skip to main content
research-article
Open Access

Exploring the Efficacy of Sparse, General-Purpose Sensor Constellations for Wide-Area Activity Sensing

Published:21 June 2019Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Future smart homes, offices, stores and many other environments will increasingly be monitored by distributed sensors, supporting rich, context-sensitive applications. There are two opposing instrumentation approaches. On one end is full sensor saturation, where every object of interest is tagged with a sensor. On the other end, we can imagine a hypothetical, omniscient sensor capable of detecting events throughout an entire building from one location. Neither approach is currently practical, and thus we explore the middle ground between these two extremes: a sparse constellation of sensors working together to provide the benefits of full saturation, but without the social, aesthetic, maintenance and financial drawbacks. More specifically, we target a density of one sensor per room (and less), which means the average home could achieve full coverage with perhaps ten sensors. We quantify and characterize the performance of sparse sensor constellations through deployments across three environments and 67 unique activities. Our results illuminate accuracy implications across key spatial configurations important for enabling more practical, wide-area activity sensing.

References

  1. R.E Abbott and S.C. Hadden. 1990. Product Specification for a Nonintrusive Appliance Load Monitoring System. EPRI Report #NI-101, 1990.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Artem Babenko and Victor Lempitsky. 2015. Aggregating Deep Convolutional Features for Image Retrieval. In IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), Dec. 2015, pp. 1269--1277. arXiv: 1510.07493. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Rajesh Krishna Balan, Archan Misra, and Youngki Lee. 2014. LiveLabs: building an in-situ real-time mobile experimentation testbed. In Proceedings of the 15th Workshop on Mobile Computing Systems and Applications (HotMobile '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 14, 6 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Alex Beltran, Varick L. Erickson, and Alberto E. Cerpa. 2013. ThermoSense: Occupancy Thermal Based Sensing for HVAC Control. In Proceedings of the 5th ACM Workshop on Embedded Systems For Energy-Efficient Buildings (BuildSys'13). ACM, New York, NY, USA. Article 11, 8 pages.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Jeffrey P. Bigham, Chandrika Jayant, HaSmoMwenjie Ji, Greg Little, Andrew MillerCoffe Maker Micro, Robert C. Miller, Robin Miller, Aubrey Tatarowicz, Brandyn White, Samual White, and Tom Yeh. 2010. VizWiz: nearly real-time answers to visual questions. In Proceedings of the 23nd annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology (UIST '10). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 333--342. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Bosch. Cross Domain Development Kit. Last accessed: September 16, 2018. https://xdk.bosch-connectivity.comGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Michael Boyle, Christopher Edwards, and Saul Greenberg. 2000. The effects of filtered video on awareness and privacy. In Proceedings of the 2000 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work (CSCW '00). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1--10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Leo Bremman. 2001. Random Forests. 2001. In the Journal of Machine Learning. Volume 45-1. 5--32. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Gabe Cohn, Sidhant Gupta, Jon Froehlich, Eric Larson, and Shwetak N. Patel. 2010. GasSense: Appliance-Level, Single-Point Sensing of Gas Activity in the Home. In Pervasive Computing: 8th International Conference (Pervasive 2010), Helsinki, Finland, May 17-20, 2010. Springer. 265--282. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Diane J. Cook, Narayanan C. Krishnan, and Parisa Rashidi. 2013. Activity Discovery and Activity Recognition: A New Partnership. IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, Volume: 43, Issue: 3, June 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. David Culler, Jason Hill, Mike Horton, Kris Pister, Robert Szewczyk, and Alec Wood. 2002. Mica: The commercialization of microsensor motes. In Sensor Technology and Design.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Samuel DeBruin, Bradford Campbell, and Prabal Dutta. 2013. Monjolo: an energy-harvesting energy meter architecture. In Proceedings of the 11th ACM Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems (SenSys '13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 18, 14 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. James Fogarty, Carolyn Au, and Scott E. Hudson. 2006. Sensing from the basement: a feasibility study of unobtrusive and low-cost home activity recognition. In Proceedings of the 19th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology (UIST '06). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 91--100. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Jon E. Froehlich, Eric Larson, Tim Campbell, Conor Haggerty, James Fogarty, and Shwetak N. Patel. 2009. HydroSense: infrastructure-mediated single-point sensing of whole-home water activity. In Proceedings of the 11th international conference on Ubiquitous computing (UbiComp '09). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 235--244. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Anhong Guo, Xiang 'Anthony' Chen, Haoran Qi, Samuel White, Suman Ghosh, Chieko Asakawa, and Jeffrey P. Bigham. 2016. VizLens: A Robust and Interactive Screen Reader for Interfaces in the Real World. In Proceedings of the 29th Annual Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 651--664. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Sidhant Gupta, Matthew S. Reynolds, and Shwetak N. Patel. 2010. ElectriSense: single-point sensing using EMI for electrical event detection and classification in the home. In Proceedings of the 12th ACM international conference on Ubiquitous computing (UbiComp '10). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 139--148. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Sidhant Gupta, Ke-Yu Chen, Matthew S. Reynolds, and Shwetak N. Patel. 2011. LightWave: using compact fluorescent lights as sensors. In Proceedings of the 13th international conference on Ubiquitous computing (UbiComp '11). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 65--74. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. George Hart. Advances in Nonintrusive Appliance Load Monitoring. In Proc. of EPRI Inf. and Automation Conf. '91.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. George Hart. Nonintrusive Appliance Load Monitoring. 1992. In Proceedings of the IEEE EPRI Information and Automation Technology Conference, Washington, DC, June 26-28, 1992. 80(12), 1870--1891.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Scott E. Hudson and Ian Smith. 1996. Techniques for addressing fundamental privacy and disruption tradeoffs in awareness support systems. In Proceedings of the 1996 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work (CSCW '96). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 248--257. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. International Code Council, Inc. (2011). 2012 International Building Code (IBC). Country Club Hills, IL.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Nicholas Lane, Emiliano Miluzzo, Hong Lu, Daniel Peebles, Tanzeem Choudhury, and Andrew T. Campbell. A survey of mobile phone sensing. In IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 48, no. 9, pp. 140--150, Sept. 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Gierad Laput, Walter S. Lasecki, Jason Wiese, Robert Xiao, Jeffrey P. Bigham, and Chris Harrison. 2015. Zensors: Adaptive, Rapidly Deployable, Human-Intelligent Sensor Feeds. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1935--1944.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Gierad Laput, Yang Zhang, and Chris Harrison. 2017. Synthetic Sensors: Towards General-Purpose Sensing. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 3986--3999.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Walter S. Lasecki, Young Chol Song, Henry Kautz, and Jeffrey P. Bigham. 2013. Real-time crowd labeling for deployable activity recognition. In Proceedings of the 2013 conference on Computer supported cooperative work (CSCW '13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1203--1212. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Beth Logan, Jennifer Healey, Matthai Philipose, Emmanuel Munguia Tapia, and Stephen Intille. 2007. A long-term evaluation of sensing modalities for activity recognition. In Proceedings of the 9th international conference on Ubiquitous computing (UbiComp '07). Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 483--500. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. MeSchup - Build connected products. Last accessed: September 17, 2018. http://www.meschup.comGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Ganesh R. Naik and Wenwu Wang. 2014. Blind Source Separation: Advances in Theory, Algorithms and Applications. In Signals and Communication Technology, Springer 2014. ISBN 9783642550164. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Notion - Wireless Home Monitoring Made Easy. Last accessed: September 15, 2018. https://getnotion.comGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Shijia Pan, Mostafa Mirshekari, Pei Zhang, Hae Young Noh, "Occupant traffic estimation through structural vibration sensing," In Proc. SPIE 9803, Sensors and Smart Structures Technologies for Civil, Mechanical, and Aerospace Systems 2016, 980306 (20 April, 2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Particle Inc, Spark Server. Last accessed: September 15, 2018. https://github.com/spark/spark-serverGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Shwetak N. Patel, Thomas Robertson, Julie A. Kientz, Matthew S. Reynolds, and Gregory D. Abowd. 2007. At the flick of a switch: detecting and classifying unique electrical events on the residential power line. In Proceedings of the 9th international conference on Ubiquitous computing (UbiComp '07). Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 271--288. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Shwetak N. Patel, Matthew S. Reynolds, and Gregory D. Abowd. 2009. Detecting Human Movement by Differential Air Pressure Sensing in HVAC System Ductwork: An Exploration in Infrastructure Mediated Sensing. In Proceedings of Pervasive '08. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1--18. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Fabian Pedregosa et. al. 2011. Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python. In the Journal of Machine Learning Research. Vol. 12. 2825--2830, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Kristofer SJ Pister, Joseph M. Kahn, and Bernhard E. Boser. 1999. Smart dust: Wireless networks of millimeter-scale sensor nodes. Highlight Article, Electronics Research Laboratory Research Summary, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Manuel Ruiz-Sandoval, Tomonori Nagayama, and B. F. Spencer Jr. 2006. Sensor development using Berkeley Mote platform. In Journal of Earthquake Engineering 10, no. 2, 2006. 289--309.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. Sen.se Mother. The Universal Monitoring Solution. Last accessed: September 15, 2018. https://sen.se/mother/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Nagender Kumar Suryadevara and Subhas Chandra Mukhopadhyay. Wireless Sensor Network Based Home Monitoring System for Wellness Determination of Elderly. In IEEE Sensors Journal, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 1965--1972, June 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Emmanuel Munguia Tapia, Stephen S. Intille, and Kent Larson. 2004. Activity Recognition in the Home Using Simple and Ubiquitous Sensors. In Pervasive Computing: Second International Conference (PERVASIVE 2004), Linz/Vienna, Austria, April 21-23, 2004. Springer. 158--175.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Texas Instruments. SimpleLink SensorTag. Last accessed: September 14, 2018. http://www.ti.com/ww/en/wire-less_connectivity/sensortag2015/gettingStarted.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Geoffrey Werner-Allen, Konrad Lorincz, Matt Welsh, Omar Marcillo, Jeff Johnson, Mario Ruiz, and Jonathan Lees. 2006. Deploying a Wireless Sensor Network on an Active Volcano. In IEEE Internet Computing 10, 2 (March 2006). 18--25. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Mengyu Zhou, Kaixin Sui, Minghua Ma, Youjian Zhao, Dan Pei, and Thomas Moscibroda. 2016. MobiCamp: a Campus-wide Testbed for Studying Mobile Physical Activities. In Proceedings of the 3rd International on Workshop on Physical Analytics (WPA '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1--6. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Exploring the Efficacy of Sparse, General-Purpose Sensor Constellations for Wide-Area Activity Sensing

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    Full Access

    • Published in

      cover image Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies
      Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies  Volume 3, Issue 2
      June 2019
      802 pages
      EISSN:2474-9567
      DOI:10.1145/3341982
      Issue’s Table of Contents

      Copyright © 2019 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 21 June 2019
      • Accepted: 1 April 2019
      • Revised: 1 February 2019
      • Received: 1 November 2018
      Published in imwut Volume 3, Issue 2

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader