligent sensing systems for measuring wellness indices of the daily activities for the elderly. In 2012 Eighth International Conference on Intelligent Environments. IEEE, 347--350. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  54. UNFPA. 2012. State of the world population. Available at: http://www.unfpa.org/swp {Accessed January 7, 2013}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. S. Vallor. 2011. Carebots and caregivers: Sustaining the ethical ideal of care in the 21st century. Philosophy and Technology 24, 254.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  56. A. Wald. 1973. Sequential Analysis. Wiley publications in statistics Abraham Wald Courier Corporation. 212.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  57. World Health Organization. 2012. Ageing. Available at: http://www.who.int/ {Accessed July 2, 2013}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  58. M. Yedidia and A. Tiedemann. 2008. How do family caregivers describe their needs for professional help? Journal of Social Work Education 44, 43--47.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  59. I. Zavala-Ibarra and J. Favela. 2012. Ambient videogames for health monitoring in older adults. In 2012 8th International Conference on Intelligent Environments. IEEE, 27--33. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  60. D. Zhang et al. 2012. Social and community intelligence: Technologies and trends. IEEE Software 29, 88--92. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Design of a Predictive Scheduling System to Improve Assisted Living Services for Elders

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    Full Access

    • Published in

      cover image ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology
      ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology  Volume 6, Issue 4
      Regular Papers and Special Section on Intelligent Healthcare Informatics
      August 2015
      419 pages
      ISSN:2157-6904
      EISSN:2157-6912
      DOI:10.1145/2801030
      • Editor:
      • Yu Zheng
      Issue’s Table of Contents

      Copyright © 2015 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 24 July 2015
      • Accepted: 1 February 2015
      • Revised: 1 October 2014
      • Received: 1 October 2013
      Published in tist Volume 6, Issue 4

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader