skip to main content
research-article
Public Access

OmniTrack: A Flexible Self-Tracking Approach Leveraging Semi-Automated Tracking

Published:11 September 2017Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

We now see an increasing number of self-tracking apps and wearable devices. Despite the vast number of available tools, however, it is still challenging for self-trackers to find apps that suit their unique tracking needs, preferences, and commitments. Furthermore, people are bounded by the tracking tools’ initial design because it is difficult to modify, extend, or mash up existing tools. In this paper, we present OmniTrack, a mobile self-tracking system, which enables self-trackers to construct their own trackers and customize tracking items to meet their individual tracking needs. To inform the OmniTrack design, we first conducted semi-structured interviews (N = 12) and analyzed existing mobile tracking apps (N = 62). We then designed and developed OmniTrack as an Android mobile app, leveraging a semi-automated tracking approach that combines manual and automated tracking methods. We evaluated OmniTrack through a usability study (N = 10) and improved its interfaces based on the feedback. Finally, we conducted a 3-week deployment study (N = 21) to assess if people can capitalize on OmniTrack’s flexible and customizable design to meet their tracking needs. From the study, we showed how participants used OmniTrack to create, revise, and appropriate trackers—ranging from a simple mood tracker to a sophisticated daily activity tracker. We discuss how OmniTrack positively influences and supports self-trackers’ tracking practices over time, and how to further improve OmniTrack by providing more appropriate visualizations and sharable templates, incorporating external contexts, and supporting researchers’ unique data collection needs.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

References

  1. Phil Adams, Mashfiqui Rabbi, Tauhidur Rahman, Mark Matthews, Amy Voida, Geri Gay, Tanzeem Choudhury, and Stephen Voida. 2014. Towards Personal Stress Informatics: Comparing Minimally Invasive Techniques for Measuring Daily Stress in the Wild. ICST. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Apple Watch. Retrieved July 12, 2017 from http://www.apple.com/watchGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Health - Apple. Retrieved July 12, 2017 from http://www.apple.com/ios/health/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. ResearchKit and CareKit - Apple. Retrieved July 12, 2017 from http://www.apple.com/researchkit/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. App Market Explorer | iOS. Retrieved July 12, 2017 from https://42matters.com/app-market-explorer/iosGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Aria. Retrieved July 12, 2017 from https://www.fitbit.com/ariaGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Audible. Retrieved July 12, 2017 from http://www.audible.comGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Aaron Bangor, Philip Kortum, and James Miller. 2009. Determining What Individual SUS Scores Mean: Adding an Adjective Rating Scale. Journal of Usability Studies 4, 3 (May 2009), 114--123. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2835587.2835589 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Frank Bentley and Konrad Tollmar. 2013. The Power of Mobile Notifications to Increase Wellbeing Logging Behavior. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1095--1098. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. John Brooke. 1996. SUS-A quick and dirty usability scale. Usability evaluation in industry 189, 194 (1996), 4--7. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.232.5526Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Daytum. Retrieved July 12, 2017 from https://daytum.com/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Eun Kyoung Choe, Bongshin Lee, Sean Munson, Wanda Pratt, and Julie A. Kientz. 2013. Persuasive performance feedback: the effect of framing on self-efficacy. AMIA … Annual Symposium proceedings / AMIA Symposium. AMIA Symposium 2013 (2013), 825--833.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Eun Kyoung Choe, Saeed Abdullah, Mashfiqui Rabbi, Edison Thomaz, Daniel A Epstein, Felicia Cordeiro, Matthew Kay, Gregory D Abowd, Tanzeem Choudhury, James Fogarty, Bongshin Lee, Mark Matthews, and Julie A Kientz. 2017. Semi-Automated Tracking: A Balanced Approach for Self-Monitoring Applications. IEEE Pervasive Computing 16, 1 (Jan 2017), 74--84. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Eun Kyoung Choe, Jaeyeon Jung, Bongshin Lee, and Kristie Fisher. 2013. Nudging People Away from Privacy-Invasive Mobile Apps through Visual Framing. In INTERACT (3) (Lecture Notes in Computer Science), Paula KotzÃl’, Gary Marsden, Gitte Lindgaard, Janet Wesson, and Marco Winckler (Eds.), Vol. 8119. Springer, 74--91. http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/interact/interact2013-3.html#ChoeJLF13Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Eun Kyoung Choe, Bongshin Lee, Matthew Kay, Wanda Pratt, and Julie A. Kientz. 2015. SleepTight: Low-burden, Self-monitoring Technology for Capturing and Reflecting on Sleep Behaviors. In Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing (UbiComp ’15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 121--132. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Eun Kyoung Choe, Bongshin Lee, Haining Zhu, Nathalie Henry Riche, and Dominikus Baur. 2017. Understanding Self-Reflection: How People Reflect on Personal Data through Visual Data Exploration. In Proceedings of the 11th EAI International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare (PervasiveHealth ’17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 10.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Eun Kyoung Choe, Nicole B. Lee, Bongshin Lee, Wanda Pratt, and Julie A. Kientz. 2014. Understanding Quantified-selfers’ Practices in Collecting and Exploring Personal Data. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1143--1152. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Chia-Fang Chung, Elena Agapie, Jessica Schroeder, Sonali Mishra, James Fogarty, and Sean A. Munson. 2017. When Personal Tracking Becomes Social: Examining the Use of Instagram for Healthy Eating. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1674--1687. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Felicia Cordeiro, Elizabeth Bales, Erin Cherry, and James Fogarty. 2015. Rethinking the Mobile Food Journal: Exploring Opportunities for Lightweight Photo-Based Capture. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 3207--3216. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Jennifer L. Davidson and Carlos Jensen. 2013. What Health Topics Older Adults Want to Track: A Participatory Design Study. In Proceedings of the 15th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS ’13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 26, 8 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Daniel A. Epstein, Monica Caraway, Chuck Johnston, An Ping, James Fogarty, and Sean A. Munson. 2016. Beyond Abandonment to Next Steps: Understanding and Designing for Life After Personal Informatics Tool Use. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1109--1113. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Feltron. Retrieved July 12, 2017 from http://www.feltron.com/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Reporter App. Retrieved July 12, 2017 from http://www.reporter-app.com/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Denzil Ferreira, Vassilis Kostakos, and Anind K. Dey. 2015. AWARE: Mobile Context Instrumentation Framework. Frontiers in ICT 2 (2015), 6.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Fitbit. Retrieved July 12, 2017 from https://www.fitbit.comGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Data Digest: Announcing Our Annual Benchmark On The State Of US Consumers And Technology In 2015. http://blogs.forrester.com/ gina_fleming/15-09-28-data_digest_announcing_our_annual_benchmark_on_the_state_of_us_consumers_and_technology_in_2015. (2015). Accessed: 2.5.2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Google Firebase. Retrieved July 12, 2017 from https://firebase.google.com/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Google Fit. Retrieved July 12, 2017 from https://www.google.com/fit/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Google Forms. Retrieved July 12, 2017 from https://www.google.com/forms/about/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. mHealth App Developer Economics 2016. (2016). Retrieved July 12, 2017 from http://research2guidance.com/r2g/r2g-mHealth-App-Developer-Economics-2016.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Daniel Harrison, Paul Marshall, Nadia Bianchi-Berthouze, and Jon Bird. 2015. Activity Tracking: Barriers, Workarounds and Customisation. In Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing (UbiComp ’15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 617--621. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Samsung S Health. Retrieved July 12, 2017 from http://shealth.samsung.comGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. IFTTT. Retrieved July 12, 2017 from http://www.ifttt.comGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Matthew Kay, Eun Kyoung Choe, Jesse Shepherd, Benjamin Greenstein, Nathaniel Watson, Sunny Consolvo, and Julie A. Kientz. 2012. Lullaby: A Capture 8 Access System for Understanding the Sleep Environment. In Proceedings of the 2012 ACM Conference on Ubiquitous Computing (UbiComp ’12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 226--234. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. KeepTrack. Retrieved July 12, 2017 from http://www.zagalaga.com/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Young-Ho Kim, Jae Ho Jeon, Eun Kyoung Choe, Bongshin Lee, KwonHyun Kim, and Jinwook Seo. 2016. TimeAware: Leveraging Framing Effects to Enhance Personal Productivity. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 272--283. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Kotlin Programming Language. Retrieved July 12, 2017 from https://kotlinlang.org/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Amanda Lazar, Christian Koehler, Joshua Tanenbaum, and David H. Nguyen. 2015. Why We Use and Abandon Smart Devices. In Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing (UbiComp ’15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 635--646. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Ian Li, Anind Dey, and Jodi Forlizzi. 2010. A Stage-based Model of Personal Informatics Systems. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’10). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 557--566. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Ian Li, Anind K. Dey, and Jodi Forlizzi. 2012. Using Context to Reveal Factors That Affect Physical Activity. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 19, 1, Article 7 (May 2012), 21 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. William Lidwell, Kritina Holden, and Jill Butler. 2010. Universal Principles of Design, Revised and Updated: 125 Ways to Enhance Usability, Influence Perception, Increase Appeal, Make Better Design Decisions, and Teach through Design (second edition, revised and updated ed.). Rockport Publishers. http://amazon.com/o/ASIN/1592535879/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Do more with Webhooks - IFTTT. Retrieved July 12, 2017 from https://ifttt.com/maker_webhooksGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Yevgeniy Medynskiy and Elizabeth Mynatt. 2010. Salud!: An open infrastructure for developing and deploying health self-management applications. In 2010 4th International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare (PervasiveHealth ’10). 1--8.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  44. Microsoft Band. Retrieved July 12, 2017 from https://www.microsoft.com/microsoft-bandGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. Microsoft Health. Retrieved July 12, 2017 from https://www.microsoft.com/microsoft-band/en-us/microsoft-healthGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. Misfit: Fitness Trackers 8 Wearable Technology. Retrieved July 12, 2017 from https://misfit.comGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. Mood tracking journal. Retrieved July 12, 2017 from http://www.moodtrack.com/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. Moves. Retrieved July 12, 2017 from https://moves-app.comGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. Sean Munson and Sunny Consolvo. 2012. Exploring Goal-setting, Rewards, Self-monitoring, and Sharing to Motivate Physical Activity. IEEE.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. MyFitnessPal - Free Calorie Counter. Retrieved July 12, 2017 from https://www.myfitnesspal.com/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. Noom Coaching. Retrieved July 12, 2017 from http://noom.co.kr/service/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  52. PACO: The Personal Analytics Companion. Retrieved July 12, 2017 from https://www.pacoapp.comGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  53. Martin Pielot, N Henze, and S Boll. 2011. Experiments in app stores-How to ask users for their consent. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Ethics, Logs and Videotape: Ethics in Large Scale Trials 8 User Generated Content in conjunction with CHI 2011. 1--4.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  54. Mashfiqui Rabbi, Min Hane Aung, Mi Zhang, and Tanzeem Choudhury. 2015. MyBehavior: Automatic Personalized Health Feedback from User Behaviors and Preferences Using Smartphones. In Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing (UbiComp ’15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 707--718. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  55. Ruth Ravichandran, Sang-Wha Sien, Shwetak N. Patel, Julie A. Kientz, and Laura R. Pina. 2017. Making Sense of Sleep Sensors: How Sleep Sensing Technologies Support and Undermine Sleep Health. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 6864--6875. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  56. Ian Renfree, Daniel Harrison, Paul Marshall, Katarzyna Stawarz, and Anna Cox. 2016. Don’t Kick the Habit: The Role of Dependency in Habit Formation Apps. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA ’16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2932--2939. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  57. RescueTime: Time management software for staying productive and happy in the modern workplace. Retrieved July 12, 2017 from https://www.rescuetime.comGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  58. John Rooksby, Parvin Asadzadeh, Alistair Morrison, Claire McCallum, Cindy Gray, and Matthew Chalmers. 2016. Implementing Ethics for a Mobile App Deployment. In Proceedings of The 28th Australian Conference on Human Computer Interaction (OzCHI 2016). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  59. John Rooksby, Mattias Rost, Alistair Morrison, and Matthew Chalmers Chalmers. 2014. Personal Tracking As Lived Informatics. In Proceedings of the 32Nd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1163--1172. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  60. Katarzyna Stawarz, Anna L. Cox, and Ann Blandford. 2015. Beyond Self-Tracking and Reminders: Designing Smartphone Apps That Support Habit Formation. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2653--2662. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  61. SurveyMongkey: Free online survey software 8 questionnaire tool. Retrieved July 12, 2017 from https://www.surveymonkey.com/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  62. UP by Jawbone. Retrieved July 12, 2017 from https://jawbone.com/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  63. Blase Ur, Elyse McManus, Melwyn Pak Yong Ho, and Michael L. Littman. 2014. Practical Trigger-action Programming in the Smart Home. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 803--812. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  64. Blase Ur, Melwyn Pak Yong Ho, Stephen Brawner, Jiyun Lee, Sarah Mennicken, Noah Picard, Diane Schulze, and Michael L. Littman. 2016. Trigger-Action Programming in the Wild: An Analysis of 200,000 IFTTT Recipes. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 3227--3231. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  65. Max G. Van Kleek, Michael Bernstein, Katrina Panovich, Gregory G. Vargas, David R. Karger, and MC Schraefel. 2009. Note to Self: Examining Personal Information Keeping in a Lightweight Note-taking Tool. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’09). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1477--1480. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  66. Kanit Wongsuphasawat, Dominik Moritz, Anushka Anand, Jock Mackinlay, Bill Howe, and Jeffrey Heer. 2016. Voyager: Exploratory Analysis via Faceted Browsing of Visualization Recommendations. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 22, 1 (Jan 2016), 649--658.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  67. Mi Band. Retrieved July 12, 2017 from http://www.mi.com/en/miband2Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  68. Rayoung Yang, Eunice Shin, Mark W. Newman, and Mark S. Ackerman. 2015. When Fitness Trackers Don’t ’Fit’: End-user Difficulties in the Assessment of Personal Tracking Device Accuracy. In Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing (UbiComp ’15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 623--634. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. OmniTrack: A Flexible Self-Tracking Approach Leveraging Semi-Automated Tracking

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    Full Access

    • Published in

      cover image Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies
      Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies  Volume 1, Issue 3
      September 2017
      2023 pages
      EISSN:2474-9567
      DOI:10.1145/3139486
      Issue’s Table of Contents

      Copyright © 2017 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 11 September 2017
      • Accepted: 1 July 2017
      • Revised: 1 May 2017
      • Received: 1 February 2017
      Published in imwut Volume 1, Issue 3

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader