Osman Yaşar
Skip Abstract Section
Abstract
Addressing its cognitive essence, universal value, and curricular practices.
- Aho, A. Computation and computational thinking. The Computer Journal 55, 7 (Jul. 2012), 832--835. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Armoni, M. On teaching abstraction to computer science novices. J. Comp in Math & Science Teaching 32, 3 (Mar. 2013), 265--284.Google Scholar
- Bransford, J., Brown, A., and Cocking, R. How People Learn. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C., 2000.Google Scholar
- Brown, P., Roediger, H., and McDaniel, M. Make it Stick. Belknap Press of Harvard, 2014.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Creswell, J.W. Educational Research. 4th Edition. Pearson Education, Inc., 2012.Google Scholar
- Denning, P. Remaining trouble spots with computational thinking. Commun. ACM 60, 6 (June 2017), 33--39. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Dunbar, K. and Klahr, D. Scientific thinking and reasoning. In K. Holyoak and R. Morrison, Eds., The Oxford Handbook of Thinking and Reasoning. Oxford University Press, London, 2012, 701--718.Google Scholar
- Evans, J. and Frankish, K. In Two Minds: Dual Processes and Beyond. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2009.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Findlay, S.D. and Thagard, P. How parts make up wholes. Frontiers in Physiology 3, 455 (2012).Google ScholarCross Ref
- Goleman, D. Emotional Intelligence. Bantam Dell, New York, 2006.Google Scholar
- Grover, S. and Pea, R. Computational thinking: A review of the state of the field. Educational Researcher 42, 1 (Jan. 2013), 38--43.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Guzdial, M. Paving the way for computational thinking. Commun. ACM 51, 8 (Aug. 2008), 25--27. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hawkins, J. On Intelligence. Times Books, New York, 2004. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hebb, D. The Organization of Behavior. Wiley, New York, 1949.Google Scholar
- Kant, I. The Critique of Pure Reason. (J.M.D. Meiklejohn, Trans.). eBook@Adelaide, The University of Adelaide Library, Australia, 1787.Google Scholar
- Kirschner, P.A., Sweller, J., and Clark, R.E. Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work. Educational Psychologist 41, 2 (Feb. 2006), 75--86.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Koehler, M., Shin, T., and Mishra, P. How do we measure TPACK? In R.N. Ronau, C.R. Rakes, and M.L. Niess, Eds., Educational Technology, Teacher Knowledge, and Classroom Impact IGI Global, Hershey, PA, 2012, 16--31.Google Scholar
- Kuhn, T. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. U. Chicago Press, Chicago, 1962.Google Scholar
- Montague, R. How We Make Decisions. Plume Books, New York, 2006.Google Scholar
- Papert, S. Mindstorms: Children, Computers, and Powerful Ideas. Basic Books, New York, 1980 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Rutten, N., van Joolingen, W.R., and van der Veen, J.T. The learning effects of computer simulations in science education. Computers & Education 58, 1 (Jan. 2012), 136--153. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Schanzer, E., Fisler, K. and Krishnamurthi, S. Bootstrap: Going beyond programming in after-school computer science. SPLASH Education Symposium, Claremont, CA., 2013.Google Scholar
- Smetana, L.K. and Bell, R.L. Computer simulations to support science instruction and learning. Int. J. Science Education 34, 9 (Sept. 2012), 1337--1370.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Sun, R. Duality of Mind. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, 2002.Google Scholar
- Tenenbaum, J.B., Kemp, C., Griffiths, T.L., and Goodman, N.D. How to grow a mind: Statistics, structure, and abstraction. Science 331, (2011), 1279--1285.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Thagard, P. The Cognitive Science of Science. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2012.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Turing, A.M. On Computable Numbers, with an Application to the Entscheidungs problem. In Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society 2, 42 (1937), 230--265.Google Scholar
- Wing, J.M. Computational thinking---What and why? The Link Magazine (Mar. 06, 2011).Google Scholar
- Wing, J.M. Computational thinking. Commun. ACM 49, 3 (Mar. 2006), 33--35. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Yaşar, O. Modeling and simulation: How everything seems to form and grow. Comp. in Sci. and Eng. 19, 1 (Jan. 2017), 74--77. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Yaşar, O., Maliekal, J., Veronesi, P. and Little, L. The essence of scientific and engineering thinking and tools to promote it. In Proceedings of the American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference, 2017.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Yaşar, O. and Maliekal, J. Computational pedagogy. Comp. in Sci. and Eng. 16, 3 (Mar. 2014), 78--88.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Yaşar, O., Maliekal, J., Veronesi, P., and Little, L. An interdisciplinary approach to professional development of math, science and technology teachers. Comp. in Math & Sci. Teaching 33, 3 (Mar. 2014), 349--374.Google Scholar
- Yaşar, O. and Landau, R. Elements of computational science and engineering education. SIAM Review 45, 4 (2003), 787--805.Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- A new perspective on computational thinking
Recommendations
Computational Thinking Meets Design Thinking: Technology and Arts Collaborations
GLSVLSI '15: Proceedings of the 25th edition on Great Lakes Symposium on VLSIAre fine arts and technology compatible partners" Do these disciplines support each other or flinch when they are combined like oil and water" Do collaborative efforts provide interesting insights and opportunities for students" For practitioners" There ...
A new way of thinking about computational thinking
Computational Thinking has emerged as an enduring metaphor in teaching and thinking about Computer Science since Jeanette Wing brought the term to our attention in a 2006 CACM article. Computational thinking involves abstraction, but a definition that ...
Computational thinking education: Issues and challenges
AbstractComputational Thinking is a term applied to describe the increasing attention on students' knowledge development about designing computational solutions to problems, algorithmic thinking, and coding. It focuses on skills ...
Comments