skip to main content
research-article

Exploring Traditional Phones as an E-Mail Interface for Older Adults

Published:13 January 2016Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

This article explores the design and development of voice interfaces via traditional telephones as a way of supporting asynchronous online communication for older adults. E-mail is the primary form of online communication for older adults. However, e-mail communication currently requires access to and the ability to use an Internet-connected computer or device, which may be problematic due to barriers of physical access, expense, insufficient computer skill, or other accessibility issues. To address this, the present work leverages the pervasive hardware of traditional phones and familiar nonvisual models of phone-based interaction to create a new e-mail interface for older adults. We examine the potential of e-mail interaction via traditional phones through long-term field observations, prototype testing, and a four-week field-based user study. Our findings indicate that a simple voice e-mail interface accessed through traditional phones is usable for older adults and is a useful way for offline older adults to interact with an e-mail account. The ease of use and convenience of a phone-based interface are important given the “work” of keeping in touch over e-mail, and this approach has the potential to open up new avenues of online access for older adults who are still offline or who have late-life disabilities that make using traditional graphical e-mail systems difficult. This project contributes new insights regarding the ways in which voice interfaces can support asynchronous online communication for older adults and provides design guidance for the development of subsequent voice interfaces.

References

  1. Aging in Place Technology Watch. 2011. Technology Survey Age 65 to 100. Retrieved from http://www.ageinplacetech.com.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Nuno Baptista, Rui Prior, and Manuel E. Correia. 2009. Telephone interface for the email service. In Future Computing, Service Computation, Cognitive, Adaptive, Content, Patterns (COMPUTATIONWORLD'09). Computation World. IEEE, 437--442. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Michael T. Braun. 2013. Obstacles to social networking website use among older adults. Computers in Human Behavior 29, 3 (2013), 673--680. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Kathy Charmaz. 2000. Grounded theory: Objectivist and constructivist methods. In Handbook of Qualitative Research, 2nd ed., N. Denzin and Y. Lincoln (Eds.). Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, 509--535.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Raymundo Cornejo, Mónica Tentori, and Jesús Favela. 2013. Ambient awareness to strengthen the family social network of older adults. Computer Supported Cooperative Work 22, 2--3 (2013), 309--344. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Erin Cornwell and Linda Waite. 2009. Measuring social isolation among older adults using multiple indicators from the NSHAP study. Journal of Gerontol 64B (2009), i38--i46. Issue suppl_1.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Shelia R. Cotten, George Ford, Sherry Ford, and Timothy M. Hale. 2012. Internet use and depression among older adults. Computers in Human Behavior 28, 2 (2012), 496--499. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.10.021 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Sara Czaja, Neil Charness, Arthur D. Fisk, Christopher Hertzog, Sankaran N. Nair, Wendy Rogers, and Joseph Sharit. 2006. Factors predicting the use of technology: Findings from the center for research and education on aging and technology enhancement (CREATE). Psychology and Aging 21 (2006), 333--352. Issue 2.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Fred D. Davis, Richard P. Bagozzi, and Paul R. Warshaw. 1989. User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science 35 (1989), 982--1003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Anna Dickinson and Robin L. Hill. 2007. Keeping in touch: Talking to older people about computers and communication. Education and Gerontology (2007), 613--630. Issue 33.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Anna Dickinson, Allan F. Newell, Michael J. Smith, and Robin L. Hill. 2005. Introducing the internet to the over-60s: Developing an email system for older novice computer users. Interacive Computing 17, 6 (2005), 621--642. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Sara Ferlander. 2007. The importance of different forms of social capital for health. Acta Sociologica 50 (2007), 115--128.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Arthur D. Fisk, Wendy A. Rogers, Neil Charness, Sara J. Czaja, and Joseph Sharit. 2009. Designing for Older Adults: Principles and Creative Human Factors Approaches. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.4017/gt.2005.03.03.010.00Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Vaibhav Garg, Lesa Lorenzen-Huber, L. Jean Camp, and Kay Connelly. 2012. Risk communication design for older adults. ISG* ISARC. Retrieved from http://www.ljean.com/files/RiskOlderAdults.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Vicki L. Hanson. 2009. Age and web access: The next generation. In Proceedings of the W4A. ACM, 7--15. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1535658 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Nic Hollinworth and Faustina Hwang. 2011. Investigating familiar interactions to help older adults learn computer applications more easily. In Proceedings of CHI. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Alexis Hope, Ted Schwaba, and Anne Marie Piper. 2014. Understanding digital and material social communications for older adults. In Proceedings of CHI. 3903--3912. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Juan Pablo Hourcade, Christopher M. Nguyen, Keith B. Perry, and Natalie L. Denburg. 2010. Pointassist for older adults: Analyzing sub-movement characteristics to aid in pointing tasks. In Proceedings of CHI. 1115--1124. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Eun Ju Lee, Clifford Nass, and Scott Brave. 2000. Can computer-generated speech have gender?: An experimental test of gender stereotype. In Ext Abs of CHI.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Siân E. Lindley. 2012. Shades of lightweight: Supporting cross-generational communication through home messaging. Universal Access in the Information Society 11, 1 (2012), 31--43. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Siân E. Lindley, Richard Harper, and Abigail Sellen. 2008. Designing for elders: Exploring the complexity of relationships in later life. In Proceedings of BCS-HCI. 77--86. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Siân E. Lindley, Richard Harper, and Abigail Sellen. 2009. Desiring to be in touch in a changing communications landscape: Attitudes of older adults. In Proceedings of CHI. 1693--1702. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Lorna Lines and Kate S. Hone. 2002. Older adults’ evaluations of speech output. In Proceedings of ASSETS. New York, NY, 170--177. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/638249.638280 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. R. C. Littell, G. A. Milliken, W. W. Stroup, and R. D. Wolfinger. 1996. SAS System for Mixed Models. 633 pp. pages.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. James Lubben and Melanie Gironda. 2003. Centrality of social ties to the health and well-being of older adults. In Social Work and Health Care in an Aging Society: Education, Policy, Practice, and Research. Springer.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Tracy L. Mitzner, Julie B. Boron, Cara Bailey Fausset, Anne E. Adams, Neil Charness, Sara J. Czaja, Katinka Dijkstra, Arthur D. Fisk, Wendy A. Rogers, and Joseph Sharit. 2010. Older adults talk technology: Technology usage and attitudes. Computers in Human Behavior 26, 6 (2010), 1710--1721. Online Interactivity: Role of Technology in Behavior Change. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Karyn Moffatt, Jessica David, and Ronald M. Baecker. 2012. Connecting grandparents and grandchildren. In Connecting Families: The Impact of New Communication Technologies on Domestic Life, Carman Neustaedter, Steve Harrison, and Abigail Sellen (Eds.). Springer, 173--193.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Clifford Nass and Scott Brave. 2005. Wired for Speech: How Voice Activates and Advances the Human-Computer Relationship. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Chris Norval, John L. Arnott, and Vicki L. Hanson. 2014. What’s on your mind?: Investigating recommendations for inclusive social networking and older adults. In Proceedings of CHI. 3923--3932. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Neil Patel, Sheetal Agarwal, Nitendra Rajput, Amit Nanavati, Paresh Dave, and Tapan S. Parikh. 2009. A comparative study of speech and dialed input voice interfaces in rural india. In Proceedings of CHI. 51--54. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Paul Resnick. 1992. HyperVoice: A phone-based CSCW platform. In Proceedings of CSCW. 218--225. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Nithya Sambasivan, Julie Weber, and Edward Cutrell. 2011. Designing a phone broadcasting system for urban sex workers in India. In Proceedings of CHI. 267--276. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Sergio Sayago and Josep Blat. 2010. Telling the story of older people e-mailing: An ethnographical study. International Journal of Human Computer Studies 68, 1--2 (2010), 105--120. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2009.10.004 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Chris Schmandt. 1993. Phoneshell: The telephone as computer terminal. In Proceedings of ICME (MULTIMEDIA’93). 373--382. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Aaron Smith. 2014. Older adults and technology use. Pew Research Center.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Shima Sum, R. Mark Mathews, Ian Hughes, and Andrew Campbell. 2008. Internet use and loneliness in older adults. Cyberpsychology and Behavior 11 (2008). Issue 2.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. S. Shyam Sundar, Anne Oeldorf-Hirsch, Jon Nussbaum, and Richard Behr. 2011. Retirees on Facebook: Can online social networking enhance their health and wellness? In Proceedings of CHI. 2287--2292. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Maria Wolters, Kallirroi Georgila, Johanna D. Moore, Robert H. Logie, Sarah E. MacPherson, and Matthew Watson. 2009b. Reducing working memory load in spoken dialogue systems. Interactive Computing 21, 4 (Aug. 2009), 276--287. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.intcom.2009.05.009 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Maria Wolters, Kallirroi Georgila, Johanna D. Moore, and Sarah E. Macpherson. 2009a. Being old doesn’t mean acting old: How older users interact with spoken dialog systems. ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing 2, 1 (2009). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. World Health Organization. 2015. Definition of an older or elderly person. Retrieved from http://www.who.int/healthinfo/survey/ageingdefnolder/en/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Kathryn Zickuhr, Lee Rainie, Kristen Purcell, and Maeve Duggan. 2013. How Americans value public libraries in their communities. Retrieved from http://pewrsr.ch/1d8eKBD.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in

Full Access

  • Published in

    cover image ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing
    ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing  Volume 8, Issue 2
    January 2016
    74 pages
    ISSN:1936-7228
    EISSN:1936-7236
    DOI:10.1145/2878628
    Issue’s Table of Contents

    Copyright © 2016 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 13 January 2016
    • Accepted: 1 October 2015
    • Revised: 1 August 2015
    • Received: 1 April 2015
    Published in taccess Volume 8, Issue 2

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader