Jean-Paul Laumond
Skip Abstract Section
Abstract
Exploring the distinction between an optimal robot motion and a robot motion resulting from the application of optimization techniques.
- Balkcom, D. and Mason, M. Time optimal trajectories for differential drive vehicles. Int. J. Robotics Research 21, 3 (2002), 199--217.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Barraquand, J. and Ferbach, P. A method of progressive constraints for manipulation planning. IEEE Trans. on Robotics and Automation 13, 4 (1997) 473--485.Google Scholar
- Barraquand, J. and Lacombe, J.-C. Robot motion planning: A distributed representation approach. Intern. J. of Robotics Research 10, 6 (1991), 628--649. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bobrow, J., Dubowsky, S. and Gibson, J. Time-optimal control of robotic manipulators along specified paths. Int. J. of Robotics Research 4, 3 (1985), 3--17Google ScholarCross Ref
- Brady, M., Hollerbach, J., Johnson, T., Lozano-Pérez, T. and Masson, M.T. Robot Motion: Planning and Control. MIT Press, 1983. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Brock, O. and Khatib, O. Elastic strips: A framework for motion generation in human environments. Int. J. of Robotics Research 21, 12 (2002), 1031--1052.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Choset, H., Lynch, K.M., Hutchinson, S., Kantor, A., Burgard, W., Kavraki, L.E. and Thrun, S. Principles of Robot Motion: Theory, Algorithms, and Implementations. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, June 2005.Google Scholar
- Connolly, C. and Grupen, R. Applications of harmonic functions to robotics. J. of Robotic Systems 10, 7 (1992), 931--946.Google Scholar
- Dalibard, S., Nakhaei, A., Lamiraux, F. and Laumond, J.-P. Whole-body task planning for a humanoid robot: A way to integrate collision avoidance. In Proceedings of IEEE-RAS Int. Conference on Humanoid Robots, 2009.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Desaulniers, G. On shortest paths for a car-like robot maneuvering around obstacles. Robotics and Autonomous Systems 17 (1996), 139--148.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Diehl, M. and Mombaur, K., eds. Fast Motions in Biomechanics and Robotics. Lecture Notes in Control and Information Sciences, vol 340. Springer, 2006.Google Scholar
- Donald, B., Xavier, P., Canny, J. and Reif, J. Kinodynamic motion planning. JACM 40, 5 (1993), 1048--1066. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Dubins, L. On curves of minimal length with a constraint on average curvature and with prescribed initial and terminal positions and tangents. Amer. J. of Mathematics 79 (1957), 497--516.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Hopcroft, J. Schwartz, J. and Sharir, M. Planning, Geometry, and Complexity of Robot Motion. Ablex, 1987. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jacobs, P., Laumond, J.-P. and Rege, A. Nonholonomic motion planning for HILARE-like mobile robots. Intelligent Robotics. M. Vidyasagar and M. Trivedi, eds. McGraw Hill, 1991.Google Scholar
- Jaouni, H., Khatib, M. and Laumond, J.-P. Elastic bands for nonholonomic car-like robots: algorithms and combinatorial issues. In Robotics: The Algorithmic Perspective. P. Agarwal, L. Kavraki, and M. Mason, eds. A.K. Peters, 1998. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jean, F. Complexity of nonholonomic motion planning. Int. J. of Control 74, 8 (2001), 776--782.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jurdjevic, V. Geometric Control Theory. Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Kalakrishnan, M., Chitta, S., Theodorou, E., Pastor, P. and Schaal, S. Stomp: Stochastic trajectory optimization for motion planning. In Proceedings of the IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation (2011).Google ScholarCross Ref
- Kavraki, L., Svestka, P., Latombe, J.-C. and Overmars, M. Probabilistic roadmaps for path planning in high-dimensional configuration spaces. IEEE Trans. on Robotics and Automation 12, 4 (1996), 566--580.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Khatib, O. Real-time obstacle avoidance for manipulators and mobile robots. The Int. J. of Robotics Research 5, 1 (1986), 90--98, 1986. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Latombe, J.-C. Robot Motion Planning. Kluwer Academic Press, 1991. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Laumond, J., Mansard, N. and Lasserre, J. Robot motion optimization as action selection principle. Commun. ACM, (to appear).Google Scholar
- Laumond, J.-P., Jacobs, P., Taix, M. and Murray, R. A motion planner for nonholonomic mobile robots. IEEE Trans. on Robotics and Automation, 10, 5 (1994), 577--593.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Laumond, J.-P. and Siméon, T. Notes on visibility roadmaps and path planning. New Directions in Algorithmic and Computational Robotics. B. Donald, K. Lynch, and D. Rus, eds. A.K. Peters, 2001.Google Scholar
- LaValle, S. Planning Algorithms. Cambridge University Press, 2006. Google ScholarDigital Library
- LaValle, S. and Kuffner, J. Rapidly-exploring random trees: Progress and prospects. Algorithmic and Computational Robotics: New Directions. B. Donald, K. Lynch and D. Rus, eds. A.K. Peters, 2001, 293--308.Google Scholar
- Lozano-Pérez, T. Spatial planning: A configuration space approach. IEEE Trans. on Computer 32, 2 (1983), 108--120. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Neustadt, L. Optimization, a moment problem and non linear programming. SIAM J. Control (1964), 33--53.Google Scholar
- Paul, R. Robot Manipulators: Mathematics, Programming, and Control. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1st edition, 1982. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Pfeiffer, F. and Johanni, R. A concept for manipulator trajectory planning. IEEE Journal of Robotics and Automation 3, 2 (1987).Google ScholarCross Ref
- Quinlan, S. and Khatib, O. Elastic bands: Connecting path planning and control. In Proceedings of the IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation (1993).Google ScholarCross Ref
- Reeds, J. and Shepp, L. Optimal paths for a car that goes both forwards and backwards. Pacific Journal of Mathematics 145, 2 (1990), 367--393.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Rimon, E. and Koditschek. Exact robot navigation using artificial potential fields. IEEE Trans. on Robotics and Automation 8, 5 (1992), 501--518.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Schwartz, J. and Sharir, M. On the piano movers problem II: General techniques for computing topological properties of real algebraic manifolds. Advances of Applied Mathematics 4 (1983), 298--351. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Shin, K.G. and McKay, N.D. Minimum-time control of robotic manipulators with geometric path constraints. IEEE Trans. on Automatic Control 30, 6 (1985), 531--541.Google Scholar
- Souères, P. and Laumond, J.-P. Shortest paths synthesis for a car-like robot. IEEE Trans. on Automatic Control 41, 5 (1996), 672--688.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Sussmann, H. and Tang, G. Shortest paths for the Reeds-Shepp car: A worked out example of the use of geometric techniques in nonlinear optimal control. Rutgers Center for Systems and Control Technical Report 91-10, 1991.Google Scholar
- Verscheure, D., Demeulenaere, B., Swevers, J., Schutter, J.D. and Diehlm M. Time-optimal path tracking for robots: A convex optimization approach. IEEE Trans. on Automatic Control 54, 10 (2009), 2318--2327.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Zucker, M., Ratliff, N., Dragan, A., Pivtoraiko, M., Klingensmith, M., Dellin, C., Bagnell, J. and Srinivasa, S. Chomp: Covariant Hamiltonian optimization for motion planning. Int. J. of Robotics Research 32, 9-10 (2013), 1164--1193. Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- Optimality in robot motion: optimal versus optimized motion
Recommendations
Beyond anthropomorphising robot motion and towards robot-specific motion: consideration of the potential of artist—dancers in research on robotic motion
AbstractThe design of robot motion is one of the most important questions in social robotics as it underpins successful human–robot interaction. Human-inspired motion design based on anthropomorphic models, through which human motion features are ...
Comments