skip to main content
research-article

Price of Stability in Polynomial Congestion Games

Published:31 December 2015Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

The price of anarchy (PoA) in congestion games has attracted a lot of research over the past decade. This has resulted in a thorough understanding of this concept. In contrast, the price of stability (PoS), which is an equally interesting concept, is much less understood.

In this article, we consider congestion games with polynomial cost functions with nonnegative coefficients and maximum degree d. We give matching bounds for the PoS in such games—that is, our technique provides the exact value for any degree d.

For linear congestion games, tight bounds were previously known. Those bounds hold even for the more restricted case of dominant equilibria, which may not exist. We give a separation result showing that this is not possible for congestion games with quadratic cost functions—in other words, the PoA for the subclass of games that admit a dominant strategy equilibrium is strictly smaller than the PoS for the general class.

References

  1. Sebastian Aland, Dominic Dumrauf, Martin Gairing, Burkhard Monien, and Florian Schoppmann. 2011. Exact price of anarchy for polynomial congestion games. SIAM Journal on Computing 40, 5, 1211--1233. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Susanne Albers. 2008. On the value of coordination in network design. In Proceedings of the 19th Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (SODA’08). 294--303. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Elliot Anshelevich, Anirban Dasgupta, Jon M. Kleinberg, Éva Tardos, Tom Wexler, and Tim Roughgarden. 2004. The price of stability for network design with fair cost allocation. In Proceedings of the 45th Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS’04). 295--304. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Baruch Awerbuch, Yossi Azar, and Amir Epstein. 2005. The price of routing unsplittable flow. In Proceedings of the 37th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC’05). 57--66. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Kshipra Bhawalkar, Martin Gairing, and Tim Roughgarden. 2010. Weighted congestion games: Price of anarchy, universal worst-case examples, and tightness. In Algorithms—ESA 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 6347. Springer, 17--28. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Vittorio Bilò. 2012. A unifying tool for bounding the quality of non-cooperative solutions in weighted congestion games. In Proceedings of the 10th International Workshop on Approximation and Online Algorithms (WAOA’12). 215--228.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Vittorio Bilò and Roberta Bove. 2011. Bounds on the price of stability of undirected network design games with three players. Journal of Interconnection Networks 12, 1--2, 1--17.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Vittorio Bilò, Ioannis Caragiannis, Angelo Fanelli, and Gianpiero Monaco. 2010. Improved lower bounds on the price of stability of undirected network design games. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on Algorithmic Game Theory (SAGT’10). 90--101. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Vittorio Bilò, Michele Flammini, and Luca Moscardelli. 2013. The price of stability for undirected broadcast network design with fair cost allocation is constant. In Proceedings of the 54th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS’13). 638--647. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Ioannis Caragiannis, Michele Flammini, Christos Kaklamanis, Panagiotis Kanellopoulos, and Luca Moscardelli. 2011. Tight bounds for selfish and greedy load balancing. Algorithmica 61, 3, 606--637. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Ho-Lin Chen and Tim Roughgarden. 2006. Network design with weighted players. In Proceedings of the 18th Annual ACM Symposium on Parallelism in Algorithms and Architectures (SPAA’06). ACM, New York, NY, 29--38. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1148109.1148114 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. George Christodoulou, Christine Chung, Katrina Ligett, Evangelia Pyrga, and Rob van Stee. 2009. On the price of stability for undirected network design. In Proceedings of the 7th Workshop on Approximation and Online Algorithms (WAOA’09). 86--97. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. George Christodoulou and Martin Gairing. 2013. Price of stability in polynomial congestion games. In Proceedings of the 40th International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP’13). 496--507. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. George Christodoulou and Elias Koutsoupias. 2005a. On the price of anarchy and stability of correlated equilibria of linear congestion games. In Algorithms—ESA 2005. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 3669. Springer, 59--70. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. George Christodoulou and Elias Koutsoupias. 2005b. The price of anarchy of finite congestion games. In Proceedings of the 37th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC’05). 67--73. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. George Christodoulou, Elias Koutsoupias, and Paul G. Spirakis. 2011. On the performance of approximate equilibria in congestion games. Algorithmica 61, 1, 116--140. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Yann Disser, Andreas Emil Feldmann, Max Klimm, and Matús Mihalák. 2015. Improving the Hk-bound on the price of stability in undirected Shapley network design games. Theoretical Computer Science 562, 557--564. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Amos Fiat, Haim Kaplan, Meital Levy, Svetlana Olonetsky, and Ronen Shabo. 2006. On the price of stability for designing undirected networks with fair cost allocations. In Proceedings of the 33rd International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP’06). 608--618. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Elias Koutsoupias and Christos H. Papadimitriou. 1999. Worst-case equilibria. In Proceedings of the 16th Annual Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STACS’99). 404--413. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Euiwoong Lee and Katrina Ligett. 2013. Improved bounds on the price of stability in network cost sharing games. In Proceedings of 14th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce (EC’13). 607--620. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Jian Li. 2009. An O(&frac;log n log log n upper bound on the price of stability for undirected Shapley network design games. Information Processing Letters 109, 15, 876--878. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Dov Monderer and Lloyd S. Shapley. 1996. Potential games. Games and Economics Behavior 14, 124--143.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Robert W. Rosenthal. 1973. A class of games possessing pure-strategy Nash equilibria. International Journal of Game Theory 2, 65--67.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Tim Roughgarden. 2012. Intrinsic robustness of the price of anarchy. Communications of the ACM 55, 7, 116--123. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Andreas S. Schulz and Nicólas E. Stier-Moses. 2002. On the performance of user equilibria in traffic networks. In Proceedings of the 14th Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (SODA’03). 86--87. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Price of Stability in Polynomial Congestion Games

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in

        Full Access

        • Published in

          cover image ACM Transactions on Economics and Computation
          ACM Transactions on Economics and Computation  Volume 4, Issue 2
          February 2016
          140 pages
          ISSN:2167-8375
          EISSN:2167-8383
          DOI:10.1145/2872312
          Issue’s Table of Contents

          Copyright © 2015 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 31 December 2015
          • Accepted: 1 April 2015
          • Revised: 1 March 2015
          • Received: 1 December 2014
          Published in teac Volume 4, Issue 2

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article
          • Research
          • Refereed

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader