skip to main content
research-article

VibHand: On-Hand Vibrotactile Interface Enhancing Non-Visual Exploration of Digital Graphics

Published:04 November 2020Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Visual graphics are widely spread in digital media and are useful in many contexts of daily life. However, access to this type of graphical information remains a challenging task for people with visual impairments (VI). In this study, we designed and evaluated an on-hand vibrotactile interface that enables users with VI to explore digital graphics presented on tablets. We first conducted a set of exploratory tests with both people with VI and blindfolded (BF) people to investigate several design factors. We then conducted a comparative experiment to verify that on-hand vibrotactile cues (indicating direction and progression) can enhance the non-visual exploration of digital graphics. The results based on 12 participants with VI and 12 BF participants confirmed the usability of the technique and revealed that the visual status of the users does not impact graphics identification and comparison tasks.

References

  1. Jérémy Albouys-Perrois, Jérémy Laviole, Carine Briant, and Anke M. Brock. 2018. Towards a Multisensory Augmented Reality Map for Blind and Low Vision People: a Participatory Design Approach. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Paper 629, 14 pages. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174203Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. David S. Alles. 1970. Information Transmission by Phantom Sensations. IEEE Trans. Man-Machine Syst. 11, 1 (1970), 85--91. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/TMMS.1970.299967Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Jessalyn Alvina, Shengdong Zhao, Simon T. Perrault, Maryam Azh, Thijs Roumen, and Morten Fjeld. 2015. OmniVib: Towards Cross-body Spatiotemporal Vibrotactile Notifications for Mobile Phones. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2487--2496. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702341Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Heller, M.A., 1989. Picture and pattern perception in the sighted and the blind: the advantage of the late blind. Perception, 18(3), pp.379--389Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Sandra Bardot, Marcos Serrano, and Christophe Jouffrais. 2016. From tactile to virtual: using a smartwatch to improve spatial map exploration for visually impaired users. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services (MobileHCI '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 100--111. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2935334.2935342Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Anke Brock, Samuel Lebaz, Bernard Oriola, Delphine Picard, Christophe Jouffrais, and Philippe Truillet. 2012. Kin'touch: understanding how visually impaired people explore tactile maps. In CHI '12 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2471--2476. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2212776.2223821Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Emeline Brulé, Brianna J. Tomlinson, Oussama Metatla, Christophe Jouffrais, and Marcos Serrano. 2020. Review of Quantitative Empirical Evaluations of Technology for People with Visual Impairments. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1--14. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376749Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Jessica R. Cauchard, Janette L. Cheng, Thomas Pietrzak, and James A. Landay. 2016. ActiVibe: Design and Evaluation of Vibrations for Progress Monitoring. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 3261--3271. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858046Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Cornoldi Cesare, Carla Tinti, Irene C. Mammarella, Anna Maria Re, and Diego Varotto. "Memory for an imagined pathway and strategy effects in sighted and in totally congenitally blind individuals." Acta Psychologica 130, no. 1 (2009): 11--16.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Angela Chang, Sile O'Modhrain, Rob Jacob, Eric Gunther, and Hiroshi Ishii. 2002. ComTouch: design of a vibrotactile communication device. In Proceedings of the 4th conference on Designing interactive systems: processes, practices, methods, and techniques (DIS '02). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 312--320. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/778712.778755Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Qin Chen, Simon T. Perrault, Quentin Roy, and Lonce Wyse. 2018. Effect of temporality, physical activity and cognitive load on spatiotemporal vibrotactile pattern recognition. In Proceedings of the 2018 International Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces (AVI '18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 25, 9 pages. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3206505.3206511Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Camors Damien, Damien Appert, Jean-Baptiste Durand, and Christophe Jouffrais. "Tactile Cues for Improving Target Localization in Subjects with Tunnel Vision." Multimodal Technologies and Interaction 3, no. 2 (2019): 26.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Jacobson, R. Dan. "Navigating maps with little or no sight: An audio-tactile approach." In Content Visualization and Intermedia Representations (CVIR'98). 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Delphine Picard, Samuel Lebaz, Christophe Jouffrais, and Catherine Monnier. "Haptic recognition of two-dimensional raised-line patterns by early-blind, late-blind, and blindfolded sighted adults." Perception 39, no. 2 (2010): 224--235.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Julie Ducasse, Anke M Brock, and Christophe Jouffrais. 2018. Accessible Interactive Maps for Visually Impaired Users. In Mobility of Visually Impaired People. Springer, 537--584. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/978--3--319--54446--5_17Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Julie Ducasse, Marc J-M Macé, Marcos Serrano, and Christophe Jouffrais. 2016. Tangible Reels: Construction and Exploration of Tangible Maps by Visually Impaired Users. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2186--2197. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858058Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Don Samitha Elvitigala, Denys J. C. Matthies, Vipula Dissanayaka, Chamod Weerasinghe, and Suranga Nanayakkara. 2019. 2bit-TactileHand: Evaluating Tactons for On-Body Vibrotactile Displays on the Hand and Wrist. In Proceedings of the 10th Augmented Human International Conference 2019 (AH2019). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 3, 8 pages. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3311823.3311832Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Nicholas A. Giudice, Hari Prasath Palani, Eric Brenner, and Kevin M. Kramer. 2012. Learning non-visual graphical information using a touch-based vibro-audio interface. In Proceedings of the 14th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers and accessibility (ASSETS '12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 103--110. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2384916.2384935Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Cagatay Goncu and Kim Marriott. 2011. GraVVITAS: Generic Multi-touch Presentation of Accessible Graphics. In Proceedings of the 13th IFIP TC 13 Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (INTERACT '11),30--48. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/978--3--642--23774--4Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Jonggi Hong, Alisha Pradhan, Jon E. Froehlich, and Leah Findlater. 2017. Evaluating Wrist-Based Haptic Feedback for Non-Visual Target Finding and Path Tracing on a 2D Surface. In Proceedings of the 19th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS '17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 210--219. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3132525.3132538Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Sreekar Krishna, Shantanu Bala, Troy McDaniel, Stephen McGuire, and Sethuraman Panchanathan. 2010. VibroGlove: an assistive technology aid for conveying facial expressions. In CHI '10 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '10). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 3637--3642. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/1753846.1754031Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Zhuoluo Ma, Yue Liu, Dejiang Ye, and Lu Zhao. 2019. Vibrotactile Wristband for Warning and Guiding in Automated Vehicles. In Extended Abstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '19). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Paper LBW2220, 6 pages. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3290607.3312819Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Jonatan Martínez, Arturo García, Miguel Oliver, José Pascual Molina, and Pascual González. 2016. Identifying Virtual 3D Geometric Shapes with a Vibrotactile Glove. IEEE Comput. Graph. Appl. 36, 1 (2016), 42--51. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/MCG.2014.81Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Anita Meier, Denys J. C. Matthies, Bodo Urban, and Reto Wettach. 2015. Exploring vibrotactile feedback on the body and foot for the purpose of pedestrian navigation. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Sensor-based Activity Recognition and Interaction, ACM, 1--11. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2790044.2790051Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Giuseppe Melfi, Karin Müller, Thorsten Schwarz, Gerhard Jaworek, and Rainer Stiefelhagen. 2020. Understanding what you feel: A Mobile Audio-Tactile System for Graphics Used at Schools with Students with Visual Impairment. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1--12. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376508Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Hari P. Palani, Paul D. S. Fink & Nicholas A. Giudice (2020): Design Guidelines for Schematizing and Rendering Haptically Perceivable Graphical Elements on Touchscreen Devices, International Journal of Human--Computer Interaction, 1--22.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Jaeyoung Park, Jaeha Kim, Yonghwan Oh, and Hong Z Tan. 2016. Rendering moving tactile stroke on the palm using a sparse 2d array. In International Conference on Human Haptic Sensing and Touch Enabled Computer Applications. Springer, Cham, 47--56. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/978--3--319--42324--1Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Benjamin Poppinga, Charlotte Magnusson, Martin Pielot, and Kirsten Rassmus-Gröhn. 2011. TouchOver map: audio-tactile exploration of interactive maps. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Human Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services (MobileHCI '11). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 545--550. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2037373.2037458Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. R.M. Sakia. The Box-Cox transformation technique: a review. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series D (The Statistician), 41(2), 169--178.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Elizabeth B-N Sanders. 2002. From user-centered to participatory design approaches. Design and the social sciences: Making connections 1, 8 (2002).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Choi Seungmoon, and Katherine J. Kuchenbecker. "Vibrotactile display: Perception, technology, and applications." Proceedings of the IEEE 101, no. 9 (2012): 2093--2104.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Abigale Stangl, Meredith Ringel Morris, and Danna Gurari. 2020. 'Person, Shoes, Tree. Is the Person Naked'? What People with Vision Impairments Want in Image Descriptions. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1--13. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376404Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Anil K. Raj, Steven J. Kass, and James F. Perry. 2012. Vibrotactile Displays for Improving Spatial Awareness. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting. Sage CA: Los Angeles, 44, 1 (2012), 181--184. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/154193120004400148Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Joe Tekli, Youssef Bou Issa, and Richard Chbeir. 2018. Evaluating touch-screen vibration modality for blind users to access simple shapes and graphics. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 110, August 2017 (2018), 115--133. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2017.10.009Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Zheshen Wang, Baoxin Li, Terri Hedgpeth, and Teresa Haven. 2009. Instant tactile-audio map: enabling access to digital maps for people with visual impairment. In Proceedings of the 11th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers and accessibility (Assets '09). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 43--50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/1639642.1639652Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Ruolin Wang, Chun Yu, Xing-Dong Yang, Weijie He, and Yuanchun Shi. 2019. EarTouch: Facilitating Smartphone Use for Visually Impaired People in Mobile and Public Scenarios. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '19). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Paper 24, 13 pages. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300254Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. John S Zelek. 2005. Seeing by touch (haptics) for wayfinding. In International congress series, Vol. 1282. Elsevier, 1108--1112.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. VibHand: On-Hand Vibrotactile Interface Enhancing Non-Visual Exploration of Digital Graphics

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in

      Full Access

      • Published in

        cover image Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
        Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction  Volume 4, Issue ISS
        ISS
        November 2020
        488 pages
        EISSN:2573-0142
        DOI:10.1145/3433930
        Issue’s Table of Contents

        Copyright © 2020 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 4 November 2020
        Published in pacmhci Volume 4, Issue ISS

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader