skip to main content
research-article

Values throughout the Game Space

Published:31 October 2022Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Pro-social themes like empathy and wellbeing are gaining popularity within games to contrast the medium's stigmatised explorations of themes like violence, often to catalyse reflection or even change players' beliefs surrounding complex scenarios. These abstract themes can be classified as a game's "values": elements that are "useful or important" to game designers and their audience.

Exploration of values in games was spearheaded by Values at Play, which described how values manifest in games and advocated for their explicit consideration within games and their discourse. Frameworks such as empathy, ethical, and anti-oppressive design all discuss similar values, but present ontological diversity that makes it difficult to collate games and frameworks under the values-conscious design umbrella. Such frameworks also often focus on design approaches and small-scale prototypes but pay less attention to how values influence aspects like publication and play. As such, the present research examines values within each stage of a game's lifecycle: design, development, publication, interaction, and reportage. Doing so provides an understanding of values in multiple game contexts. This provides new perspectives that form the basis of a taxonomy for values in games, which is then presented alongside practical questions for values-conscious designers, publishers, and players to guide its use.

References

  1. Saiqa Aleem, Luiz Fernando Capretz, and Faheem Ahmed. 2016. Game development software engineering process life cycle: a systematic review. Journal of Software Engineering Research and Development 4, 1 (November 2016), 1--8. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1186/s40411-016-0032--7Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. APA Task Force on Violent Media. 2015. Technical report on the review of the violent video game literature. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1037/e504632016-001Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Christine M. Bachen, Pedro F. Hernández-Ramos, and Chad Raphael. 2012. Simulating REAL LIVES: Promoting Global Empathy and Interest in Learning Through Simulation Games. Simulation & Gaming 43, 4 (August 2012), 437--460. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1046878111432108Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Kathy A. Baker. 2021. Self-Care: It's Not Just a Trend. Gastroenterology Nursing 44, 2 (April 2021), 79--81. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1097/SGA.0000000000000604Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. K de Beer. 2016. Analysing alternate reality games based on game design theory to propose a conceptual framework?. Masters Dissertation. University of Pretoria, Pretoria. Retrieved September 29, 2021 from https://scholar.google.co.za/citations?view_op=view_citation&hl=en&user=m-vEhZ0AAAAJ&citation_for_view=m-vEhZ0AAAAJ:9yKSN-GCB0ICGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. J Belman. 2014. Game Elements: The Language of Values. In Values at Play in Digital Games. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA, 33--72.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Jonathan Belman and Mary Flanagan. 2010. Designing games to foster empathy. International Journal of Cognitive Technology 15, 1 (2010), 5--15.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Isaiah Berlin. 2013. The Crooked Timber of Humanity: Chapters in the History of Ideas - Second Edition. Princeton University Press. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400847815Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Arianna Boldi and Amon Rapp. 2021. Commercial video games as a resource for mental health: A systematic literature review. Behaviour & Information Technology 0, 0 (July 2021), 1--37. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2021.1943524Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Mattie Brice. 2011. Ludonarrative Resonance. Mattie Brice. Retrieved December 17, 2021 from http://www.mattiebrice.com/ludonarrative-resonance/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Capcom. 2009. Resident Evil 5. Capcom, Osaka, JP.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Emily Carl, Aliza T. Stein, Andrew Levihn-Coon, Jamie R. Pogue, Barbara Rothbaum, Paul Emmelkamp, Gordon J. G. Asmundson, Per Carlbring, and Mark B. Powers. 2019. Virtual reality exposure therapy for anxiety and related disorders: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Journal of Anxiety Disorders 61, (January 2019), 27--36. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.janxdis.2018.08.003Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. B Code. 2018. #SelfCare. Tru Luv, United States of America. Retrieved December 30, 2021 from https://truluv.ai/self-careGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Michelle Colder Carras, Antonius van Rooij, Donna Spruijt-Metz, Joseph Kvedar, Mark Griffiths, Yorghos Carabas, and Alain Labrique. 2018. Commercial Video Games As Therapy: A New Research Agenda to Unlock the Potential of a Global Pastime. Frontiers in Psychiatry 8, 1 (January 2018), 300--307. DOI:https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2017.00300Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Steven Conway. 2020. Poisonous Pantheons: God of War and Toxic Masculinity. Games and Culture 15, 8 (December 2020), 943--961. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1555412019858898Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Sandra Danilovic. 2018. Game Design Therapoetics: Autopathographical Game Authorship as Self-Care, Self-Understanding, and Therapy. PhD thesis. University of Toronto, Toronto. Retrieved June 12, 2019 from https://tspace.library.utoronto.ca/handle/1807/89836Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Ann DeSmet, Ross Shegog, Dimitri Van Ryckeghem, Geert Crombez, and Ilse De Bourdeaudhuij. 2015. A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Interventions for Sexual Health Promotion Involving Serious Digital Games. Games for Health Journal 4, 2 (April 2015), 78--90. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1089/g4h.2014.0110Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Sebastian Deterding, Dan Dixon, Rilla Khaled, and Lennart Nacke. 2011. From game design elements to gamefulness: defining ?gamification." In Proceedings of the 15th International Academic MindTrek Conference: Envisioning Future Media Environments (MindTrek '11), Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 9--15. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2181037.2181040Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. EA DICE. 2008. Mirror's Edge. EA DICE.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Robert James Elliott and Nigel John Kalton. 1972. The Existence of Value in Differential Games. American Mathematical Soc.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Sarah Beth Evans and Elyse Janish. 2015. #INeedDiverseGames: How the Queer Backlash to GamerGate Enables Nonbinary Coalition. QED: A Journal in GLBTQ Worldmaking 2, 2 (2015), 125--150. DOI:https://doi.org/10.14321/qed.2.2.0125Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Damiano Felini. 2015. Beyond Today's Video Game Rating Systems: A Critical Approach to PEGI and ESRB, and Proposed Improvements. Games and Culture 10, 1 (January 2015), 106--122. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1555412014560192Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Bill Ferguson. 2012. The Emergence of Games for Health. Games for Health Journal 1, 1 (February 2012), 1--2. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1089/g4h.2012.1010Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Christopher J. Ferguson and Brad Glasgow. 2021. Who are GamerGate? A descriptive study of individuals involved in the GamerGate controversy. Psychology of Popular Media 10, 2 (2021), 243--247. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1037/ppm0000280Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Mary Flanagan. 2009. Critical Play: Radical Game Design (1st ed.). MIT Press, London, UK. Retrieved June 18, 2019 from https://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2469995Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Mary Flanagan, Daniel C. Howe, and Helen Nissenbaum. 2005. Values at Play: Design Tradeoffs in Socially-oriented Game Design. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '05), ACM, New York, NY, 751--760. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/1054972.1055076Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Mary Flanagan and Helen Nissenbaum. 2014. Values at Play in Digital Games. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Kenneth Fleischmann. 2013. Information and Human Values. Morgan & Claypool Publishers.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. C Franklin. 2013. "Keep Your Politics Out of My Video Games." Errant Signal. Retrieved December 13, 2021 from http://www.errantsignal.com/blog/?p=582Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. G Frasca. 2003. September 12th. Newsgaming, United States of America.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Janine Fron, Tracy Fullerton, Jacquelyn Ford Morie, and Celia Pearce. 2007. The Hegemony of Play. In Proceedings of DiGRA 2007: Situated Play, Digital Games Research Association, Tokyo, JP.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. M Gault. 2018. Valve Has Removed a School Shooting Simulator From Steam, Calling the Developer a "Troll." Vice. Retrieved December 22, 2021 from https://www.vice.com/en/article/evkp3a/active-shooter-removed-from-steam-by-valveGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Douglas A. Gentile, Craig A. Anderson, Shintaro Yukawa, Nobuko Ihori, Muniba Saleem, Lim Kam Ming, Akiko Shibuya, Albert K. Liau, Angeline Khoo, Brad J. Bushman, L. Rowell Huesmann, and Akira Sakamoto. 2009. The Effects of Prosocial Video Games on Prosocial Behaviors: International Evidence from Correlational, Longitudinal, and Experimental Studies. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 35, 6 (June 2009), 752--763. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167209333045Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. J Gerblick. 2019. Kojima is most proud of Death Stranding's "positive" shared-world multiplayer approach. gamesradar. Retrieved November 15, 2019 from https://www.gamesradar.com/kojima-is-most-proud-of-death-strandings-positive-shared-world-multiplayer-approach/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Rosana Ruas Machado Gomes. 2020. Trauma, empathy and complicity in The Last of Us Part II: playing as enemy characters. ANTARES: Letras e Humanidades 12, 28 (December 2020), 167--185.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Eric Gordon and Steven Schirra. 2011. Playing with Empathy: Digital Role-playing Games in Public Meetings. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Communities and Technologies (C&T '11), ACM, New York, NY, 179--185. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2103354.2103378Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. L Grace. 2010. Critical Gameplay - Design Techniques and Case Studies. In Designing Games for Ethics: Models, Techniques and Frameworks (1st edition), K Schrier and D Gibson (eds.). Idea Group Inc (IGI), United States of America, 128--141.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Tobias Greitemeyer and Dirk O. Mügge. 2014. Video Games Do Affect Social Outcomes: A Meta-Analytic Review of the Effects of Violent and Prosocial Video Game Play. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 40, 5 (May 2014), 578--589. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167213520459Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. Tobias Greitemeyer, Silvia Osswald, and Markus Brauer. 2010. Playing prosocial video games increases empathy and decreases schadenfreude. Emotion 10, 6 (2010), 796--802.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. Andrea Gunraj, Susana Ruiz, Ashley York, K Schrier, and D Gibson. 2011. Power to the People: Anti-Oppressive Game Design. In Designing Games for Ethics: Models, Techniques and Frameworks (1st ed.). Information Science Reference, New York, 253--274. Retrieved May 23, 2019 from https://www.igi-global.com/chapter/power-people-anti-oppressive-game/50743Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Yemaya J. Halbrook, Aisling T. O'Donnell, and Rachel M. Msetfi. 2019. When and How Video Games Can Be Good: A Review of the Positive Effects of Video Games on Well-Being. Perspect Psychol Sci 14, 6 (November 2019), 1096--1104. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691619863807Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  42. Christian Happ, André Melzer, and Georges Steffgen. 2013. Superman vs. BAD Man? The Effects of Empathy and Game Character in Violent Video Games. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking 16, 10 (June 2013), 774--778. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2012.0695Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Harmonix. 2005. Guitar Hero. RedOctane, Boston, MA, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Sabine Harrer. 2011. Game Design for Cultural Studies: An Experiential Approach to Critical Thinking. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Games + Learning + Society Conference (GLS'11), ETC Press, Pittsburgh, PA, 97--101. Retrieved June 12, 2019 from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2206376.2206388Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. Sabine Harrer. 2017. GGC 2017: Vulvas on the Tablet: Cunt Touch This (by Dr. Sabine Harrer). Uppsala University, Gotland. Retrieved July 31, 2019 from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZmnMYtyAl18Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. Sabine Harrer. 2017. GGC 2017: Grief Based Game Design (by Dr. Sabine Harrer). Uppsala University, Gotland. Retrieved July 31, 2019 from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZmnMYtyAl18Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. Sabine Harrer. 2019. Radical Jamming: Sketching Radical Design Principles for Game Creation Workshops. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Game Jams, Hackathons and Game Creation Events 2019 (ICGJ 2019), ACM, New York, NY, 1--5. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3316287.3316297Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. Sabine Harrer and Martin Pichlmair. 2015. Black Skin White Guns - Becoming Colonizer in Resident Evil 5. In Proceedings of The Philosophy of Computer Games 2015, The Philosophy of Computer Games, Berlin, 16.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. Tilo Hartmann, K. Maja Krakowiak, and Mina Tsay-Vogel. 2014. How Violent Video Games Communicate Violence: A Literature Review and Content Analysis of Moral Disengagement Factors. Communication Monographs 81, 3 (July 2014), 310--332. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2014.922206Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  50. J. Tuomas Harviainen and Andreas Lieberoth. 2012. Similarity of Social Information Processes in Games and Rituals: Magical Interfaces. Simulation & Gaming 43, 4 (August 2012), 528--549. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1046878110392703Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  51. J.C. Herz. 2013. A 15-year-old critique of the game industry that's still relevant today. Game Developer. Retrieved December 22, 2021 from https://www.gamedeveloper.com/business/a-15-year-old-critique-of-the-game-industry-that-s-still-relevant-todayGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  52. Tobias Heussner, Toiya Kristen Finley, Jennifer Brandes Hepler, and Ann Lemay. 2015. The Game Narrative Toolbox. Focal Press, Burlington, MA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  53. C Hocking. 2007. Ludonarrative Dissonance in Bioshock. Click Nothing. Retrieved December 17, 2021 from https://www.clicknothing.com/click_nothing/2007/10/ludonarrative-d.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  54. P Howell and B Stevens. 2019. Epistemological Issues in Understanding Games Design, Play-Experience, and Reportage. In Proceedings of DiGRA 2019 Conference: Games, Play and the Emerging Ludo-Mix, Digital Games Research Association, Kyoto, Japan. Retrieved from http://www.digra.org/wp-content/uploads/digital-library/DiGRA_2019_paper_35.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. Infinity Ward. 2009. Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2. Activision, California.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  56. Katherine Isbister. 2016. How Games Move Us: Emotion by Design (1st edition ed.). The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  57. Leslie Jamison. 2014. The Empathy Exams: Essays (1st Edition ed.). Graywolf Press, Minneapolis, MN.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  58. Tobias Jeep. 2008. GR. We Go By Jeep. Retrieved December 23, 2021 from http://jeepen.org/games/gr/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  59. A Jerrett, Peter Howell, and Neil Dansey. 2020. Developing an Empathy Spectrum for Games. Games and Culture (September 2020). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1555412020954019Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  60. Kristine Jørgensen. 2016. The Positive Discomfort of Spec Ops: The Line. Game Studies 16, 2 (December 2016). Retrieved December 29, 2021 from http://gamestudies.org/1602/articles/jorgensenkristineGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  61. Firas Khatib, Seth Cooper, Michael D. Tyka, Kefan Xu, Ilya Makedon, Zoran Popovic, David Baker, and Foldit Players. 2011. Algorithm discovery by protein folding game players. PNAS 108, 47 (November 2011), 18949--18953. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1115898108Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  62. C Kluckhohn. 1951. Values and Value-Orientations in the Theory of Action: An Exploration in Definition and Classification. In Toward a General Theory of Action (1st ed.), C Parsons and E Shills (eds.). Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 388--443.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  63. Julia Kneer, Malte Elson, and Florian Knapp. 2016. Fight fire with rainbows: The effects of displayed violence, difficulty, and performance in digital games on affect, aggression, and physiological arousal. Computers in Human Behavior 54, (January 2016), 142--148. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.07.034Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  64. H Kojima. 2019. Death Stranding Available November 8 on PS4. PlayStation Blog. Retrieved February 27, 2020 from https://blog.us.playstation.com/2019/05/29/death-stranding-available-november-8-on-ps4/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  65. H Kojima and A Sakamoto. 2019. Death Stranding. Kojima Productions, Japan.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  66. Konami. 1998. Dance Dance Revolution. Konami, Tokyo, JP.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  67. Martijn J.L. Kors, Gabriele Ferri, Erik D. van der Spek, Cas Ketel, and Ben A.M. Schouten. 2016. A Breathtaking Journey. On the Design of an Empathy-Arousing Mixed-Reality Game. In Proceedings of the 2016 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play (CHI PLAY '16), ACM, New York, NY, 91--104. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2967934.2968110Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  68. Raph Koster. 2013. Theory of Fun for Game Design (2nd ed.). O'Reilly Media, Inc., California, FL.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  69. Annakaisa Kultima and Alyea Sandovar. 2016. Game design values. In Proceedings of the 20th International Academic Mindtrek Conference (AcademicMindtrek '16), Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 350--357. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2994310.2994362Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  70. Sin Fai Lam. 2017. A fantasy based in reality: Hellblade. Gaming the Mind. Retrieved May 4, 2021 from https://www.rcpsych.ac.uk/news-and-features/blogs/detail/cultural-blog/2017/06/23/a-fantasy-based-in-reality-how-service-user-and-specialist-input-informed-the-portrayal-of-psychosis-in-hellbladeGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  71. Amanda Lange. 2014. "You're Just Gonna Be Nice": How Players Engage with Moral Choice Systems. Journal of Games Criticism 1, 1 (January 2014), 1--16.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  72. N Lawhead, J Sui, P Snow, K Snow, Jenny J Hsia, and N Freeman. 2019. Personal Experiences as Games. Game Developers Conference, San Francisco, CA. Retrieved June 12, 2019 from https://www.gdcvault.com/play/1025675/Personal-Experiences-asGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  73. Jeremy Lee, Kathleen Luchini, Benjamin Michael, Cathie Norris, and Elliot Soloway. 2004. More than just fun and games: assessing the value of educational video games in the classroom. In CHI '04 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '04), Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1375--1378. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/985921.986068Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  74. Helen Lewis. 2014. A quest for understanding. The Lancet Psychiatry 1, 5 (October 2014), 341. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(14)70386--4Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  75. Jonas Linderoth and Torill Elvira Mortensen. 2015. Dark Play: The Aesthetics of Controversial Playfulness. In The Dark Side of Game Play. Routledge.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  76. Conor Linehan, Sabine Harrer, Ben Kirman, Shaun Lawson, and Marcus Carter. 2015. Games Against Health: A Player-Centered Design Philosophy. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '15), Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 589--600. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2702613.2732514Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  77. G Lobanov. 2021. Chicory: A Colorful Tale. Finji, United States of America.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  78. J Madigan and Kelli N Dunlap. 2019. Empathy in Video Games. The Psychology of Video Games. Retrieved May 20, 2020 from https://www.psychologyofgames.com/2019/07/podcast-50-empathy-in-video-games/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  79. Alexander Mann. 2020. Pseudo-Gambling and Whaling: How Loot Boxes Pray on Vulnerable Populations and How to Curtail Future Predatory Behavior. Washington Journal of Law, Technology & Arts 15, 3 (April 2020), 200.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  80. Patricia J. Manney. 2008. Empathy in the Time of Technology: How Storytelling is the Key to Empathy. Journal of Evolution & Technology 19, 1 (2008), 51--61.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  81. Jeffrey Matulef. 2013. Amnesia: A Machine for Pigs writer describes disturbing cut content. Eurogamer. Retrieved December 30, 2021 from https://www.eurogamer.net/articles/2013-09--27-amnesia-a-machine-for-pigs-writer-describes-disturbing-cut-contentGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  82. Heidi McDonald. 2018. Making Them Care: The Narrative Burden for Creating Empathy. Game Developers Conference, San Francisco, CA. Retrieved June 12, 2019 from https://www.gdcvault.com/play/1025424/Making-Them-Care-The-NarrativeGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  83. Jane McGonigal. 2007. Why I Love Bees: A Case Study in Collective Intelligence Gaming. In The Ecology of Games: Connecting Youth, Games, and Learning, Katie Salen (ed.). MIT Press, Cambridge, 199--227. Retrieved January 22, 2010 from http://mitpress2.mit.edu/books/chapters/0262195755chap9.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  84. Jane McGonigal. 2010. Urgent Evoke: What Went Right, What Went Wrong: Lessons from Season 1 of EVOKE. Retrieved March 23, 2015 from http://blog.urgentevoke.net/2010/07/26/what-went-right-what-went-wrong-lessons-from-season-1-evoke1/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  85. Jane McGonigal. 2010. World Without Oil (game recap). Disruptive Effects Conference, University of Minnesota. Retrieved July 26, 2021 from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WbBpC3AYZxUGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  86. Jane McGonigal. 2011. Reality is broken: why games make us better and how they can change the world. Penguin Press, New York.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  87. Jane McGonigal. 2012. The game that can give you 10 extra years of life. TED, TEDGlobal. Retrieved February 26, 2019 from https://www.ted.com/talks/jane_mcgonigal_the_game_that_can_give_you_10_extra_years_of_life?language=enGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  88. Jane McGonigal. 2016. SuperBetter: How a gameful life can make you stronger, happier, braver and more resilient (1st ed.). HarperCollins, London, UK.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  89. A Miklik and J Harr. 2016. You Feel Like Shit. Amanda Miklik Coaching + Consulting, United States of America.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  90. M Montola. 2014. The Positive Negative Experience in Extreme Role-Playing. In The Foundation Stone of Nordic Larp (1st ed.), Eleanor Saitta, Marie Holm-Andersen and Jon Back (eds.). Knutpunkt, Sweden, 152--166.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  91. Naughty Dog. 2007. Uncharted: Drake's Fortune. Naughty Dog, Santa Monica, CA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  92. Naughty Dog. 2020. The Last of Us Part II. Naughty Dog, Santa Monica, CA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  93. Ninja Theory. 2017. Hellblade: Senua's Sacrifice. Ninja Theory, Cambridge, UK.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  94. Nintendo EPD. 2020. Animal Crossing: New Horizons. Nintendo, Kyoto, JP.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  95. Helen Nissenbaum and Mary Flanagan. 2014. Curriculum: Values At Play. Retrieved December 21, 2021 from https://www.valuesatplay.org/curriculumGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  96. C Osathanunkul. 2015. A classification of business models in video game industry. International Journal of Management Cases 17, 1 (2015), 35--4.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  97. R Ottosen. 2017. Video games as war propaganda: Can peace journalism offer an alternative approach. In Peace Journalism in Times of War (2nd ed.), Majid Tehranian and Susan Dente Ross (eds.). Routledge, New York, NY, 91--99.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  98. Janne Paavilainen, Hannu Korhonen, Kati Alha, Jaakko Stenros, Elina Koskinen, and Frans Mayra. 2017. The Pokemon GO Experience: A Location-Based Augmented Reality Mobile Game Goes Mainstream. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2493--2498. Retrieved July 16, 2021 from https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025871Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  99. Vijay Pande, T Derner, and P Eastman. 2020. Covid19 -- Folding@home. Folding@Home. Retrieved May 6, 2020 from https://foldingathome.org/covid19/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  100. Marco Pautasso. 2013. Ten Simple Rules for Writing a Literature Review. PLOS Computational Biology 9, 7 (July 2013), e1003149. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003149Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  101. Reyhan Pradantyo. 2020. How the Visual Design of Video Game Antagonists Affects Perception of Morality. Sepulah Nopember Institute of Technology, Surabaya, Indonesia. Retrieved December 20, 2021 from https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcomp.2021.531713/fullGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  102. Z Quinn and P Lindsey. 2013. Depression Quest. The Quinnspiracy, United States of America.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  103. James Rogers. 2019. Sick "Rape Day' video game sparks global outrage. New York Post. Retrieved December 22, 2021 from https://nypost.com/2019/03/08/sick-rape-day-video-game-sparks-global-outrage/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  104. Milton Rokeach. 1973. The nature of human values (1st ed.). Free Press, New York, NY, US.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  105. B Romero. 2016. Are Games Art? Ted, Galway. Retrieved September 28, 2020 from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L5sBdR4-GGM&ab_channel=TEDxTalksGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  106. B Romero. 2019. Work. Brenda Romero. Retrieved June 13, 2019 from http://brenda.games/work-1Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  107. Bonnie Ruberg and Rainforest Scully-Blaker. 2021. Making players care: The ambivalent cultural politics of care and video games. International Journal of Cultural Studies 24, 4 (July 2021), 655--672. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1367877920950323Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  108. D Rusch. 2017. Making Deep Games: Designing Games with Meaning and Purpose (1st edition ed.). Routledge, Boca Raton, FL.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  109. D Rusch. 2018. Existential Game Design - Lost in the Woods, Searching for Bliss. Uppsala University, Gotland. Retrieved June 12, 2019 from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oeJnT9nMNyMGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  110. Doris Rusch. 2012. "Elude": designing depression. In Proceedings of the International Conference on the Foundations of Digital Games (FDG '12), Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 254--257. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2282338.2282389Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  111. E Sampat. 2017. Empathy Engines: Design Games That Are Personal, Political, And Profound (2nd ed.). CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform, United States of America. Retrieved June 12, 2019 from https://elizabethsampat.itch.io/empathy-enginesGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  112. Antranig Arek Sarian. 2018. "No Going Back": The Telltale Model as Thought Experiment. Eludamos. Journal for Computer Game Culture 9, 1 (2018), 17.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  113. A Sarkeesian and E Adams. 2013. Tropes vs Women in Video Games. Feminist Frequency. Retrieved November 11, 2019 from https://feministfrequency.com/tag/tropes-vs-women-in-video-games/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  114. Jesse Schell. 2014. The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses (Second Edition ed.). CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  115. Donald A. Schön. 1983. The Reflective Practitioner?: How Professionals Think in Action (1st ed.). Routledge, London, UK. DOI:https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315237473Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  116. K Schrier. 2017. Confronting Games and Ethics: Challenging Students to Be Critical Designers. San Francisco, CA. Retrieved May 21, 2019 from https://www.gdcvault.com/play/1024214/Confronting-Games-and-Ethics-ChallengingGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  117. K Schrier. 2019. Designing Ourselves: Identity, Bias, Empathy and Game Design. Center of Technology and Society, San Francisco, CA. Retrieved June 24, 2019 from https://www.adl.org/media/13011/downloadGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  118. K Schrier and D Gibson (Eds.). 2010. Designing Games for Ethics: Models, Techniques and Frameworks (1st edition ed.). IGI Global, New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  119. Karen Schrier and Matthew Farber. 2021. A systematic literature review of "empathy' and "games.' Journal of Gaming & Virtual Worlds 13, 2 (June 2021), 195--214. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1386/jgvw_00036_1Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  120. Kevin Schut. 2013. Of Games and God: A Christian Exploration of Video Games. Baker Books.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  121. Adrienne Shaw and Elizaveta Friesem. 2016. Where is the Queerness in Games?: Types of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, and Queer Content in Digital Games. International Journal of Communication 10, 1 (July 2016), 13.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  122. Katie Shilton. 2018. Values and Ethics in Human-computer Interaction. Foundations and Trends® in Human-Computer Interaction 12, 2 (2018), 107--171.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  123. Miguel Sicart. 2011. The Ethics of Computer Games (1st ed.). MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  124. J. A Simpson and E. S. C Weiner (Eds.). 1993. Oxford English Dictionary (Second Edition ed.). Oxford University Press, Oxford, NY.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  125. Clare Southerton. 2014. Zombies, Run! Rethinking Immersion in Light of Nontraditional Gaming Contexts. In Transmedia Practice: A Collective Approach (1st ed.). Brill, Leiden, NL, 131--141. Retrieved July 16, 2021 from https://brill.com/view/book/edcoll/9781848882614/BP000013.xmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  126. Square Enix. 2021. Life is Strange: True Colors. Life is Strange: True Colors. Retrieved May 4, 2021 from https://lifeisstrange.square-enix-games.com/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  127. Frithjof Staude-Müller, Thomas Bliesener, and Stefanie Luthman. 2008. Hostile and Hardened? An Experimental Study on (De-)Sensitization to Violence and Suffering Through Playing Video Games. Swiss Journal of Psychology 67, 1 (March 2008), 41--50. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1024/1421-0185.67.1.41Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  128. Jaakko Stenros and Sarah Lynne Bowman. 2018. Transgressive Role-Play. In Role-Playing Game Studies. Routledge.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  129. Keith Stuart. 2013. Luxuria Superbia -- a game about sex and giving. The Guardian. Retrieved December 30, 2021 from https://www.theguardian.com/technology/gamesblog/2013/nov/06/luxuria-superbia-the-game-you-pleaseGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  130. Bernard Suits. 1978. The Grasshopper: Games, Life, and Utopia (First Edition ed.). University of Toronto Press, Buffalo, NY.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  131. H Taylor. 2018. Valve banning "child exploitation" games from Steam. GamesIndustry.biz. Retrieved December 22, 2021 from https://www.gamesindustry.biz/articles/2018--12--10-valve-banning-child-exploitation-games-from-steamGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  132. Telltale Games. 2012. The Walking Dead: Season One. Telltale Games, San Rafael, California.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  133. Philip E. Tetlock. 2003. Thinking the unthinkable: sacred values and taboo cognitions. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7, 7 (July 2003), 320--324. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364--6613(03)00135--9Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  134. The Copenhagen Game Collective. 2015. Cunt Touch This. The Copenhagen Game Collective, Copenhagen.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  135. Valve. 2018. Who Gets To Be On The Steam Store? Steam. Retrieved December 22, 2021 from https://store.steampowered.com/news/group/27766192/view/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  136. Valve. 2019. Rape Day will not ship on Steam. Steam. Retrieved December 22, 2021 from https://store.steampowered.com/news/group/27766192/view/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  137. Valve. 2021. Onboarding. Steamworks. Retrieved December 22, 2021 from https://partner.steamgames.com/doc/gettingstarted/onboardingGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  138. Emma Vossen. 2020. Tom Nook, Capitalist or Comrade? On Nook Discourse and the Millennial Housing Crisis. loading 13, 22 (2020), 109--134. DOI:https://doi.org/10.7202/1075266arGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  139. Agata Waszkiewicz and Martyna Bakun. 2020. Towards the aesthetics of cozy video games. Journal of Gaming & Virtual Worlds 12, 3 (October 2020), 225--240. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1386/jgvw_00017_1Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  140. Langdon Winner. 1980. Do Artifacts Have Politics? Daedalus 109, 1 (1980), 121--136.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  141. Yager Development. 2012. Spec Ops: The Line. Yager Development, Germany.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  142. José P. Zagal, Staffan Björk, and Chris Lewis. 2013. Dark Patterns in the Design of Games. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on the Foundations of Digital Games, Foundations of Digital Games 2013, Chania, GR, 39--46. Retrieved December 31, 2021 from http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:ri:diva-24252Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Values throughout the Game Space

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in

        Full Access

        • Published in

          cover image Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
          Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction  Volume 6, Issue CHI PLAY
          CHI PLAY
          October 2022
          986 pages
          EISSN:2573-0142
          DOI:10.1145/3570219
          Issue’s Table of Contents

          Copyright © 2022 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 31 October 2022
          Published in pacmhci Volume 6, Issue CHI PLAY

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader