skip to main content
research-article
Public Access

Negotiating Relation Work with Telehealth Home Care Companionship Technologies that Support Aging in Place

Published:01 November 2018Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

In response to a perceived caregiver shortage and need to support aging in place, telehealth home care systems are being developed to provide remote care and monitoring to older people. Though research has examined the experiences of teleoperators delivering care through these systems, we know less about the experiences of older adults receiving this care. We report findings from a three-month study of a tablet-based telehealth home care system that provides support for aging in place. We find that there is a mismatch between the designer's conception of how care should be delivered and the ways that participants were interested in using the system. This mismatch exists in four areas: participants' interest in getting to know the human teleoperators and rejecting the virtual avatar, interrogating the interface to figure out the inner workings of the platform, pushing for a more symmetrical relationship, and negotiating the relation work that they were willing to perform in the "sacred space" of their homes. We draw on the concept of heteromation to understand the political dimensions of telehealth aging in place technologies. We also provide implications and future directions for technologies requiring relation work as well as the design of avatar-based remote companionship.

References

  1. Bratteteig, T. and Eide, I. 2017. Becoming a Good Homecare Practitioner: Integrating Many Kinds of Work. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW). 26, 4--6 (Dec. 2017), 563--596. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Bratteteig, T. and Wagner, I. 2013. Moving Healthcare to the Home: The Work to Make Homecare Work. ECSCW 2013: Proceedings of the 13th European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 21--25 September 2013, Paphos, Cyprus. Springer, London. 143--162.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Breazeal, C. and Foerst, A. 1999. Schmoozing with robots: Exploring the boundary of the original wireless network. Proceedings of the 1999 Conference on Cognitive Technology (CT99 (1999), 375--390.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Caldeira, C., Bietz, M., Vidauri, M. and Chen, Y. 2017. Senior Care for Aging in Place: Balancing Assistance and Independence. Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (New York, NY, USA, 2017), 1605--1617. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Ceci, C., Björnsdóttir, K. and Purkis, M.E. 2013. Perspectives on Care at Home for Older People. Routledge.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Chang, W.L., Sabanovic, S. and Huber, L. 2013. Use of seal-like robot PARO in sensory group therapy for older adults with dementia. 2013 8th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) (Mar. 2013), 101--102. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Charmaz, K. 2006. Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis. Sage Publications.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Companion Care Salaries in the United States | Indeed.com: https://www.indeed.com/cmp/Companion-Care/salaries. Accessed: 2018-09-02.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Consolvo, S., Roessler, P. and Shelton, B.E. 2004. The CareNet Display: Lessons Learned from an In Home Evaluation of an Ambient Display. UbiComp 2004: Ubiquitous Computing (Sep. 2004), 1--17.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Czaja, S.J. and Sharit, J. 1998. Age differences in attitudes toward computers. The Journals of Gerontology. Series B, Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences. 53, 5 (Sep. 1998), P329--340.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Dishman, E. 2004. Inventing wellness systems for aging in place. Computer. 37, 5 (May 2004), 34--41. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Dombrowski, L., Harmon, E. and Fox, S. 2016. Social Justice-Oriented Interaction Design: Outlining Key Design Strategies and Commitments. Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (New York, NY, USA, 2016), 656--671. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Edwards, W.K. and Grinter, R.E. 2001. At Home with Ubiquitous Computing: Seven Challenges. Ubicomp 2001: Ubiquitous Computing. G.D. Abowd, B. Brumitt, and S. Shafer, eds. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. 256--272. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Ekbia, H. and Nardi, B. 2014. Heteromation and its (dis)contents: The invisible division of labor between humans and machines. First Monday. 19, 6 (May 2014).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Ekbia, H. and Nardi, B. 2015. The Political Economy of Computing: The Elephant in the HCI Room. interactions. 22, 6 (Oct. 2015), 46--49. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Ekbia, H.R., Nardi, B. and Sabanovic, S. 2015. On the Margins of the Machine: Heteromation and Robotics. iConference (2015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Ekbia, H.R. and Nardi, B.A. 2017. Heteromation, and Other Stories of Computing and Capitalism. The MIT Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. English, T. and Carstensen, L.L. 2014. Selective narrowing of social networks across adulthood is associated with improved emotional experience in daily life. International Journal of Behavioral Development. 38, 2 (Mar. 2014), 195--202.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Eustis, N.N., Kane, R.A. and Fischer, L.R. 1993. Home Care Quality and the Home Care Worker: Beyond Quality Assurance as Usual. The Gerontologist. 33, 1 (Feb. 1993), 64--73.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Farshchian, B.A., Vilarinho, T. and Mikalsen, M. 2017. From Episodes to Continuity of Care: a Study of a Call Center for Supporting Independent Living. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW). 26, 3 (Jun. 2017), 309--343. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Fitzpatrick, G. and Ellingsen, G. 2013. A Review of 25 Years of CSCW Research in Healthcare: Contributions, Challenges and Future Agendas. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW). 22, 4--6 (Aug. 2013), 609--665. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Foong, P.S., Zhao, S., Carlson, K. and Liu, Z. 2017. VITA: Towards Supporting Volunteer Interactions with Long-Term Care Residents with Dementia. Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2017), 6195--6207. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Glasner, J. 2016. Why Venture Capitalists Are Caring More About Home Care. Forbes.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Greenhalgh, T., Wherton, J., Sugarhood, P., Hinder, S., Procter, R. and Stones, R. 2013. What matters to older people with assisted living needs? A phenomenological analysis of the use and non-use of telehealth and telecare. Social Science & Medicine. 93, (Sep. 2013), 86--94.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Institute of Medicine of the National Academies 2008. Retooling for an Aging America: Building the Health Care Workforce. Institute of Medicine.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Irani, L.C. and Silberman, M.S. 2013. Turkopticon: Interrupting Worker Invisibility in Amazon Mechanical Turk. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (New York, NY, USA, 2013), 611--620. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Koch, S. 2006. Home telehealth-Current state and future trends. International Journal of Medical Informatics. 75, 8 (Aug. 2006), 565--576.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Lazar, A., Thompson, H.J., Piper, A.M. and Demiris, G. 2016. Rethinking the Design of Robotic Pets for Older Adults. Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (New York, NY, USA, 2016), 1034--1046. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Lee, M.L. and Dey, A.K. 2011. Reflecting on Pills and Phone Use: Supporting Awareness of Functional Abilities for Older Adults. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (New York, NY, USA, 2011), 2095--2104. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Light, A., Leong, T.W. and Robertson, T. 2015. Ageing Well with CSCW. ECSCW 2015: Proceedings of the 14th European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 19--23 September 2015, Oslo, Norway. Springer, Cham. 295--304.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Lindley, S. and Wallace, J. 2015. Placing in Age: Transitioning to a New Home in Later Life. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 22, 4 (Jun. 2015), 20:1--20:39. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Lindley, S.E., Harper, R. and Sellen, A. 2008. Designing for Elders: Exploring the Complexity of Relationships in Later Life. Proceedings of the 22Nd British HCI Group Annual Conference on People and Computers: Culture, Creativity, Interaction - Volume 1 (Swinton, UK, UK, 2008), 77--86. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Lorenzen-Huber, L., Boutain, M., Camp, L.J., Shankar, K. and Connelly, K.H. 2011. Privacy, Technology, and Aging: A Proposed Framework. Ageing International. 36, 2 (Jun. 2011), 232--252.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. Melenhorst, A.-S., Rogers, W.A. and Caylor, E.C. 2001. The Use of Communication Technologies by Older Adults: Exploring the Benefits from the User's Perspective. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting. 45, 3 (Oct. 2001), 221--225.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Mort, M., Roberts, C. and Callén, B. 2013. Ageing with telecare: care or coercion in austerity? Sociology of Health & Illness. 35, 6 (Jul. 2013), 799--812.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. Muller, M.J. 1999. Invisible Work of Telephone Operators: An Ethnocritical Analysis. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW). 8, 1--2 (Mar. 1999), 31--61. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Muller, M.J., Carr, R., Ashworth, C., Diekmann, B., Wharton, C., Eickstaedt, C. and Clonts, J. 1995. Telephone Operators As Knowledge Workers: Consultants Who Meet Customer Needs. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (New York, NY, USA, 1995), 130--137. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Mynatt, E.D., Essa, I. and Rogers, W. 2000. Increasing the Opportunities for Aging in Place. Proceedings on the 2000 Conference on Universal Usability (New York, NY, USA, 2000), 65--71. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Mynatt, E.D., Rowan, J., Craighill, S. and Jacobs, A. 2001. Digital Family Portraits: Supporting Peace of Mind for Extended Family Members. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (New York, NY, USA, 2001), 333--340. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Nasreddine, Z.S., Phillips, N.A., Bédirian, V., Charbonneau, S., Whitehead, V., Collin, I., Cummings, J.L. and Chertkow, H. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: A Brief Screening Tool For Mild Cognitive Impairment. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 53, 4, 695--699.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. National Research Council of the National Academies 2011. Health Care Comes Home: The Human Factors. National Academies Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Nishio, S., Ishiguro, H. and Hagita, N. 2007. Can a Teleoperated Android Represent Personal Presence? A Case Study with Children. Psychologia. 50, (2007), 330--342.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Odetti, L., Anerdi, G., Barbieri, M.P., Mazzei, D., Rizza, E., Dario, P., Rodriguez, G. and Micera, S. 2007. Preliminary experiments on the acceptability of animaloid companion robots by older people with early dementia. 2007 29th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (Aug. 2007), 1816--1819.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Orlov, L.M. Technology for Aging in Place: 2018 Market Overview: 2018. https://www.ageinplacetech.com/files/aip/Market Overview 2018 Final 03--14--2018.pdf#. Accessed: 2018-04--16.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. Parker, A.G. 2013. Designing for Health Activism. interactions. 20, 2 (Mar. 2013), 22--25. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. Procter, R., Greenhalgh, T., Wherton, J., Sugarhood, P., Rouncefield, M. and Hinder, S. 2014. The Day-to-Day Co-Production of Ageing in Place. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW). 23, 3 (Jun. 2014), 245--267. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. Procter, R., Wherton, J. and Greenhalgh, T. 2018. Hidden Work and the Challenges of Scalability and Sustainability in Ambulatory Assisted Living. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 25, 2 (Apr. 2018), 11:1--11:26. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. Procter, R., Wherton, J., Greenhalgh, T., Sugarhood, P., Rouncefield, M. and Hinder, S. 2016. Telecare Call Centre Work and Ageing in Place. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW). 25, 1 (Feb. 2016), 79--105. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  49. Riche, Y. and Mackay, W. 2010. PeerCare: Supporting Awareness of Rhythms and Routines for Better Aging in Place. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW). 19, 1 (Feb. 2010), 73--104. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  50. Roberts, C. and Mort, M. 2009. Reshaping what counts as care: Older people, work and new technologies. ALTER - European Journal of Disability Research / Revue Européenne de Recherche sur le Handicap. 3, 2 (Apr. 2009), 138--158.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. Roberts, C., Mort, M. and Milligan, C. 2012. Calling for Care: 'Disembodied' Work, Teleoperators and Older People Living at Home. Sociology. 46, 3 (Jun. 2012), 490--506.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  52. Sherbourne, C.D. and Stewart, A.L. 1991. The MOS social support survey. Social Science & Medicine. 32, 6 (Jan. 1991), 705--714.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  53. Stacey, C.L. Finding dignity in dirty work: the constraints and rewards of low-wage home care labour. Sociology of Health & Illness. 27, 6, 831--854.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  54. Stacey, C.L. 2011. The Caring Self: The Work Experiences of Home Care Aides. Cornell University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. Steele, R., Lo, A., Secombe, C. and Wong, Y.K. 2009. Elderly persons' perception and acceptance of using wireless sensor networks to assist healthcare. International Journal of Medical Informatics. 78, 12 (Dec. 2009), 788--801.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  56. Vines, J., Lindsay, S., Pritchard, G.W., Lie, M., Greathead, D., Olivier, P. and Brittain, K. 2013. Making Family Care Work: Dependence, Privacy and Remote Home Monitoring Telecare Systems. Proceedings of the 2013 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing (New York, NY, USA, 2013), 607--616. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  57. Vines, J., Pritchard, G., Wright, P., Olivier, P. and Brittain, K. 2015. An Age-Old Problem: Examining the Discourses of Ageing in HCI and Strategies for Future Research. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 22, 1 (Feb. 2015), 2:1--2:27. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  58. Waycott, J., Davis, H., Vetere, F., Morgans, A., Gruner, A., Ozanne, E. and Kulik, L. 2014. Captioned Photographs in Psychosocial Aged Care: Relationship Building and Boundary Work. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (New York, NY, USA, 2014), 4167--4176. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  59. Waycott, J., Vetere, F., Pedell, S., Morgans, A., Ozanne, E. and Kulik, L. 2016. Not For Me: Older Adults Choosing Not to Participate in a Social Isolation Intervention. Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (New York, NY, USA, 2016), 745--757. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  60. Welsh, D., Morrissey, K., Foley, S., McNaney, R., Salis, C., McCarthy, J. and Vines, J. 2018. Ticket to Talk: Supporting Conversation Between Young People and People with Dementia Through Digital Media. Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2018), 375:1--375:14. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Negotiating Relation Work with Telehealth Home Care Companionship Technologies that Support Aging in Place

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in

      Full Access

      • Published in

        cover image Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
        Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction  Volume 2, Issue CSCW
        November 2018
        4104 pages
        EISSN:2573-0142
        DOI:10.1145/3290265
        Issue’s Table of Contents

        Copyright © 2018 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 1 November 2018
        Published in pacmhci Volume 2, Issue CSCW

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader