skip to main content
research-article
Public Access

Extending Battery System Operation via Adaptive Reconfiguration

Published:16 January 2019Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Large-scale battery packs are commonly used in applications such as electric vehicles (EVs) and smart grids. Traditionally, to provide stable voltage to the loads, voltage regulators are used to convert battery packs’ output voltage to those of the loads’ required levels, causing power loss especially when the difference between the supplied and required voltages is large or when the load is light. In this article, we address this issue via a reconfiguration framework for the battery system. By abstracting the battery system as a cell graph, we develop an adaptive reconfiguration algorithm to identify the desired system configurations based on real-time load requirements. Our design is evaluated via both prototype-based experiments, EV driving trace-based emulations, and large-scale simulations. The results demonstrate an extended system operation time of up to 5×, especially when facing severe cell imbalance.

References

  1. A123. 2016. AMP20 Energy Modules. Retrieved on January 3, 2019 from http://www.a123systems.com/automotive/products/modules/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Mahmoud Alahmad, Herb Hess, Mohammad Mojarradi, William West, and Jay Whitacre. 2008. Battery switch array system with application for JPL’s rechargeable micro-scale batteries. Journal of Power Sources 177, 2 (2008), 566--578.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Battery. 2018. 18650 2800mAh Li-ion Battery. Retrieved on January 3, 2019 from https://www.amazon.com/Rechargeable-Mini-Butterball-Batteries-Flashlight/dp/B01GE3ZA10.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Gerbrand Ceder, Marc Doyle, Pankaj Arora, and Yuris Fuentes. 2002. Computational modeling and simulation for rechargeable batteries. MRS Bulletin (2002), 619--623.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. P. Chou, C. Park, J. Park, K. Pham, and J. Liu. 2003. B#: A battery emulator and power profiling instrument. In ISLPED’03. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. S. Ci, N. Lin, and D. Wu. 2016. Reconfigurable battery techniques and systems: A survey. IEEE Access 4 (2016), 1175--1189.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Song Ci, Jiucai Zhang, Hamid Sharif, and Mahmoud Alahmad. 2012a. Dynamic reconfigurable multi-cell battery: A novel approach to improve battery performance. In APEC’12.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Song Ci, Jiucai Zhang, Hamid Sharif, and Mahmoud Alahmadu. 2012b. A novel design of adaptive reconfigurable multiple battery for power-aware embedded networked sensing systems. In GLOBECOM’12.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. L. Cloth, M. R. Jongerden, and B. R. Haverkort. 2007. Computing battery lifetime distributions. In DSN’07. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. T. H. Cormen, C. E. Leiserson, R. L. Rivest, and C. Stein. 2001. Introduction to Algorithms. MIT Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Dimension Engineering. 2014. A beginner’s guide to switching regulators. https://www.dimensionengineering.com/info/switching-regulators.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Liang He, Lipeng Gu, Linghe Kong, Yu Gu, Cong Liu, and Tian He. 2013. Exploring adaptive reconfiguration to optimize energy efficiency in large battery systems. In IEEE RTSS’13. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Liang He, Yu Gu, Cong Liu, Ting Zhu, and Kang G. Shin. 2015. SHARE: SoH-aware reconfiguration to enhance deliverable capacity of large-scale battery packs. In ACM/IEEE ICCPS’15. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Liang He, Linghe Kong, Siyu Lin, Shaodong Ying, Yu Gu, Tian He, and Cong Liu. 2016a. RAC: Reconfiguration-assisted charging in large-scale lithium-ion battery systems. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grids 7, 3 (2016).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Liang He, Shaodong Ying, and Yu Gu. 2016b. RTSS’13 Demo Video. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4oyj8nbGlk8.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. D. B. Johnson. 1975. Finding all the elementary circuits of a directed graph. SIAM Journal on Computing 4, 1 (1975), 77--84.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Taesic Kim, Wei Qiao, and Liyan Qu. 2011b. Series-connected self-reconfigurable multicell battery. In APEC’11.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Taesic Kim, Wei Qiao, and Liyan Qu. 2012. A series-connected self-reconfigurable multicell battery capable of safe and effective charging/discharging and balancing operations. In APEC’12.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Younghyun Kim, Sangyoung Park, Yanzhi Wang, Qing Xie, Naehyuck Chang, Massimo Poncino, and Massoud Pedram. 2011a. Balanced reconfiguration of storage banks in a hybrid electrical energy storage system. In ICCAD’11. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Scot J. Moura, Jeffrey L. Stein, and Hosam K. Fathy. 2013. Battery-health conscious power management in plug-in hybrid electric vehicles via electrochemical modeling and stochastic control. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology 21, 3 (2013), 679--694.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Neware. 2018. Neware Battery Testing System. Retrieved January 3, 2019 from http://newarebattery.com/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Daler Rakhmatov and Sarma Vrudhula. 2003. Energy management for battery-powered embedded systems. ACM Transactions on Embedded Computing Systems 2 (2003), 277--324. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Delyan Raychev, Youhuizi Li, and Weisong Shi. 2011. The seventh cell of a six-cell battery. In WEED’11.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Peng Rong and M. Pedram. 2006. An analytical model for predicting the remaining battery capacity of lithium-ion batteries. IEEE Transactions on Very Large Scale Integration Systems 14, 5 (2006), 441--451. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. TI. 2016. TPS62750: High efficiency step-down converter for USB applications. Data Sheet.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. TI. 2018. LM317. Retrieved January 3, 2019 from http://www.ti.com/lit/ds/slvs044x/slvs044x.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. K. Vatanparvar and M. A. Al Faruque. 2016. Eco-friendly automotive climate control and navigation system for electric vehicles. In ICCPS’16. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. H. Visairo and P. Kumar. 2008. A reconfigurable battery pack for improving power conversion efficiency in portable devices. In ICCDCS’08.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. S. Zeljkovic, T. Reiter, and D. Gerling. 2014. Efficiency optimized single-stage reconfigurable DC/DC converter for hybrid and electric vehicles. IEEE Journal of Emerging and Selected Topics in Power Electronics, 2, 3 (Sept. 2014), 496--506.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Extending Battery System Operation via Adaptive Reconfiguration

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    Full Access

    • Published in

      cover image ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks
      ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks  Volume 15, Issue 1
      February 2019
      382 pages
      ISSN:1550-4859
      EISSN:1550-4867
      DOI:10.1145/3300201
      Issue’s Table of Contents

      Copyright © 2019 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 16 January 2019
      • Accepted: 1 October 2018
      • Revised: 1 July 2018
      • Received: 1 January 2018
      Published in tosn Volume 15, Issue 1

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format