Abstract
Sociological appropriations of practice theory as applied to sustainable design have successfully problematized overly simplistic and individualistic models of consumer choice and behavior change. By taking everyday practices as the principal units of analysis, they move towards acknowledging the socially and materially structured nature of human activity. However, to inform sustainable HCI we also need to understand how practices are part of wider experiential environments and flows of practical activity. In this article, we develop an approach rooted in phenomenological anthropology and sensory ethnography. This approach builds on theories of place, perception and movement and enables us to situate practices, and understand practical activity, as emplaced within complex and shifting ecologies of things. Drawing on an interdisciplinary study of domestic energy consumption and digital media use, we discuss ethnographic and design practice examples. We demonstrate how this theoretical and methodological framework can be aligned with the 3rd paradigm of HCI.
- Abowd, G., Dey, A., Brown, P., Davies, N., Smith, M., and Steggles, P. 1999. Towards a better understanding of context and context-awareness. In Proceedings of the 1st International Symposium on Handheld and Ubiquitous Computing. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 1707, Springer. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Barnes, B. 2001. Practice as collective action. In The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory, T. Schatzki, K. Knorr-Cetina, and E. von Savigny, Eds., Routledge, London, 17--28.Google Scholar
- Bhamra, T., Lilley, D., and Tang, T. 2011. Design for sustainable behaviour: Using products to change consumer behaviour. Design J. 14, 4, 427--445.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Bødker, S. 2006. When second wave HCI meets third wave challenges. In Proceedings of the 4th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. 1--8. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bull, M. 2005. No dead air! The iPod and the culture of mobile listening. Leisure Studies. 24, 4, 343--355.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Chatterton, T. 2011. An introduction to thinking about ‘energy behaviour’: a multi model approach. Paper for the Department of Energy and Climate Change, O. Anderson, Ed., Department of Energy and Climate Change, UK.Google Scholar
- Chetty, M., Tran, D., and Grinter, R. E. 2008. Getting to green: understanding resource consumption in the home. In Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing (Ubicomp'08). Google ScholarDigital Library
- Clarke, A. 2011. Design Anthropology: Object Culture in the 21st Century. Springer.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Couldry, N. 2010. Theorising media as practice. In Theorising Media and Practice, B. Bräuchler and J. Postill, Eds., Berghahn, Oxford, 35--54.Google Scholar
- Crabtree, A. 2003. Designing Collaborative Systems: A Practical Guide to Ethnography. Springer. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Darby, S. 2010. Smart metering: what potential for householder engagement? Build. Res. Inf. 38, 5, 442--57.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Dourish, P. 2010. HCI and environmental sustainability: the politics of design and the design of politics. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Dourish, P. and Bell, G. 2011. Divining a Digital Future: Mess And Mythology in Ubiquitous Computing. MIT Press. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Dourish, P. 2001a. Where The Action Is: The Foundations Of Embodied Interaction. MIT Press, Boston. Google Scholar
- Dourish, P. 2001b. Seeking a foundation for context-aware computing. Hum.-Comput. Interact. 16, 2--4, 229--241. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Dourish, P. 2006. Implications for design. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM Press, 541--550. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Gill, Z., Tierney, M., Pegg, I., and Allan, N. 2010. Low-energy dwellings: the contribution of behaviours to actual performance. Build. Res. Inf. 38, 5, 491--508.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Gram-Hanssen, K. 2007. Teenage consumption of cleanliness: how to make it sustainable? Sustainability Sci. 3, 2, 15--23.Google Scholar
- Gunn, W. 2008. Learning to ask naïve questions with IT product design students. Arts Humanities Higher Educ. 7, 3, 323--336.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Haines, V., Mitchell, V., and Mallaband, B. 2012. Merging a practice-orientated approach with an engineering-driven product development: a case study on home improvement. J. Design Res. 10, 1/2, 28--49.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Harrison, S. and Dourish, P. 1996. Re-place-ing space: the roles of place and space in collaborative systems. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW'96). ACM, 67--76. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Harrison, S., Sengers, P., and Tatar, D. 2011. Making epistemological trouble. Interact. Comput. 23, 385--392. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Harrison, S., Tatar, D., and Sengers, P. 2007. The three paradigms of HCI. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM Press, New York.Google Scholar
- Hobart, M. 2010. What do we mean by ‘media practices’? In Theorising Media and Practice, B. Bräuchler and J. Postill, Eds., Berghahn, Oxford, 55--76.Google Scholar
- Howes, D. 2005. Skinscapes: Embodiment, Culture and Environment. In The Book of Touch, C. Classen, Ed., Berg, Oxford, 27--39.Google Scholar
- Ingold, T. 2000. The Perception of the Environment. Routledge.Google Scholar
- Ingold, T. 2007. Lines: A Brief History.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ingold, T. 2008. Anthropology is not ethnography. Proc. British Acad. 154, 69--92.Google Scholar
- Ingold, T. 2011. Being Alive. Routledge, London.Google Scholar
- Kuijer, L. and De Jong, A. 2011a. Exploring practices of thermal comfort for sustainable design. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM.Google Scholar
- Kuijer, L. and De Jong, A. 2011b. Practice theory and human-centered design: a sustainable bathing example. In Proceedings of the Nordic Design Research Conference.Google Scholar
- Kuijer, L. and De Jong, A. 2012. Identifying design opportunities for reduced household resource consumption: exploring practices of thermal comfort. J. Design Res. 10, 1/2, 67--85.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Law, J. 2001. After Method: Mess in Social Science Research. Routledge, London.Google Scholar
- Mankoff, J. C., Blevis, E., Borning, A., Friedman, B., Fussell, S. R., Hasbrouck, J., Woodruff, A., and Sengers, P. 2007. Environmental sustainability and interaction. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 211--212. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Marchand, T. H. J. 2010. Making knowledge: explorations of the indissoluble relation between minds, bodies, and environment. J. Royal Anthropological Inst. 16, Issue Supplement, S1--S21.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Massey, D. 2005. For Space. Sage, London.Google Scholar
- Morosanu, R. 2011. Domestic moments of consumption and multisensory experience. Paper presented at the postgraduate group of discussions in material culture and digital anthropology, University College London.Google Scholar
- Muller, M. J. 2003. Participatory design: the third space in HCI. In Handbook of HCI, J. Jacko and A. Sears, Eds., Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ. Google ScholarDigital Library
- O'Brien, J., Rodden, T., and Rouncefield, M. 1999. At home with technology: an ethnographic study of a set top box trial. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 6, 282--308. Google ScholarDigital Library
- OFCOM. 2012. Communications Market Report 2012. Available online at http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/binaries/research/cmr/cmr12/CMR_UK_2012.pdf.Google Scholar
- Peterson, M. A. 2010. ‘But it is my habit to read the Times’: Metaculture and practice in the reading of Indian newspapers. In Theorising Media and Practice, B. Bräuchler and J. Postill, Eds., Berghahn, Oxford, 127--146.Google Scholar
- Pierce, J., Fan, C., Lomas, D., Marcu, G., and Paulos, E. 2010. Some considersations on the (in)effectiveness of residential energy feedback systems. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems.Google Scholar
- Pierce, J., Schiano, D., and Paulos, E. 2010. Home, habits, and energy: examining domestic interactions and energy consumption. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Pink, S. 2004. Home Truths: Gender, Domestic Objects and Everyday Life. Berg, Oxford.Google Scholar
- Pink, S. 2009. Doing Sensory Ethnography. SAGE, London.Google Scholar
- Pink, S. 2011. Drawing with our feet (and trampling the maps): Walking with video as a graphic anthropology. In Redrawing Anthropology, T. Ingold, Ed., Ashgate, Farnham.Google Scholar
- Pink, S. 2012. Situating Everyday Life: Practices and Places, Sage, London.Google Scholar
- Pink, S. and Leder Mackley, K. 2012. Video and a sense of the invisible: Approaching domestic energy consumption through the sensory home. Sociological Res. Online. 17, 1, 3, http://www.socresonline.org.uk/17/1/3.html.Google Scholar
- Räsänen, M. and Nyce, J. 2006. A new role for anthropology?: rewriting ‘context’ and ‘analysis’ in HCI research. In Proceedings of the 4th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Changing Roles (NordiCHI'06).Google Scholar
- Reckwitz, A. 2002. Towards a theory of social practices: A development in culturalist theorizing. Eur. J. Social Theory 5, 2, 243--263.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Rittel, H. and Webber, M. 1984. Planning problems are wicked problems. In Developments in Design Methodology, N. Cross, Ed., John Wiley and Sons, New York, 135--144.Google Scholar
- Rogers, Y. 2006. Moving on from Weiser's vision of calm computing: engaging ubicomp experiences. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing (UbiComp'06). Google ScholarDigital Library
- Schatzki, T. 1996. Social Practices: A Wittgensteinian Approach to Human Activity and the Social. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Schatzki, T. 2001. Introduction: Practice theory. In The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory, T. Schatzki, K. Knorr-Cetina, and E. von Savigny, Eds., Routledge, London.Google Scholar
- Sengers, P., Boehner, K., David, S., and Kaye, J. 2005. Reflective design. In Proceedings of the 4th Decennial Conference on Critical Computing: Between Sense and Sensibility (CC'05). O. W. Bertelsen, N. O. Bouvin, P. G. Krogh, and M. Kyng, Eds., ACM, New York. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sengers, P., Boehner, K., and Knouf, N. 2009. Sustainable HCI meets third wave HCI: 4 themes. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems.Google Scholar
- Shove, E. 2003. Comfort, Cleanliness and Convenience: The Social Organziation of Normality. Berg, Oxford.Google Scholar
- Shove, E., Watson, M., Hand, M., and Ingram, J. 2007. The Design of Everyday Life. Berg, Oxford.Google Scholar
- Shove, E. 2010. Beyond the ABC: climate change policy and theories of social change. Environ. Plan. A 42, 6, 1273--1285.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Strengers, Y. 2011. Negotiating everyday life: The role of energy and water consumption feedback. J. Consumer Culture. 11, 3, 319--338.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Swan, L., Taylor, A. S., and Harper, R. 2008. Making place for clutter and other ideas of home. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 15, 2, Article 9. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Tacchi, J. 1998. Radio texture: Between self and others. In Material Cultures: Why Some Things Matter, D. Miller, Ed., University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Warde, A. 2005. Consumption and theories of practice. J. Consumer Culture 5, 2, 131--53.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Weisner, M., Gold, R., and Brown, J. S. 1999. Origins of ubiquitous computing research at PARC in the late 1980s. IBM Syst. J. 38, 4, 693--696. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Wilcox, S. and Pawson, H., Eds. 2010. UK housing review 2010/2011 (Compendium: Dwellings, Stock Conditions and Households). http://www.york.ac.uk/res/ukhr/ukhr1011/compendium.htm.Google Scholar
- Wolf, T. V., Rode, J. A., Sussman, J., and Kellogg, W. A. 2006. Dispelling ‘design’ as the black art of CHI. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM Press, 521--530. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Woodruff, A., Hasbrouck, J., and Augustin, S. 2008. A bright green perspective on sustainable choices. In Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'08). Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ylirisku, S. and Buur, J. 2007. Designing with Video: Focusing the User-Centered Design Process. Springer. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ylirisku, S., Halttunen, V., Nuojua, J., and Juustila, A. 2009. Framing design in the third paradigm. In Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'09). ACM, Press, NY, 1131--1140. Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- Applying the lens of sensory ethnography to sustainable HCI
Recommendations
This Changes Sustainable HCI
CHI '18: Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsMore than a decade into Sustainable HCI (SHCI) research, the community is still struggling to converge on a shared understanding of sustainability and HCI's role in addressing it. We think this is largely a positive sign, reflective of maturity; yet, ...
A sustainable design fiction: Green practices
Special issue on practice-oriented approaches to sustainable HCIIn this article, we argue that an approach informed by practice theory coupled with design fiction provides useful insights into the role of interaction design with respect to environmental sustainability. We argue that a practice-oriented approach can ...
Everyday practice and sustainable HCI: understanding and learning from cultures of (un)sustainability
CHI EA '11: CHI '11 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing SystemsWithin the CHI community we have witnessed a broadening of concerns to include various everyday contexts such as the domestic, rural and urban, as well as diverse, underrepresented, and marginalized communities. Such everyday contexts have also emerged ...
Comments