skip to main content
research-article
Free Access

Countering the negative image of women in computing

Published:24 April 2019Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

A positive image would inspire the capable but underrepresented who might otherwise give up on computing.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

References

  1. Abbate, J. Recoding Gender: Women's Changing Participation in Computing. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Adam, A., Griffiths, M., Keogh, C., Moore, K., Richardson, H., and Tattersall, A. Being an 'it' in IT: Gendered identities in IT work. European Journal of Information Systems 15, 4, 2006, 368--378.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. American Association of University Women. Barriers and Bias: The Status of Women in Leadership, 2016; https://www.aauw.org/research/barriers-and-bias/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Ashcraft, C., McLain, B., and Eger, E. 2016 Update Women in Tech: The Facts: See What's Changed and What Hasn't. National Coalition of Women in Info Tech; https://www.ncwit.org/sites/default/files/resources/ncwit_women-in-it_2016-full-report_final-web06012016.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Austing, R., Barnes, B., Bonnette, D., Engel, G., and Stokes, G. Curriculum '78: Recommendations for the undergraduate program in computer science. Commun. ACM 22, 3 (Mar. 1979). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Berki, E. and Payton, F.C. Work-life balance and identity in a virtual world: Facts, tensions and intentions for women in IT. Chapter in Lost and Found in Virtual Reality: Women and Information Technology, H. Isomäki and A. Pohjola, Eds. University of Lapland Press, Rovaniemi, Finland, 2005, 275--296.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Bhatt, M., Blakely, J., Mohanty, N., and Payne, R. How Media Shapes Perceptions of Science and Technology for Girls and Women. Fem Inc., 2015; https://learcenter.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/femSTEM.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Blickenstaff, J.C. Women and science careers: Leaky pipeline or gender filter? Gender & Education 17, 4 (Oct. 2005), 369--386.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. British Computing Society. Policy and Influence. The U.K. Women in Tech Council. Women in IT Interviews; https://www.bcs.org/upload/pdf/women-it.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. British Computing Society. The Women in IT Scorecard. The Chartered Institute for IT, 2014; https://www.bcs.org/upload/pdf/Women%20in%20IT%20scorecardv2.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Center for Talent Innovation. Athena 2.0: Accelerating Female Talent in Science, Engineering and Technology, Feb. 1, 2014; http://www.talentinnovation.org/publication.cfm?publication=1420Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Cheryan, S., Plaut, V.C., Handron, C., and Hudson, C. The stereotypical computer scientist: Gendered media representations as a barrier to inclusion for women. Sex Roles: A Journal of Research 69, 1--2 (2013), 58--71; https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2013-22691-001Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Chimba, M. and Kitzinger, J. Bimbo or boffin? Women in science: An analysis of media representations and how female scientists negotiate cultural contradictions. Public Understanding of Science 19, 5 (Sept. 1, 2010), 609--624.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Fiske, S.T., Cuddy, A.J., Glick, P., and Xu, J. A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 82, 6 (2002), 878--902; https://cos.gatech.edu/facultyres/Diversity_Studies/Fiske_StereotypeContent.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Fox, K. The 30 Most Influential Computer Scientists Alive Today. Computer Science Hub, Dec. 2014; http://www.computersciencedegreehub.com/30-most-influential-computer-scientists-alive-today/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Fox, M.F. Women and men faculty in academic science and engineering: Social-organizational indicators and implications. American Behavioral Scientist 53, 7 (Feb. 9, 2010), 997--1012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Gholipour, B. Is the stereotype that 'women can't be geniuses' causing gender gaps? Huffington Post (Jan. 20, 2015); https://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/01/20/women-geniuses_n_6508908.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Gioia, D.A., Corley, K.G., and Hamilton, A.L. Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research. Organizational Research Methods 16, 1 (Jan. 1, 2013), 15--31.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Hannon, K. Inspired or frustrated, women go to work for themselves. New York Times (Oct. 3, 2017); https://www.nytimes.com/2017/10/03/business/women-entrepreneur-career.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Hofstede, G. Dimensionalizing cultures: The Hofstede Model in context. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture 2, 1 (Jan. 12, 2011), article 8; https://scholarworks.gvsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1014&context=orpc and The 6-D model of national culture; https://geerthofstede.com/culture-geert-hofstede-gert-jan-hofstede/6d-model-of-national-culture/Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Humphreys, S.M., Ed. Women and minorities in science: Strategies for increasing participation. In Proceedings of the AAAS Selected Symposium 66. Westview Press, Inc., Boulder, CO, 1982.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Kapor Center for Social Impact. The 2017 Tech Leavers Study Online Report; https://www.kaporcenter.org/tech-leavers/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Kareithi, P.J. Hegemonic Masculinity in Media Contents. UNESCO, 2014; http://www.unesco.org/fileadmin/MULTIMEDIA/HQ/CI/CI/pdf/publications/gamag_research_agenda_kareithi.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Kvasny, L., Trauth, E., and Morgan, A. Power relations in IT education and work: The intersectionality of gender, race and class. Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society 7, 2/3 (2009), 96--118Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Lie, M. Technology and masculinity: The case of the computer. The European Journal of Women's Studies 2, 3 (Aug. 1, 1995), 379--394.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Malcom, S. and Malcom, L. Thirty-Five Years After 'The Double Bind,' Obstacles Remain for Minority Women in STEM. As reported by the American Association for the Advancement of Science, Aug. 15, 2011; http://www.aaas.org/news/thirty-five-years-after-double-bind-obstacles-remain-minority-women-stemGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Mendick, H. and Moreau, M. New media, old images: Constructing online representations of women and men in science. Engineering and Technology, Gender and Education 25, 3 (2013), 325--339Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Mundy, L. Why is Silicon Valley so awful to women? The Atlantic (Apr. 2017), 60--73; https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2017/04/why-is-silicon-valley-so-awful-to-women/517788/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. National Science Foundation. Women, Minorities, and Persons with Disabilities in Science and Engineering. Special Report NSF 17-310. National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics, Arlington, VA, 2017; https://www.nsf.gov/statistics/2017/nsf17310/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Nelsen, R.A. Race and computing: The problem of sources, the potential of prosopography, and the lesson of Ebony Magazine. IEEE Annals of the History of Computing 39, 1 (Jan.--Mar. 2017), 29--51. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Payton, F.C. Cultures of participation & design - @ myhealthimpact: For students, by students. Information Systems Journal 26, 4 (Aug. 14, 2015), 319--338. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Quora (contributor). Why women leave the tech industry at a 45% higher rate than men. Forbes (Feb. 28, 2017); https://www.forbes.com/sites/quora/2017/02/28/why-women-leave-the-tech-industry-at-a-45-higher-rate-than-men/#6e2db5744216Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Siakas, K.V., Berki, E., and Georgiadou, E. CODE for SQM: A model for cultural and organisational diversity evaluation. In Proceedings of the European Software Process Improvement Conference (Graz, Austria, Dec. 10--12). Verlag der Technischen Universität: Graz, Austria, 2003, IX.1--11.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Simon, S. and Hoyt, C.L. Exploring the effect of media images on women's leadership self-perceptions and aspirations. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations 16, 2 (Mar. 1, 2013), 232--245.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Sydell, L. The Forgotten Female Programmers Who Created Modern Tech. National Public Radio blog, Oct. 6, 2014; https://www.npr.org/sections/alltechconsidered/2014/10/06/345799830/the-forgotten-female-programmers-who-created-modern-techGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Thornham, H. and McFarlane, A. Cross-generational gender constructions. Women, teenagers and technology. The Sociological Review 59, 1 (Feb. 2011), 64--85.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. Tiainen, T. and Berki, E. The reproduction process of gender bias: A case of ICT professors through recruitment in a gender-neutral country. Journal of Studies in Higher Education 44, 1 (2019), 170--184.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. The U.K. Women in Tech Council. Policy and Influence. The Chartered Institute for IT, British Computing Society--Women in IT Interview, 2014; http://www.bcs.org/category/17537Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Williams, J.C. Hacking tech's diversity problem. Harvard Business Review 92, 10 (Oct. 2014), 94--100.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Womenable. The 2016 State of Women-Owned Businesses Report; http://www.womenable.com/content/userfiles/2016_State_of_Women-Owned_Businesses_Executive_Report.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Countering the negative image of women in computing

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    Full Access

    • Published in

      cover image Communications of the ACM
      Communications of the ACM  Volume 62, Issue 5
      May 2019
      83 pages
      ISSN:0001-0782
      EISSN:1557-7317
      DOI:10.1145/3328504
      Issue’s Table of Contents

      Copyright © 2019 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 24 April 2019

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Popular
      • Refereed

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format