skip to main content
research-article
Open Access

Facilitating Human-Mobile Robot Communication via Haptic Feedback and Gesture Teleoperation

Published:16 November 2018Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

In this article, we present a bi-directional communication scheme that facilitates interaction between a person and a mobile robot that follows the person. A person-following robot can assist people in many applications including load carrying, elder care, and emotional support. However, commercially available personal robot systems usually have limited sensing and actuation capabilities. They are not expected to function perfectly in complex environments, and human intervention is required when the robot fails. We propose to use a holdable mechatronic device to reduce the user’s effort in communication and enable natural interaction during the intervention. Our design of the holdable device consists of two parts: a haptic interface that displays touch cues to convey the robot’s failure status via asymmetric vibrations, and a command interface for teleoperating the robot follower with hand gestures. We experimentally evaluated the device and the communication strategy in two sets of user studies with a controlled environment and a physical robot follower. Results show that with the proposed method, users are able to perform their tasks better, respond to robot failure events faster, and adjust walking speed according to the robot’s limitations. We also demonstrate that users can successfully teleoperate the robot to avoid obstacles when navigating in challenging environments.

References

  1. Tomohiro Amemiya, Hideyuki Ando, and Taro Maeda. 2005. Phantom-DRAWN: Direction guidance using rapid and asymmetric acceleration weighted by nonlinearity of perception. In International Conference on Augmented Tele-Existence. 201--208. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Tomohiro Amemiya, Hideyuki Ando, and Taro Maeda. 2005. Virtual force display: Direction guidance using asymmetric acceleration via periodic translational motion. In IEEE World Haptics Conference. 619--622. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Tomohiro Amemiya and Hiroaki Gomi. 2014. Distinct pseudo-attraction force sensation by a thumb-sized vibrator that oscillates asymmetrically. In International Conference on Human Haptic Sensing and Touch Enabled Computer Applications. 88--95.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Edwin Babaians, Navid Khazaee Korghond, Alireza Ahmadi, Mojtaba Karimi, and Saeed Shiry Ghidary. 2015. Skeleton and visual tracking fusion for human following task of service robots. In RSI International Conference on Robotics and Mechatronics. 761--766.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Kim Baraka, Stephanie Rosenthal, and Manuela Veloso. 2016. Enhancing human understanding of a mobile robot’s state and actions using expressive lights. In IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication. IEEE, 652--657.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Luca Consolini, Fabio Morbidi, Domenico Prattichizzo, and Mario Tosques. 2008. Leader--follower formation control of nonholonomic mobile robots with input constraints. Automatica 44, 5 (2008), 1343--1349. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Heather Culbertson, Juliette Unwin, and Katherine J. Kuchenbecker. 2014. Modeling and rendering realistic textures from unconstrained tool-surface interactions. IEEE Transactions on Haptics 7, 3 (2014), 381--393.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Heather Culbertson, Julie M. Walker, and Allison M. Okamura. 2016. Modeling and design of asymmetric vibrations to induce ungrounded pulling sensation through asymmetric skin displacement. In IEEE Haptics Symposium. 27--33.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Heather Culbertson, Julie M. Walker, Michael Raitor, and Allison M. Okamura. 2017. WAVES: A wearable asymmetric vibration excitation system for presenting three-dimensional translation and rotation cues. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 4972--4982. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Meredyth Daneman and Philip M. Merikle. 1996. Working memory and language comprehension: A meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin 8 Review 3, 4 (1996), 422--433.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Aveek K. Das, Rafael Fierro, R. Vijay Kumar, James P. Ostrowski, John Spletzer, and Camillo J. Taylor. 2002. A vision-based formation control framework. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation 18, 5 (2002), 813--825.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. D. B. Edwards, T. A. Bean, D. L. Odell, and M. J. Anderson. 2004. A leader-follower algorithm for multiple AUV formations. In IEEE/OES Autonomous Underwater Vehicles. 40--46.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. S. Garrido-Jurado, R. Mu noz Salinas, F. J. Madrid-Cuevas, and M. J. Marín-Jiménez. 2014. Automatic generation and detection of highly reliable fiducial markers under occlusion. Pattern Recognition 47, 6 (2014), 2280--2292. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Rachel Gockley, Jodi Forlizzi, and Reid Simmons. 2007. Natural person-following behavior for social robots. In ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction. 17--24. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. H.-M. Gross, Ch Schroeter, Steffen Mueller, Michael Volkhardt, Erik Einhorn, Andreas Bley, Ch Martin, Tim Langner, and Matthias Merten. 2011. Progress in developing a socially assistive mobile home robot companion for the elderly with mild cognitive impairment. In IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. IEEE, 2430--2437.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Wenjiang Guo, Wei Ni, I-Ming Chen, Zhong Qiang Ding, and Song Huat Yeo. 2009. Intuitive vibro-tactile feedback for human body movement guidance. In IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics. 135--140. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Richard Hartley, Jochen Trumpf, Yuchao Dai, and Hongdong Li. 2013. Rotation averaging. International Journal of Computer Vision 103, 3 (2013), 267--305.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Nobutaka Hirai and Hiroshi Mizoguchi. 2003. Visual tracking of human back and shoulder for person following robot. In IEEE/ASME International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics. 527--532.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Fumiaki Hoshino and Kazuyuki Morioka. 2011. Human following robot based on control of particle distribution with integrated range sensors. In IEEE/SICE International Symposium on System Integration. 212--217.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Lynette A. Jones and Nadine B. Sarter. 2008. Tactile displays: Guidance for their design and application. Human Factors 50, 1 (2008), 90--111.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Marin Kobilarov, Gaurav Sukhatme, Jeff Hyams, and Parag Batavia. 2006. People tracking and following with mobile robot using an omnidirectional camera and a laser. In IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. 557--562.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. T. John Koo and Shahram M. Shahruz. 2001. Formation of a group of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs). In American Control Conference. 69--74.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Carlo Masone, Antonio Franchi, Heinrich H. Bülthoff, and Paolo Robuffo Giordano. 2012. Interactive planning of persistent trajectories for human-assisted navigation of mobile robots. In IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. 2641--2648.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. C. Masone, P. R. Giordano, H. H. Bülthoff, and A. Franchi. 2014. Semi-autonomous trajectory generation for mobile robots with integral haptic shared control. In IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. 6468--6475.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Michael Matscheko, Alois Ferscha, Andreas Riener, and Manuel Lehner. 2010. Tactor placement in wrist worn wearables. In International Symposium on Wearable Computers. 1--8.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Kazuyuki Morioka, Joo-Ho Lee, and Hideki Hashimoto. 2004. Human-following mobile robot in a distributed intelligent sensor network. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics 51, 1 (2004), 229--237.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Claudio Pacchierotti, Stephen Sinclair, Massimiliano Solazzi, Antonio Frisoli, Vincent Hayward, and Domenico Prattichizzo. 2017. Wearable haptic systems for the fingertip and the hand: Taxonomy, review, and perspectives. IEEE Transactions on Haptics 10, 4 (2017), 580--600. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Jun Rekimoto. 2013. Traxion: A tactile interaction device with virtual force sensation. In Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. 427--432. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Stephanie Rosenthal, Joydeep Biswas, and Manuela Veloso. 2010. An effective personal mobile robot agent through symbiotic human-robot interaction. In International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems. 915--922. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Stephanie Rosenthal and Manuela Veloso. 2010. Using symbiotic relationships with humans to help robots overcome limitations. In Workshop for Collaborative Human/AI Control for Interactive Experiences.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Stephanie Rosenthal, Manuela M. Veloso, and Anind K. Dey. 2011. Task behavior and interaction planning for a mobile service robot that occasionally requires help. In AAAI Conference on Automated Action Planning for Autonomous Mobile Robots. AAAI Press, 14--19. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Nicholas Roy, Gregory Baltus, Dieter Fox, Francine Gemperle, Jennifer Goetz, Tad Hirsch, Dimitris Margaritis, Michael Montemerlo, Joelle Pineau, Jamie Schulte, et al. 2000. Towards personal service robots for the elderly. In Workshop on Interactive Robots and Entertainment, Vol. 25. 184.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Junji Satake and Jun Miura. 2009. Robust stereo-based person detection and tracking for a person following robot. In ICRA Workshop on People Detection and Tracking. 1--10.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Stefano Scheggi, Marco Aggravi, and Domenico Prattichizzo. 2017. Cooperative navigation for mixed human-robot teams using haptic feedback. IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems 47, 4 (2017), 462--473.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Stefano Scheggi, Francesco Chinello, and Domenico Prattichizzo. 2012. Vibrotactile haptic feedback for human-robot interaction in leader-follower tasks. In International Conference on Pervasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments. 51:1--51:4. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Stefano Scheggi, Fabio Morbidi, and Domenico Prattichizzo. 2014. Human-robot formation control via visual and vibrotactile haptic feedback. IEEE Transactions on Haptics 7, 4 (2014), 499--511.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. Fabrizio Sergi, Dino Accoto, Domenico Campolo, and Eugenio Guglielmelli. 2008. Forearm orientation guidance with a vibrotactile feedback bracelet: On the directionality of tactile motor communication. In IEEE RAS/EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics. 433--438.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. Takuya Shima and Kenjiro Takemura. 2012. An ungrounded pulling force feedback device using periodical vibration-impact. In International Conference on Human Haptic Sensing and Touch Enabled Computer Applications. 481--492. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Dominik Sieber, Selma Music, and Sandra Hirche. 2015. Multi-robot manipulation controlled by a human with haptic feedback. In IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. 2440--2446.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. Aaron St Clair and Maja Mataric. 2015. How robot verbal feedback can improve team performance in human-robot task collaborations. In ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human--Robot Interaction. ACM, 213--220. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Atsushi Tani, Gen Endo, Edwardo F. Fukushima, Shigeo Hirose, Masatsugu Iribe, and Toshio Takubo. 2011. Study on a practical robotic follower to support home oxygen therapy patients-development and control of a mobile platform. In IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. IEEE, 2423--2429.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  42. Hanns W. Tappeiner, Roberta L. Klatzky, Bert Unger, and Ralphs Hollis. 2009. Good vibrations: Asymmetric vibrations for directional haptic cues. In World Haptics Conference. 285--289. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Sebastian Thrun. 2004. Toward a framework for human-robot interaction. Human--Computer Interaction 19, 1--2 (2004), 9--24. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Parris Wellman and Robert D. Howe. 1995. Towards realistic vibrotactile display in virtual environments. ASME Dynamic Systems and Control Division 57, 2 (1995), 713--718.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. Takashi Yoshimi, Manabu Nishiyama, Takafumi Sonoura, Hideichi Nakamoto, Seiji Tokura, Hirokazu Sato, Fumio Ozaki, Nobuto Matsuhira, and Hiroshi Mizoguchi. 2006. Development of a person following robot with vision based target detection. In IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. 5286--5291.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  46. Woo-han Yun, Dohyung Kim, and Jaeyeon Lee. 2010. Person following with obstacle avoidance based on multi-layered mean shift and force field method. In IEEE International Conference on Systems Man and Cybernetics. 3813--3816.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Facilitating Human-Mobile Robot Communication via Haptic Feedback and Gesture Teleoperation

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in

          Full Access

          • Published in

            cover image ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction
            ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction  Volume 7, Issue 3
            October 2018
            95 pages
            EISSN:2573-9522
            DOI:10.1145/3292529
            Issue’s Table of Contents

            Copyright © 2018 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 16 November 2018
            • Revised: 1 July 2018
            • Accepted: 1 July 2018
            • Received: 1 January 2018
            Published in thri Volume 7, Issue 3

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article
            • Research
            • Refereed

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader