Alex Kayal
Willem-Paul Brinkman
Mark A. Neerincx
Skip Abstract Section
Abstract
Social commitments (SCs) provide a flexible, norm-based, governance structure for sharing and receiving data. However, users of data sharing applications can subscribe to multiple SCs, possibly producing opposing sharing and receiving requirements. We propose resolving such conflicts automatically through a conflict resolution model based on relevant user values such as privacy and safety. The model predicts a user’s preferred resolution by choosing the commitment that best supports the user’s values. We show through an empirical user study (n = 396) that values, as well as recency and norm type, significantly improve a system’s ability to predict user preference in location sharing conflicts.
- Nirav Ajmeri, Jiaming Jiang, Rada Chirkova, Jon Doyle, and Munindar P. Singh. 2016. Coco: Runtime reasoning about conflicting commitments. In Proceedings of the 25th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI’16). 17--23. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Tina Balke, Célia da Costa Pereira, Frank Dignum, Emiliano Lorini, Antonino Rotolo, Wamberto Vasconcelos, and Serena Villata. 2013. Norms in MAS: Definitions and related concepts. In Normative Multi-Agent Systems, Dagstuhl Follow-Ups, Vol. 4. Schloss Dagstuhl--Leibniz-Zentrum fuer Informatik, Wadern, Germany, 1--31.Google Scholar
- Trevor Bench-Capon. 2003. Persuasion in practical argument using value-based argumentation frameworks. Journal of Logic and Computation 13, 3, 429--448.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Pia Borlund and Jesper W. Schneider. 2010. Reconsideration of the simulated work task situation: A context instrument for evaluation of information retrieval interaction. In Proceedings of the 3rd Symposium on Information Interaction in Context (IIiX’10). ACM, New York, NY, 155--164. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Giuseppe Carenini and John Loyd. 2004. ValueCharts: Analyzing linear models expressing preferences and evaluations. In Proceedings of the Working Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces (AVI’04). ACM, New York, NY, 150--157. Google ScholarDigital Library
- J. Cohen. 1988. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Natalia Criado, Elizabeth Black, and Michael Luck. 2015. A coherence maximisation process for solving normative inconsistencies. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems 30, 4, 640--680. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Alexei Czeskis, Ivayla Dermendjieva, Hussein Yapit, Alan Borning, Batya Friedman, Brian Gill, and Tadayoshi Kohno. 2010. Parenting from the pocket: Value tensions and technical directions for secure and private parent-teen mobile safety. In Proceedings of the 6th Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security (SOUPS’10). ACM, New York, NY, 15:1--15:15. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ignacio Fernández-Tobías, Matthias Braunhofer, Mehdi Elahi, Francesco Ricci, and Iván Cantador. 2016. Alleviating the new user problem in collaborative filtering by exploiting personality information. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 26, 2–3, 221--255. Google ScholarDigital Library
- A. Field, J. Miles, and Z. Field. 2012. Discovering Statistics Using R. SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
- W. H. Finch, J. E. Bolin, and K. Kelley. 2014. Multilevel Modeling Using R. Taylor 8 Francis.Google Scholar
- Samuel D. Gosling, Simine Vazire, Sanjay Srivastava, and Oliver P. John. 2004. Should we trust Web-based studies? A comparative analysis of six preconceptions about Internet questionnaires. American Psychologist 59, 2, 93--104.Google ScholarCross Ref
- S. Hansson. 1991. Norms and values. Crítica 23, 67, 3--13.Google Scholar
- Amy Adele Hasinoff. 2017. Where are you? Location tracking and the promise of child safety. Television and New Media 18, 6, 496--512.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Marc W. Howard and Michael J. Kahana. 2002. A distributed representation of temporal context. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 46, 3, 269--299. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Alina Huldtgren, Pascal Wiggers, and Catholijn M. Jonker. 2014. Designing for self-reflection on values for improved life decision. Interacting with Computers 26, 1, 27--45.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Karl M. Kapp. 2012. The Gamification of Learning and Instruction: Game-Based Methods and Strategies for Training and Education. Pfeiffer 8 Company. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Alex Kayal, Willem-Paul Brinkman, Rianne Gouman, Mark A. Neerincx, and M. Birna van Riemsdijk. 2014a. A value-centric model to ground norms and requirements for ePartners of children. In Coordination, Organization, Institutions, and Norms in Agent Systems IX. Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
- Alex Kayal, Willem-Paul Brinkman, Hanna Zoon, Mark A. Neerincx, and M. Birna van Riemsdijk. 2014b. A value-sensitive mobile social application for families and children. In Posters, Demos, Late-Breaking Results and Workshop Proceedings of the 22nd Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation, and Personalization Co-Located With the 22nd Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation, and Personalization (UMAP’14).Google Scholar
- Bart P. Knijnenburg, Martijn C. Willemsen, Zeno Gantner, Hakan Soncu, and Chris Newell. 2012. Explaining the user experience of recommender systems. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 22, 4, 441--504. Google ScholarDigital Library
- John H. Krantz and Reeshad Dalal. 2000. Validity of Web-based psychological research. In Psychological Experiments on the Internet, M. H. Birnbaum (Ed.). Academic Press, San Diego, CA, 35--60.Google Scholar
- Kate Miriam Loewenthal. 2001. An Introduction to Psychological Tests and Scales. UCL Press, London, England.Google Scholar
- Felipe Meneguzzi, Odinaldo Rodrigues, Nir Oren, Wamberto W. Vasconcelos, and Michael Luck. 2015. BDI reasoning with normative considerations. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence 43, C, 127--146. Google ScholarDigital Library
- J. Nihlen-Fahlquist. 2013. Responsibility and privacy—ethical aspects of using GPS to track children. Children and Society 29, 1, 38--47.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Helen Nissenbaum. 2010. Privacy in Context: Technology, Policy and the Integrity of Social Life. Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Nir Oren, Michael Luck, Simon Miles, and Timothy J. Norman. 2008. An argumentation inspired heuristic for resolving normative conflict. In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Coordination, Organisations, Institutions, and Norms in Agent Systems.Google Scholar
- Umberto Panniello, Alexander Tuzhilin, and Michele Gorgoglione. 2012. Comparing context-aware recommender systems in terms of accuracy and diversity. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 24, 1, 35--65. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Alina Pommeranz, Christian Detweiler, Pascal Wiggers, and Catholijn Jonker. 2011. Elicitation of situated values: Need for tools to help stakeholders and designers to reflect and communicate. Ethics and Information Technology 14, 4, 285--303. Google ScholarDigital Library
- C. Robson. 2002. Real World Research: A Resource for Social Scientists and Practitioner-Researchers (2nd ed.). Blackwell Publishing, Malden, MA.Google Scholar
- M. Rokeach. 1973. The Nature of Human Values. Free Press, New York, NY.Google Scholar
- Munindar Singh. 1999. An ontology for commitments in multiagent systems. Artificial Intelligence and Law 7, 1, 97--113. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Munindar P. Singh. 2008. Semantical considerations on dialectical and practical commitments. In Proceedings of the 23rd National Conference on Artificial Intelligence—Volume 1 (AAAI’08). 176--181. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Pankaj R. Telang and Munindar P. Singh. 2011. Specifying and verifying cross-organizational business models: An agent-oriented approach. IEEE Transactions on Services Computing 5, 3, 305--318. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ibo Van de Poel. 2013. Translating values into design requirements. In Philosophy and Engineering: Reflections on Practice, Principles and Process. Springer Netherlands, 253--266.Google Scholar
- T. van der Weide. 2011. Arguing to Motivate Decisions. Ph.D. Dissertation. Utrecht University.Google Scholar
- M. Birna van Riemsdijk, Louise Dennis, Michael Fisher, and Koen V. Hindriks. 2015a. A semantic framework for socially adaptive agents: Towards strong norm compliance. In Proceedings of the 2015 International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS’15). 423--432. Google ScholarDigital Library
- M. Birna van Riemsdijk, Catholijn M. Jonker, and Victor Lesser. 2015b. Creating socially adaptive electronic partners: Interaction, reasoning and ethical challenges. In Proceedings of the 14th International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS’15). 1201--1206. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Asimina Vasalou, Anne-Marie Oostveen, and Adam N. Joinson. 2012. A case study of non-adoption: The values of location tracking in the family. In Proceedings of the ACM 2012 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW’12). ACM, New York, NY, 779--788. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Wamberto W. Vasconcelos, Martin J. Kollingbaum, and Timothy J. Norman. 2009. Normative conflict resolution in multi-agent systems. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems 19, 2, 124--152. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bodo Winter. 2013. A very basic tutorial for performing linear mixed effects analyses. arXiv:1308.5499.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Automatic Resolution of Normative Conflicts in Supportive Technology Based on User Values
Recommendations
A user-centred social commitment model for location sharing applications in the family life domain
Mobile location-sharing technology is used increasingly by parents to know where their children are. It is our aim to make such technology more flexible in adapting to the particular social context in which it operates. We propose to realise this by ...
TOWARD COMBINING AUTOMATIC RESOLUTION WITH SOCIAL MEDIATION FOR RESOLVING MULTIUSER CONFLICTS
SOCIAL AWARENESS IN SMART SPACES: PART IIn spite of intensive effort to resolve conflicts between multiple users of context-aware applications in a smart space, there has been no practical solution for flexibly resolving them based on the situation of the users. In this paper, we propose a ...
Detection and Resolution of Normative Conflicts in Multi-agent Systems: A Literature Survey
AAMAS '18: Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent SystemsThe detection and resolution of conflicts among norms are key processes to guarantee the proper behavior of multi-agent systems (MAS) regulated by norms. A way of regulation is required to restrict and guide the autonomous and possibly heterogeneous ...
Comments