skip to main content
research-article

Tight Bounds for the Price of Anarchy of Simultaneous First-Price Auctions

Published:13 January 2016Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

We study the price of anarchy (PoA) of simultaneous first-price auctions (FPAs) for buyers with submodular and subadditive valuations. The current best upper bounds for the Bayesian price of anarchy (BPoA) of these auctions are e/(e − 1) [Syrgkanis and Tardos 2013] and 2 [Feldman et al. 2013], respectively. We provide matching lower bounds for both cases even for the case of full information and for mixed Nash equilibria via an explicit construction. We present an alternative proof of the upper bound of e/(e − 1) for FPAs with fractionally subadditive valuations that reveals the worst-case price distribution, which is used as a building block for the matching lower bound construction.

We generalize our results to a general class of item bidding auctions that we call bid-dependent auctions (including FPAs and all-pay auctions) where the winner is always the highest bidder and each bidder’s payment depends only on his own bid.

Finally, we apply our techniques to discriminatory price multiunit auctions. We complement the results of de Keijzer et al. [2013] for the case of subadditive valuations by providing a matching lower bound of 2. For the case of submodular valuations, we provide a lower bound of 1.109. For the same class of valuations, we were able to reproduce the upper bound of e/(e − 1) using our nonsmooth approach.

References

  1. Michael R. Baye, Dan Kovenock, and Casper G. de Vries. 1996. The all-pay auction with complete information. Economic Theory 8, 2, 291--305.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Kshipra Bhawalkar and Tim Roughgarden. 2011. Welfare guarantees for combinatorial auctions with item bidding. In Proceedings of the 22nd Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Kshipra Bhawalkar and Tim Roughgarden. 2012. Simultaneous single-item auctions. In Internet and Network Economics. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 7695. Springer, 337--349. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Sushil Bikhchandani. 1999. Auctions of heterogeneous objects. Games and Economic Behavior 26, 193--220.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Michal Bresky. 2008. Pure Equilibrium Strategies in Multi-Unit Auctions with Private Value Bidders. CERGE-EI Working Papers wp376. The Center for Economic Research and Graduate Education, Economic Institute, Prague. http://ideas.repec.org/p/cer/papers/wp376.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Ioannis Caragiannis, Christos Kaklamanis, Panagiotis Kanellopoulos, and Maria Kyropoulou. 2011. On the efficiency of equilibria in generalized second price auctions. In Proceedings of the 12th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce. ACM, New York, NY, 81--90. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Shuchi Chawla and Jason D. Hartline. 2013. Auctions with unique equilibria. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce. 181--196. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Shuchi Chawla, Jason D. Hartline, David L Malec, and Balasubramanian Sivan. 2010. Multi-parameter mechanism design and sequential posted pricing. In Proceedings of the 42nd ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC’10). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. George Christodoulou, Annamária Kovács, and Michael Schapira. 2008. Bayesian combinatorial auctions. In Proceedings of the 35th International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming, Part I (ICALP’08). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. George Christodoulou, Annamária Kovács, Alkmini Sgouritsa, and Bo Tang. 2013. Tight bounds for the price of anarchy of simultaneous first price auctions. arXiv:1312.2371 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Edward H. Clarke. 1971. Multipart pricing of public goods. Public Choice 11, 1, 17--33.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Bart de Keijzer, Evangelos Markakis, Guido Schäfer, and Orestis Telelis. 2013. Inefficiency of standard multi-unit auctions. In Algorithms—ESA 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 8125. Springer, 385--396. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40450-4_33Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Benjamin Edelman, Michael Ostrovsky, and Michael Schwarz. 2007. Internet advertising and the generalized second-price auction: Selling billions of dollars worth of keywords. American Economic Review 97, 1, 242--259. http://ideas.repec.org/a/aea/aecrev/v97y2007i1p242-259.html.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Uriel Feige. 2006. On maximizing welfare when utility functions are subadditive. In Proceedings of the 38th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC’06). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Uriel Feige and Jan Vondrák. 2010. The submodular welfare problem with demand queries. Theory of Computing 6, 1, 247--290. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.4086/toc.2010.v006a011Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Michal Feldman, Hu Fu, Nick Gravin, and Brendan Lucier. 2013. Simultaneous auctions are (almost) efficient. In Proceedings of the 45th Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC’13). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Hu Fu, Robert D. Kleinberg, and Ron Lavi. 2012. Conditional equilibrium outcomes via ascending price processes with applications to combinatorial auctions with item bidding. In Proceedings of the 13th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce (EC’12). ACM, New York, NY. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Theodore Groves. 1973. Incentives in teams. Econometrica 41, 4, 617--663.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Jason D. Hartline and Tim Roughgarden. 2009. Simple versus optimal mechanisms. In Proceedings of the 10th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce (EC’09). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Avinatan Hassidim, Haim Kaplan, Yishay Mansour, and Noam Nisan. 2011. Non-price equilibria in markets of discrete goods. In Proceedings of the 12th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce (EC’11). ACM, New York, NY. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Elias Koutsoupias and Christos Papadimitriou. 1999. Worst-case equilibria. In Proceeding of 26th International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STACS’99). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Vijay Krishna. 2002. Auction Theory. Academic Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Alessandro Lizzeri and Nicola Persico. 2000. Uniqueness and existence of equilibrium in auctions with a reserve price. Games and Economic Behavior 30, 1, 83--114.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Brendan Lucier and Allan Borodin. 2010. Price of anarchy for greedy auctions. In Proceedings of the 21st Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms. 537--553. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Brendan Lucier and Renato Paes Leme. 2011. GSP auctions with correlated types. In Proceedings of the 12th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce (EC’11). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Evangelos Markakis and Orestis Telelis. 2012. Uniform price auctions: Equilibria and efficiency. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Algorithmic Game Theory (SAGT’12). 227--238. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Paul Milgrom. 2000. Putting auction theory to work: The simultaneous ascending auction. Journal of Political Economy 108, 2, 245--272.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Noam Nisan and Amir Ronen. 1999. Algorithmic mechanism design (extended abstract). In Proceedings of the 31st Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC’99). 129--140. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Noam Nisan and Amir Ronen. 2000. Computationally feasible VCG-based mechanisms. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Noam Nisan and Ilya Segal. 2006. The communication requirements of efficient allocations and supporting prices. Journal of Economic Theory 129, 1, 192--224. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jet.2004.10.007Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Renato Paes Leme and Éva Tardos. 2010. Pure and Bayes-Nash price of anarchy for generalized second price auction. In Proceedings of the 51st Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS’10). 735--744. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Tim Roughgarden. 2012. The price of anarchy in games of incomplete information. In Proceedings of the 13th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce (EC’12). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Tim Roughgarden. 2014. Barriers to near-optimal equilibria. In Proceedings of the 55th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS’14). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Vasilis Syrgkanis and Eva Tardos. 2013. Composable and efficient mechanisms. In Proceedings of the 45th Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC’13). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Hal R. Varian. 2007. Position auctions. International Journal of Industrial Organization 25, 6, 1163--1178.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. William Vickrey. 1961. Counterspeculation, auctions, and competitive sealed tenders. Journal of Finance 16, 1, 8--37.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Tight Bounds for the Price of Anarchy of Simultaneous First-Price Auctions

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    Full Access

    • Published in

      cover image ACM Transactions on Economics and Computation
      ACM Transactions on Economics and Computation  Volume 4, Issue 2
      February 2016
      140 pages
      ISSN:2167-8375
      EISSN:2167-8383
      DOI:10.1145/2872312
      Issue’s Table of Contents

      Copyright © 2016 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 13 January 2016
      • Accepted: 1 June 2015
      • Revised: 1 April 2015
      • Received: 1 January 2015
      Published in teac Volume 4, Issue 2

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader