skip to main content
research-article
Open Access

Game-based Climate Change Engagement: Analyzing the Potential of Entertainment and Serious Games

Published:06 October 2021Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Video games have risen as a popular medium with the potential to become a powerful tool for public climate change engagement. However, little is known about how existing digital games can fulfill this role. This study systematically compiles 150 video games that represent climate change, including serious (n = 109) and for entertainment (n = 41). The games are analyzed by adapting an existing framework (15 dimensions: achievable, challenging, concrete, credible, efficacy-enhancing, experiential learning, feedback-oriented, fun, identity-driven, levelling-up, meaningful, narrative-driven, reward-driven, simulating, social) and statistically compared. The analysis reveals that most games comply with most recommended attributes, but credibility, achievability, meaningfulness, and social features are uncommon or rare. Statistical results comparing serious games and games for entertainment associate six attributes with serious games (achievable, challenging, credible, efficacy-enhancing, experiential learning, feedback-oriented), and one (narrative-driven) with games for entertainment. The findings suggest that researchers would benefit from widening their lens to detect previously overlooked opportunities for game-based climate change engagement, communication, and education. The study also provides a systematic mapping of extant games depicting climate change for interested developers, designers and educators.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

References

  1. 34BigThings. 2016. Redout: Enhanced Edition. Game [PC]. 34BigThings, Turin, Italy.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Benjamin Abraham. 2018. Video game visions of climate futures: ARMA 3 and implications for games and persuasion. Games and Culture 13, 1 (2018), 71--91.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Benjamin J Abraham and Darshana Jayemanne. 2017. Where are all the climate change games? Locating digital games' response to climate change. Transformations 30 (2017), 74--94.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. National Aeronautics and Space Administration. 2004. Climate Kids Power Up! Game [browser]. National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington, D.C., US.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Gilbert Ahamer. 2013. Game, not fight: change climate change! Simulation & Gaming 44, 2--3 (2013), 272--301.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Sun Joo Ahn, Joshua Bostick, Elise Ogle, Kristine L Nowak, Kara T McGillicuddy, and Jeremy N Bailenson. 2016. Experiencing nature: Embodying animals in immersive virtual environments increases inclusion of nature in self and involvement with nature. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 21, 6 (2016), 399--419.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Sun Joo Grace Ahn, Jeremy N Bailenson, and Dooyeon Park. 2014. Short-and long-term effects of embodied experiences in immersive virtual environments on environmental locus of control and behavior. Computers in Human Behavior 39 (2014), 235--245.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Jeannette Angel, Alicia LaValle, Deepti Mathew Iype, Stephen Sheppard, and Aleksandra Dulic. 2015. Future Delta 2.0 An Experiential Learning Context for a Serious Game about Local Climate Change. In SIGGRAPH Asia 2015 Symposium on Education. ACM Press, New York, NY, 1--10.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Acute Art. 2018. Rising. Game [Android]. Acute Art, London, UK.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Dalibor Barto?. 2019. Trash Time. Game [PC]. Dalibor Barto? and TEDI Games, Slovakia.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Ian Bogost. 2007. Persuasive games. Vol. 5. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Andy Chalk. 2012. Balance of Power Creator Says Kickstarter Used To Be Cool. The Escapist. Retrieved May 19, 2020 from https://v1.escapistmagazine.com/news/view/119259-Balance-of-Power-Creator-Says-Kickstarter-Used-To-Be- CoolGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Tina Chan and Adam Leung. 2020. Illuminate: A Simulation Game to Instill Grounded Hope in Youth for Climate Action. In Extended Abstracts of the 2020 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play. ACM, New York, NY, 47--49.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Alenda Y Chang. 2019. Playing nature: Ecology in video games. Vol. 58. U of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Daniel A Chapman, Brian Lickel, and EzraMMarkowitz. 2017. Reassessing emotion in climate change communication. Nature Climate Change 7, 12 (2017), 850--852.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Caren B Cooper. 2011. Media literacy as a key strategy toward improving public acceptance of climate change science. BioScience 61, 3 (2011), 231--237.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Carlos Coronado. 2019. Koral. Game [PC]. Carlos Coronado, Spain.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Gaming Corps. 2016. The Descendant. Game [PC]. Microids, Paris, France.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Chris Crawford. 1990. Balance of the Planet. Game [DOS, browser emulated]. Chris Crawford, US.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. John W Creswell and J David Creswell. 2017. Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. SAGE Publishing, Thousand Oaks, CA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Mihaly Czikszentmihalyi. 1990. Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. Harper & Row, New York, NY.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Climate Emergency Declaration. 2019. Climate emergency declarations in 1,087 jurisdictions and local governments cover 266 million citizens. Climate Emergency Declaration.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. ZMQ Development. 2009. Copenhagen Challenge. Game [browser]. ZMQ Development, Delhi, India.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. ZU Digital. 2017. World Rescue. Game [Android]. ZU Digital, Budapest, Hungary.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Damien Djaouti, Julian Alvarez, and Jean-Pierre Jessel. 2011. Classifying serious games: the G/P/S model. In Handbook of research on improving learning and motivation through educational games: Multidisciplinary approaches. IGI Global, Hershey, PA, 118--136.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Kevin Doherty and Gavin Doherty. 2018. Engagement in HCI: conception, theory and measurement. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR) 51, 5 (2018), 1--39.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Alysson Diniz dos Santos, Francesco Strada, and Andrea Bottino. 2018. Approaching sustainability learning via digital serious games. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies 12, 3 (2018), 303--320.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Lars Doucet. 2009. Super Energy Apocalypse: Recycled. Game [browser]. Lars Doucet, Texas, US.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Lars Doucet and Vinod Srinivasan. 2010. Designing entertaining educational games using procedural rhetoric: a case study. In Proceedings of the 5th ACM SIGGRAPH Symposium on Video Games. ACM, New York, NY, 5--10. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact., Vol. 5, No. CHI PLAY, Article 226. Publication date: September 2021. 226:18 Daniel Fernández Galeote & Juho HamariGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Anthony Dudo, Vincent Cicchirillo, Lucy Atkinson, and Samantha Marx. 2014. Portrayals of technoscience in video games: A potential avenue for informal science learning. Science Communication 36, 2 (2014), 219--247.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. EarthGames. 2016. Climate Quest. Game [Android]. EarthGames, Seattle, Washington, US.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. EarthGames. 2016. EcoTrivia: Save the Animals. Game [iOS]. EarthGames, Seattle, Washington, US.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. EarthGames. 2017. A Caribou's Tale. Game [Android]. EarthGames, Seattle, Washington, US.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. EarthGames. 2017. Infrared Escape. Game [Android]. EarthGames, Washington, US.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. EarthGames. 2018. Life of Pika. Game [Android]. EarthGames, Seattle, Washington, US.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Daedalic Entertainment. 2012. A New Beginning - Final Cut. Game [PC]. Daedalic Entertainment, Hamburg, Germany.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Elevator Entertainment. 2014. Habitat the Game. Game [iOS]. Elevator Entertainment, Chippendale, Australia.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Séverine Erhel and Eric Jamet. 2013. Digital game-based learning: Impact of instructions and feedback on motivation and learning effectiveness. Computers & education 67 (2013), 156--167.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Carlo Fabricatore and Ximena López. 2012. Sustainability Learning through Gaming: An Exploratory Study. Electronic Journal of e-Learning 10, 2 (2012), 209--222.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Carlo Fabricatore, Ximena López, Carlo Fabricatore, and In C Busch. 2014. A model to identify affordances for game-based sustainability learning. In Proceedings of the 8th European Conference on Games Based Learning (ECGBL 2014), Vol. 1. Academic Conferences and Publishing International Limited, Reading, England, 99--109.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Daniel Fernández Galeote, Mikko Rajanen, Dorina Rajanen, Nikoletta Z. Legaki, David J. Langley, and Juho Hamari. 2021. Gamification for climate change engagement: review of corpus and future agenda. Environmental Research Letters 16, 6 (2021), 1--50. http://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748--9326/abec05Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Kristoffer S Fjællingsdal and Christian A Klöckner. 2017. ENED-GEM: a conceptual framework model for psychological enjoyment factors and learning mechanisms in educational games about the environment. Frontiers in psychology 8 (2017), 1085.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Kristoffer S Fjællingsdal and Christian A Klöckner. 2019. Gaming Green: The Educational Potential of Eco--A Digital Simulated Ecosystem. Frontiers in psychology 10 (2019), 2846.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Collaborative for Advanced Landscape Planning. 2016. Future Delta 2.0. Game [PC]. Collaborative for Advanced Landscape Planning, Vancouver, Canada.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. Art Works for Change. 2013. Bioharmonious. Game [browser]. Art Works for Change, US.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. Centre for System Solutions. 2018. New Shores. Game [browser]. Centre for System Solutions, Wroclaw, Poland.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. Frederik Hermund, Ole F. Toubro, Jakob E. Nielsen, Roman Spycher, and Benjamin Salqvist. 2005. 3rd World Farmer. Game [browser]. Frederik Hermund and Ole F. Toubro and Jakob E. Nielsen and Roman Spycher and Benjamin Salqvist, Denmark.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. Mother Gaia. 2009. City Rain. Game [browser]. Ovolo Corporation, Montreal, Canada.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. Firaxis Games. 2019. Sid Meier's Civilization VI: Gathering Storm. Game [PC]. 2K Games, Novato, California.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. Haemimont Games. 2014. Tropico 5 - Waterborne. Game [PC]. Kalypso Media Digital, Worms, Germany.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. Orphic Games. 2019. The Unclearness. Game [PC]. Orphic Games, Germany.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  52. Positech Games. 2013. Democracy 3. Game [PC]. Positech Games, UK.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  53. Strange Loop Games. 2018. Eco. Game [PC]. Strange Loop Games, Seattle, Washington, US.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  54. Tapps Games. 2017. The Greenhouse Effect Is a Lie. Game [Android]. Tapps Games, São Paulo, Brazil.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. YCJY Games. 2016. The Aquatic Adventure of the Last Human. Game [PC]. YCJY Games, Gothenburg, Sweden.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  56. James Paul Gee. 2003. What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. Computers in Entertainment (CIE) 1, 1 (2003), 20--20.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  57. James Paul Gee. 2008. The Ecology of Games. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, Chapter Learning and Games, 21--40. https://doi.org/10.1162/dmal.9780262693646.021Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  58. National Geographic. 2013. Plan it Green: Generation Station. Game [browser]. National Geographic, New York City, New York, US.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  59. Robert Gifford. 2011. The dragons of inaction: psychological barriers that limit climate change mitigation and adaptation. American psychologist 66, 4 (2011), 290.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  60. Juho Hamari. 2019. Gamification. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ, 1--3. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405165518. wbeos1321 arXiv:https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/9781405165518.wbeos1321Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  61. Inez EP Harker-Schuch, Franklin P Mills, Steven J Lade, and Rebecca M Colvin. 2020. CO2peration--Structuring a 3D interactive digital game to improve climate literacy in the 12--13-year-old age group. Computers & Education 144 (2020), 103705.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  62. Chip Heath and Dan Heath. 2010. Switch: How to Change Things When Change Is Hard. Crown Publishing Group, New York, NY.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  63. Robin Hunicke, Marc LeBlanc, and Robert Zubek. 2004. MDA: A formal approach to game design and game research. In Proceedings of the AAAI Workshop on Challenges in Game AI, Vol. 4. Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence, Menlo Park, CA, 1--5. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact., Vol. 5, No. CHI PLAY, Article 226. Publication date: September 2021. Game-based Climate Change Engagement: Analyzing the Potential of Entertainment and Serious Games 226:19Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  64. IguanaBee. 2014. Ciclania. Game [browser]. IguanaBee, Santiago, Chile.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  65. Bohemia Interactive. 2013. Arma 3. Game [PC]. Bohemia Interactive, Prague, Czechia.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  66. Charlene Jennett, Ioanna Iacovides, Anna L Cox, Anastasia Vikhanova, Emily Weigold, Layla Mostaghimi, Geraint Jones, James Jenkins, Sarah Gallacher, and Yvonne Rogers. 2016. Squeezy Green Balls: Promoting Environmental Awareness through Playful Interactions. In Proceedings of the 2016 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play. ACM, New York, NY, 389--400.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  67. Cheryl I Johnson, Shannon KT Bailey, and Wendi L Van Buskirk. 2017. Instructional techniques to facilitate learning and motivation of serious games. Springer-Verlag, New York, NY, Chapter Designing effective feedback messages in serious games and simulations: A research review, 119--140.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  68. Daniel Kahneman. 2017. Thinking, Fast and Slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux, New York, NY.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  69. Korina Katsaliaki and Navonil Mustafee. 2015. Edutainment for sustainable development: A survey of games in the field. Simulation & Gaming 46, 6 (2015), 647--672.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  70. KliktrixStudios. 2016. BlockMount. Game [PC].Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  71. Erik Knol and PeterWDe Vries. 2011. EnerCities-A serious game to stimulate sustainability and energy conservation: Preliminary results. eLearning Papers 25 (2011), 1--10.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  72. Kokakiki. 2010. Ziro. Game [PC]. Kalypso Media Digital, Worms, Germany.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  73. Kuuasema. 2016. CleanPower. Game [iOS]. Fortum Corporation, Espoo, Finland.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  74. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. 2011. Interactive Energy & Climate Simulation. Game [browser]. Lawrence Livermore National Security, Livermore, California, US.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  75. Petri Lankoski and Staffan Björk. 2015. Formal analysis of gameplay. In Game Research Methods. ETC Press, Pittsburgh, PA, 23--35.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  76. Sustainable Learning. 2015. Sustainable Shaun. Game [browser]. Sustainable Learning, Bristol, UK.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  77. Joey J Lee, Pinar Ceyhan, William Jordan-Cooley, and Woonhee Sung. 2013. GREENIFY: A real-world action game for climate change education. Simulation & Gaming 44, 2--3 (2013), 349--365.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  78. Leonard Menchiari, Daniele Vicinanzo, and Giulio Perrone. 2019. The Eternal Castle [REMASTERED]. Game [PC]. Playsaurus, Los Angeles, California, US.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  79. Georgia Liarakou, Eleni Sakka, Costas Gavrilakis, and Costas Tsolakidis. 2012. Evaluation of serious games, as a tool for education for sustainable development. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-learning 15, 2 (2012), 96--110.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  80. Irene Lorenzoni, Sophie Nicholson-Cole, and Lorraine Whitmarsh. 2007. Barriers perceived to engaging with climate change among the UK public and their policy implications. Global environmental change 17, 3--4 (2007), 445--459.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  81. Andrés Lucero, Jussi Holopainen, Elina Ollila, Riku Suomela, and Evangelos Karapanos. 2013. The playful experiences (PLEX) framework as a guide for expert evaluation. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Designing Pleasurable Products and Interfaces. ACM, New York, NY, 221--230.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  82. Edward W Maibach, Matthew Nisbet, Paula Baldwin, Karen Akerlof, and Guoqing Diao. 2010. Reframing climate change as a public health issue: an exploratory study of public reactions. BMC public health 10, 1 (2010), 1--11.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  83. David M Markowitz, Rob Laha, Brian P Perone, Roy D Pea, and Jeremy N Bailenson. 2018. Immersive virtual reality field trips facilitate learning about climate change. Frontiers in psychology 9 (2018), 2364.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  84. Marleen Cobben, Netherlands Institute of Ecology, and iTZiT Visual Technology. 2017. Climate Pursuit. Game [browser]. Netherlands Institute of Ecology, Wageningen, Netherlands.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  85. Valérie Masson-Delmotte, Panmao Zhai, Hans-Otto Pörtner, Debra Roberts, Jim Skea, Priyadarshi R Shukla, Anna Pirani, W Moufouma-Okia, C Péan, R Pidcock, et al. 2018. Global warming of 1.5°C. An IPCC Special Report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty. Technical Report. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Geneva, Switzerland.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  86. Iván Matellanes. 2014. The Wheel of Climate Change. Game [PC]. Iván Matellanes, Spain.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  87. Matteo Signer, Benjamin Schmid, and Patricia Schmid. 2018. Climate Change Simulator 2018 Chinese Hoax Edition. Game [browser]. smeanox, Switzerland.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  88. Mei-Lan Steimle, Jonathan Heckerman, and Preston Carlson. 2018. Vegan Dating Simulator. Game [browser]. Stanford Student Games, Stanford, California, US.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  89. Melesta. 2013. Green City. Game [PC]. Big Fish Games, Seattle, Washington, US.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  90. Melesta. 2013. Green City 2. Game [PC]. Big Fish Games, Seattle, Washington, US.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  91. Molleindustria. 2008. Oiligarchy. Game [browser]. Molleindustria, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, US.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  92. Molleindustria. 2010. Memory Reloaded. Game [browser]. Molleindustria, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, US.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  93. Martha C Monroe, Richard R Plate, Annie Oxarart, Alison Bowers, and Willandia A Chaves. 2019. Identifying effective climate change education strategies: a systematic review of the research. Environmental Education Research 25, 6 (2019), 791--812. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact., Vol. 5, No. CHI PLAY, Article 226. Publication date: September 2021. 226:20 Daniel Fernández Galeote & Juho HamariGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  94. Luca Morganti, Federica Pallavicini, Elena Cadel, Antonio Candelieri, Francesco Archetti, and Fabrizia Mantovani. 2017. Gaming for Earth: Serious games and gamification to engage consumers in pro-environmental behaviours for energy efficiency. Energy Research & Social Science 29 (2017), 95--102.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  95. Susanne C Moser. 2010. Communicating climate change: history, challenges, process and future directions. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change 1, 1 (2010), 31--53.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  96. Susanne C Moser and Lisa Dilling. 2011. The Oxford handbook of climate change and society. Oxford University Press, Oxford, England, Chapter Communicating Climate Change: Closing the Science-Action Gap, 161--174. https: //doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199566600.003.0011Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  97. BradfordWMott, Charles B Callaway, Luke S Zettlemoyer, Seung Y Lee, and James C Lester. 1999. Towards narrativecentered learning environments. In Proceedings of the 1999 AAAI fall symposium on narrative intelligence. Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence, Menlo Park, CA, 78--82.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  98. Vicki Moulder, Lorna R Boschman, Ron Wakkary, Carman Neustaedter, and Hiroki Hill Kobayashi. 2018. HCI interventions for science communication. In Extended Abstracts of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New York, NY, 1--9.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  99. Viknashvaran Narayanasamy, Kok Wai Wong, Chun Che Fung, and Shri Rai. 2006. Distinguishing games and simulation games from simulators. Computers in Entertainment (CIE) 4, 2 (2006), 9--es.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  100. Isabel Newsome. 2020. An Educational Game Bringing Awareness to Declining Insect Populations. In Extended Abstracts of the 2020 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play. ACM, New York, NY, 326--329.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  101. E Michael Nussbaum, Marissa C Owens, Gale M Sinatra, Abeera P Rehmat, Jacqueline R Cordova, Sajjad Ahmad, Fred C Harris Jr, and Sergiu M Dascalu. 2015. Losing the Lake: Simulations to promote gains in student knowledge and interest about climate change. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education 10, 6 (2015), 789--811.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  102. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. 2009. Where Rivers Meet the Sea. Game [browser]. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Washington, D.C., US.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  103. State of Play Games. 2014. Lumino City. Game [PC]. State of Play Games, London, UK.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  104. Tania Ouariachi, José Gutiérrez-Pérez, and María-Dolores Olvera-Lobo. 2018. Can serious games help to mitigate climate change? Exploring their influence on Spanish and American teenagers' attitudes/¿ Pueden los serious games ayudar a mitigar el cambio climático? Una exploración de su influencia sobre las actitudes de los adolescentes españoles y estadounidenses. Psyecology 9, 3 (2018), 365--395.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  105. Tania Ouariachi, Chih-Yen Li, and Wim JL Elving. 2020. Gamification approaches for education and engagement on pro-environmental behaviors: Searching for best practices. Sustainability 12, 11 (2020), 4565.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  106. Tania Ouariachi, María Dolores Olvera-Lobo, and José Gutiérrez-Pérez. 2017. Analyzing climate change communication through online games: Development and application of validated criteria. Science communication 39, 1 (2017), 10--44.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  107. Tania Ouariachi, María Dolores Olvera-Lobo, José Gutiérrez-Pérez, and Edward Maibach. 2019. A framework for climate change engagement through video games. Environmental education research 25, 5 (2019), 701--716.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  108. Trista Patterson and Sam Barratt. 2019. Playing for the planet: How video games can deliver for people and the environment. United Nations Environment Programme, GRID-Arendal.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  109. Petroglyph. 2018. Forged Battalion. Game [PC]. Team17 Digital, Wakefield, UK.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  110. PIXOWL. 2014. The Sandbox EDU. Game [iOS]. PIXOWL, San Francisco, California, US.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  111. PlayGen. 2009. Climate Health Impact. Game [browser]. PlayGen, London, UK.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  112. Jacob Poushter and Christine Huang. 2019. Climate change still seen as the top global threat, but cyberattacks a rising concern. Pew Research Center 10 (2019), 1--37.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  113. The EPIC Project. 2015. Survive Global Climate Change. Game [Android]. Kendall College of Art and Design, Grand Rapids, Michigan, US.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  114. The EPIC Project. 2017. Battling Extinction. Game [Android]. Kendall College of Art and Design, Grand Rapids, Michigan, US.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  115. Diana Reckien and Klaus Eisenack. 2013. Climate change gaming on board and screen: A review. Simulation & Gaming 44, 2--3 (2013), 253--271.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  116. Red Redemption. 2006. Climate Challenge. Game [browser]. Red Redemption, Oxford, UK.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  117. Red Redemption. 2011. Fate of the World. Game [PC]. Soothsayer Games, Maidenhead, UK.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  118. Red Redemption. 2011. Fate of the World: Tipping Point. Game [PC]. Red Redemption, Oxford, UK.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  119. Related Designs and Bluebyte. 2011. Anno 2070. Game [PC]. Ubisoft, Paris, France.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  120. Rose Abernathy Keller, Fred Tarabout, Paula Escuadra, and Dren Mcdonald. 2015. Owl Together. Game [browser]. Rose Abernathy Keller, San Francisco, California, US.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  121. Hardin Sally and Moser Claire. 2019. Climate Deniers in the 116th Congress. Center for American Progress Action Fund. Center for American Progress Action. Retrieved May 19, 2020 from https://www.americanprogressaction.org/issues/ green/news/2019/01/28/172944/climate-deniers-116th-congress/ Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact., Vol. 5, No. CHI PLAY, Article 226. Publication date: September 2021. Game-based Climate Change Engagement: Analyzing the Potential of Entertainment and Serious Games 226:21Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  122. Mike S Schäfer. 2012. Online communication on climate change and climate politics: a literature review. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change 3, 6 (2012), 527--543.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  123. Wailea Siler. 2017. Upstream: Combat Climate Change. Game [iOS]. Scott Siler, US.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  124. Lemon Squeezy. 2019. 1000 days to escape. Game [PC]. Lemon Squeezy, Novosibirsk, Russia.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  125. Marios Stanitsas, Konstantinos Kirytopoulos, and Elise Vareilles. 2019. Facilitating sustainability transition through serious games: A systematic literature review. Journal of cleaner production 208 (2019), 924--936.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  126. Game Source Studio. 2016. Carbon Warfare. Game [iOS]. Game Source Studio, Cergy, France.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  127. Stray Fawn Studio. 2016. Niche. Game [PC]. Stray Fawn Studio, Zurich, Switzerland.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  128. SweeneyXx. 2019. Climate Change: Gravity Edition. Game [browser]. SweeneyXx.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  129. Grant Tavinor. 2009. The art of videogames. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  130. thatgamecompany. 2019. Flower. Game [PC]. Annapurna Interactive, West Hollywood, California, US.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  131. Alliance to Save Energy. 2006. Energy Hog. Game [browser]. Alliance to Save Energy, Washington, D.C., US.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  132. Giovanni Maria Troiano, Dylan Schouten, Michael Cassidy, Eli Tucker-Raymond, Gillian Puttick, and Casper Harteveld. 2020. Ice Paddles, CO2 Invaders, and Exploding Planets: How Young Students Transform Climate Science Into Serious Games. In Proceedings of the Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play. ACM, New York, NY, 534--548.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  133. Raimo Tuomela. 1995. The importance of us: A philosophical study of basic social notions. Stanford University Press, Palo Alto, CA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  134. Energy UK Department for Business and Industrial Strategy. 2013. 2050 Calculator. Game [browser]. UK Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, London, UK.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  135. Universcience, France TV Éducation, and Tralalere. 2013. 2020 Energy. Game [browser]. Universcience, Paris, France.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  136. Sander Van der Linden, Edward Maibach, and Anthony Leiserowitz. 2015. Improving public engagement with climate change: Five "best practice" insights from psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science 10, 6 (2015), 758--763.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  137. David I Waddington and Thomas Fennewald. 2018. Grim FATE: Learning about systems thinking in an in-depth climate change simulation. Simulation & gaming 49, 2 (2018), 168--194.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  138. PatriciaWastiau, Caroline Kearney, andWouter Van den Berghe. 2009. How are digital games used in schools. European Schoolnet. Retrieved May 11, 2020 from http://games.eun.org/upload/gis-synthesis_report_en.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  139. Elke U Weber and Paul C Stern. 2011. Public understanding of climate change in the United States. American Psychologist 66, 4 (2011), 315.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  140. Charlotte Lærke Weitze. 2014. Developing goals and objectives for gameplay and learning. In Learning, education and games: Volume one: Curricular and design considerations. ETC Press, Pittsburgh, PA, 225--249.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  141. WGBH. 2014. Energy Lab. Game [browser]. Public Broadcasting Service, Arlington County, Virginia, US.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  142. Victoria Wibeck, Tina-Simone Neset, and Björn-Ola Linnér. 2013. Communicating climate change through ICT-based visualization: Towards an analytical framework. Sustainability 5, 11 (2013), 4760--4777.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  143. Tom Wijman. 2019. The Global games market will generate $152.1 Billion in 2019 as the US overtakes China as the biggest market. Newzoo.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  144. Jessica Fitts Willoughby and Hollie Smith. 2016. Communication strategies and new media platforms: exploring the synergistic potential of health and environmental communication. Science Communication 38, 4 (2016), 535--545.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  145. Winter Wolves. 2009. Bionic Heart. Game [PC]. Winter Wolves, Italy.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  146. MindFuel Wonderville. 2009. Waste Avengers. Game [browser]. Science Alberta Foundation, Calgary, Canada.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  147. MindFuel Wonderville. 2015. Solar Energy Defenders. Game [browser]. Science Alberta Foundation, Calgary, Canada.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  148. Pieter Wouters, Christof Van Nimwegen, Herre Van Oostendorp, and Erik D Van Der Spek. 2013. A meta-analysis of the cognitive and motivational effects of serious games. Journal of educational psychology 105, 2 (2013), 249.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  149. Jason S Wu and Joey J Lee. 2015. Climate change games as tools for education and engagement. Nature Climate Change 5, 5 (2015), 413--418.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Game-based Climate Change Engagement: Analyzing the Potential of Entertainment and Serious Games

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in

        Full Access

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader