skip to main content
research-article

Effect of Distinct Ambient Noise Types on Mobile Interaction

Published:05 July 2018Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

The adverse effect of ambient noise on humans has been extensively studied in fields like cognitive science, indicating a significant impact on cognitive performance, behaviour, and emotional state. Surprisingly, the effect of ambient noise has not been studied in the context of mobile interaction. As smartphones are ubiquitous by design, smartphone users are exposed to a wide variety of ambient noises while interacting with their devices. In this paper, we present a structured analysis of the effect of six distinct ambient noise types on typical smartphone usage tasks. The evaluated ambient noise types include variants of music, urban noise and speech. We analyse task completion time and errors, and find that different ambient noises affect users differently. For example, while speech and urban noise slow down text entry, being exposed to music reduces completion time in target acquisition tasks. Our study contributes to the growing research area on situational impairments, and we compare our results to previous work on the effect of cold-induced situational impairments. Our results can be used to support smartphone users through adaptive interfaces which respond to the ongoing context of the user.

References

  1. S. Aram, A. Troiano, and E. Pasero. 2012. Environment sensing using smartphone. In 2012 IEEE Sensors Applications Symposium Proceedings. 1--4.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Amy FT Arnsten and Patricia S Goldman-Rakic. 1998. Noise stress impairs prefrontal cortical cognitive function in monkeys: evidence for a hyperdopaminergic mechanism. Archives of general psychiatry 55, 4 (1998), 362--368.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Alan Baddeley and Pierre Salame. 1986. The unattended speech effect: perception or memory? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 12, 4 (1986), 525.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Simon Banbury and Dianne C Berry. 1997. Habituation and dishabituation to speech and office noise. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 3, 3 (1997), 181.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Simon Banbury and Dianne C Berry. 1998. Disruption of office-related tasks by speech and office noise. British journal of psychology 89, 3 (1998), 499--517.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Simon P. Banbury, William J. Macken, Sébastien Tremblay, and Dylan M. Jones. 2001. Auditory Distraction and Short-Term Memory: Phenomena and Practical Implications. Human Factors 43, 1 (2001), 12--29. arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1518/001872001775992462 PMID: 11474757.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. ML Bartelink, A De Wit, H Wollersheim, A Theeuwes, and Th Thien. 1993. Skin vascular reactivity in healthy subjects: influence of hormonal status. Journal of Applied Physiology 74, 2 (1993), 727--732.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Sebastian Boring, David Ledo, Xiang 'Anthony' Chen, Nicolai Marquardt, Anthony Tang, and Saul Greenberg. 2012. The fat thumb: using the thumb's contact size for single-handed mobile interaction. In Proceedings of the 14th international conference on Human-computer interaction with mobile devices and services. ACM, 39--48. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Clare Caldwell and Sally A Hibbert. 2002. The influence of music tempo and musical preference on restaurant patrons' behavior. Psychology 8 Marketing 19, 11 (2002), 895--917.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Gianna Cassidy and Raymond AR MacDonald. 2007. The effect of background music and background noise on the task performance of introverts and extraverts. Psychology of Music 35, 3 (2007), 517--537.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Sheldon Cohen and Neil Weinstein. 1981. Nonauditory effects of noise on behavior and health. Journal of Social Issues 37, 1 (1981), 36--70.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Brian H Dalton and David G Behm. 2007. Effects of noise and music on human and task performance: A systematic review. Occupational Ergonomics 7, 3 (2007), 143--152.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Anind K. Dey. 2001. Understanding and Using Context. Personal Ubiquitous Comput. 5, 1 (Jan. 2001), 4--7. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Mayank Goel, Leah Findlater, and Jacob Wobbrock. 2012. WalkType: Using Accelerometer Data to Accomodate Situational Impairments in Mobile Touch Screen Text Entry. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2687--2696. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Charles J Golden and Shawna M Freshwater. 1978. Stroop color and word test. (1978).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Jorge Goncalves, Vassilis Kostakos, Simo Hosio, Evangelos Karapanos, and Olga Lyra. 2013. IncluCity: Using Contextual Cues to Raise Awareness on Environmental Accessibility. In Proceedings of the 15th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS '13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 17, 8 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Jorge Goncalves, Zhanna Sarsenbayeva, Niels van Berkel, Chu Luo, Simo Hosio, Sirkka Risanen, Hannu Rintamäki, and Vassilis Kostakos. 2017. Tapping Task Performance on Smartphones in Cold Temperature. Interacting with Computers 29, 3 (2017), 355--367.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Morgan Harvey and Matthew Pointon. 2018. Noisy Signals: Understanding the Impact of Auditory Distraction on Web Search Tasks. In Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Human Information Interaction&Retrieval. ACM, 241--244. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Mack T Henderson, Anne Crews, and Joan Barlow. 1945. A study of the effect of music distraction on reading efficiency. Journal of Applied Psychology 29, 4 (1945), 313.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Niels Henze, Enrico Rukzio, and Susanne Boll. 2011. 100,000,000 Taps: Analysis and Improvement of Touch Performance in the Large. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Human Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services (MobileHCI '11). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 133--142. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Eve Hoggan, Andrew Crossan, Stephen A Brewster, and Topi Kaaresoja. 2009. Audio or tactile feedback: which modality when?. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. ACM, 2253--2256. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Morris B Holbrook. 1981. Integrating compositional and decompositional analyses to represent the intervening role of perceptions in evaluative judgments. Journal of Marketing Research (1981), 13--28.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Sharon K Holmberg and Sharon Coon. 1999. Ambient sound levels in a state psychiatric hospital. Archives of psychiatric nursing 13, 3 (1999), 117--126.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Makoto Iwanaga and Takako Ito. 2002. Disturbance effect of music on processing of verbal and spatial memories. Perceptual and motor skills 94, 3_suppl (2002), 1251--1258.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Kari Kallinen. 2002. Reading news from a pocket computer in a distracting environment: effects of the tempo of background music. Computers in Human Behavior 18, 5 (2002), 537--551.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Juliane Kämpfe, Peter Sedlmeier, and Frank Renkewitz. 2011. The impact of background music on adult listeners: A meta-analysis. Psychology of Music 39, 4 (2011), 424--448.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Eiman Kanjo. 2010. Noisespy: A real-time mobile phone platform for urban noise monitoring and mapping. Mobile Networks and Applications 15, 4 (2010), 562--574. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. J Peter Kincaid, Robert P Fishburne Jr, Richard L Rogers, and Brad S Chissom. 1975. Derivation of new readability formulas (automated readability index, fog count and flesch reading ease formula) for navy enlisted personnel. Technical Report. Naval Technical Training Command Millington TN Research Branch.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Hannu Kukka, Jorge Goncalves, Kai Wang, Tommi Puolamaa, Julien Louis, Mounib Mazouzi, and Leire Roa Barco. 2016. Utilizing Audio Cues to Raise Awareness and Entice Interaction on Public Displays. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (DIS '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 807--811. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Yong Liu, Jorge Goncalves, Denzil Ferreira, Simo Hosio, and Vassilis Kostakos. 2014. Identity Crisis of Ubicomp?: Mapping 15 Years of the Field's Development and Paradigm Change. In Proceedings of the 2014 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing (UbiComp '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 75--86. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Yong Liu, Jorge Goncalves, Denzil Ferreira, Bei Xiao, Simo Hosio, and Vassilis Kostakos. 2014. CHI 1994-2013: Mapping Two Decades of Intellectual Progress Through Co-word Analysis. In Proceedings of the 32Nd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 3553--3562. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Randi C Martin, Michael S Wogalter, and Janice G Forlano. 1988. Reading comprehension in the presence of unattended speech and music. Journal of memory and language 27, 4 (1988), 382--398.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Heather McElrea and Lionel Standing. 1992. Fast music causes fast drinking. Perceptual and Motor skills 75, 2 (1992), 362--362.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Ronald E Milliman. 1982. Using background music to affect the behavior of supermarket shoppers. The journal of Marketing (1982), 86--91.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Ronald E Milliman. 1986. The influence of background music on the behavior of restaurant patrons. Journal of consumer research 13, 2 (1986), 286--289.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. Sachi Mizobuchi, Mark Chignell, and David Newton. 2005. Mobile Text Entry: Relationship Between Walking Speed and Text Input Task Difficulty. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Human Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices 8 Services (MobileHCI '05). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 122--128. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Alexander Ng, Stephen A. Brewster, and John H. Williamson. 2014. Investigating the Effects of Encumbrance on One- and Two- Handed Interactions with Mobile Devices. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1981--1990. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Alexander Ng, John H. Williamson, and Stephen A. Brewster. 2014. Comparing Evaluation Methods for Encumbrance and Walking on Interaction with Touchscreen Mobile Devices. In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Human-computer Interaction with Mobile Devices 8 Services (MobileHCI '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 23--32. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Adrian C North, David J Hargreaves, and Sarah J Heath. 1998. Musical tempo and time perception in a gymnasium. Psychology of Music 26, 1 (1998), 78--88.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. Theodore J. Noseworthy and Karen Finlay. 2009. A Comparison of Ambient Casino Sound and Music: Effects on Dissociation and on Perceptions of Elapsed Time While Playing Slot Machines. Journal of Gambling Studies 25, 3 (01 Sep 2009), 331--342.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  41. Michael D Oliver. 1996. The effect of background music on mood and reading comprehension performance of at-risk college freshmen. Ph.D. Dissertation. Wayne State University.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Denise C Park, Christopher Hertzog, Daniel P Kidder, Roger W Morrell, and Christopher B Mayhorn. 1997. Effect of age on event-based and time-based prospective memory. Psychology and aging 12, 2 (1997), 314.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Pierre Salame and Alan Baddeley. 1982. Disruption of short-term memory by unattended speech: Implications for the structure of working memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 21, 2 (1982), 150--164.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  44. Pierre Salame and Alan Baddeley. 1989. Effects of background music on phonological short-term memory. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 41, 1 (1989), 107--122.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  45. Zhanna Sarsenbayeva, Jorge Goncalves, Juan García, Simon Klakegg, Sirkka Rissanen, Hannu Rintamäki, Jari Hannu, and Vassilis Kostakos. 2016. Situational Impairments to Mobile Interaction in Cold Environments. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing (UbiComp '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 85--96. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. Zhanna Sarsenbayeva, Niels van Berkel, Chu Luo, Vassilis Kostakos, and Jorge Goncalves. 2017. Challenges of Situational Impairments During Interaction with Mobile Devices. In Proceedings of the 29th Australian Conference on Computer-Human Interaction (OZCHI '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 477--481. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. Zhanna Sarsenbayeva, Niels van Berkel, Aku Visuri, Sirkka Rissanen, Hannu Rintamäki, Vassilis Kostakos, and Jorge Goncalves. 2017. Sensing Cold-Induced Situational Impairments in Mobile Interaction Using Battery Temperature. Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol. 1, 3, Article 98 (Sept. 2017), 9 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. Bastian Schildbach and Enrico Rukzio. 2010. Investigating Selection and Reading Performance on a Mobile Phone While Walking. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Human Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services (MobileHCI '10). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 93--102. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  49. Andrew Sears, Min Lin, Julie Jacko, and Yan Xiao. 2003. When computers fade: Pervasive computing and situationally-induced impairments and disabilities. In HCI International, Vol. 2. 1298--1302.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. Stephen Stansfeld, John Gallacher, Wolfgang Babisch, and Martin Shipley. 1996. Road traffic noise and psychiatric disorder: prospective findings from the Caerphilly Study. Bmj 313, 7052 (1996), 266--267.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  51. Sébastien Tremblay, Alastair P Nicholls, David Alford, and Dylan M Jones. 2000. The irrelevant sound effect: Does speech play a special role? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 26, 6 (2000), 1750.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  52. Kristin Vadas, Nirmal Patel, Kent Lyons, Thad Starner, and Julie Jacko. 2006. Reading On-the-go: A Comparison of Audio and Hand-held Displays. In Proceedings of the 8th Conference on Human-computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services (MobileHCI '06). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 219--226. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  53. Niels van Berkel, Chu Luo, Theodoros Anagnostopoulos, Denzil Ferreira, Jorge Goncalves, Simo Hosio, and Vassilis Kostakos. 2016. A Systematic Assessment of Smartphone Usage Gaps. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 4711--4721. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  54. N Venetjoki, A Kaarlela-Tuomaala, E Keskinen, and V Hongisto. 2006. The effect of speech and speech intelligibility on task performance. Ergonomics 49, 11 (2006), 1068--1091.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  55. We Wen and Kanachi Michihiko. 2006. The effects of music type and volume on short-term memory. Tohoku Psychol Folia 64 (2006), 68--76.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Effect of Distinct Ambient Noise Types on Mobile Interaction

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in

      Full Access

      • Published in

        cover image Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies
        Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies  Volume 2, Issue 2
        June 2018
        741 pages
        EISSN:2474-9567
        DOI:10.1145/3236498
        Issue’s Table of Contents

        Copyright © 2018 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 5 July 2018
        • Revised: 1 April 2018
        • Accepted: 1 April 2018
        • Received: 1 February 2018
        Published in imwut Volume 2, Issue 2

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader