skip to main content
research-article

Price Shock Detection With an Influence-Based Model of Social Attention

Authors Info & Claims
Published:29 September 2017Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

There has been increasing interest in exploring the impact of human behavior on financial market dynamics. One of the important related questions is whether attention from society can lead to significant stock price movements or even abnormal returns. To answer the question, we develop a new measurement of social attention, named periodic cumulative degree of social attention, by simultaneously considering the individual influence and the information propagation in social networks. Based on the vast social network data, we evaluate the new attention measurement by testing its significance in explaining future abnormal returns. In addition, we test the forecasting ability of social attention for stock price shocks, defined by the cumulative abnormal returns. Our results provide significant evidence to support the intercorrelated relationship between the social attention and future abnormal returns. The outperformance of the new approach in predicting price shocks is also confirmed by comparison with several benchmark methods.

References

  1. Anup Agrawal, Jeffrey F. Jaffe, and Gershon N. Mandelker. 1992. The post-merger performance of acquiring firms: A re-examination of an anomaly. Journal of Finance 47, 4, 1605--162. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Daniel Andrei and Michael Hasler. 2014. Investor attention and stock market volatility. Review of Financial Studies 28, 1, 33--72. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Werner Antweiler and Murray Z. Frank. 2004. Is all that talk just noise? The information content of Internet stock message boards. Journal of Finance 59, 3, 1259--1294. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Ray Ball and Philip Brown. 1968. An empirical evaluation of accounting income numbers. Journal of Accounting Research 6, 2, 159--178. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Alon Brav, Christopher Geczy, and Paul A. Gompers. 2000. Is the abnormal return following equity issuances anomalous? Journal of Financial Economics 56, 2, 209--249. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Jie Cai, Ralph A. Walkling, and Ke Yang. 2016. The price of street friends: Social networks, informed trading, and shareholder costs. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 51, 3, 801--837. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Hailiang Chen, Prabuddha De, Yu Hu, and Byoung-Hyoun Hwang. 2014. Wisdom of crowds: The value of stock opinions transmitted through social media. Review of Financial Studies 27, 5, 1367--1403. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Hao Chen, Keli Xiao, Jinwen Sun, and Song Wu. 2017. A double-layer neural network framework for high-frequency forecasting. ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems 7, 4, 11.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Zhi Da, Joseph Engelberg, and Pengjie Gao. 2011. In search of attention. Journal of Finance 66, 5, 1461--1499. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Peter Lloyd Davies and Michael Canes. 1978. Stock prices and the publication of second-hand information. Journal of Business 51, 1, 43--56. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Michael S. Drake, Jared Jennings, Darren T. Roulstone, and Jacob R. Thornock. 2016. The comovement of investor attention. Management Science. Available at http://pubsonline.informs.org/doi/abs/10.1287/mnsc.2016.2477?journalCode=mnsc.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Olubunmi Faleye, Tunde Kovacs, and Anand Venkateswaran. 2014. Do better-connected CEOs innovate more? Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 49, 5--6, 1201--1225. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Eugene F. Fama and Kenneth R. French. 1993. Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds. Journal of Financial Economics 33, 1, 3--56. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Jacob Goldenberg, Barak Libai, and Eitan Muller. 2001. Talk of the network: A complex systems look at the underlying process of word-of-mouth. Marketing Letters 12, 3, 211--223. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Mark Granovetter. 1978. Threshold models of collective behavior. American Journal of Sociology 83, 6, 1420--1443. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Bernd Hayo and Ali M. Kutan. 2005. The impact of news, oil prices, and global market developments on Russian financial markets. Economics of Transition 13, 2, 373--393. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. David Kempe, Jon Kleinberg, and Éva Tardos. 2003. Maximizing the spread of influence through a social network. In Proceedings of the 9th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. ACM, New York, NY, 137--146. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Jennifer L. Koski, Edward M. Rice, and Ali Tarhouni. 2004. Noise trading and volatility: Evidence from day trading and message boards. SSRN. Available at https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=533943.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Albert S. Kyle. 1985. Continuous auctions and insider trading. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society 53, 6, 1315--1335. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Victor Lavrenko, Matt Schmill, Dawn Lawrie, Paul Ogilvie, David Jensen, and James Allan. 2000. Mining of concurrent text and time series. In Proceedings of the KDD 2000 Workshop on Text Mining, Vol. 2000. 37--44.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Alvin Chung Man Leung, Ashish Agarwal, Prabhudev Konana, and Alok Kumar. 2016. Network analysis of search dynamics: The case of stock habitats. Management Science. Available at http://pubsonline.informs.org/doi/abs/10.1287/mnsc.2016.2470?journalCode=mnsc.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Qi Liu, Biao Xiang, Nicholas Jing Yuan, Enhong Chen, Hui Xiong, Yi Zheng, and Yu Yang. 2017. An influence propagation view of PageRank. ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data 11, 3, 30.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Xueming Luo, Jie Zhang, and Wenjing Duan. 2013. Social media and firm equity value. Information Systems Research 24, 1, 146--163. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Shiguang Ma. 2004. The Efficiency of China’s Stock Market. Ashgate, Farnham, UK.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Sanjiv Sabherwal, Salil K. Sarkar, and Ying Zhang. 2008. Online talk: Does it matter? Managerial Finance 34, 6, 423--436. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Robert P. Schumaker and Hsinchun Chen. 2009. Textual analysis of stock market prediction using breaking financial news: The AZFin text system. ACM Transactions on Information Systems 27, 2, 12.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. William F. Sharpe. 1964. Capital asset prices: A theory of market equilibrium under conditions of risk. Journal of Finance 19, 3, 425--442.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. David Simon and Rawley Heimer. 2012. Facebook Finance: How Social Interaction Propagates Active Investing. Working Paper No. 15-22. Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Timm O. Sprenger, Andranik Tumasjan, Philipp G. Sandner, and Isabell M. Welpe. 2014. Tweets and trades: The information content of stock microblogs. European Financial Management 20, 5, 926--957. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Chih-Fong Tsai and Zen-Yu Quan. 2014. Stock prediction by searching for similarities in candlestick charts. ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems 5, 2, 9.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Biao Xiang, Qi Liu, Enhong Chen, Hui Xiong, Yi Zheng, and Yu Yang. 2013. PageRank with priors: An influence propagation perspective. In Proceedings of the 23rd International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI’13). 2740--2746.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Steve Y. Yang, Sheung Yin Kevin Mo, and Anqi Liu. 2015. Twitter financial community sentiment and its predictive relationship to stock market movement. Quantitative Finance 15, 10, 1637--1656. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Li Zhang, Keli Xiao, Qi Liu, Yefan Tao, and Yuefan Deng. 2015. Modeling social attention for stock analysis: An influence propagation perspective. In Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM’15). IEEE, Los Alamitos, CA, 609--618.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Li Zhang, Liang Zhang, Keli Xiao, and Qi Liu. 2016. Forecasting price shocks with social attention and sentiment analysis. In Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM’16). IEEE, Los Alamitos, CA, 559--566. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. David Zimbra, Hsinchun Chen, and Robert F. Lusch. 2015. Stakeholder analyses of firm-related Web forums: Applications in stock return prediction. ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems 6, 1, 2.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. C. F. Tsai and Z. Y. Quan. 2014. Stock prediction by searching for similarities in candlestick charts. ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems (TMIS). 5, 2, 9.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. M. C. Lin, A. J. Lee, R. T. Kao, and K. T. Chen. 2011. Stock price movement prediction using representative prototypes of financial reports. ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems (TMIS). 2, 3, 19.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Price Shock Detection With an Influence-Based Model of Social Attention

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in

          Full Access

          • Published in

            cover image ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems
            ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems  Volume 9, Issue 1
            March 2018
            89 pages
            ISSN:2158-656X
            EISSN:2158-6578
            DOI:10.1145/3146385
            Issue’s Table of Contents

            Copyright © 2017 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 29 September 2017
            • Accepted: 1 August 2017
            • Revised: 1 March 2017
            • Received: 1 June 2016
            Published in tmis Volume 9, Issue 1

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article
            • Research
            • Refereed

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader