skip to main content
research-article

Moving Beyond Market Research: Demystifying Smartphone User Behavior in India

Published:11 September 2017Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Large-scale mobile data studies can reveal valuable insights into user behavior, which in turn can assist system designers to create better user experiences. After a careful review of existing mobile data literature, we found that there have been no large-scale studies to understand smartphone usage behavior in India -- the second-largest and fastest growing smartphone market in the world. With the goal of understanding various facets of smartphone usage in India, we conducted a mixed-method longitudinal data collection study through an Android app released on Google Play. Our app was installed by 215 users, and logged 11.9 million data points from them over a period of 8 months. We analyzed this rich dataset along the lines of four broad facets of smartphone behavior -- how users use different apps, interact with notihcations, react to different contexts, and charge their smartphones -- to paint a holistic picture of smartphone usage behavior of Indian users. This quantitative analysis was complemented by a survey with 55 users and semi-structured interviews with 26 users to deeply understand their smartphone usage behavior. While our first-of-its-kind study uncovered many interesting facts about Indian smartphone users, we also found striking differences in usage behavior compared to past studies in other geographical contexts. We observed that Indian users spend significant time with their smartphones after midnight, continuously check notifications without attending to them and are extremely conscious about their smartphones’ battery. Perhaps the most dramatic finding is the nature of mobile consumerism of Indian users as shown by our results. Taken together, these and the rest of our findings demonstrate the unique characteristics that are shaping the smartphone usage behavior of Indian users.

References

  1. App Annie 2016 Retrospective. Technical Report. App Annie.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. 2015. Cisco smartphone prediction. https://newsroom.cisco.com/press-release-content?articleId=1741352. (2015). Accessed: August 11, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. 2016. Currency demonetization in India. http://thediplomat.com/2016/12/indias-demonetization-time-for-a-digital-economy/. (2016). Accessed: August 11, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. 2016. Smartphone Ownership in India. http://www.pewglobal.org/2016/02/22/smartphone-ownership-and-internet-usage-continues-to-climb-in-emerging-economies/. (2016). Accessed: August 11, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. 2016. Strategy Analytics. https://www.strategyanalytics.com/strategy-analytics/news/strategy-analytics-press-releases/strategy-analytics-press-release/2016/08/05/strategy-analytics-android-captures-record-97-percent-smartphone-marketshare-in-india-in-q2-2016. (2016). Accessed: August 11, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Paul Baumann and Silvia Santini. 2014. How the availability of Wi-Fi connections influences the use of mobile devices. In Proceedings of the 2014 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing: Adjunct Publication. ACM, 367--372. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Matthias Böhmer, Brent Hecht, Johannes Schöning, Antonio Krüger, and Gernot Bauer. 2011. Falling asleep with Angry Birds, Facebook and Kindle: a large scale study on mobile application usage. In Proceedings of the 13th international conference on Human computer interaction with mobile devices and services. ACM, 47--56. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Karen Church, Denzil Ferreira, Nikola Banovic, and Kent Lyons. 2015. Understanding the challenges of mobile phone usage data. In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services. ACM, 504--514. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Sanjeev Davey and Anuradha Davey. 2014. Assessment of smartphone addiction in Indian adolescents: A mixed method study by systematic-review and meta-analysis approach. International journal of preventive medicine 5, 12 (2014), 1500.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Sujata P Deshmukh, Prashant Deshmukh, and G Thampi. 2013. Transformation from E-commerce to M-commerce in Indian Context. International Journal of Computer Science Issues 10, 4 (2013), 55--60.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Sanjay Dixit, Harish Shukla, A Bhagwat, Arpita Bindal, Abhilasha Goyal, Alia Zaidi, and Akansha Shrivastava. 2010. A study to evaluate mobile phone dependence among students of a medical college and associated hospital of central India. Indian Journal of Community Medicine 35, 2 (2010), 339.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Trinh Minh Tri Do, Jan Blom, and Daniel Gatica-Perez. 2011. Smartphone usage in the wild: a large-scale analysis of applications and context. In Proceedings of the 13th international conference on multimodal interfaces. ACM, 353--360. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Hossein Falaki, Ratul Mahajan, Srikanth Kandula, Dimitrios Lymberopoulos, Ramesh Govindan, and Deborah Estrin. 2010. Diversity in smartphone usage. In Proceedings of MobiSys ’10. ACM, 179--194. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Denzil Ferreira, Anind K Dey, and Vassilis Kostakos. 2011. Understanding human-smartphone concerns: a study of battery life. In International Conference on Pervasive Computing. Springer, 19--33. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Denzil Ferreira, Jorge Goncalves, Vassilis Kostakos, Louise Barkhuus, and Anind K Dey. 2014. Contextual experience sampling of mobile application micro-usage. In Proceedings of the 16th international conference on Human-computer interaction with mobile devices 8 services. ACM, 91--100. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Aakar Gupta, William Thies, Edward Cutrell, and Ravin Balakrishnan. 2012. mClerk: enabling mobile crowdsourcing in developing regions. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 1843--1852. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Simo Hosio, Denzil Ferreira, Jorge Goncalves, Niels van Berkel, Chu Luo, Muzamil Ahmed, Huber Flores, and Vassilis Kostakos. 2016. Monetary assessment of battery life on smartphones. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 1869--1880. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Simon L Jones, Denzil Ferreira, Simo Hosio, Jorge Goncalves, and Vassilis Kostakos. 2015. Revisitation analysis of smartphone app use. In Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing. ACM, 1197--1208. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Juuso Karikoski and Tapio Soikkeli. 2013. Contextual usage patterns in smartphone communication services. Personal and ubiquitous computing 17, 3 (2013), 491--502. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Vassilis Kostakos, Denzil Ferreira, Jorge Goncalves, and Simo Hosio. 2016. Modelling smartphone usage: a markov state transition model. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing. ACM, 486--497. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Uichin Lee, Joonwon Lee, Minsam Ko, Changhun Lee, Yuhwan Kim, Subin Yang, Koji Yatani, Gahgene Gweon, Kyong-Mee Chung, and Junehwa Song. 2014. Hooked on smartphones: an exploratory study on smartphone overuse among college students. In Proceedings of the 32nd annual ACM conference on Human factors in computing systems. ACM, 2327--2336. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Ding Li, Shuai Hao, Jiaping Gui, and William GJ Halfond. 2014. An empirical study of the energy consumption of android applications. In 2014 IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance and Evolution (ICSME). IEEE, 121--130. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Yong Liu, Denzil Ferreira, Jorge Goncalves, Simo Hosio, Pratyush Pandab, and Vassilis Kostakos. 2016. Donating Context Data to Science: The Effects of Social Signals and Perceptions on Action-Taking. Interacting with Computers (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Yong Liu and Hongxiu Li. 2011. Exploring the impact of use context on mobile hedonic services adoption: An empirical study on mobile gaming in China. Computers in Human Behavior 27, 2 (2011), 890--898. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Akhil Mathur and Sharad Jaiswal. 2013. Exploring the interplay between community media and mobile web in developing regions. In Proceedings of the 15th international conference on Human-computer interaction with mobile devices and services. ACM, 318--327. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Akhil Mathur, Nicholas D Lane, and Fahim Kawsar. 2016. Engagement-aware computing: Modelling user engagement from mobile contexts. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing. ACM, 622--633. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Abhinav Mehrotra, Robert Hendley, and Mirco Musolesi. 2016. PrefMiner: mining user’s preferences for intelligent mobile notification management. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing. ACM, 1223--1234. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Abhinav Mehrotra, Mirco Musolesi, Robert Hendley, and Veljko Pejovic. 2015. Designing content-driven intelligent notification mechanisms for mobile applications. In Proceedings of UbiComp ’15. ACM, 813--824. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Abhinav Mehrotra, Veljko Pejovic, Jo Vermeulen, Robert Hendley, and Mirco Musolesi. 2016. My Phone and Me: Understanding People’s Receptivity to Mobile Notifications. (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Hendrik Müller, Jennifer Gove, and John Webb. 2012. Understanding tablet use: a multi-method exploration. In Proceedings of the 14th international conference on Human-computer interaction with mobile devices and services. ACM, 1--10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Veljko Pejovic and Mirco Musolesi. 2014. Interruptme: designing intelligent prompting mechanisms for pervasive applications. In Proceedings of UbiComp ’14.ACM, 897--908. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Martin Pielot, Karen Church, and Rodrigo De Oliveira. 2014. An in-situ study of mobile phone notifications. In Proceedings of the 16th international conference on Human-computer interaction with mobile devices 8 services. ACM, 233--242. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Martin Pielot, Rodrigo de Oliveira, Haewoon Kwak, and Nuria Oliver. 2014. Didn’t you see my message?: predicting attentiveness to mobile instant messages. In Proceedings of the 32nd annual ACM conference on Human factors in computing systems. ACM, 3319--3328. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Martin Pielot, Tilman Dingler, Jose San Pedro, and Nuria Oliver. 2015. When Attention is Not Scarce - Detecting Boredom from Mobile Phone Usage. In Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing (UbiComp ’15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 825--836. DOI :http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2750858.2804252 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Ahmad Rahmati and Lin Zhong. 2013. Studying smartphone usage: Lessons from a four-month field study. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing 12, 7 (2013), 1417--1427. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Susmi Routray and Reema Khurana. 2015. Flipkart’s App-only Strategy: A Game Changer? Harvard Business Review.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Alireza Sahami Shirazi, Niels Henze, Tilman Dingler, Martin Pielot, Dominik Weber, and Albrecht Schmidt. 2014. Large-scale assessment of mobile notifications. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems. ACM, 3055--3064. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Andrew I Schein, Alexandrin Popescul, Lyle H Ungar, and David M Pennock. 2002. Methods and metrics for cold-start recommendations. In Proceedings of SIGIR ’02. ACM, 253--260. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Choonsung Shin, Jin-Hyuk Hong, and Anind K Dey. 2012. Understanding and prediction of mobile application usage for smart phones. In Proceedings of the 2012 ACM Conference on Ubiquitous Computing. ACM, 173--182. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Tapio Soikkeli, Juuso Karikoski, and Heikki Hammainen. 2011. Diversity and end user context in smartphone usage sessions. In Next generation mobile applications, services and technologies (NGMAST), 2011 5th international conference on. IEEE, 7--12. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Fani Tsapeli and Mirco Musolesi. 2015. Investigating causality in human behavior from smartphone sensor data: a quasi-experimental approach. EPJ Data Science 4, 1 (2015), 24.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  42. Niels van Berkel, Chu Luo, Theodoros Anagnostopoulos, Denzil Ferreira, Jorge Goncalves, Simo Hosio, and Vassilis Kostakos. 2016. A systematic assessment of smartphone usage gaps. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 4711--4721. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Aku Visuri, Zhanna Sarsenbayeva, Niels van Berkel, Jorge Goncalves, Reza Rawassizadeh, Vassilis Kostakos, and Denzil Ferreira. 2017. Thantifying Sources and Types of Smartwatch Usage Sessions. (2017), 3569--3581. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Tingxin Yan, David Chu, Deepak Ganesan, Aman Kansal, and Jie Liu. 2012. Fast app launching for mobile devices using predictive user context. In Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Mobile systems, applications, and services. ACM, 113--126. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Moving Beyond Market Research: Demystifying Smartphone User Behavior in India

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    Full Access

    • Published in

      cover image Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies
      Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies  Volume 1, Issue 3
      September 2017
      2023 pages
      EISSN:2474-9567
      DOI:10.1145/3139486
      Issue’s Table of Contents

      Copyright © 2017 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 11 September 2017
      Published in imwut Volume 1, Issue 3

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader