A large-scale study of daily information needs captured in situ

Abstract

The goal of this work is to provide a fundamental understanding of the daily information needs of people through a large-scale, in-depth, quantitative investigation. To this end, we have conducted one of the most comprehensive studies of information needs to date, spanning a 3-month period and involving more than 100 users. The study employed a contextual experience sampling method, a snippet-based diary technique using SMS technology, and an online Web diary to gather in situ insights into the types of needs that occur from day to day, how those needs are addressed, and how contextual, technological, and demographic factors impact on those needs. Our results not only complement earlier studies but also provide a new understanding of the intricacies of people’s daily information needs.

References

1. Alia Amin, Sian Townsend, Jacco Ossenbruggen, and Lynda Hardman. 2009. Fancy a drink in Canary Wharf? A user study on location-based mobile search. In Proceedings of INTERACT’09. Springer-Verlag, Uppsala, Sweden, 736--749. http://oai.cwi.nl/oai/asset/14046/14046A.pdf.
2. Lisa F. Barrett and Daniel J. Barrett. 2001. An introduction to computerized experience sampling in psychology. Social Science Computer Review 19, 2 (Summer 2001), 175--185. http://www.affective-science.org/pubs/2001/01CompExperSampling.pdf.
3. Frank R. Bentley and Crysta J. Metcalf. 2008. Location and activity sharing in everyday mobile communication. In Proceedings of Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA’08). ACM, New York, NY, 2453--2462. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1358628.1358702
4. Joel Brandt, Noah Weiss, and Scott R. Klemmer. 2007. txt 4 l8r: Lowering the burden for diary studies under mobile conditions. In Proceedings of Extended Abstracts (CHI’07). ACM, New York, NY, 2303--2308. http://hci.stanford.edu/publications/2007/brandt_txt4l8r_chi2007_wip.pdf.
5. Iain Campbell. 2000. The Ostensive Model of Developing Information Needs. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
6. Li Chen and Luole Qi. 2010. A diary study of understanding contextual information needs during leisure traveling. In Proceedings of the Third Symposium on Information Interaction in Context (IIiX’10). ACM, New York, NY, 265--270. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1840784.1840823
7. Mauro Cherubini, Rodrigo de Oliveira, Anna Hiltunen, and Nuria Oliver. 2011. Barriers and bridges in the adoption of today’s mobile phone contextual services. In Proceedings of Mobile Human-Computer Interaction Conference (MobileHCI’11). ACM Press, New York, NY.
8. Mauro Cherubini and Nuria Oliver. 2009. A refined experience sampling method to capture mobile user experience. In Proceedings of the International Workshop of Mobile User Experience Research (CHI’09), Yelena Nakhimovsky, Dean Eckles, and Jens Riegelsberger (Eds.). Boston, MA. https://sites.google.com/site/chi09mobileworkshop/papers-upload/06_ExperienceSampling.pdf?attredirects=0
9. Alton Y. K. Chua, Radhika Shenoy Balkunje, and Dion Hoe-Lian Goh. 2011. Fulfilling mobile information needs: A study on the use of mobile phones. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Ubiquitous Information Management and Communication (ICUIMC’11). ACM, New York, NY, Article 92, 7 pages. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1968613.1968721
10. Karen Church and Barry Smyth. 2009. Understanding the intent behind mobile information needs. In Proceedings of IUI’09. ACM, 247--256.
11. Martin Colbert. 2007. Problems rendezvousing: A diary study. In Handbook of Mobile Human-Computer Interaction. Idea Group Publishing, London, UK, 1--23.
12. Sunny Consolvo and Miriam Walker. 2003. Using the experience sampling method to evaluate ubicomp applications. IEEE Pervasive Computing 2, 2 (April 2003), 24--31. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/MPRV.2003.1203750
13. David Dearman, Melanie Kellar, and Khai N. Truong. 2008. An examination of daily information needs and sharing opportunities. In Proceedings of the 2008 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW’08). ACM, New York, NY, 679--688. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1460563.1460668
14. Nathan Eagle and Alex S. Pentland. 2006. Reality mining: Sensing complex social systems. Personal Ubiquitous Computing 10, 4 (March 2006), 255--268.
15. Joel E. Fischer. 2009. Experience-sampling tools: A critical review. In Proceedings of Mobile Living Labs 09: Methods and Tools for Evaluation in the Wild (MobileHCI’09). ACM.
16. Jon Froehlich, Mike Y. Chen, Sunny Consolvo, Beverly Harrison, and James A. Landay. 2007. MyExperience: A system for in situ tracing and capturing of user feedback on mobile phones. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Mobile Systems, Applications and Services (MobiSys’07). ACM, New York, NY, 57--70. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1247660.1247670
17. Rebecca E. Grinter and Margery A. Eldridge. 2003. Wan2tlk?: Everyday text messaging. In Proceedings of ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’03). Fort Lauderdale, FL, 441--448. http://www.cc.gatech.edu/∼beki/c24.pdf
18. Tomi Heimonen. 2009. Information needs and practices of active mobile Internet users. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Mobile Technology, Application and Systems (Mobility’09). ACM, New York, NY, Article 50, 8 pages. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1710035.1710085
19. Annika M. Hinze, Carole Chang, and David M. Nichols. 2010. Contextual queries express mobile information needs. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Human Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services (MobileHCI’10). ACM, New York, NY, 327--336. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1851600.1851658
20. Stefan E. Hormuth. 1986. The sampling of experiences in situ. Journal of Personality 54, 1, 262--293. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1986.tb00395.x
21. Giovanni Iachello, Khai N. Truong, Gregory D. Abowd, Gillian R. Hayes, and Molly Stevens. 2006. Prototyping and sampling experience to evaluate ubiquitous computing privacy in the real world. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’06). 1009. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1124772.1124923
22. Stephen S. Intille, John Rondoni, Charles Kukla, Isabel Ancona, and Ling Bao. 2003. A context-aware experience sampling tool. In Proceedings of Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA’03). ACM, New York, NY, 972--973. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/765891.766101
23. Jesper Kjeldskov and Connor Graham. 2003. A review of mobile HCI research methods. In Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services. Springer, 317--335.
24. Daijiro Komaki, Takahiro Hara, and Shojiro Nishio. 2012. How does mobile context affect people’s Web search behavior?: A diary study of mobile information needs and search behaviors. In Proceedings of the IEEE 26th International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications (AINA). IEEE, 245--252.
25. Meredith Ringel Morris, Jaime Teevan, and Katrina Panovich. 2010. What do people ask their social networks, and why?: A survey study of status message q&a behavior. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’’10). ACM, 1739--1748. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1753326.1753587
26. Michael D. Myers. 1997. Qualitative research in information systems. Management Information Systems Quarterly 21, 241--242.
27. Leysia Palen and Marilyn Salzman. 2002. Voice-mail diary studies for naturalistic data capture under mobile conditions. In Proceedings of the 2002 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW’02). ACM, New York, NY, 87--95. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/587078.587092
28. Christie N. Scollon, Chu Kim-Prieto, and Ed Diener. 2003. Experience sampling: Promises and pitfalls, strengths and weaknesses. Journal of Happiness Studies 4, 1, 5--34.
29. Timothy Sohn, Kevin A. Li, William G. Griswold, and James D. Hollan. 2008. A diary study of mobile information needs. In Proceedings of the 26th Annual SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’08). ACM, New York, NY, 433--442. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1357054.1357125
30. Sakari Tamminen, Antti Oulasvirta, Kalle Toiskallio, and Anu Kankainen. 2004. Understanding mobile contexts. Personal Ubiquitous Computing 8, 135--143. https://www.hiit.fi/files/admin/sab/SAB04/material/UERG/22_UMC_Puc2004_Oulasvirta.pdf.
31. Robert S. Taylor. 1968. Question-negotiation and information seeking in libraries. College and Research Libraries 29, 178--194.
32. Jaime Teevan, Amy Karlson, Shahriyar, A. J. Bernheim Brush, and John Krumm. 2011. Understanding the importance of location, time, and people in mobile local search behavior. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Human Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services (MobileHCI’11). ACM, New York, NY, 77--80.
33. Martijn Vastenburg, Natalia Herrera, Juan Augusto, Juan Corchado, Paulo Novais, and Cesar Analide. 2010. Adaptive Experience Sampling: Addressing the Dynamic Nature of In-Situ User Studies. Vol. 72. Springer, Berlin, 197--200. DOI: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?rep=rep1&type=pdf&doi=10.1.1.208.9338

Index Terms

• Information systems