skip to main content
research-article

Moment-Matching-Based Conjugacy Approximation for Bayesian Ranking and Selection

Published:14 November 2017Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

We study the conjugacy approximation models in the context of Bayesian ranking and selection with unknown correlations. Under the assumption of normal-inverse-Wishart prior distribution, the posterior distribution remains a normal-inverse-Wishart distribution thanks to the conjugacy property when all alternatives are sampled at each step. However, this conjugacy property no longer holds if only one alternative is sampled at a time, an appropriate setting when there is a limited budget on the number of samples. We propose two new conjugacy approximation models based on the idea of moment matching. Both of them yield closed-form Bayesian prior updating formulas. We apply these updating formulas in Bayesian ranking and selection using the knowledge gradient method and show the superiority of the proposed conjugacy approximation models in applications of wind farm placement and computer model calibration.

References

  1. Y. Chen and I. O. Ryzhov. 2016. Approximate bayesian inference as a form of stochastic approximation: A new consistency theory with applications. In Proceedings of the 2016 Winter Simulation Conference. IEEE Press, 534--544. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. S. Chick. 2006. Bayesian ideas and discrete event simulation: Why, what and how. In Proceedings of the Winter Simulation Conference, L. Perrone, F. Wieland, J. Liu, B. Lawson, D. Nicol, and R. Fujimoto (Eds.). 96--105. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. S. Chick and P. Frazier. 2012. Sequential sampling for selection with economics of selection procedures. Manage. Sci. 58, 3 (2012), 550--569. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. B. A. Cosgrove, D. Lohmann, K. E. Mitchell, P. R. Houser, E. F. Wood, J. C. Schaake, A. Robock, and others. 2003. Real-time and retrospective forcing in the North American land data assimilation system (NLDAS) project. J. Geophys. Res. 108, D22 (2003), 8842--8853. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. M. H. DeGroot. 2004. Optimal Statistical Decisions. John Wiley 8 Sons.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. W. Fan, L. J. Hong, and B. L. Nelson. 2016. Indifference-zone-free selection of the best. Operat. Res. 64, 6 (2016), 1499--1514. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. P. I. Frazier, W. B. Powell, and S. Dayanik. 2009. The knowledge-gradient policy for correlated normal rewards. INFORMS J. Comput. 21, 4 (2009), 599--613. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. G. H. Golub and C. F. Van Loan. 1996. Matrix Computations. Johns Hopkins Studies in the Mathematical Science.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. A. K. Gupta and D. K. Nagar. 2000. Matrix Variate Distributions. Chapman 8 Hall.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. L. J. Hong and B. L. Nelson. 2009. A brief introduction to optimization via simulation. In Proceedings of the Winter Simulation Conference, M. D. Rosetti, R. R. Hill, B. Johansson, A. Dunkin, and R. G. Ingalls (Eds.). 75--85. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. S.-H. Kim and B. L. Nelson. 2001. A fully sequential procedure for indifference-zone selection in simulation. ACM Trans. Model. Comput. Simul. 11, 3 (2001), 251--273. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. S.-H. Kim and B. L. Nelson. 2006. On the asymptotic validity of fully sequential selection procedures for steady-state simulation. Operat. Res. 54, 3 (2006), 475--488. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. S.-H. Kim and B. L. Nelson. 2007. Recent advances in ranking and selection. In Proceedings of the Winter Simulation Conference, S. G. Henderson, B. Biller, M.-H. Hsieh, J. Shortle, J. D. Tew, and R. R. Barton (Eds.). 162--172.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. T. P. Minka. 2001a. Expectation propagation for approximate Bayesian inference. In Proceedings of the 17th Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence. Morgan Kaufmann, 362--369.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. T. P. Minka. 2001b. A Family of Algorithms for Approximate Bayesian Inference. Ph.D. Dissertation. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. M. D. Morris, T. J. Mitchell, and D. Ylvisaker. 1993. Bayesian design and analysis of computer experiments: Use of derivatives in surface prediction. Technometrics 35 (1993), 243--255. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. W. B. Powell and I. O. Ryzhov. 2012. Optimal Learning. John Wiley 8 Sons.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. P. Z. G. Qian. 2012. Sliced Latin hypercube designs. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 107, 497 (2012), 393--399. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. H. Qu, I. O. Ryzhov, M. C. Fu, and Z. Ding. 2015. Sequential selection with unknown correlation structures. Operat. Res. 63, 4 (2015), 931--948. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. W. Scott, P. Frazier, and W. B. Powell. 2011. The correlated knowledge gradient for simulation optimization of continuous parameters using gaussian process regression. SIAM J. Optimiz. 21, 3 (2011), 996--1026. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. R. Tuo and J. C. F. Wu. 2015. Efficient calibration for imperfect computer models. Ann. Stat. 43, 6 (2015), 2331--2352. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Raymond K. W. Wong, Curtis B. Storlie, and Thomas Lee. 2017. A frequentist approach to computer model calibration. J. Roy. Stat. Soc. B 79, 2 (2017), 635--648. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. J. Xie and P. Frazier. 2013. Sequential bayes-optimal policies for multiple comparisons with a known standard. Operat. Res. 61, 3 (2013), 1174--1189. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Jianming Ye. 1998. On measuring and correcting the effects of data mining and model selection. J. Am. Stat. Ass. 93, 441 (1998), 120--131. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Q. Zhang and Y. Song. 2015. Simulation selection for empirical model comparison. In Proceedings of the 2015 Winter Simulation Conference. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Moment-Matching-Based Conjugacy Approximation for Bayesian Ranking and Selection

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in

        Full Access

        • Published in

          cover image ACM Transactions on Modeling and Computer Simulation
          ACM Transactions on Modeling and Computer Simulation  Volume 27, Issue 4
          October 2017
          158 pages
          ISSN:1049-3301
          EISSN:1558-1195
          DOI:10.1145/3155315
          Issue’s Table of Contents

          Copyright © 2017 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 14 November 2017
          • Accepted: 1 September 2017
          • Revised: 1 August 2017
          • Received: 1 August 2016
          Published in tomacs Volume 27, Issue 4

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article
          • Research
          • Refereed

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader