skip to main content
research-article
Public Access

Departing and Returning: Sense of Agency as an Organizing Concept for Understanding Social Media Non/use Transitions

Published:01 November 2018Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Recent work has identified a variety of motivations for various forms of technology use and non-use. However, less work has closely examined relationships between those motivations and the experiences of transiting among these different forms of use and non-use. This paper fills that gap by conducting a qualitative interview- and diary-based study where participants were asked to deactivate their Facebook account. An abductive analysis suggests participants' experiences can be organized under the conceptual umbrella of sense of agency, which refers to an individual's perception that their actions are under their own control. The analysis shows how, across disparate motivations, all participants took actions that increased their own subjective sense of agency, regardless of whether they returned to Facebook or not. The discussion applies this conceptual lens to prior studies of technology use and non-use. Doing so shows how sense of agency may provide an organizing orientation for understanding subjective experiences of use and non-use.

References

  1. Alessandro Acquisti and Ralph Gross. 2006. Imagined Communities: Awareness, Information Sharing, and Privacy on the Facebook. In Proceedings of the Privacy Enhancing Technology Symposium. Springer, Cambridge, England, 36--58. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Icek Ajzen. 1991. The Theory of Planned Behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 50, 2 (Dec. 1991), 179--211.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Cecilie Schou Andreassen, Torbjørn Torsheim, Geir Scott Brunborg, and Stale Pallesen. 2012. Development of a Facebook Addiction Scale. Psychological Reports 110, 2 (April 2012), 501--517.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Eric P. S. Baumer. 2015. Usees. In Proc CHI. ACM Press, 3295--3298. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Eric P. S. Baumer, Phil Adams, Vera D. Khovanskaya, Tony C. Liao, Madeline E. Smith, Victoria Schwanda Sosik, and Kaiton Williams. 2013. Limiting, Leaving, and (Re)Lapsing: An Exploration of Facebook Non-Use Practices and Experiences. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI). ACM, Paris, 3257--3266. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Eric P. S. Baumer and Jed R. Brubaker. 2017. Post-Userism. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI). ACM, Denver, CO, 6291--6303. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Eric P. S. Baumer, Jenna Burrell, Morgan G. Ames, Jed R. Brubaker, and Paul Dourish. 2015. On the Importance and Implications of StudyingTechnologyNon-Use.interactions22,2(2015),52--56. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Eric P. S. Baumer, Shion Guha, Emily Quan, David Mimno, and Geri K. Gay. 2015. Missing Photos, Suffering Withdrawal, or Finding Freedom? HowExperiencesofSocialMediaNon-UseIn uencetheLikelihoodofReversion.SocialMedia+Society1,2(2015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Eric P. S. Baumer, Xiaotong Xu, Christine Chu, Shion Guha, and Geri K. Gay. 2017. When Subjects Interpret the Data: Social Media Non-Use as a Case for Adapting the Delphi Method to CSCW. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (CSCW) (CSCW '17). ACM, Portland, OR, 1527--1543. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Tim Bayne and Elisabeth Pacherie. 2007. Narrators and Comparators: The Architecture of Agentive Self-Awareness. Synthese 159, 3 (Dec. 2007), 475--491.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Jeremy Birnholtz. 2010. Adopt, Adapt, Abandon: Understanding Why Some Young Adults Start, and Then Stop, Using Instant Messaging. Computers in Human Behavior 26, 6 (Nov. 2010), 1427--1433. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. danah boyd. 2014. It's Complicated: The Social Lives of Networked Teens (1 edition ed.). Yale University Press, New Haven. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Jed R. Brubaker. 2008. Wants Moar: Visual Media's Use of Text in LOLcats and Silent Film. gnovis Journal 8 (May 2008), 117--124.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Jed R. Brubaker, Mike Ananny, and Kate Crawford. 2014. Departing Glances: A Sociotechnical Account of 'leaving' Grindr. New Media & Society 18, 3 (2014), 373--390.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Geo Cooper and John Bowers. 1995. Representing the User: Notes on the Disciplinary Rhetoric of HCI. In The Social and Interactional Dimensions of Human-Computer Interfaces, Peter J. Thomas (Ed.). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 48--66. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi and Reed Larson. 1987. Validity and Reliability of the Experience-Sampling Method. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease 175, 9 (1987), 526--536.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Fred D. Davis, Richard P. Bagozzi, and Paul R. Warshaw. 1989. User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models. Management Science 35, 8 (1989), 982--1003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Jenny Davis. 2012. The Problem with Internet Addiction. (2012).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Maeve Duggan, Nicole B. Ellison, Cli Lampe, Amanda Lenhart, and Mary Madden. 2015. Pew Social Meida Report 2015. Technical Report January. Pew Research Center, Washington, D.C.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Cathy A. Eastwood, Lucille Travis, Tanya T. Morgenstern, and Erin K. Donaho. 2007 Sep-Oct. Weight and Symptom Diary for Self- Monitoring in Heart Failure Clinic Patients. The Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing 22, 5 (2007 Sep-Oct), 382--389.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Nicole B. Ellison, Charles Stein eld, and Cli Lampe. 2007. The Bene ts of Facebook "Friends:" Social Capital and College Students' Use of Online Social Network Sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 12, 4 (July 2007), 1143--1168.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. MustafaEmirbayerandAnnMische.1998.WhatIsAgency?Amer.J.Sociology103,4(Jan.1998),962--1023.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Marcus Foth and Greg Hearn. 2007. Networked Individualism of Urban Residents: Discovering the Communicative Ecology in Inner-City Apartment Buildings. Information, Communication & Society 10, 5 (Oct. 2007), 749--772. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. X, No. Y, Article Z. Publication date: November 2018Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Chris Frith. 2005. The Self in Action: Lessons from Delusions of Control. Consciousness and Cognition 14, 4 (Dec. 2005), 752--770.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. C D Frith, S J Blakemore, and D M Wolpert. 2000. Abnormalities in the Awareness and Control of Action. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 355, 1404 (Dec. 2000), 1771--1788.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Shaun Gallagher. 2007. The Natural Philosophy of Agency. Philosophy Compass 2, 2 (March 2007), 347--357.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Shaun Gallagher. 2012. Multiple Aspects in the Sense of Agency. New Ideas in Psychology 30, 1 (April 2012), 15--31.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Barney G. Glaser and Anselm L. Strauss. 1967. The Discovery of Grounded Theory. Routledge, Oxon and New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Ricardo Gomez, Kirsten Foot, Meg Young, Rose Paquet-Kinsley, and Stacey Morrison. 2015. Pulling the Plug Visually: Images of Resistance to ICTs and Connectivity. First Monday 20, 11 (Nov. 2015).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Jon E. Grant, Marc N. Potenza, Aviv Weinstein, and David A. Gorelick. 2010. Introduction to Behavioral Addictions. The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse 36, 5 (Aug. 2010), 233--241.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Shannon Greenwood, Andrew Perrin, and Maeve Duggan. 2016. Social Media Update 2016. Technical Report. Pew Research Center, Washington, D.C.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Mark D. Griffths. 2013. Social Networking Addiction: Emerging Themes and Issues. Journal of Addiction Research & Therapy 4, 5 (2013).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Mark D. Griffths, Daria J. Kuss, and Zsolt Demetrovics. 2014. Social Networking Addiction. In Behavioral Addictions. Elsevier, 119--141.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Shion Guha and Stephen B. Wicker.2015.SpatialSubterfuge:AnExperienceSamplingStudytoPredictDeceptiveLocationDisclosures.In Proceedings of the ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing (UbiComp). ACM, Osaka, Japan, 1131--1135. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Christine A. Halverson. 2002. Activity Theory and Distributed Cognition: Or What Does CSCW Need to DO with Theories? Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 11, 1 (2002), 243--267. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Eszter Hargittai. 2008. Whose Space? Di erences Among Users and Non-Users of Social Network Sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 13, 1 (2008), 276--297. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Eszter Hargittai and Alice Marwick. 2016. "What Can I Really Do?" Explaining the Privacy Paradox with Online Apathy. International Journal of Communication 10 (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Ellie Harmon and Melissa Mazmanian. 2013. Stories of the Smartphone in Everyday Discourse: Con ict, Tension & Instability. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI). Paris, 1051--1060. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Julia M. Hormes, Brianna Kearns, and C. Alix Timko. 2014. Craving Facebook? Behavioral Addiction to Online Social Networking and Its Association with Emotion Regulation De cits. Addiction 109, 12 (Dec. 2014), 2079--2088.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. ISO/IEC. 2001. 9126--1:2001 Software Engineering -- Product Quality -- Part 1: Quality Model. Technical Report.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. ISO/IEC. 2007. 15939:2007 Systems and Software Engineering -- Measurement Process. Technical Report.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Victor Kaptelinin and Bonnie A. Nardi. 2006. Acting with Technology: Activity Theory and Interaction Design (Acting with Technology). The MIT Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Cliff Lampe, Jessica Vitak, and Nicole Ellison. 2013. Users and Nonusers: Interactions between Levels of Facebook Adoption and Social Capital. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW). Baltimore, MD, 809--819. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Robert LaRose, Carolyn A. Lin, and Matthew S. Eastin. 2003. Unregulated Internet Usage: Addiction, Habit, or De cient Self-Regulation? Media Psychology 5, 3 (Aug. 2003), 225--253.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  45. Reed Larson and Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi. 1983. The Experience Sampling Method. In New Directions for Methdology of Social & Behavioral Science, H. T. Reis (Ed.). Vol. 15. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA, 41--56.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. Bruno Latour. 1992. Where Are the Missing Masses? The Sociology of a Few Mundane Artifacts. In Shaping Technology / Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change, Wiebe E. Bijker and John Law (Eds.). MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 225--258.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. Richard S. Lazarus and Susan Folkman. 1984. Stress, Appraisal, and Coping. Springer Publishing Company, New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. Gilly Leshed, Maria Hakansson, and Joseph 'Jo sh' Kaye. 2014. "Our Life Is the Farm and Farming Is Our Life": Home-Work Coordination in Organic Farm Families. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (CSCW '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 487--498. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  49. Moez Limayem, Sabine Gabriele Hirt, and Christy M K Cheung. 2013. Habit in the Context of IS Continuance: Theory Extension and Scale Development. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS). Utrecht.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. John Lo and, David A. Snow, Leon Anderson, and Lyn H. Lo and. 1971 (2005). Analyzing Social Settings. Wadsworth, Belmont, CA. Alice E. Marwick. 2012. The Public Domain: Social Surveillance in Everyday Life. Surveillance and Society 9, 4 (2012), 378--393. Stanley Milgram. 1974. Obedience to Authority. Harper & Row, New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. Alice E. Marwick. 2012. The Public Domain: Social Surveillance in Everyday Life. Surveillance and Society 9, 4 (2012), 378--393.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  52. Stanley Milgram. 1974. Obedience to Authority. Harper & Row, New YorkGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  53. James W. Moore. 2016. What Is the Sense of Agency and Why Does It Matter? Frontiers in Psychology 7 (Aug. 2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  54. Judith A. Ouellette and Wendy Wood. 1998. Habit and Intention in Everyday Life: The Multiple Processes by Which Past Behavior Predicts Future Behavior. Psychological Bulletin 124, 1 (July 1998), 54--74.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  55. AnttiOulasvirta,TyeRattenbury,LingyiMa,andEevaRaita.2012.HabitsMakeSmartphoneUseMorePervasive.PersonalandUbiquitous Computing 16, 1 (Jan. 2012), 105--114. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  56. Elisabeth Pacherie. 2007. The Sense of Control and the Sense of Agency. Psyche 13, 1 (2007), 1--30.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  57. Leysia Palen and Paul Dourish. 2003. Unpacking "Privacy" for a Networked World. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI). Ft. Lauderdale, FL, 129--136. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  58. James Pierce and Eric Paulos. 2014. Some Variations on a Counterfunctional Digital Camera. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (DIS). ACM, Vancouver, BC, 131--140. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  59. Ethan R. Plaut. 2015. Technologies of Avoidance: The Swear Jar and the Cell Phone. First Monday 20, 11 (2015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  60. Laura Portwood-Stacer. 2012. How We Talk About Media Refusal, Part 1: "Addiction". Flow 16, 3 (2012).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  61. Laura Portwood-Stacer. 2013. Media Refusal and Conspicuous Non-Consumption: The Performative and Political Dimensions of Facebook Abstention. New Media & Society 15, 7 (Nov. 2013), 1041--1057.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  62. Lee Rainie and Mary Madden. 2015. Americans' Privacy Strategies Post-Snowden. (March 2015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  63. Lee Rainie, Aaron Smith, and Maeve Duggan. 2013. Coming and Going on Facebook. Technical Report. Pew Research Center, Pew Internet and American Life Project, Washington, D.C.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  64. Tracii Ryan and Sophia Xenos. 2011. Who Uses Facebook? An Investigation into the Relationship between the Big Five, Shyness, Narcissism, Loneliness, and Facebook Usage. Computers in Human Behavior 27, 5 (Sept. 2011), 1658--1664. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  65. ChristineSatchellandPaulDourish.2009.BeyondtheUser:UseandNon-UseinHCI.InProceedingsoftheAustralasianComputer-Human Interaction Conference (OZCHI). ACM, Melbourne, Australia, 9--16. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  66. Sarita Yardi Schoenebeck. 2014. Giving up Twitter for Lent: How and Why We Take Breaks from Social Media. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI). Toronto, ON, 773--782. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  67. Natasha Dow Schull. 2012. Addiction by Design. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  68. Christie Napa Scollon, Chu Kim-Prieto, and Ed Diener. 2009. Experience Sampling: Promises and Pitfalls, Strengths and Weaknesses. In Assessing Well-Being, Ed Diener and Alex C. Michalos (Eds.). Springer, Dordrecht.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  69. Irina Shklovski, Janet Vertesi, and Silvia Lindtner. 2014. Introduction to This Special Issue on Transnational HCI. Human--Computer Interaction 29, 1 (Jan. 2014), 1--21. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  70. Madeline E. Smith, Duyen T. Nguyen, Charles Lai, Gilly Leshed, and Eric P.S. Baumer. 2012. Going to College and Staying Connected: Communication Between College Freshmen and Their Parents. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW). ACM, Seattle, WA, 789--798. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  71. Stefan Stieger, Christoph Burger, Manuel Bohn, and Martin Voracek. 2013. Who Commits Virtual Identity Suicide? Differences in Privacy Concerns, Internet Addiction, and Personality between Facebook Users and Quitters. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking 16, 9 (Sept. 2013), 629--34.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  72. Adam Tapal, Ela Oren, Reuven Dar, and Baruch Eitam. 2017. The Sense of Agency Scale: A Measure of Consciously Perceived Control overOne'sMind,Body,andtheImmediateEnvironment.FrontiersinPsychology8(Sept.2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  73. Zeynep Tufekci. 2008. Grooming, Gossip, Facebook and MySpace. Information, Communication & Society 11, 4 (June 2008), 544--564.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  74. Alexander J. A. M. van Deursen, Colin L. Bolle, Sabrina M. Hegner, and Piet A. M. Kommers. 2015. Modeling Habitual and Addictive Smartphone Behavior: The Role of Smartphone Usage Types, Emotional Intelligence, Social Stress, Self-Regulation, Age, and Gender. Computers in Human Behavior 45 (April 2015), 411--420. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  75. Bas Verplanken and Henk Aarts. 1999. Habit, Attitude, and Planned Behaviour: Is Habit an Empty Construct or an Interesting Case of Goal-DirectedAutomaticity?EuropeanReviewofSocialPsychology10,1(Jan.1999),101--134.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  76. Verplanken Bas, Aarts Henk, Knippenberg Ad, and Moonen Anja. 2011. Habit versus Planned Behaviour: A Field Experiment. British Journal of Social Psychology 37, 1 (June 2011), 111--128.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  77. Daniel M. Wegner. 2002. The Illusion of Conscious Will. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  78. Daniel M. Wegner and Thalia Wheatley. 1999. Apparent Mental Causation: Sources of the Experience of Will. American Psychologist 54, 7 (July 1999), 480--492.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  79. Pamela Wisniewski, Heng Xu, and Yunan Chen. 2014. Understanding User Adaptation Strategies for the Launching of Facebook Timeline. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI). ACM, Toronto, ON, 2421--2430. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. X, No. Y, Article Z. Publication date: November 2018. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  80. Wendy Wood and David T. Neal. 2007. A New Look at Habits and the Habit-Goal Interface. Psychological Review 114, 4 (Oct. 2007), 843--863.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  81. Sally Wyatt. 2003. Non-Users Also Matter: The Construction of Users and Non-Users of the Internet. In How Users Matter: The Co-Construction of Users and Technology, Nelly Oudshoorn and Trevor Pinch (Eds.). MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 67--79.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  82. Peter M. Yellowlees and Shayna Marks. 2007. Problematic Internet Use or Internet Addiction? Computers in Human Behavior 23, 3 (May 2007), 1447--1453. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Departing and Returning: Sense of Agency as an Organizing Concept for Understanding Social Media Non/use Transitions

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    Full Access

    • Published in

      cover image Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
      Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction  Volume 2, Issue CSCW
      November 2018
      4104 pages
      EISSN:2573-0142
      DOI:10.1145/3290265
      Issue’s Table of Contents

      Copyright © 2018 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 1 November 2018
      Published in pacmhci Volume 2, Issue CSCW

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader