skip to main content
research-article

Culturally Significant Presence in Single-player Computer Games

Authors Info & Claims
Published:03 December 2020Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Cultural presence is a term used to explain and evaluate cultural learning in virtual heritage projects but is less frequently used for video games. Given the increasing importance of video games to cultural heritage, this article investigates explanations of cultural presence that could be communicated by games, especially concerning UNESCO and ICOMOS definitions of cultural significance. The aim is to determine if cultural presence can be communicated via video games and across a range of game genres.

Observations derived from game prototyping workshops for history and heritage aided the development of a teachable list of desirable game elements. To distinguish itself from the vagueness surrounding theories of cultural presence, a theory of culturally significant presence is proposed. Culturally significant presence requires three components: culturally significant artifacts and practices; an overarching framework of a singular, identifiable cultural viewpoint; and awareness by the participant of both the culturally significant and the overarching cultural framework and perspective (which gives sites, artifacts, and practices their cultural significance and relational value).

As awareness of cultural presence requires time for reflection, single-player games were chosen that were not completely dependent on time-based challenges. Another criterion was cultural heritage content: They must simulate aspects of heritage and history, communicate a specific cultural framework, or explore and reconstruct a past culture. Four games were chosen that simulate a culture, explain archaeological methods, portray indigenous intangible heritage, or explain historical-based ecosystems of the past based on educational guidelines. The games are Assassin's Creed: Origins; Heaven's Vault; Never Alone; and a Ph.D. project: Saxon. Their genres could be described as first-person shooter/open world/virtual tour; dialogue-based puzzle game; 2D platform game; and turn-based strategy game.

The aim is not to evaluate the entire range of interactive virtual environments and games, but to examine the applicability and relevance of this new theory and to ascertain whether the four games provided useful feedback on the concept and usefulness of culturally significant presence. A more clearly demarcated theory may not only help focus evaluation studies but also encourage game developers to modify or allow modification of commercial games for classroom teaching of digital heritage.

References

  1. Robert J. Stone. 2005. Serious gaming—virtual reality's saviour. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Virtual Systems and Multimedia: Virtual Reality at Work in the 21st Century, Impact on Society.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Michela Mortara, Chiara Eva Catalano, Francesco Bellotti, Giusy Fiucci, Minica Houry-Panchetti, and Panagiotis Petridis. 2014. Learning cultural heritage by serious games. J. Cult. Herit. 15, 3 (2014), 318--325. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2013.04.004Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Eike Falk Anderson, Leigh McLoughlin, Fotis Liarokapis, Christopher Peters, Panagiotis Petridis, and Sara De Freitas. Developing serious games for cultural heritage: A state-of-the-art review. Virt. Real. 14, 4 (2010), 255--275.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Eike Falk Anderson, Leigh McLoughlin, Fotis Liarokapis, Christopher Peters, C. Petridis, and Sara de Freitas. 2009. Serious games in cultural heritage. In Proceedings of the 10th International Symposium on Virtual Reality, Archaeology and Cultural Heritage.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Fedwa Laamarti, Mohamad Eid, and Abdulmotaleb El Saddik. 2014. An overview of serious games. Int. J. Comput. Games Technol. 2014 (2014), 358152.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Anastasios Doulamis, Fotis Liarokapis, Panagiotis Petridis, and Georgios Miaoulis. 2012. Serious games for cultural applications. In Intelligent Computer Graphics 2011, Springer, 97--115.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Andrew Reinhard. 2018. Archaeogaming: An Introduction to Archaeology in and of Video Games. Berghahn Books.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Daniel Livingstone, Sandy Louchart, and Stuart Jeffrey. 2016. Archaeological storytelling in games. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Playing with History: Games, Antiquity and History.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. UNESCO. 1972. In Proceedings of the Convention Concerning the Protection of the World Cultural and Natural Heritage. UNESCO, Paris, France.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Robert Stone and Takeo Ojika. 2000. Virtual heritage: What next? IEEE Multim. 7, 2 (2000), 73--74.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Katie Salen and Eric Zimmerman. 2004. Rules of Play: Game design Fundamentals. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Jesper Juul. 2003. The game, the player, the world: Looking for a heart of gameness. In Proceedings of the DIGRA Conference—“Level Up.”Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Erik Champion. 2006. Evaluating Cultural Learning in Virtual Environments. Ph.D. Thesis. Dept. of Geomatics, Faculty of Engineering and the Faculty of Architecture, Building, and Planning, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Thomas W. Malone. 1982. Heuristics for designing enjoyable user interfaces: Lessons from computer games. In Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Australia ICOMOS Incorporated International Council on Monuments and Sites. 2013. The Burra Charter: The Australia ICOMOS Charter for Places of Cultural Significance. 31.10.2013 ed. ICOMOS, Burwood, Australia.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. UNESCO. 2003. In Proceedings of the Convention for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage. UNESCO. UNESCO, Paris. MISC/2003/CLT/CH/14.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. G. Riva, G. Castelnuovo, A. Gaggioli, and F. Mantovani. 2002. Towards a cultural approach to presence. In Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop PRESENCE.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Erik Champion. 2002. Cultural engagement in virtual heritage environments with inbuilt interactive evaluation mechanisms. In Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop PRESENCE.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Erik Champion. 2008. Game-based historical learning. In Handbook of Research on Effective Electronic Gaming in Education, Information Science Reference. 219--234.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Laia Pujol-Tost. 2018. Cultural presence in virtual archaeology: An exploratory analysis of factors. Pres. Teleop. Virt. Environ. 26, 3 (2018), 247--263.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Erik Champion. 2011. Playing with the Past. Springer, London, UK.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Erik Champion. 2003. Online exploration of Mayan culture. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Virtual Systems and Multimedia, Hybrid Reality: Art, Technology and the Human Factor. IOS Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Erik Champion, Ian Bishop, and Bharat Dave. 2012. The Palenque project: Evaluating interaction in an online virtual archaeology site. Virt. Real. 16, 2 (2012), 121--139.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Cook Inlet Tribal Council. 2017. Storytelling for the next generation. In Storytelling for the Next Generation: How a Nonprofit in Alaska Harnessed the Power of Video Games to Share and Celebrate Cultures, A. A. A. Mil et al. (Eds.). Sidestone Press, Leiden, the Netherlands, 220.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Angenitus Arie Andries Mol, Csilla E. Ariese-Vandemeulebroucke, Krijn H. J. Boom, and Aris Politopoulos (Eds.). 2017. The interactive past: Archaeology, heritage 8 video games. Sidestone Press, Leiden, the Netherlands.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Barbara Bodenhorn and Olga Ulturgasheva. Envisioning Arctic futures: Digital and otherwise. Mus. Anthrop. Rev. 12, 2 (2018), 100--119.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Amy Fredeen. 2017. Never Alone: Storytelling for the Next Generation. Retrieved from https://internationalfunders.org/never-alone-storytelling-for-the-next-generation/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Philippa Warr. 2019. Heaven's Vault review: Unravel the past in this ace archaeology adventure. Retrieved from https://www.pcgamer.com/heavens-vault-review/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Khee Hoon Chan. 2019. Heaven's Vault review: An archaeology video game actually about archaeology. Retrieved from https://www.polygon.com/reviews/2019/4/16/18311381/heavens-vault-review-ps4-steam-inkle.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Douglas N. Dow. 2013. Historical veneers: Anachronism, simulation, and art history in Assassin's Creed II. In Playing with the Past: Digital Games and the Simulation of History, M. W. Kapell and A. B. R. Elliott (Eds.). Bloomsbury, New York, NY, 215--232.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Jakub Majewski. 2015. Cultural heritage in role-playing video games: A map of approaches. Furn. J. 2 (2015), 24--36.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Jeremiah McCall. 2013. Gaming the Past Using Video Games to Teach Secondary History. Routledge.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Ellen Forsyth. 2010. From Assassins Creed 2 to the five greatest warriors: Games and reading. Australas. Publ. Libr. Inf. Serv. 23, 3 (2010), 117.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Kirk Hamilton. 2017. Assassin's Creed Origins: The Kotaku Review. (27 Oct. 2017). Retrieved from https://www.kotaku.com.au/2017/10/assassins-creed-origins-the-kotaku-review/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Dawn Spring. 2015. Gaming history: Computer and video games as historical scholarship. Rethink. Hist. 19, 2 (2015), 207--221.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. Bob Whittaker and Peter Der Manuelian. 2018. History respawned: Harvard Egyptologist on Assassin's Creed origins. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ANQL5z_JEpQ.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Simone De Rochefort. 2018. Assassin's Creed Origins’ Discovery Tour lets the beauty of Egypt shine. (14 Feb. 2018). Retrieved from https://www.polygon.com/2018/2/14/17008318/assassins-creed-origins-discovery-tour-impressions.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Dave Thier. 2018. “Assassin's Creed Origins Discovery Tour” May Be the Best Assassin's Creed Ever. (21 Feb. 2018). Retrieved from https://www.forbes.com/sites/davidthier/2018/02/21/assassins-creed-origins-discovery-tour-may-be-the-best-assassins-creed-ever/#4a279ac15d32.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Hayden Dingman. 2018. Assassin's Creed: Origins's Discovery Tour Mode Shows How Great Educational Games Could Be. (24 Feb. 2018). Retrieved from https://www.pcworld.com/article/3257596/assassins-creed-origins-discovery-tour-mode.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. John Walker. 2018. We Perhaps Need a Little Bit More Education: Assassin's Creed Origins’ Discovery Tour. (22 Feb. 2018). Retrieved from https://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2018/02/22/assassins-creed-origins-discovery-tour-review/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. J. F. V. Hiriart. 2019. (unpublished). Gaming the past: Designing and using digital games as historical learning contexts. Ph.D. Thesis. School of Arts and Media, The University of Salford, Manchester, UK.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. J. F. V. Hiriart. 2016. Can we build it? Using experimental prototyping and iterative development for historical game design. In Proceedings of Playing with History 2016: DiGRA/FDG Workshop on Playing with history: Games, Antiquity and History.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. J. F. V. Hiriart. 2018. The game of making an archaeology game: Proposing a design framework for historical game design. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology (CAA’18).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Robyn Gillam and Jeffrey Jacobson. 2015. The Egyptian Oracle Project: Ancient Ceremony in Augmented Reality. Bloomsbury Publishing, London, UK; New York, NY.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. Erik Champion. 2009. Roles and worlds in the hybrid game of oblivion. Int. J.f Role-Play. 1, 1 (2009), 37--52.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. Jeffrey Jacobson and Lynn Holden. 2007. Virtual heritage. Techné: Res. Philos. Technol. 10, 3 (2007), 55--61.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Culturally Significant Presence in Single-player Computer Games

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in

      Full Access

      • Published in

        cover image Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage
        Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage   Volume 13, Issue 4
        Special Issue on Culture Games and Regular Papers
        December 2020
        208 pages
        ISSN:1556-4673
        EISSN:1556-4711
        DOI:10.1145/3441387
        Issue’s Table of Contents

        Copyright © 2020 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 3 December 2020
        • Accepted: 1 July 2020
        • Revised: 1 June 2020
        • Received: 1 March 2020
        Published in jocch Volume 13, Issue 4

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      HTML Format

      View this article in HTML Format .

      View HTML Format