skip to main content
research-article

Digital Lollipop: Studying Electrical Stimulation on the Human Tongue to Simulate Taste Sensations

Published:25 October 2016Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Among the five primary senses, the sense of taste is the least explored as a form of digital media applied in Human--Computer Interface. This article presents an experimental instrument, the Digital Lollipop, for digitally simulating the sensation of taste (gustation) by utilizing electrical stimulation on the human tongue. The system is capable of manipulating the properties of electric currents (magnitude, frequency, and polarity) to formulate different stimuli. To evaluate the effectiveness of this method, the system was experimentally tested in two studies. The first experiment was conducted using separate regions of the human tongue to record occurrences of basic taste sensations and their respective intensity levels. The results indicate occurrences of sour, salty, bitter, and sweet sensations from different regions of the tongue. One of the major discoveries of this experiment was that the sweet taste emerges via an inverse-current mechanism, which deserves further research in the future. The second study was conducted to compare natural and artificial (virtual) sour taste sensations and examine the possibility of effectively controlling the artificial sour taste at three intensity levels (mild, medium, and strong). The proposed method is attractive since it does not require any chemical solutions and facilitates further research opportunities in several directions including human--computer interaction, virtual reality, food and beverage, as well as medicine.

References

  1. L. M. Bartoshuk. 2000. Comparing sensory experiences across individuals: Recent psychophysical advances illuminate genetic variation in taste perception. Chemical Senses 25, 4, 447--460. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. R. Blaycock. 1996. Excitotoxins--The taste that kills. Obtenido el 14, 8.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. R. Brown and D. McNeill. 1966. The “tip of the tongue” phenomenon. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 5, 4, 325--337. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. C. F. Dalziel and W. R. Lee. 1968. Reevaluation of lethal electric currents. IEEE Transactions on Industry and General Applications, IGA-4, 5, 467--476.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. D. Derbyshire. March 2009. Revealed: The headset that will mimic all five senses and make the virtual world as convincing as real life. Retrieved September 23, 2016 from http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-1159206/The-headset-mimic-senses-make-virtual-world-convincing-real-life.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. R. J. Dobrin. 1984. Liquid cleaner-disinfectant composition for use in wiping down dental operatories. (Aug. 7 1984). US Patent 4,464,293.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. A. Drewnowski. 1997. Taste preferences and food intake. Annual Review of Nutrition 17, 1, 237--253. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. S. Firestein. 2001. How the olfactory system makes sense of scents. Nature 413, 6852, 211--218. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. R. Haag and A. Cuschieri. 1993. Recent advances in high-frequency electrosurgery: Development of automated systems. Journal of the Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh 38, 6, 354--364.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. V. Hayward, O. R. Astley, M. Cruz-Hernandez, D. Grant, and G. Robles-De-La-Torre. 2004. Haptic interfaces and devices. Sensor Review 24, 1, 16--29. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. I. Lackovic and Z. Stare. 2007. Low-frequency dielectric properties of the oral mucosa. In 13th International Conference on Electrical Bioimpedance and the 8th Conference on Electrical Impedance Tomography. Springer, Berlin, 154--157. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. H. T. Lawless, D. A. Stevens, K. W. Chapman, and A. Kurtz. 2005. Metallic taste from electrical and chemical stimulation. Chemical Senses 30, 3, 185.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. C. A. Loucks and R. L. Doty. 2004. Effects of stimulation duration on electrogustometric thresholds. Physiology 8 Behavior 81, 1, 1--4.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Dan Maynes-Aminzade. 2005. Edible bits: Seamless interfaces between people, data and food. In Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’05)—Extended Abstracts. Citeseer, ACM, 2207--2210.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. H. Nakamura and H. Miyashita. 2011. Augmented gustation using electricity. In Proceedings of the 2nd Augmented Human International Conference. ACM, 34. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. T. Narumi, M. Sato, T. Tanikawa, and M. Hirose. 2010. Evaluating cross-sensory perception of superimposing virtual color onto real drink: Toward realization of pseudo-gustatory displays. In Proceedings of the 1st Augmented Human International Conference. ACM, 18. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. K. H. Plattig and J. Innitzer. 1976. Taste qualities elicited by electric stimulation of single human tongue papillae. Pflügers Archiv European Journal of Physiology 361, 2, 115--120. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. A. K. Pleasonton. 1970. Sensitivity of the tongue to electrical stimulation. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 13, 3, 635.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. N. Ranasinghe, A. D. Cheok, O. N. N. Fernando, H. Nii, and G. Ponnampalam. 2011b. Electronic taste stimulation. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing. ACM, 561--562. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Nimesha Ranasinghe, Adrian David Cheok, Owen Noel Newton Fernando, Hideaki Nii, and Ponnampalam Gopalakrishnakone. 2011a. Digital taste: Electronic stimulation of taste sensations. In Ambient Intelligence. Springer, Berlin, 345--349. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. N. Ranasinghe, K. Karunanayaka, A. D. Cheok, O. N. N. Fernando, H. Nii, and P. Gopalakrishnakone. 2011c. Digital taste and smell communication. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Body Area Networks. ICST (Institute for Computer Sciences, Social-Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering), 78--84. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. N. Ranasinghe, R. Nakatsu, H. Nii, and P. Gopalakrishnakone. 2012. Tongue mounted interface for digitally actuating the sense of taste. In 16th International Symposium on Wearable Computers (ISWC’12). IEEE, USA, 80--87. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. B. D. Ratner. 2009. Clinical Engineering. In Biomedical Engineering Desk Reference, B. D. Ratner, A. S. Hoffman, F. J. Schoen, et al. (eds). Academic Press, Cambridge, MA, 377.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. L. Robertsson, B. Iliev, R. Palm, and P. Wide. 2007. Perception modeling for human-like artificial sensor systems. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 65, 5, 446--459. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. J. A. Stillman, R. P. Morton, and D. Goldsmith. 2000. Automated electrogustometry: A new paradigm for the estimation of taste detection thresholds. Clinical Otolaryngology 8 Allied Sciences 25, 2, 120--125.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. J. A. Stillman, R. P. Morton, K. D. Hay, Z. Ahmad, and D. Goldsmith. 2003. Electrogustometry: Strengths, weaknesses, and clinical evidence of stimulus boundaries. Clinical Otolaryngology 8 Allied Sciences 28, 5, 406--410.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. A. Volta. 1800. On the electricity excited by the mere contact of conducting substances of different kinds. In Abstracts of the Papers Printed in the Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Vol. 1. JSTOR, London, 27--29. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Digital Lollipop: Studying Electrical Stimulation on the Human Tongue to Simulate Taste Sensations

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in

        Full Access

        • Published in

          cover image ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications, and Applications
          ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications, and Applications  Volume 13, Issue 1
          February 2017
          278 pages
          ISSN:1551-6857
          EISSN:1551-6865
          DOI:10.1145/3012406
          Issue’s Table of Contents

          Copyright © 2016 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 25 October 2016
          • Accepted: 1 August 2016
          • Revised: 1 July 2016
          • Received: 1 November 2015
          Published in tomm Volume 13, Issue 1

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article
          • Research
          • Refereed

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader