skip to main content
research-article

Live Streaming as Co-Performance: Dynamics between Center and Periphery in Theatrical Engagement

Authors Info & Claims
Published:07 November 2019Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Live streaming is a highly participatory form of performance, involving various types of audience participation such as liking, commenting, and gifting. But how do streamers and audiences collaborate to deliver live streaming performances? We approach this question through an interview study with 30 spectators and eight streamers in China. Drawing from theatrical engagement research, we use the cogitative spatial concept of center-peripheral attention of the audience to analyze the complex interplay between streamers and spectators, where the former occupy the center and the latter the periphery. We then discuss the orchestration of the center and the periphery, where streamers and spectators coordinate their respective performances, as well as the interaction between the center and the periphery, where the center-periphery distinction blurs. Based on these findings, we discuss co-performance as a theatrical metaphor for understanding live streaming and audience engagement.

References

  1. Katja Battarbee. 2003. Defining co-experience. Proc. 2003 Int. Conf. Des. pleasurable Prod. interfaces - DPPI '03 (2003), 109. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/782896.782923Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Susanne Bodker and Peter Bogh Andersen. 2005. Complex Mediation. Human-Computer Interact. 20, 4 (December 2005), 353--402. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327051hci2004_1Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual. Res. Psychol. 3, 2 (January 2006), 77--101. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oaGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Simon Bründl and Thomas Hess. 2016. Why Do Users Broadcast? Examining Individual Motives and Social Capital on Social Live Streaming Platforms. In Proc. of PACIS 2016, Paper 332.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Simon Bründl, Christian Matt, and Thomas Hess. 2017. Consumer Use of Social Live Streaming Services: The Influence of Co-Experience and Effectance on Enjoyment. In porc. of ECIS 2017, 1775--1791.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Ting Cao and Ruichao Ren. 2016. Live Streaming Industry Research Report (in Chinese). (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Teresa Cerratto-Pargman, Chiara Rossitto, and Louise Barkhuus. 2014. Understanding audience participation in an interactive theater performance. In Proceedings of the 8th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction Fun, Fast, Foundational - NordiCHI '14, 608--617. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2639189.2641213Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Yue Chen, Qin Gao, and Pei Luen Patrick Rau. 2015. Understanding gratifications of watching danmaku videos -- videos with overlaid comments. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 153--163. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/978--3--319--20907--4_14Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Yue Chen, Qin Gao, and Pei Luen Patrick Rau. 2017. Watching a Movie Alone yet Together: Understanding Reasons for Watching Danmaku Videos. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact. 33, 9 (2017), 731--743. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2017.1282187Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Gifford Cheung and Jeff Huang. 2011. Starcraft from the stands: understanding the game spectator. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '11), 763--772. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1979053Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. CNNIC. 2017. The Survey on the Development of the Thirty-ninth China Internet Network of CNNIC. CNNIC.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Jose van. Dijck. 2013. The culture of connectivity?: a critical history of social media. Oxford University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Jodi Forlizzi and Katja Battarbee. 2004. Understanding experience in interactive systems. In Proceedings of the 2004 conference on Designing interactive systems processes, practices, methods, and techniques - DIS '04, 261--268. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/1013115.1013152Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Gustav Freytag and Elias J MacEwan. 1900. Freytag's Technique of the drama, an exposition of dramatic composition and art.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Mathilde B. Friedländer. 2017. Streamer Motives and User-Generated Content on Social Live-Streaming Services. In Proc. of JISTaP 2017, 65--84. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1633/JISTaP.2017.5.1.5Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Enrico Gandolfi. 2016. To watch or to play, it is in the game: The game culture on Twitch.tv among performers, plays and audiences. J. Gaming Virtual Worlds 8, (March 2016), 63--82. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1386/jgvw.8.1.63_1Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Daniel Gros, Brigitta Wanner, Anna Hackenholt, Piotr Zawadzki, and Kathrin Knautz. 2017. World of Streaming. Motivation and Gratification on Twitch. In Social Computing and Social Media. Human Behavior, 44--57.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Oliver L. Haimson and John C. Tang. 2017. What Makes Live Events Engaging on Facebook Live, Periscope, and Snapchat. Proc. 2017 CHI Conf. Hum. Factors Comput. Syst. - CHI '17 (2017), 48--60. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025642Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Russell Haines, Jill Hough, Lan Cao, and Douglas Haines. 2014. Anonymity in Computer-Mediated Communication: More Contrarian Ideas with Less Influence. Gr. Decis. Negot. 23, 4 (2014), 765--786. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-012--9318--2Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. William A. Hamilton, Oliver Garretson, and Andruid Kerne. 2014. Streaming on twitch: fostering participatory communities of play within live mixed media. Proc. SIGCHI Conf. Hum. Factors Comput. Syst. (2014), 1315--1324. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557048Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Zorah Hilvert-Bruce, James T. Neill, Max Sjöblom, and Juho Hamari. 2018. Social motivations of live-streaming viewer engagement on Twitch. Comput. Human Behav. 84, (2018), 58--67. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.02.013Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Mu Hu, Mingli Zhang, and Yu Wang. 2017. Why do audiences choose to keep watching on live video streaming platforms? An explanation of dual identification framework. Comput. Human Behav. 75, (2017), 594--606. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.06.006Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. iiMedia Research. 2019. A Report on China's Live Streaming Market 2018--2019. Retrieved from http://report.iimedia.cn/report.jsp?reportId=36269&acPlatCode=IIMReport&iimediaId=63478Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. H. X. Jiang. 2014. The research of barrage video from communication vision. Master thesis submitted to School of Journalism and Communication.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Mark R. Johnson and Jamie Woodcock. 2019. 'It's like the gold rush': the lives and careers of professional video game streamers on Twitch.tv. Information, Commun. Soc. 22, 3 (February 2019), 336--351. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1386229Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Mehdi Kaytoue, Arlei Silva, Loïc Cerf, Wagner Meira Jr, and Chedy Raïssi. 2012. Watch me Playing, I am a Professional: a First Study on Video Game Live Streaming. In Proc. of WWW 2012, 1181--1188. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2187980.2188259Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Yubo Kou and Bonnie Nardi. 2018. Complex Mediation in the Formation of Political Opinions. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '18. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174210Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Frank Lavin. 2018. China's Live Streaming Industry Is Booming -- Here's How It Works. forbes. Retrieved from https://www.forbes.com/sites/franklavin/2018/06/19/why-does-china-lead-in-live-streaming/#4fb140b5dcadGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Pascal Lessel, Michael Mauderer, Christian Wolff, and Antonio Krüger. 2017. Let's Play My Way: Investigating Audience Influence in User-Generated Gaming Live-Streams. Proc. 2017 ACM Int. Conf. Interact. Exp. TV Online Video (2017), 51--63. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3077548.3077556Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Yao Li, Yubo Kou, Je Seok Lee, and Alfred Kobsa. 2018. Tell Me Before You Stream Me: Managing Information Disclosure in Video Game Live Streaming. Proc. ACM Human-Computer Interact. 2, CSCW (November 2018), 1--18. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3274376Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Literacy Terms. 2019. Climax. Retrieved from https://literaryterms.net/climax/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Danielle Lottridge, Frank Bentley, Matt Wheeler, Jason Lee, Janet Cheung, Katherine Ong, and Cristy Rowley. 2017. Third-Wave Livestreaming: Teens' Long Form Selfie. MobileHCI (2017). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3098279.3098540Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Zhicong Lu, Haijun Xia, Seongkook Heo, and Daniel Wigdor. 2018. You Watch, You Give, and You Engage: A Study of Live Streaming Practices in China. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 466. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174040Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Xiaojuan Ma and Nan Cao. 2017. Video-based Evanescent, Anonymous, Asynchronous Social Interaction: Motivation and Adaption to Medium. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing - CSCW '17, 770--782. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2998181.2998256Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Bruce A. McConachie. 2008. Engaging audiences?: a cognitive approach to spectating in the theatre. Palgrave Macmillan. Retrieved March 26, 2019 from https://books.google.com/books?id=iefGAAAAQBAJ&dq=Engaging+Audiences:+A+Cognitive+Approach+to+Spectating+in+the+Theatre&lr=&source=gbs_navlinks_sGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Sarah E. Needleman. 2015. Twitch's Viewers Reach 100 Million a Month. The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved from https://blogs.wsj.com/digits/2015/01/29/twitchs-viewers-reach-100-million-a-month/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Anthony Pellicone. 2016. Performing Play: Cultural Production on Twitch.tv. Proc. 2016 CHI Conf. Hum. Factors Comput. Syst. - CHI '16 (2016), 244--248. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2851581.2859022Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Anthony J. Pellicone and June Ahn. 2017. The Game of Performing Play: Understanding Streaming as Cultural Production. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '17, 4863--4874. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025854Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Stuart Reeves, Christian Greiffenhagen, Martin Flintham, Steve Benford, Matt Adams, Ju Row-Farr, and Nick Tandavanitj. 2015. I'd Hide You: Performing Live Broadcasting in Public. In Proc. of CHI 2015, 2573--2582. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702257Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Katrin Scheibe, Kaja J Fietkiewicz, and Wolfgang G Stock. 2016. Information Behavior on Social Live Streaming Services. J Inf Sci Theory Pr. 4, 2 (2016), 6--20. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1633/JISTaP.2016.4.2.1Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  41. Joseph Seering, Robert Kraut, and Laura Dabbish. 2017. Shaping Pro and Anti-Social Behavior on Twitch Through Moderation and Example-Setting. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing - CSCW '17, 111--125. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2998181.2998277Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Max Sjöblom and Juho Hamari. 2017. Why do people watch others play video games? An empirical study on the motivations of Twitch users. Comput. Human Behav. 75, (2017), 985--996. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.10.019Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Thomas Smith, Marianna Obrist, and Peter Wright. 2013. Live-streaming changes the (video) game. Proc. 11th Eur. Conf. Interact. TV video - EuroITV '13 (2013), 131. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2465958.2465971Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Susan Leigh Star and Anselm Strauss. 1999. Layers of Silence, Arenas of Voice: The Ecology of Visible and Invisible Work. Comput. Support. Coop. Work 8, 1--2 (March 1999), 9--30. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008651105359Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. John C. Tang, Gina Venolia, and Kori M. Inkpen. 2016. Meerkat and Periscope: I Stream, You Stream, Apps Stream for Live Streams. Proc. SIGCHI Conf. Hum. Factors Comput. Syst. (CHI 2016) (2016), 4770--4780. DOI:https://doi.org/cc63Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. Twitch. 2017. twitch.tv 2017 in review. Retrieved from https://blog.twitch.tv/2017-twitch-year-in-review-the-comic-book-ed1b08f8f116?gi=95a48c7a92a7Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. Donghee Yvette Wohn, Guo Freeman, and Caitlin McLaughlin. 2018. Explaining Viewers' Emotional, Instrumental, and Financial Support Provision for Live Streamers. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '18, 1--13. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174048Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. Qunfang Wu, Yisi Sang, Shan Zhang, and Yun Huang. 2018. Danmaku vs. Forum Comments: Understanding User Participation and Knowledge Sharing in Online Videos. In Proceedings of the 2018 ACM Conference on Supporting Groupwork - GROUP '18, 209--218. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3148330.3148344Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  49. Tim Wulf, Frank M. Schneider, and Stefan Beckert. 2018. Watching Players: An Exploration of Media Enjoyment on Twitch. Games Cult. (2018), 1--19. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1555412018788161Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. Yaxing Yao, Jennifer Bort, and Yun Huang. 2017. Understanding Danmaku's Potential in Online Video Learning. Proc. 2017 CHI Conf. Ext. Abstr. Hum. Factors Comput. Syst. - CHI EA '17 (2017), 3034--3040. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3027063.3053258Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. Chuang-Wen You, Ya-Fang Lin, Cheng-Yuan Li, Yu-Lun Tsai, Ming-Chyi Huang, Chao-Hui Lee, Hao-Chuan Wang, and Hao-Hua Chu. 2016. KeDiary: Using Mobile Phones to Assist Patients in Recovering from Drug Addiction. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '16, 5704--5709. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858185Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  52. Bingjie Yu and Watts Leon. 2017. Designing Commenting Mechanisms for Dynamic Media?: Synchronous Overlay and Adjacent Scrollable. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference Companion Publication on Designing Interactive Systems (DIS '17 Companion), 18--22. DOI:https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/3064857.3079111Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  53. Eun Yu, Chanyong Jung, Hyungjin Kim, and Jaemin Jung. 2018. Impact of viewer engagement on gift-giving in live video streaming. Telemat. Informatics 35, 5 (2018), 1450--1460. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2018.03.014Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  54. Xiaoxing Zhang, Yu Xiang, and Lei Hao. 2019. Virtual gifting on China's live streaming platforms: hijacking the online gift economy. Chinese J. Commun. (March 2019), 1--16. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/17544750.2019.1583260Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. Baohua Zhou. 2017. Who's using Live Streaming? Live Streaming User constitution, behavior and evaluation analysis. News Journalist, 52--62.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Live Streaming as Co-Performance: Dynamics between Center and Periphery in Theatrical Engagement

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    Full Access

    • Published in

      cover image Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
      Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction  Volume 3, Issue CSCW
      November 2019
      5026 pages
      EISSN:2573-0142
      DOI:10.1145/3371885
      Issue’s Table of Contents

      Copyright © 2019 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 7 November 2019
      Published in pacmhci Volume 3, Issue CSCW

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader