skip to main content
research-article

Quantified Baby: Parenting and the Use of a Baby Wearable in the Wild

Published:06 December 2017Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Baby wearable technologies are becoming increasingly popular, particularly in early infancy. However, little research has been conducted to investigate how baby wearable technologies are adopted and used in parenting. This paper presents a two-week in-depth situated study with six mothers in their homes consisting of contextual entry and exit interviews, video recordings of "out-of-box" experiences, and a diary study. Using interpretative phenomenological analysis, participants' use and expectations of the baby wearable technology were examined. Use of the device directly impacted upon parents' knowledge production and anxiety, and influenced the perceived physicality and social factors of parenting. We frame these findings around sociological norms of the vulnerable child and responsible mother, as well as the notion of "lived informatics", where individuals' interaction with the technology influenced the perception, use and impact of the baby wearable on everyday parenting practices and familial relationships.

References

  1. Angelcare. 2017. Angelcare AC1300 Video, Movement; Sound Monitor | Angelcare UK. Angelcare. Retrieved April 27, 2017 from https://angelcare.co.uk/product/angelcare-ac1300-video-movement-sound-monitorGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Amid Ayobi, Paul Marshall, and Anna L. Cox. 2016. Reflections on 5 Years of Personal Informatics: Rising Concerns and Emerging Directions. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '16), 2774--278 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Madeline Balaam, Judy Robertson, Geraldine Fitzpatrick, Rebecca Say, Gillian Hayes, Melissa Mazmanian, and Belinda Parmar. 2013. Motherhood and HCI. In CHI '13 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '13), 3215--3218. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Lesley Barclay, Louise Everitt, Frances Rogan, Virginia Schmied, and Aileen Wyllie. 1997. Becoming a mother -- an analysis of women's experience of early motherhood. Journal of Advanced Nursing 25, 4: 719--728.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Marguerite Barry, Kevin Doherty, Jose Marcano Bellisario, Josip Car, Cecily Morrison, and Gavin Doherty. 2017. mHealth for Maternal Mental Health: Everyday Wisdom in Ethical Design. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '17). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Lillian R. Blackmon, DANIEL G. Batton, Edward F. Bell, William A. Engle, W.P. Kanto, Gilbert I. Martin, Warren N. Rosenfeld, Ann R. Stark, and J.A. Lemons. 2003. Apnea, sudden infant death syndrome, and home monitoring. Pediatrics 111, 4: 914--917.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Peter S. Blair, Ed Mitchell, Peter J. Fleming, Iain J. Smith, Martin Ward Platt, Jeanine Young, Pam Nadin, P.J. Berry, and Jean Golding. 1999. Babies sleeping with parents: case-control study of factors influencing the risk of the sudden infant death syndromeCommentary: Cot deathGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. ___the story so far. BMJ 319, 7223: 1457--146Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology 3, 2: 77--101.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. British Telecommunications PLC. 2017. BT Digital Baby Monitor 300 (077497) | BT Shop. BT Shop. Retrieved April 27, 2017 from https://www.shop.bt.com/products/bt-digital-baby-monitor-300-077497-9N50.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Barry Brown, Moira McGregor, and Eric Laurier. 2013. iPhone in Vivo: Video Analysis of Mobile Device Use. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '13), 1031--1040. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Scott Carter and Jennifer Mankoff. 2005. When Participants Do the Capturing: The Role of Media in Diary Studies. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '05), 899--908. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Monica J. Casper and Daniel R. Morrison. 2010. Medical Sociology and Technology: Critical Engagements. Journal of Health and Social Behavior 51, 1_suppl: S120--S132.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Pia Haudrup Christensen. 2000. Childhood and the Cultural Constitution of Vulnerable Bodies. In The Body, Childhood and Society. Palgrave Macmillan UK, London, 38--59.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Sunny Consolvo, David W. McDonald, Tammy Toscos, Mike Y. Chen, Jon Froehlich, Beverly Harrison, Predrag Klasnja, Anthony LaMarca, Louis LeGrand, Ryan Libby, Ian Smith, and James A. Landay. 2008. Activity Sensing in the Wild: A Field Trial of Ubifit Garden. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '08), 1797--1806. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Robbie Davis-Floyd and Joseph Dumit. 1998. Cyborg babies: From techno-sex to techno-tots. Psychology Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Chris Elsden, Bettina Nissen, Andrew Garbett, David Chatting, David Kirk, and John Vines. 2016. Metadating: Exploring the Romance and Future of Personal Data. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '16), 685--698. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Linda Finlay and Claire Ballinger. 2006. Qualitative research for allied health professionals: challenging choices. John Wiley & Sons.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Jason W. Fouts. 2000. On Site: An "Out-of-box" Experience. Commun. ACM 43, 11: 28--29. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Kevin Gaunt, Júlia Nacsa, and Marcel Penz. 2014. Baby Lucent: Pitfalls of Applying Quantified Self to Baby Products. In CHI '14 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '14), 263--268. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Lorna Gibson and Vicki L. Hanson. 2013. Digital Motherhood: How Does Technology Help New Mothers? In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '13), 313--322. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Bill Gillham. 2005. Research Interviewing: The range of techniques: A practical guide. McGraw-Hill Education (UK).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Hans Hadders. 2009. Enacting death in the intensive care unit: medical technology and the multiple ontologies of death. Health:An Interdisciplinary Journal for the Social Study of Health, Illness and Medicine 13, 6: 571--587.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Sharon Hays. 1998. The cultural contradictions of motherhood. Yale University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. George W. Holden and Pamela C. Miller. 1999. Enduring and different: a meta-analysis of the similarity in parents' child rearing. Psychological bulletin 125, 2: 223.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. K. Holtzblatt and S. Jones. 1993. Contextual inquiry: A participatory technique for system design. Participatory design: Principles and practice: 180--193.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Mary Hui, Christine Ly, and Carman Neustaedter. 2012. MammiBelli: Sharing Baby Activity Levels Between Expectant Mothers and Their Intimate Social Groups. In CHI '12 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '12), 1649--1654. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Sophia Alice Johnson. 2015. "Intimate mothering publics": comparing face-to-face support groups and Internet use for women seeking information and advice in the transition to first-time motherhood. Culture, Health & Sexuality 17, 2: 237--251.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Sophia Johnson and Sophia Alice. 2014. "Maternal Devices", Social Media and the Self-Management of Pregnancy, Mothering and Child Health. Societies 4, 2: 330--350.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Natalie D. Kane. 2017. Baby Futures. Retrieved June 20, 2017 from http://babyfutures.tumblr.com/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Elizabeth Kaziunas, Mark S. Ackerman, Silvia Lindtner, and Joyce M. Lee. 2017. Caring through Data: Attending to the Social and Emotional Experiences of Health Datafication. In Proceedings of Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Ketola. 2005. Special issue on out-of-box experience and consumer devices. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 9, 4: 187--190. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. David King. 2014. Marketing wearable home baby monitors: real peace of mind? BMJ: British Medical Journal (Online) 349.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. David King. 2014. Marketing wearable home baby monitors: real peace of mind? BMJ: British Medical Journal (Online) 349.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Sonja Olin Lauritzen. 2008. Notions of child health: mothers' accounts of health in their young babies. Sociology of Health & Illness 19, 4: 436--456.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. Liana S. Leach, Carmel Poyser, and Kate Fairweather-Schmidt. 2017. Maternal perinatal anxiety: A review of prevalence and correlates. Clinical Psychologist 21, 1: 4--19.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. Tama Leaver. 2017. Intimate Surveillance: Normalizing Parental Monitoring and Mediation of Infants Online. Social Media + Society 3, 2: 2056305117707192.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Deborah Lupton. Infant embodiment and interembodiment: A review of sociocultural perspectives. Childhood 0, 0: 1--14.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Deborah Lupton. 2012. Infant embodiment and interembodiment: A review of sociocultural perspectives. Childhood 0, 0: 1--14.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Deborah Lupton. 2013. Understanding the Human Machine {Commentary}. IEEE Technology and Society Magazine 32, 4: 25--30.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  41. Deborah Lupton. 2013. Quantifying the body: monitoring and measuring health in the age of mHealth technologies. Critical Public Health 23, 4: 393--403.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  42. Deborah A. Lupton. 2011. "The best thing for the baby": Mothers' concepts and experiences related to promoting their infants' health and development. Health, Risk & Society 13, 7--8: 637--651.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  43. Deborah Lupton and John Tulloch. 2002. 'Risk is Part of Your Life': Risk Epistemologies Among a Group of Australians. Sociology 36, 2: 317--334.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  44. Made for Mums. 2017. 10 of the best baby monitors. Made for Mums. Retrieved April 27, 2017 from http://www.madeformums.com/reviews-and-shopping/10-of-the-best-baby-monitors/31409.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. Clara Mancini, Keerthi Thomas, Yvonne Rogers, Blaine A. Price, Lukazs Jedrzejczyk, Arosha K. Bandara, Adam N. Joinson, and Bashar Nuseibeh. 2009. From Spaces to Places: Emerging Contexts in Mobile Privacy. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing (UbiComp '09), 1--10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. Gary Marx and Valerie Steeves. 2010. From the Beginning: Children as Subjects and Agents of Surveillance. Surveillance & Society 7, 3/4: 192--230. Retrieved April 11, 2017 from http://ojs.library.queensu.ca/index.php/surveillance-and-society/article/view/4152Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. L.H. Miller, A. Fraser, and R. Moy. 2008. How does cot death prevention advice influence parents' behaviour? Child: Care, Health and Development 34, 5: 613--618.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  48. M.K. Nelson. 2008. Watching Children: Describing the Use of Baby Monitors on Epinions.com. Journal of Family Issues 29, 4: 516--538.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  49. Nikki Newhouse. 2016. Bump2Bump: Online Peer Support in First-Time Pregnancy. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '16), 239--243. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  50. Janni Nielsen, Torkil Clemmensen, and Carsten Yssing. 2002. Getting Access to What Goes on in People's Heads?: Reflections on the Think-aloud Technique. In Proceedings of the Second Nordic Conference on Human-computer Interaction (NordiCHI '02), 101--110. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  51. 0. Owlet. 2017. Owlet Smart Sock; Baby Care. Owlet Care. Retrieved April 27, 2017 from http://www.owletcare.com/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  52. Misha Patel and Aisling Ann O'Kane. 2015. Contextual Influences on the Use and Non-Use of Digital Technology While Exercising at the Gym. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '15), 2923--2932. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  53. Jeannette Pols. 2013. Knowing Patients: Turning Patient Knowledge into Science. Science, Technology & Human Values. Retrieved from http://sth.sagepub.com/content/early/2013/09/13/0162243913504306.abstractGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  54. Katie Reid, Paul Flowers, and Michael Larkin. 2005. Exploring lived experience. The Psychologist 18, 1: 20--23. Retrieved April 27, 2017 from https://is.muni.cz/el/1423/jaro2009/PSY118/um/exploring_lived_experience.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. Yvonne Rogers, Kay Connelly, Lenore Tedesco, William Hazlewood, Andrew Kurtz, Robert E. Hall, Josh Hursey, and Tammy Toscos. 2007. Why It's Worth the Hassle: The Value of In-situ Studies when Designing Ubicomp. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing (UbiComp '07), 336--353. Retrieved from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1771592.1771612 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  56. John Rooksby, Mattias Rost, Alistair Morrison, and Matthew Chalmers Chalmers. 2014. Personal tracking as lived informatics. Proceedings of the 32nd annual ACM conference on Human factors in computing systems - CHI '14: 1163--1172. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  57. Sarla Sethi. 1995. The Dialectic in Becoming a Mother: Experiencing a Postpartum Phenomenon. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences 9, 4: 235--244.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  58. Jonathan A. Smith. 2004. Reflecting on the development of interpretative phenomenological analysis and its contribution to qualitative research in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology 1, 1: 39--54.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  59. Jonathan A. Smith, Paul Flowers, and Michael Larkin. 2009. Interpretative phenomenological analysis: Theory, method and research. Sage.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  60. A. Straus and J. Corbin. 1998. Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. Basics of Qualitative Research.: 265--274.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  61. Diana Adis Tahhan. 2008. Depth and Space in Sleep: Intimacy, Touch and the Body in Japanese Co-sleeping Rituals. Body & Society 14, 4: 37--56.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  62. E. Temir, A.A. O'Kane, P. Marshall, and A. Blandford. 2016. Running: A Flexible Situated Study. In Proceedings of CHI 2016: Extended Abstracts. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  63. Divya Venkataramani, Aaishwarya Jadhav, Shubham Wadzirkar, Jaikumar Ambekar, Kranti Dive, Sonit Sharma, and Gaurav Khadse. 2015. Infant monitoring using wearable computing. International Journal of Engineering and Technical Research 3, 11: 95--98. Retrieved April 27, 2017 from https://www.erpublication.org/published_paper/IJETR033369.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  64. Amy Wenzel, Erin N. Haugen, and Melanie Goyette. 2005. Sexual adjustment in postpartum women with Generalized Anxiety Disorder. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology 23, 4: 365--366.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Quantified Baby: Parenting and the Use of a Baby Wearable in the Wild
    Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    Full Access

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader