Melissa J. Rogerson
Skip Abstract Section
Abstract
Despite increasing interest in the use of digital tools in boardgames for both commercial and research purposes, little research has to date explored how and why these tools are used. We interviewed 18 professionals working in the boardgame industry to explore the combination of digital tools and tabletop play, which affords new experiences and opportunities for both players and designers. We generated five key themes from the interview data. Participants engaged with ontological questions about the fundamental nature of games; they showed strong opinions about the use of digital tools; they discussed the impacts of digital tools for game design as well as in their design practice; they raised concerns about the costs to develop and maintain such tools; and they considered how they affect the in-game player experience. From these themes, we generate five design principles for digital tools for boardgame play: traceability, completeness, integration, privacy, and materiality. Grounded in empirical data, these design principles guide game designers and researchers seeking to explore this novel design space. Our research focuses attention on the role of digital components in play and on the need for thoughtful implementation that considers the entire lifecycle of the game, from development through publication and, ultimately, archival access.
- Andrea Aguilar Álvarez Altamirano, Brenda Cruz Ortega, Itzel Alejandra Jiménez Loranca and Leon Eduardo Arango Olmos. 2019. Enredados: an analogue-digital board game to rethink gender violence in social networks Proceedings of the IX Latin American Conference on Human Computer Interaction, Association for Computing Machinery, Panama City, Panama, Article 33.Google Scholar
- Troels L Andersen, Sune Kristensen, Bjørn W Nielsen and Kaj Grønbæk. 2004. Designing an augmented reality board game with children: the battleboard 3D experience. in Proceedings of the 2004 conference on Interaction design and children: building a community, ACM, 137--138.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Saskia Bakker, Debby Vorstenbosch, Elise van den Hoven, Gerard Hollemans and Tom Bergman. 2007. Tangible interaction in tabletop games: studying iconic and symbolic play pieces Proceedings of the international conference on Advances in computer entertainment technology, Association for Computing Machinery, Salzburg, Austria, 163--170.Google Scholar
- Evan Barba, Yan Xu, Blair Maclntyre and Tony Tseng. 2009. Lessons from a class on handheld augmented reality game design Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Foundations of Digital Games, Association for Computing Machinery, Orlando, Florida, 2--9.Google Scholar
- Daniel Bengtsson and Giedre Jursenaite. 2019. A user study to analyse the experience of augmented reality board games Faculty of Computing, Blekinge Institute of Technology, Karlskrona, Sweden.Google Scholar
- Karl Bergström and Staffan Björk. 2020. A Mixed Blessing? Exploring the Use of Computers to Augment and Mediate Board Games. in Brown, D. and MacCallum-Stewart, E. eds. Rerolling Boardgames: Essays on Themes, Systems, Experiences and Ideologies, McFarland.Google Scholar
- Srinjita Bhaduri, Jesús G. Ortiz Tovar and Shaun K. Kane. 2017. Fabrication Games: Using 3D Printers to Explore New Interactions for Tabletop Games Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGCHI Conference on Creativity and Cognition, Association for Computing Machinery, Singapore, Singapore, 51--62.Google Scholar
- Norman Blaikie. 2007. Approaches to Social Enquiry. Polity Press, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
- Inka Brand and Markus Brand. 2014. Das magische Museum [SmartPLAY], Ravensburger Spieleverlag GmbH, Ravensburg, Germany.Google Scholar
- Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2020. One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis? Qualitative Research in Psychology. 10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238Google Scholar
- Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2013. Successful Qualitative Research: A Practical Guide for Beginners. SAGE Publishing Ltd.Google Scholar
- Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3 (2). 77--101. 10.1191/1478088706qp063oaGoogle ScholarCross Ref
- Roger Burten, Alan Coleman and Vincent A. A. J. Erato. 1981. Dark Tower, Milton Bradley.Google Scholar
- . 2018. Extracting Design Guidelines for Wearables and Movement in Tabletop Role-Playing Games via a Research Through Design Process. in Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1--13.Google Scholar
- Ouz Turan Buruk and O?uzhan Özcan. 2017. User Oriented Design Speculation and Implications for an Arm-Worn Wearable Device for Table-Top Role-Playing Games. in International Conference of Design, User Experience, and Usability, Springer, 636--655.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Marcus Carter, Mitchell Harrop and Martin Gibbs. 2014. The Roll of the Dice in Warhammer 40,000. ToDIGRA: Physical and Digital in Games and Play, 1 (3).Google Scholar
- S Cavicchini and I Mariani. 2019. Hybrid board game: Possibilities and implications from an interaction design perspective. in GHItaly19. 3rd Workshop on Games-Human Interaction, CEUR, 1--6.Google Scholar
- Isaac Childres. 2017. Gloomhaven, Cephalofair Games.Google Scholar
- Isaac Childres, Noah Cohen, Rob Daviau, Justin D. Jacobson and Brian Neff. 2021. Return to Dark Tower, Restoration Games, Sunrise, FL.Google Scholar
- M. Crotty. 1998. The Foundations of Social Research: Meaning and perspective in the research process. Allen and Unwin, St Leonards, Australia.Google Scholar
- Jesper Dammeyer. 2010. Interaction of Dual Sensory Loss, Cognitive Function, and Communication in People Who Are Congenially Deaf-Blind. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 104 (11). 719--725.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Bob De Schutter, Julie A Brown and Vero Vanden Abeele. 2015. The domestication of digital games in the lives of older adults. new media & society, 17 (7). 1170--1186.Google Scholar
- Heather Desurvire and Charlotte Wiberg. 2009. Game usability heuristics (PLAY) for evaluating and designing better games: The next iteration. in International conference on online communities and social computing, Springer, 557--566.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hal Eden. 2002. Getting in on the (inter)action: exploring affordances for collaborative learning in a context of informed participation Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning: Foundations for a CSCL Community, International Society of the Learning Sciences, Boulder, Colorado, 399--407.Google Scholar
- Lina Eklund. 2012. The Sociality of Gaming A mixed methods approach to understanding digital gaming as a social leisure activity, Stockholm University Library, Stockholm, Sweden, 85.Google Scholar
- Esoteric Software. 2020. Gloomhaven Helper.Google Scholar
- Verena Fuchsberger. 2019. The future's hybrid nature. interactions, 26 (4). 26--31.Google Scholar
- Areti Galani and Jenny Kidd. 2020. Hybrid Material Encounters--Expanding the Continuum of Museum Materialities in the Wake of a Pandemic. Museum and Society, 18 (3). 298--301.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ivan Seidel Gomes. n.d. Chwazi Finger Chooser, Tenda Digital, São Caetano do Sul, Brazil.Google Scholar
- Takashi Hamada and Kenji Shimojima. 2016. Mask of the Pharaoh, Hasbro, Pawtucket, RI.Google Scholar
- Ulf Hartelius, Johan Fröhlander and Staffan Björk. 2012. Tisch digital tools supporting board games. in Proceedings of the International Conference on the Foundations of Digital Games, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA, ACM, 196--203. 10.1145/2282338.2282376Google ScholarDigital Library
- Michael James Heron, Pauline Helen Belford, Hayley Reid and Michael Crabb. 2018. Eighteen Months of Meeple Like Us: An Exploration into the State of Board Game Accessibility. The Computer Games Journal, 7 (2). 75--95.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Michael James Heron, Pauline Helen Belford, Hayley Reid and Michael Crabb. 2018. Meeple Centred Design: A Heuristic Toolkit for Evaluating the Accessibility of Tabletop Games. The Computer Games Journal, 7. 97--114.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Soren Johnson. 2014. A Study in Transparency: How Board Games Matter GDC 2014, GDC Vault.Google Scholar
- Ville Kankainen and Janne Paavilainen. 2019. Hybrid Board Game Design Guidelines DiGRA 2019, Kyoto, Japan.Google Scholar
- Ville Kankainen and Heikki Tyni. 2014. Understanding smart device tabletop games Proceedings of the 18th International Academic MindTrek Conference: Media Business, Management, Content & Services, ACM, Tampere, Finland, 238--241.Google Scholar
- Victor Kaptelinin and Bonnie Nardi. 2012. Affordances in HCI: toward a mediated action perspective Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, Austin, Texas, USA, 967--976.Google Scholar
- Reiner Knizia. 2014. King Arthur [smartPLAY], Ravensburger Spieleverlag GmbH, Ravensburg, Germany.Google Scholar
- Mehmet Kosa and Pieter Spronck. 2018. What tabletop players think about augmented tabletop games: a content analysis Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on the Foundations of Digital Games, ACM, Malmö, Sweden, 1--8.Google Scholar
- Kenneth Liberman. 2011. The reflexive intelligibility of affairs: Ethnomethodological perspectives on communicating sense. Cahiers Ferdinand de Saussure, 64. 73--99.Google Scholar
- Tania Di Mascio, Rosella Gennari, Alessandra Melonio and Pierpaolo Vittorini. 2013. Designing games for deaf children: first guidelines. International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 5 (3--4). 223--239.Google Scholar
- Bernhard Maurer and Verena Fuchsberger. 2019. Dislocated Boardgames: Design Potentials for Remote Tangible Play. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction, 3 (4). 72.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Caleb Melby. 2013. Ticket To Ride: How The Internet Fueled A New Board Game Powerhouse Forbes, www.forbes.com.Google Scholar
- Alan R. Moon. 2004. Ticket to Ride, Days of Wonder.Google Scholar
- Simone Mora, Ines Di Loreto and Monica Divitini. 2016. From interactive surfaces to interactive game pieces in hybrid board games. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Smart Environments, 8 (5). 531--548.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Janne Paavilainen, Katriina Heljakka, Jonne Arjoranta, Ville Kankainen, Linda Landenperä, Elina Koskinen, Jani Kinnunen, Lilli Sihvonen, Timo Nummenmaa, Frans Mäyrä, Raine Koskimaa and Jaakko Suominen. 2018. Hybrid Social Play Final Report University of Tampere TRIM Research Reports 26, Hybrid Social Play Consortium, University of Tampere Faculty of Communication Sciences, Tampere, Finland.Google Scholar
- Celia Pearce, Gillian Smith, Jeanie Choi and Isabella Carlsson. 2016. eBee: Merging Quilting, Electronics & Board Game Design. in Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, San Jose, CA, ACM, 3877--3880. 10.1145/2851581.2891099Google Scholar
- Melissa J. Rogerson, Martin Gibbs and Wally Smith. 2015. Digitising boardgames: Issues and Tensions. in DiGRA 2015; Diversity of Play -- Proceedings of the 2015 DiGRA International Conference.,, Lüneburg, Germany, Digital Games Research Association.Google Scholar
- Melissa J. Rogerson, Martin Gibbs and Wally Smith. 2017. Exploring the Digital Hinterland: Internet Practices surrounding the Pursuit of Offline Hobbies AOIR, Tartu, Estonia.Google Scholar
- Melissa J. Rogerson, Martin Gibbs and Wally Smith. 2016. ?I Love All the Bits": The Materiality of Boardgames. in Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, San Jose, California, USA, Association for Computing Machinery, 3956--3969. 10.1145/2858036.2858433Google ScholarDigital Library
- Melissa J. Rogerson, Martin Gibbs and Wally Smith. 2020. More than the sum of their bits: Understanding the gameboard and components. in Brown, D. and MacCallum-Stewart, E. eds. Rerolling Boardgames: Essays on Themes, Systems, Experiences and Ideologies, McFarland & Co Inc, Jefferson, NC, USA, 88--108.Google Scholar
- Melissa J. Rogerson, Lucy A. Sparrow and Martin R. Gibbs. 2021. Unpacking "Boardgames With Apps": The Hybrid Digital Boardgame Model in Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, May 8--13, 2021, Yokohama, Japan. 10.1145/3411764.3445077Google ScholarDigital Library
- Corina Sas, Steve Whittaker, Steven Dow, Jodi Forlizzi and John Zimmerman. 2014. Generating Implications for Design through Design Research. in Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 2014, CHI 2014. One of a CHInd, Toronto, ON, Canada, ACM, 1971--1980.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Dorothé Smit, Bernhard Maurer, Martin Murer, Jens Reinhardt and Katrin Wolf. 2019. Be the Meeple: New Perspectives on Traditional Board Games Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction, Association for Computing Machinery, Tempe, Arizona, USA, 695--698.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Arch Stanton. 2018. Unlock!: Secret Adventures - Tombstone Express, Space Cowboys, Boulogne, France.Google Scholar
- Anne Sullivan and Gillian Smith. 2016. Designing craft games. interactions, 24 (1). 38--41. 10.1145/3019004Google Scholar
- Firouzeh Taghikhah, William L. Raffe, George Mitri, Sebastian Du Toit, Alexey Voinov and Jaime A. Garcia. 2019. Last Island: Exploring Transitions to Sustainable Futures through Play Proceedings of the Australasian Computer Science Week Multiconference, Association for Computing Machinery, Sydney, NSW, Australia, Article 41.Google Scholar
- Maryam Tohidi, William Buxton, Ronald Baecker and Abigail Sellen. 2006. Getting the right design and the design right. in Proceedings of CHI 2006, Montréal, Québec, Canada, 1243--1252. 10.1145/1124772.1124960Google ScholarDigital Library
- Eerko Vissering. 2015--2020. Board Game Stats, Apps by Eerko.Google Scholar
- Joe A Wasserman. 2020. Materially Mediated: Boardgames as Interactive Media and Mediated Communication. in Brown, D. and MacCallum-Stewart, E. eds. Rerolling Boardgames: Essays on Themes, Systems, Experiences and Ideologies, McFarland & Co Inc, Jefferson, NC, USA, 71--87.Google Scholar
- Stewart Woods. 2012. Eurogames: The Design, Culture and Play of Modern European Board Games. McFarland & Company, Inc, Publishers, Jefferson, NC, and London, UK.Google Scholar
- xplored. n.d. Discover Teburu.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- More Than a Gimmick - Digital Tools for Boardgame Play
Recommendations
Observing Multiplayer Boardgame Play at a Distance
CHI PLAY '21: Extended Abstracts of the 2021 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in PlayMore than 18 months after it was first identified, the COVID-19 pandemic continues to restrict researchers’ opportunities to conduct research in face-to-face settings. This affects studies requiring participants to be co-located, such as those that ...
Unpacking “Boardgames with Apps”: The Hybrid Digital Boardgame Model
CHI '21: Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsIncreasingly, modern boardgames incorporate digital apps and tools to deliver content in novel ways. Despite disparate approaches to incorporating digital tools in otherwise non-digital boardgames, there has to date been no detailed classification of ...
Cooperating to Compete: the Mutuality of Cooperation and Competition in Boardgame Play
CHI '18: Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsThis paper examines the complex relationship between competition and cooperation in boardgame play. We understand boardgaming as distributed cognition, where people work together in a shared activity to accomplish the game. Although players typically ...
Comments