skip to main content
research-article

Bayesian Combinatorial Auctions

Authors Info & Claims
Published:07 April 2016Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

We study the following simple Bayesian auction setting: m items are sold to n selfish bidders in m independent second-price auctions. Each bidder has a private valuation function that specifies his or her complex preferences over all subsets of items. Bidders only have beliefs about the valuation functions of the other bidders, in the form of probability distributions. The objective is to allocate the items to the bidders in a way that provides a good approximation to the optimal social welfare value. We show that if bidders have submodular or, more generally, fractionally subadditive (aka XOS) valuation functions, every Bayes-Nash equilibrium of the resulting game provides a 2-approximation to the optimal social welfare. Moreover, we show that in the full-information game, a pure Nash always exists and can be found in time that is polynomial in both m and n.

References

  1. Noga Alon, Yuval Emek, Michal Feldman, and Moshe Tennenholtz. 2012. Bayesian ignorance. Theoretical Computer Science 452 (Sept. 2012), 1--11. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tcs.2012.05.017 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Elliot Anshelevich, Anirban Dasgupta, Jon M. Kleinberg, Éva Tardos, Tom Wexler, and Tim Roughgarden. 2004. The price of stability for network design with fair cost allocation. In Proceedings of the 45th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS'04). 295--304. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Kshipra Bhawalkar and Tim Roughgarden. 2011. Welfare guarantees for combinatorial auctions with item bidding. In Proceedings of the ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (SODA'11). 700--709. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Kshipra Bhawalkar and Tim Roughgarden. 2012. Simultaneous single-item auctions. In WINE’12. 337--349. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Liad Blumrosen and Noam Nisan. 2005. On the computational power of iterative auctions I: Demand queries. Discussion paper no. 381, The Center for the Study of Rationality, The Hebrew University. (2005). An extended abstract in EC’05 contained preliminary results.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Ioannis Caragiannis, Christos Kaklamanis, Panagiotis Kanellopoulos, and Maria Kyropoulou. 2011. On the efficiency of equilibria in generalized second price auctions. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce (EC’11). 81--90. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Ioannis Caragiannis, Christos Kaklamanis, Panagiotis Kanellopoulos, Maria Kyropoulou, Brendan Lucier, Renato Paes Leme, and Éva Tardos. 2012. On the efficiency of equilibria in generalized second price auctions. CoRR abs/1201.6429 (2012). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. George Christodoulou, Annamária Kovács, and Michael Schapira. 2008. Bayesian combinatorial auctions. In Proceedings of the 35th International Colloquium Automata, Languages and Programming, (ICALP’08). 820--832. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. George Christodoulou, Annamária Kovács, Alkmini Sgouritsa, and Bo Tang. 2013. Tight bounds for the price of anarchy of simultaneous first price auctions. arXiv:1312.2371 (2013). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Edward H. Clarke. 1971. Multipart pricing of public goods. Public Choice 11, 1 (1971), 17--33.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Bart de Keijzer, Evangelos Markakis, Guido Schäfer, and Orestis Telelis. 2013. Inefficiency of standard multi-unit auctions. In ESA(Lecture Notes in Computer Science), Hans L. Bodlaender and Giuseppe F. Italiano (Eds.), Vol. 8125. Springer, 385--396.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Shahar Dobzinski. 2011. An impossibility result for truthful combinatorial auctions with submodular valuations. In Proceedings of the 43rd ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC’11). 139--148. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Shahar Dobzinski, Noam Nisan, and Michael Schapira. 2005. Approximation algorithms for combinatorial auctionss with complement-free bidders. In Proceedings of the 37th ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC’05). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Shahar Dobzinski and Michael Schapira. 2006. An improved approximation algorithm for combinatorial auctions with submodular bidders. (2006). In Proceedings of the ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (SODA'06). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Uriel Feige. 2006. On maximizing welfare where the utility functions are subadditive. In Proceedings of the Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC’06). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Uriel Feige and Jan Vondrak. 2006. The Allocation Problem with Submodular Utility Functions. Manuscript.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Michal Feldman, Hu Fu, Nick Gravin, and Brendan Lucier. 2013. Simultaneous auctions are (almost) efficient. In Proceedings of the Symposium on Theory of Computing Conference (STOC’13). 201--210. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Hu Fu, Robert Kleinberg, and Ron Lavi. 2012. Conditional equilibrium outcomes via ascending price processes with applications to combinatorial auctions with item bidding. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce. 586. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Martin Gairing, Burkhard Monien, and Karsten Tiemann. 2005. Selfish routing with incomplete information. In Proceedings of the 17th Annual ACM Symposium on Parallel Algorithms (SPAA’05). 203--212. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Dinesh Garg and Yadati Narahari. 2005. Price of anarchy of network routing games with incomplete information. In Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Internet and Network Economics (WINE’05). 1066--1075. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Theodore Groves. 1973. Incentives in teams. Econometrica 41, 4 (1973), 617--631.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. John C. Harsanyi. 1967. Games with incomplete information played by “bayesian” players, parts i ii and iii. Management Science 14 (1967), 159--182.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Avinatan Hassidim, Haim Kaplan, Yishay Mansour, and Noam Nisan. 2011. Non-price equilibria in markets of discrete goods. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce. 295--296. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Elias Koutsoupias and Christos Papadimitriou. 1999. Worst-case equilibria. In Proceedings of the 16th Annual Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science. 404--413. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Benny Lehmann, Daniel Lehmann, and Noam Nisan. 2001. Combinatorial auctions with decreasing marginal utilities. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Renato Paes Leme and Éva Tardos. 2010. Pure and bayes-nash price of anarchy for generalized second price auction. In Proceedings of the 51st Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS’10). 735--744. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Brendan Lucier and Allan Borodin. 2010. Price of anarchy for greedy auctions. In Proceedings of the 21st Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (SODA’10). 537--553. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Brendan Lucier and Renato Paes Leme. 2011. GSP auctions with correlated types. In Proceedings of the 12th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce (EC'11). San Jose, CA, USA, 71--80. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Evangelos Markakis and Orestis Telelis. 2012. Uniform price auctions: Equilibria and efficiency. In Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium on Algorithmic Game Theory (SAGT’12). 227--238.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Noam Nisan. 2000. Bidding and allocation in combinatorial auctions. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Noam Nisan and Amir Ronen. 1999. Algorithmic mechanism design. In Proceedings of the Symposium on Theory of Computing Conference (STOC’99). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Noam Nisan and Amir Ronen. 2000. Computationally feasible vcg-based mechanisms. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Tim Roughgarden. 2012a. Intrinsic robustness of the price of anarchy. Communications of the ACM 55, 7 (2012), 116--123. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Tim Roughgarden. 2012b. The price of anarchy in games of incomplete information. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce. 862--879. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Tim Roughgarden and Éva Tardos. 2002. How bad is selfish routing? Journal of the ACM 49, 2 (2002), 236--259. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Vasilis Syrgkanis and Éva Tardos. 2013. Composable and efficient mechanisms. In Proceedings of the Symposium on Theory of Computing Conference (STOC’13). 211--220. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Adrian Vetta. 2002. Nash equilibria in competitive societies, with applications to facility location, traffic routing and auctions. In FOCS. IEEE Computer Society. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. William Vickrey. 1961. Counterspeculation, auctions and competitive sealed tenders. Journal of Finance 16, 1 (1961), 8--37.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. Jan Vondrak. 2008. Optimal approximation for the Submodular Welfare Problem in the value oracle model. (2008). In Proceedings of the Symposium on Theory of Computing Conference (STOC’08). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Bayesian Combinatorial Auctions

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in

        Full Access

        • Published in

          cover image Journal of the ACM
          Journal of the ACM  Volume 63, Issue 2
          May 2016
          249 pages
          ISSN:0004-5411
          EISSN:1557-735X
          DOI:10.1145/2906142
          Issue’s Table of Contents

          Copyright © 2016 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 7 April 2016
          • Accepted: 1 October 2015
          • Revised: 1 February 2015
          • Received: 1 March 2014
          Published in jacm Volume 63, Issue 2

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article
          • Research
          • Refereed

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader