skip to main content
research-article

Insights on Assistive Orientation and Mobility of People with Visual Impairment Based on Large-Scale Longitudinal Data

Published:06 March 2018Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Assistive applications for orientation and mobility promote independence for people with visual impairment (PVI). While typical design and evaluation of such applications involves small-sample iterative studies, we analyze large-scale longitudinal data from a geographically diverse population. Our publicly released dataset from iMove, a mobile app supporting orientation of PVI, contains millions of interactions by thousands of users over a year.

Our analysis (i) examines common functionalities, settings, assistive features, and movement modalities in iMove dataset and (ii) discovers user communities based on interaction patterns. We find that the most popular interaction mode is passive, where users receive more notifications, often verbose, while in motion and perform fewer actions. The use of built-in assistive features such as enlarged text indicate a high presence of users with residual sight. Users fall into three distinct groups: (C1) users interested in surrounding points of interest, (C2) users interacting in short bursts to inquire about current location, and (C3) users with long active sessions while in motion. iMove was designed with C3 in mind, and one strength of our contribution is providing meaningful semantics for unanticipated groups, C1 and C2. Our analysis reveals insights that can be generalized to other assistive orientation and mobility applications.

References

  1. John G. Adair. 1984. The hawthorne effect: A reconsideration of the methodological artifact. J. Appl. Psychol. 69, 2 (1984), 334.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Dragan Ahmetovic, Cristian Bernareggi, and Sergio Mascetti. 2011. Zebralocalizer: Identification and localization of pedestrian crossings. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Human Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services. ACM, 275--284. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Dragan Ahmetovic, Cole Gleason, Kris Kitani, Hironobu Takagi, and Chieko Asakawa. 2016. NavCog: Turn-by-turn smartphone navigation assistant for people with visual impairments or blindness. In Proceedings of the Web for All Conference. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Dragan Ahmetovic, Cole Gleason, Chengxiong Ruan, Kris Kitani, Hironobu Takagi, and Chieko Asakawa. 2016. NavCog: A navigational cognitive assistant for the blind. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services (MobileHCI’16). ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Dragan Ahmetovic, Masayuki Murata, Cole Gleason, Erin Brady, Hironobu Takagi, Kris Kitani, and Chieko Asakawa. 2017. Achieving practical and accurate indoor navigation for people with visual impairments. In Proceedings of the Web for All Conference. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. D. Ahmetovic, C. Bernareggi, A. Gerino, and S. Mascetti2014. ZebraRecognizer: Efficient and precise localization of pedestrian crossings. In Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Pattern Recognition. IEEE. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Aries Arditi, Jeffrey D. Holtzman, and Stephen M. Kosslyn. 1988. Mental imagery and sensory experience in congenital blindness. Neuropsychologia 26, 1 (1988), 1--12.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Thomas Aynaud. 2017. Louvain Community Detection. Retrieved July 10, 2017 from https://github.com/taynaud/python-louvain.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Claudio Bettini, Sergio Mascetti, X. Sean Wang, and Sushil Jajodia. 2007. Anonymity in location-based services: Towards a general framework. In Proceedings of the 2007 International Conference on Mobile Data Management. IEEE, 69--76. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Jeffrey P. Bigham, Anna C. Cavender, Jeremy T. Brudvik, Jacob O. Wobbrock, and Richard E. Ladner. 2007. WebinSitu: A comparative analysis of blind and sighted browsing behavior. In Proceedings of the 9th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers and accessibility. ACM, 51--58. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Vincent D. Blondel, Jean-Loup Guillaume, Renaud Lambiotte, and Etienne Lefebvre. 2008. Fast unfolding of communities in large networks. J. Stat. Mech. Theory Exper. 2008, 10 (2008), P10008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Matthias Böhmer, Brent Hecht, Johannes Schöning, Antonio Krüger, and Gernot Bauer. 2011. Falling asleep with angry birds, facebook and kindle: A large scale study on mobile application usage. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Human Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services. ACM, 47--56. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Erin L. Brady, Daisuke Sato, Chengxiong Ruan, Hironobu Takagi, and Chieko Asakawa. 2015. Exploring interface design for independent navigation by people with visual impairments. In Proceedings of the 17th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers 8 Accessibility (ASSETS’15). ACM, New York, NY, 387--388. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Marc Damashek. 1995. Gauging similarity with n-grams: Language-independent categorization of text. Science 267, 5199 (1995), 843.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Scott Deerwester, Susan T. Dumais, George W. Furnas, Thomas K. Landauer, and Richard Harshman. 1990. Indexing by latent semantic analysis. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. 41, 6 (1990), 391.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Himel Dev and Zhicheng Liu. 2017. Identifying frequent user tasks from application logs. In Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces. ACM, 263--273. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Christine Dickinson. 1998. Low Vision: Principles and Practice. Butterworth-Heinemann, Berwick upon Tweed, UK.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Trinh Minh Tri Do, Jan Blom, and Daniel Gatica-Perez. 2011. Smartphone usage in the wild: A large-scale analysis of applications and context. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Multimodal Interfaces. ACM, 353--360. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Navid Fallah, Ilias Apostolopoulos, Kostas Bekris, and Eelke Folmer. 2013. Indoor human navigation systems: A survey. Interact. Comput. 25, 1 (2013), 21--33.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Nicholas A. Giudice and Gordon E. Legge. 2008. Blind navigation and the role of technology. In Engineering Handbook of Smart Technology for Aging, Disability, and Independence. 479--500.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Martin Goldberg. 2015. Assisting Visually Impaired People with Mobility through Technology in the Age of Context. Ph.D. Dissertation. City University of New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Joo Guerreiro, Dragan Ahmetovic, Kris M. Kitani, and Chieko Asakawa. 2017. Virtual navigation for blind people: Building sequential representations of the real-world. In Proceedings of the 19th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Amy Hurst, Scott E. Hudson, Jennifer Mankoff, and Shari Trewin. 2013. Distinguishing users by pointing performance in laboratory and real-world tasks. ACM Trans. Access. Comput. 5, 2 (2013), 5. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Hideyuki Iwahashi. 1983. Toward White Wave—Story of Seiichi Miyake (in Japanese). Traffic Safety Research Center.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Anil K. Jain. 2010. Data clustering: 50 years beyond K-means. Pattern Recogn. Lett. 31, 8 (2010), 651--666. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Hernisa Kacorri, Kris M. Kitani, Jeffrey P. Bigham, and Chieko Asakawa. 2017. People with visual impairment training personal object recognizers: Feasibility and challenges. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 5839--5849. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Hernisa Kacorri, Sergio Mascetti, Andrea Gerino, Dragan Ahmetovic, Hironobu Takagi, and Chieko Asakawa. 2016. Supporting orientation of people with visual impairment: Analysis of large scale usage data. In International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Quannan Li, Yu Zheng, Xing Xie, Yukun Chen, Wenyu Liu, and Wei-Ying Ma. 2008. Mining user similarity based on location history. In Proceedings of the 16th ACM SIGSPATIAL International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems. ACM, 34. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Richard G. Long and Nicholas A. Giudice. 1997. Establishing and maintaining orientation for mobility. Foundations of Orientation and Mobility 1 (1997), 45--67.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. James MacQueen and others. 1967. Some methods for classification and analysis of multivariate observations. In Proceedings of the 5th Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, Vol. 1. Oakland, CA, 281--297.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Sergio Mascetti, Dragan Ahmetovic, Andrea Gerino, and Cristian Bernareggi. 2016. ZebraRecognizer: Pedestrian crossing recognition for people with visual impairment or blindness. Pattern Recognition 60 (2016), 405--419. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Sergio Mascetti, Dragan Ahmetovic, Andrea Gerino, Cristian Bernareggi, Mario Busso, and Alessandro Rizzi. 2016. Robust traffic lights detection on mobile devices for pedestrians with visual impairment. Computer Vision and Image Understanding 148 (2016), 123--135. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Sergio Mascetti, Lorenzo Picinali, Andrea Gerino, Dragan Ahmetovic, and Cristian Bernareggi. 2016. Sonification of guidance data during road crossing for people with visual impairments or blindness. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 85 (2016), 16--26. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Florian Meier, Johannes Aigner, and David Elsweiler. 2017. Using sessions from clickstream data analysis to uncover different types of twitter behaviour. In Proceedings of the 15th International Symposium of Information Science: Everything Changes, Everything Stays the Same? Understanding Information Spaces (ISI’17). Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Daniel R. Montello. 2001. Spatial cognition. In International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences, N. J. Smelser and B. Baltes (Eds.)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Madoka Nakajima and Shinichiro Haruyama. 2013. New indoor navigation system for visually impaired people using visible light communication. EURASIP J. Wireless Commun. Netw. 2013, 1 (2013), 1--10.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. Mark E. J. Newman and Michelle Girvan. 2004. Finding and evaluating community structure in networks. Phys. Rev. E 69, 2 (2004), 026113.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. Bo Pang and Lillian Lee. 2008. Opinion mining and sentiment analysis. Found. Trends Inf. Retriev. 2, 1--2 (2008), 1--135. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. F. Pedregosa, G. Varoquaux, A. Gramfort, V. Michel, B. Thirion, O. Grisel, M. Blondel, P. Prettenhofer, R. Weiss, V. Dubourg, J. Vanderplas, A. Passos, D. Cournapeau, M. Brucher, M. Perrot, and E. Duchesnay. 2011. Scikit-learn: Machine learning in python. Journal of Machine Learning Research 12 (2011), 2825--2830. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Torben Poulsen. 1982. Acoustic traffic signal for blind pedestrians. Appl. Acoust. 15, 5 (1982), 363--376.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  41. N. Pressey. 1977. Mowat sensor. Focus 11, 3 (1977), 35--39.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Christian Quadri, Matteo Zignani, Sabrina Gaito, and Gian Paolo Rossi. 2016. Clique-aware mobile social clouds. In Proceedings of the IFIP Networking Conference (IFIP Networking) and Workshops, 2016. IEEE, 512--517.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  43. Lisa Ran, Sumi Helal, and Steve Moore. 2004. Drishti: An integrated indoor/outdoor blind navigation system and service. In Proceedings of the Second IEEE Annual Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications, 2004 (PerCom’04). IEEE, 23--30. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Daniele Riboni, Claudio Bettini, Gabriele Civitarese, Zaffar Haider Janjua, and Rim Helaoui. 2016. SmartFABER: Recognizing fine-grained abnormal behaviors for early detection of mild cognitive impairment. In Artificial Intelligence in Medicine. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. Victor R. Schinazi, Tyler Thrash, and Daniel-Robert Chebat. 2016. Spatial navigation by congenitally blind individuals. Wiley Interdisc. Rev.: Cogn. Sci. 7, 1 (2016), 37--58.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  46. Lei Tang and Huan Liu. 2010. Community detection and mining in social media. Synth. Lect. Data Min. Knowl. Discov. 2, 1 (2010), 1--137. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. Catherine Thinus-Blanc and Florence Gaunet. 1997. Representation of space in blind persons: Vision as a spatial sense? Psychol. Bull. 121, 1 (1997), 20.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  48. Gang Wang, Xinyi Zhang, Shiliang Tang, Haitao Zheng, and Ben Y Zhao. 2016. Unsupervised clickstream clustering for user behavior analysis. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  49. William R. Wiener, Richard L. Welsh, and Bruce B. Blasch. 2010. Foundations of Orientation and Mobility. American Foundation for the Blind.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. Michele A. Williams, Amy Hurst, and Shaun K. Kane. 2013. Pray before you step out: Describing personal and situational blind navigation behaviors. In Proceedings of the 15th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility. ACM, 28. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  51. Yiming Yang and Jan O. Pedersen. 1997. A comparative study on feature selection in text categorization. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learing (ICML’97), Vol. 97. 412--420. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  52. Kumar Yelamarthi, Daniel Haas, Daniel Nielsen, and Shawn Mothersell. 2010. RFID and GPS integrated navigation system for the visually impaired. In Proceedings of the 2010 53rd IEEE International Midwest Symposium on Circuits and Systems (MWSCAS’10). IEEE, 1149--1152.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Insights on Assistive Orientation and Mobility of People with Visual Impairment Based on Large-Scale Longitudinal Data

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in

        Full Access

        • Published in

          cover image ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing
          ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing  Volume 11, Issue 1
          Special Issue of Papers from ASSETS 2016
          March 2018
          154 pages
          ISSN:1936-7228
          EISSN:1936-7236
          DOI:10.1145/3194310
          Issue’s Table of Contents

          Copyright © 2018 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 6 March 2018
          • Revised: 1 December 2017
          • Accepted: 1 December 2017
          • Received: 1 May 2017
          Published in taccess Volume 11, Issue 1

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article
          • Research
          • Refereed

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader