skip to main content
research-article

Ensuring High-Quality Private Data for Responsible Data Science: Vision and Challenges

Published:04 January 2019Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

High-quality data is critical for effective data science. As the use of data science has grown, so too have concerns that individuals’ rights to privacy will be violated. This has led to the development of data protection regulations around the globe and the use of sophisticated anonymization techniques to protect privacy. Such measures make it more challenging for the data scientist to understand the data, exacerbating issues of data quality. Responsible data science aims to develop useful insights from the data while fully embracing these considerations.

We pose the high-level problem in this article, “How can a data scientist develop the needed trust that private data has high quality?” We then identify a series of challenges for various data-centric communities and outline research questions for data quality and privacy researchers, which would need to be addressed to effectively answer the problem posed in this article.

References

  1. C. Batini and M. Scannapieco. 2016. Data and Information Quality—Dimensions, Principles and Techniques. Springer International Publishing. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. L. English. 1999. Improving Data Warehouse and Business Information Quality. Wiley. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. S. Lohr. 2018. Facial Recognition is Accurate—If You’re a White Guy. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2018/02/09/technology/facial-recognition-race-artificial-intelligence.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. D. McGilvray. 2008. Executing Data Quality Projects. Morgan Kaufmann. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. T. Nagle, T. Redman, and D. Sammon. 2017. Only 3% of Companies’ Data Meets Basic Quality Standards. Retrieved from https://hbr.org/2017/09/only-3-of-companies-data-meets-basic-quality-standards.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. European Statistical System Project. 2018. ESSnet Big Data Pilots-I. Retrieved from https://webgate.ec.europa.eu/fpfis/mwikis/essnetbigdata/index.php/Main_Page.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. T. Redman. 2016. Getting in Front on Data: Who Does What. Technics.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. T. Redman. 2018. If Your Data Is Bad, Your Machine Learning Tools Are Useless. Retrieved from https://hbr.org/2018/04/if-your-data-is-bad-your-machine-learning-tools-are-useless.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. G. Stateva, O. Bosch, D. Windmeijer, J. Maslankowski, G. Barcaroli, M. Scannapieco, D. Summa, M. Greenaway, I. Jansson, and D. Wu. 2018. Web Scraping Enterprise Characteristics-Final Report. Retrieved from https://webgate.ec.europa.eu/fpfis/mwikis/essnetbigdata/images/e/ee/Wp2_Del2_4.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. E. Wilder-James. 2016. Breaking Down Data Silos. Retrieved from https://hbr.org/2016/12/breaking-down-data-silos.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Ensuring High-Quality Private Data for Responsible Data Science: Vision and Challenges

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in

        Full Access

        • Published in

          cover image Journal of Data and Information Quality
          Journal of Data and Information Quality  Volume 11, Issue 1
          On the Horizon, Regular Papers and Challenge Paper
          March 2019
          60 pages
          ISSN:1936-1955
          EISSN:1936-1963
          DOI:10.1145/3303842
          Issue’s Table of Contents

          Copyright © 2019 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 4 January 2019
          • Received: 1 October 2018
          • Accepted: 1 October 2018
          Published in jdiq Volume 11, Issue 1

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article
          • Research
          • Refereed

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader

        HTML Format

        View this article in HTML Format .

        View HTML Format