skip to main content
research-article
Open Access

Automatic Calibration of High Density Electric Muscle Stimulation

Published:11 September 2017Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Electric muscle stimulation (EMS) can enable mobile force feedback, support pedestrian navigation, or confer object affordances. To date, however, EMS is limited by two interlinked problems. (1) EMS is low resolution -- achieving only coarse movements and constraining opportunities for exploration. (2) EMS requires time consuming, expert calibration -- confining these interaction techniques to the lab. EMS arrays have been shown to increase stimulation resolution, but as calibration complexity increases exponentially as more electrodes are used, we require heuristics or automated procedures for successful calibration. We explore the feasibility of using electromyography (EMG) to auto-calibrate high density EMS arrays. We determine regions of muscle activity during human-performed gestures, to inform stimulation patterns for EMS-performed gestures. We report on a study which shows that auto-calibration of a 60-electrode array is feasible: achieving 52% accuracy across six gestures, with 82% accuracy across our best three gestures. By highlighting the electrode-array calibration problem, and presenting a first exploration of a potential solution, this work lays the foundations for high resolution, wearable and, perhaps one day, ubiquitous EMS beyond the lab.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

References

  1. Christoph Amma, Thomas Krings, Jonas Böer, and Tanja Schultz. 2015. Advancing Muscle-Computer Interfaces with High-Density Electromyography. {In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’15), 929--938}. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Christopher Assad, Michael Wolf, Theodoros Theodoridis, Kyrre Glette, and Adrian Stoica. 2013. BioSleeve: A Natural EMG-based Interface for HRI. {In Proceedings of the 8th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-robot Interaction (HRI ’13), 69--70}. Retrieved September 18, 2016 from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2447556.2447571 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Chad E. Bouton, Ammar Shaikhouni, Nicholas V. Annetta, Marcia A. Bockbrader, David A. Friedenberg, Dylan M. Nielson, Gaurav Sharma, Per B. Sederberg, Bradley C. Glenn, W. Jerry Mysiw, Austin G. Morgan, Milind Deogaonkar, and Ali R. Rezai. 2016. Restoring cortical control of functional movement in a human with quadriplegia. Nature 533, 7602: 247--250}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Shyang Chang, Ming-Chun Hsyu, Hsiu-Yao Cheng, Sheng-Hwu Hsieh, and Chen-Chiang Lin. 2008. Synergic Co-activation in Forearm Pronation. Annals of Biomedical Engineering 36, 12: 2002--2018}.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Cristiano De Marchis, Thiago Santos Monteiro, Cristina Simon-Martinez, Silvia Conforto, and Alireza Gharabaghi. 2016. Multicontact functional electrical stimulation for hand opening: electrophysiologically driven identification of the optimal stimulation site. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation 13}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Tim Duente, Max Pfeiffer, and Michael Rohs. 2016. On-skin Technologies for Muscle Sensing and Actuation. {In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing: Adjunct (UbiComp ’16), 933--936}. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. C Frigo, M Ferrarin, W Frasson, E Pavan, and R Thorsen. 2000. EMG signals detection and processing for on-line control of functional electrical stimulation. Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology 10, 5: 351--360}.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Marco Gazzoni, Nicolò Celadon, Davide Mastrapasqua, Marco Paleari, Valentina Margaria, and Paolo Ariano. 2014. Quantifying Forearm Muscle Activity during Wrist and Finger Movements by Means of Multi-Channel Electromyography. PLOS ONE 9, 10: e109943}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Manami Katoh, Narihiro Nishimura, Maki Yokoyama, Taku Hachisu, Michi Sato, Shogo Fukushima, and Hiroyuki Kajimoto. 2013. Optimal Selection of Electrodes for Muscle Electrical Stimulation Using Twitching Motion Measurement. {In Proceedings of the 4th Augmented Human International Conference (AH ’13), 237--238}. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Oliver Beren Kaul, Max Pfeiffer, and Michael Rohs. 2016. Follow the Force: Steering the Index Finger Towards Targets Using EMS. {In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA ’16), 2526--2532}. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. T. Keller, M. Lawrence, A. Kuhn, and M. Morari. 2006. New Multi-Channel Transcutaneous Electrical Stimulation Technology for Rehabilitation. {In 28th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 2006. EMBS ’06, 194--197}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Thierry Keller and Andreas Kuhn. 2008. Electrodes for transcutaneous (surface) electrical stimulation. Journal of Automatic Control 18, 2: 35--45}.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Andreas Kuhn, Thierry Keller, Silvestro Micera, and Manfred Morari. 2009. Array electrode design for transcutaneous electrical stimulation: a simulation study. Medical Engineering 8 Physics 31, 8: 945--951}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Pedro Lopes and Patrick Baudisch. 2013. Muscle-propelled Force Feedback: Bringing Force Feedback to Mobile Devices. {In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’13), 2577--2580}. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Pedro Lopes, Lars Butzmann, and Patrick Baudisch. 2013. Muscle-propelled Force Feedback: Bringing Force Feedback to Mobile Devices Using Electrical Stimulation. {In Proceedings of the 4th Augmented Human International Conference (AH ’13), 231--232}. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Pedro Lopes, Alexandra Ion, and Patrick Baudisch. 2015. Impacto: Simulating Physical Impact by Combining Tactile Stimulation with Electrical Muscle Stimulation. {In Proceedings of the 28th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software 8 Technology (UIST ’15), 11--19}. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Pedro Lopes, Alexandra Ion, Willi Mueller, Daniel Hoffmann, Patrik Jonell, and Patrick Baudisch. 2015. Proprioceptive Interaction. {In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’15), 939--948}. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Pedro Lopes, Patrik Jonell, and Patrick Baudisch. 2015. Affordance++: Allowing Objects to Communicate Dynamic Use. {In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’15), 2515--2524}. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Pedro Lopes, Doăa Yüksel, François Guimbretière, and Patrick Baudisch. 2016. Muscle-plotter: An Interactive System Based on Electrical Muscle Stimulation That Produces Spatial Output. {In Proceedings of the 29th Annual Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST ’16), 207--217}. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Nebojša M. Malešević, Lana Z. Popović Maneski, Vojin Ilić, Nikola Jorgovanović, Goran Bijelić, Thierry Keller, and Dejan B. Popović. 2012. A multi-pad electrode based functional electrical stimulation system for restoration of grasp. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation 9: 66}.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Nebojsa Malesevic, Lana Popovic, Goran Bijelic, and Goran Kvascev. 2010. Muscle twitch responses for shaping the multi-pad electrode for functional electrical stimulation. Journal of Automatic Control 20: 53--58}.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. S. Mathur, J. J. Eng, and D. L. MacIntyre. 2005. Reliability of surface EMG during sustained contractions of the quadriceps. Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology 15, 1: 102--110}.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Jess McIntosh, Charlie McNeill, Mike Fraser, Frederic Kerber, Markus Löchtefeld, and Antonio Krüger. 2016. EMPress: Practical Hand Gesture Classification with Wrist-Mounted EMG and Pressure Sensing. {In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’16), 2332--2342}. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Jeremy Mogk and Peter Keir. 2003. The effects of posture on forearm muscle loading during gripping. Ergonomics 46, 9: 956--975}.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Jun Nishida and Kenji Suzuki. 2016. bioSync: Synchronous Kinesthetic Experience Among People. {In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA ’16), 3742--3745}. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Max Pfeiffer, Tim Dünte, Stefan Schneegass, Florian Alt, and Michael Rohs. 2015. Cruise Control for Pedestrians: Controlling Walking Direction Using Electrical Muscle Stimulation. {In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’15), 2505--2514}. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Dejan B. Popović and Mirjana B. Popović. 2011. Advances in the use of electrical stimulation for the recovery of motor function. Progress in Brain Research 194: 215--225}.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Ana Popović-Bijelić, Goran Bijelić, Nikola Jorgovanović, Dubravka Bojanić, Mirjana B. Popović, and Dejan B. Popović. 2005. Multi-Field Surface Electrode for Selective Electrical Stimulation. Artificial Organs 29, 6: 448--452}.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Raafat Shalaby, Thomas Schauer, Wolfgang Liedecke, and Jörg Raisch. 2011. Amplifier design for EMG recording from stimulation electrodes during functional electrical stimulation leg cycling ergometry. Biomedizinische Technik. Biomedical Engineering 56, 1: 23--33}.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Didier Staudenmann, Jaap H. van Dieën, Dick F. Stegeman, and Roger M. Enoka. 2014. Increase in heterogeneity of biceps brachii activation during isometric submaximal fatiguing contractions: a multichannel surface EMG study. Journal of Neurophysiology 111, 5: 984--990}.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Didier Staudenmann, Dick F. Stegeman, and Jaap H. van Dieën. 2013. Redundancy or heterogeneity in the electric activity of the biceps brachii muscle? Added value of PCA-processed multi-channel EMG muscle activation estimates in a parallel-fibered muscle. Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology: Official Journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology 23, 4: 892--898}.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Emi Tamaki, Terence Chan, and Ken Iwasaki. 2016. UnlimitedHand: Input and Output Hand Gestures with Less Calibration Time. {In Proceedings of the 29th Annual Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST ’16 Adjunct), 163--165}. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Emi Tamaki, Takashi Miyaki, and Jun Rekimoto. 2011. PossessedHand: Techniques for Controlling Human Hands Using Electrical Muscles Stimuli. {In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’11), 543--552}. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. M. T. Wolf, C. Assad, A. Stoica, Kisung You, H. Jethani, M. T. Vernacchia, J. Fromm, and Y. Iwashita. 2013. Decoding static and dynamic arm and hand gestures from the JPL BioSleeve. {In 2013 IEEE Aerospace Conference, 1--9}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. 1. The Flexors And Extensors Of The Fingers. Retrieved May 2, 2017 from http://chestofbooks.com/health/anatomy/Human-Body-Construction/1-The-Flexors-And-Extensors-Of-The-Fingers.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Automatic Calibration of High Density Electric Muscle Stimulation

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    Full Access

    • Published in

      cover image Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies
      Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies  Volume 1, Issue 3
      September 2017
      2023 pages
      EISSN:2474-9567
      DOI:10.1145/3139486
      Issue’s Table of Contents

      Copyright © 2017 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 11 September 2017
      • Accepted: 1 June 2017
      • Revised: 1 April 2017
      • Received: 1 February 2017
      Published in imwut Volume 1, Issue 3

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader