skip to main content
research-article

Distraction or Life Saver?: The Role of Technology in Undergraduate Students' Boundary Management Strategies

Published:06 December 2017Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Previous research has shown that communication technologies may make it challenging for working professionals to manage the boundaries between their work life and home life. For college students, however, there is a less clear definition of what constitutes work and what constitutes home life. As a result, students may use different boundary management strategies than working professionals. To explore this issue, we interviewed 29 undergraduates about how they managed boundaries between different areas of their life. Interviewees reported maintaining flexible and permeable boundaries that are not bounded physically or temporally. They used both technological and non-technological strategies to manage different life spheres. Interviewees saw technology as a major source of boundary violations but also as a boundary managing strategy that allowed them to achieve better life balance. Based on these findings, we propose design implications for tools to better support the boundary management processes of undergraduate students.

References

  1. Jeffrey J Arnett. 2000. Emerging adulthood: A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. American Psychologist 55, 5: 469--480.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Jeffrey J Arnett. 2005. The Developmental Context of Substance use in Emerging Adulthood. Journal of Drug Issues 35, 2: 235--254.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Blake E Ashforth, Glen E Kreiner, and Mel Fugate. 2000. All in a Day's Work: Boundaries and Micro Role Transitions. The Academy of Management Review 25, 3: 472--491.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Susanne Bødker. 2016. Rethinking technology on the boundaries of life and work. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 20, 4: 533--544. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Steven P. Brown, Eli Jones, and Thomas W. Leigh. 2005. The Attenuating Effect of Role Overload on Relationships Linking Self-Efficacy and Goal Level to Work Performance. Journal of Applied Psychology 90, 5: 972--979.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Carrie A. Bulger, Russell A. Matthews, and Mark E. Hoffman. 2007. Work and personal life boundary management: Boundary strength, work/personal life balance, and the segmentation-integration continuum. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology 12, 4: 365--375.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Marta E Cecchinato, Anna L Cox, and Jon Bird. 2015. Working 9--5?: Professional differences in email and boundary management practices. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 3989--3998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Kathy Charmaz. 2006. Constructing grounded theory: a practical guide through qualitative analysis.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Uracha Chatrakul Na Ayudhya and Suzan Lewis. 2011. From "Balancers" to "Integrators"? Young Professionals' Talk About "Work" and the Rest of "Life" in the UK. In Creating Balance? Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 47--63.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Pu Shih Daniel Chen, Amber D. Lambert, and Kevin R. Guidry. 2010. Engaging online learners: The impact of Web-based learning technology on college student engagement. Computers and Education 54, 4: 1222--1232. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Yi-Fan Chen and James E Katz. 2009. Extending family to school life: College students' use of the mobile phone. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 67, 2: 179--191. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Marcia Roe Clark. 2005. Negotiating the Freshman Year: Challenges and Strategies Among First-Year College Students. Journal of College Student Development 46, 3: 296--316.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Sue Campbell Clark. 2000. Work/Family Border Theory: A New Theory of Work/Family Balance. Human Relations 53, 6: 747--770.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Shelia R. Cotten. 2008. Students' technology use and the impacts on well-being. New Directions for Student Services, 124: 55--70.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Laura Dabbish, Gloria Mark, and Víctor M. González. 2011. Why do i keep interrupting myself? In Proceedings of the 2011 annual conference on Human factors in computing systems - CHI '11, 3127. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Richard L. Daft and Robert H. Lengel. 1986. Organizational Information Requirements, Media Richness and Structural Design. Management Science 32, 5: 554--571.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Ildikó Dén-Nagy. 2014. A double-edged sword?: a critical evaluation of the mobile phone in creating work-life balance. New Technology, Work and Employment 29, 2: 193--211.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Linda Duxbury and Rob Smart. 2011. The myth of separate worlds: An exploration of how mobile technology has redefined work-life balance. In Creating Balance?: International Perspectives on the Work-Life Integration of Professionals. 269--284.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Gwenith Fisher, Gwyn. 2002. Work/personal life balance: A construct development study.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Rowanne Fleck, Anna L Cox, and Rosalyn A V Robison. 2015. Balancing Boundaries?: Using Multiple Devices to Manage Work - Life Balance. Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems: 1--4. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Kathryn L. Fonner and Lara C. Stache. 2012. All in a day's work, at home: Teleworkers' management of micro role transitions and the work-home boundary. New Technology, Work and Employment 27, 3: 242--257.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Annis G Golden and Cheryl Geisler. 2007. Work--life boundary management and the personal digital assistant. Human Relations 60, 3: 519--551.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Cheryl F. Gordon, Linda P. (Linda Pailiang) Juang, and Moin. Syed. 2007. Internet Use and Well-Being Among College Students: Beyond Frequency of Use. Journal of College Student Development 48, 6: 674--688.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Benjamin H Gottlieb, Eva Still, and Ian R Newby-Clark. 2007. Types and Precipitants of Growth and Decline in Emerging Adulthood. Journal of Adolescent Research 22, 2: 132--155.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Christine a. Grant, Louise M. Wallace, and Peter C. Spurgeon. 2013. An exploration of the psychological factors affecting remote e-worker's job effectiveness, well-being and work-life balance. Employee Relations 36, 5: 527--546.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Andrea Grimes and A.J. Brush. 2008. Life scheduling to support multiple social roles. In Proceeding of the twenty-sixth annual CHI conference on Human factors in computing systems - CHI '08, 821. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Leslie Haddon. 2004. Information and Communication Technologies in Everyday Life.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Douglas T. Hall and Judith Richter. 1988. Balancing Work Life and Home Life: What Can Organizations Do to Help? Academy of Management Executive 2, 3: 213--223.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Tracy D Hecht and Natalie J Allen. 2009. A longitudinal examination of the work -- nonwork boundary strength construct. Journal of Organizational Behavior 30: 839--862.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. R. Junco, G. Heiberger, and E. Loken. 2011. The effect of Twitter on college student engagement and grades. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 27, 2: 119--132.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Reynol Junco and Gail A Cole-Avent. 2008. An introduction to technologies commonly used by college students. New Directions for Student Services 124: 3--17.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Ellen Ernst Kossek, Raymond a. Noe, and Beverly J. DeMarr. 1999. Work-Family Role Synthesis: Individual and Organizational Determinants. International Journal of Conflict Management 10, 2: 102--129.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Glen Kreiner, Elaine Hollensbe, and Mathew Sheep. 2009. Balancing borders and bridges: Negotiating the work-home interface via boundary work tactics. Academy of Management Journal 52, 4: 704--730.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. Gilly Leshed, Maria Håkansson, and Joseph 'Jofish' Kaye. 2014. Our life is the farm and farming is our life: home-work coordination in organic farm families. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work & social computing, 487--498. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Gloria Mark, Yiran Wang, and Melissa Niiya. 2014. Stress and multitasking in everyday college life: an empirical study of online activity. Proceedings of the 32nd annual ACM: 41--50. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Melissa Mazmanian and Ingrid Erickson. 2014. The product of availability: understanding the economic underpinnings of constant connectivity. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 763--772. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Melissa Mazmanian, Joanne Yates, and Wanda Orlikowski. 2006. UBIQUITOUS EMAIL: INDIVIDUAL EXPERIENCES AND ORGANIZATIONAL CONSEQUENCES OF BLACKBERRY USE. In Academy of Management Proceedings, D1--D6.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Jake Messersmith. 2007. Managing work-life conflict among information technology workers. Human Resource Management 46, 3: 429--451.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. Ryosuke Mita, Toshiki Taleuchi, Tomohiro Tanikawa, Takuji Narumi, and Michitaka Hirose. 2017. Early warning of task failure using task processing logs. In Proceedings of the 8th Augmented Human International Conference. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Taewoo Nam. 2014. Technology Use and Work-Life Balance. Applied Research in Quality of Life 9, 4: 1017--1040.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  41. Christena Nippert-Eng. 1996. Calendars and keys: The classification of "home" and "work." Sociological Forum 11, 3: 563--582.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  42. Ikki Ohmukai and Hideaki Takeda. 2003. Social scheduler: a proposal of collaborative personal task management. In Web Intelligence, 2003. WI 2003. Proceedings. IEEE/WIC International Conference on, 666--670. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Saroj Parasuraman and Jeffrey H. Greenhaus. 2002. Toward reducing some critical gaps in work--family research. Human Resource Management Review 12: 299--312.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  44. Matthew M Piszczek and Peter Berg. 2014. Expanding the boundaries of boundary theory: Regulative institutions and work--family role management. human relations 67, 12: 1491--1512.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. Marc Prensky. 2001. Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants Part 1. On the Horizon 9, 5: 1--6.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  46. Ken Resnicow, Colleen DiIorio, Johanna E. Soet, Belinda Borrelli, Jacki Hecht, and Denise Ernst. 2002. Motivational interviewing in health promotion: It sounds like something is changing. Health Psychology 21, 5: 444--451.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  47. John R Rizzo, Robert J House, and Sidney I Lirtzman. 1970. Role Conflict and Ambiguity in Complex Organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly 15, 2: 150--163.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  48. Christine Salazar. 2001. Building boundaries and negotiating work at home. In Proceedings of the 2001 International ACM SIGGROUP Conference on Supporting Group Work, 162--170. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  49. Aaron Smith, Lee Rainie, and Kathryn Zickuhr. 2011. College students and technology. Pew Internet & American Life Project 19.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. Madeline E Smith, Duyen T Nguyen, Charles Lai, Gilly Leshed, and Eric P S Baumer. 2012. Going to college and staying connected: Communication between college freshmen and their parents. In Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on computer supported cooperative work, 789--798. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  51. Vincent Tinto. 1975. Dropout from Higher Education: A Theoretical Synthesis of Recent Research. Review of Educational Research 45, 1: 89--125.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  52. Ian Towers, Linda Duxbury, Christopher Higgins and John Thomas. 2006. Time thieves and space invaders: technology, work and the organization. Journal of Organizational Change Management 19, 5: 593--618.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  53. Vanessa Kahen Johnson, Susan E. Gans, Sandra Kerr, and William LaValle. 2010. Managing the Transition to College: Family Functioning, Emotion Coping, and Adjustment in Emerging Adulthood. Journal of College Student Development 51, 6: 607--621.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  54. Tamara Wandel. 2007. About face(book): educational institution responses to online social networking. In WCA: Communication in the 21st Century: Exploring Roots; Expanding Visions, 1--11.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. Peter Williams, Warrick Long, and Peter Morey. 2014. Anytime Email and Work-Life Balance: An Exploration into the Views of Adventist Schools Australia Employees. TEACH Journal of Christian Education 8. Retrieved December 12, 2015 from http://research.avondale.edu.au/teach/vol8/iss2/8Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  56. Ani Yazedijan, Michelle L. Toews, Tessara Sevin, and Katherine E. Purswell. 2008. "It's a whole new world": A qualitative exploration of college students' definitions of and strategies for college success. Journal of College Student Development 49, 2: 141--154.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  57. Tomoko Yonezawa, Kunihiko Fujiwara, and Naoto Yoshida. 2016. Evaluation of Schedule Managing Agent among Multiple Members with Representation of Background Negotiations. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Human Agent Interaction, 305--312. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  58. ATLAS.ti: The Qualitative Data Analysis Research Software. Retrieved from http://atlasti.comGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Distraction or Life Saver?: The Role of Technology in Undergraduate Students' Boundary Management Strategies

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in

      Full Access

      • Published in

        cover image Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
        Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction  Volume 1, Issue CSCW
        November 2017
        2095 pages
        EISSN:2573-0142
        DOI:10.1145/3171581
        Issue’s Table of Contents

        Copyright © 2017 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 6 December 2017
        Published in pacmhci Volume 1, Issue CSCW

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader