skip to main content
research-article

CrowdPickUp: Crowdsourcing Task Pickup in the Wild

Published:11 September 2017Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

We develop and evaluate a new ubiquitous crowdsourcing platform called CrowdPickUp, that combines the advantages of mobile and situated crowdsourcing to overcome their respective limitations. In a 19-day long field study with 70 participants, we evaluate the quality of work that CrowdPickUp produces. In particular, we measure quality in terms of worker performance in a variety of tasks (requiring local knowledge, location-based, general) while using a number of different quality control mechanisms, and also capture workers’ perceptions of the platform. Our findings show that workers of CrowdPickUp contributed data of comparable quality to previously presented crowdsourcing deployments while at the same time allowing for a wide breadth of tasks to be deployed. Finally, we offer insights towards the continued exploration of this research agenda.

References

  1. Florian Alt, Alireza A. S. Shirazi, Albrecht Schmidt, Urs Kramer and Zahid Nawaz. 2010. Location-based Crowdsourcing: Extending Crowdsourcing to the Real World. In NordiCHI, ACM, 13-22. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Mustafa M. Y. Arslan, Indrajeet Singh, Shailendra Singh, Harsha H. V. Madhyastha, Karthikeyan Sundaresan and Srikanth S. V. Krishnamurthy. 2012. Computing while charging: building a distributed computing infrastructure using smartphones. In Proceedings of the 8th international conference on Emerging networking experiments and technologies, ACM, 193-204. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Jeffrey J. A. Burke, Deborah Estrin, Mark Hansen, Andrew Parker, Nithya Ramanathan, Sasank Reddy and Mani M. B. Srivastava. 2006. Participatory sensing. In First Workshop on World-Sensor-Web: Mobile Device Centric Sensory Networks and Applications at Sensys ‘06.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Chris Callison-Burch. 2009. Fast, cheap, and creative: evaluating translation quality using Amazon’s Mechanical Turk. In Proceedings of the 2009 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing: Volume 1-Volume 1, 286-295. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Manuel Cebrian, Lorenzo Coviello, Andrea Vattani and Panagiotis Voulgaris. 2012. Finding red balloons with split contracts: crobustness to individuals’ selfishness. In Proceedings of the Forty-Fourth Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC 2012), 775-788. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Zhao Chen, Rui Fu, Ziyuan Zhao, Zheng Liu, Leihao Xia, Lei Chen, Peng Cheng, Caleb C. C. Cao, Yongxin Tong and Chen C. J. Zhang. 2014. gMission: A General Spatial Crowdsourcing Platform. Proc. VLDB Endow. 7, 13: 1629-1632. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Donkor B. On Social Sentiment and Sentiment Analysis. Retrieved 13/05/2016 from http://brnrd.me/social-sentiment-sentiment-analysis/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. N. Eagle. 2009. txteagle: Mobile Crowdsourcing. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Internationalization, Design and Global Development: Held as Part of HCI International 2009, Springer-Verlag, 447-456. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Stephen Figlewski. 1979. Subjective information and market efficiency in a betting market. Journal of Political Economy 87, 1: 75-88.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Jorge Goncalves, Michael Feldman, Subingqian Hu, Vassilis Kostakos and Abraham Bernstein. 2017. Task Routing and Assignment in Crowdsourcing based on Cognitive Abilities. In Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on World Wide Web, 1023-1031. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Jorge Goncalves, Denzil Ferreira, Simo Hosio, Yong Liu, Jakob Rogstadius, Hannu Kukka and Vassilis Kostakos. 2013. Crowdsourcing on the spot: altruistic use of public displays, feasibility, performance, and behaviours. In Proceedings of the 2013 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing, ACM, 753-762. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Jorge Goncalves, Simo Hosio, Denzil Ferreira and Vassilis Kostakos. 2014. Game of Words: Tagging Places through Crowdsourcing on Public Displays. In Designing Interactive Systems, 705-714. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Jorge Goncalves, Simo Hosio and Vassilis Kostakos. 2017. Eliciting Structured Knowledge from Situated Crowd Markets. ACM Transactions on Internet Technology, 17(2), article 14. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Jorge Goncalves, Simo Hosio, Yong Liu and Vassilis Kostakos. 2016. Worker performance in a situated crowdsourcing market. Interacting with Computers 28, 5: 612-624.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Jorge Goncalves, Vassilis Kostakos, Simo Hosio, Evangelos Karapanos and Olga Lyra. 2013. IncluCity: Using Contextual Cues to Raise Awareness on Environmental Accessibility. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGACCESS International Conference on Computers and Accessibility, article 17. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Aakar Gupta, William Thies, Edward Cutrell and Ravin Balakrishnan. 2012. mClerk: enabling mobile crowdsourcing in developing regions. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, 1843-1852. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Kurtis Heimerl, Brian Gawalt, Kuang Chen, Tapan Parikh and Björn Hartmann. 2012. Community Sourcing: engaging local crowds to perform expert work via physical kiosks. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1539-1548. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Simo Hosio, Jorge Goncalves, Vili Lehdonvirta, Denzil Ferreira and Vassilis Kostakos. 2014. Situated Crowdsourcing Using a Market Model. In User Interface Software and Technology, ACM, 55-64. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Simo Hosio, Jorge Goncalves, Niels van Berkel, Simon Klakegg. 2016. Crowdsourcing situated 8 subjective knowledge for decision support. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing: Adjunct, ACM, 1478-1483. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Yi-Ching Huang. 2015. Designing a Micro-Volunteering Platform for Situated Crowdsourcing. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference Companion on Computer Supported Cooperative Work 8 Social Computing, ACM, 73-76. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Yun Huang, Alain Shema and Huichuan Xia. 2016. A proposed genome of mobile and situated crowdsourcing and its design implications for encouraging contributions. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Panagiotis G. Ipeirotis and Evgeniy Gabrilovich. 2014. Quizz: Targeted crowdsourcing with a billion (potential) users. In Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on World Wide Web, 143-154. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Panagiotis G. Ipeirotis, Foster Provost and Jing Wang. 2010. Quality management on amazon mechanical turk. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGKDD workshop on human computation, 64-67. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Thivya Kandappu, Nikita Jaiman, Randy Tandriansyah, Archan Misra, Shih-Fen Cheng, Cen Chen, Hoong Chuin Lau, Deepthi Chander and Koustov Dasgupta. 2016. TASKer: behavioral insights via campus-based experimental mobile crowd-sourcing. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing, ACM, 392-402. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Aniket Kittur, Jeffrey V. Nickerson, Michael Bernstein, Elizabeth Gerber, Aaron Shaw, John Zimmerman, Matt Lease and John Horton. 2013. The future of crowd work. In Proceedings of the 2013 conference on Computer supported cooperative work, ACM, 1301-1318. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Shin’ichi Konomi, Niwat Thepvilojanapong, Ryohei Suzuki, Susanna Pirttikangas, Kaoru Sezaki and Yoshito Tobe. 2009. Askus: Amplifying Mobile Actions. In International Conference on Pervasive Computing, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 202-219. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Nira Liberman, Yaacov Trope and Elena Stephan. 2007. Psychological distance. Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles 2: 353-383.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Yong Liu, Denzil Ferreira, Jorge Goncalves, Simo Hosio, Pratyush Pandab and Vassilis Kostakos. 2017. Donating Context Data to Science: The Effects of Social Signals and Perceptions on Action-Taking. Interacting with Computers 29, 2: 132-146.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Jan Lorenz, Heiko Rauhut, Frank Schweitzer and Dirk Helbing. 2011. How social influence can undermine the wisdom of crowd effect. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 108, 22: 9020-9025.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Thomas Ludwig, Christoph Kotthaus, Christian Reuter, Sören S. v. Dongen and Volkmar Pipek. 2016. Situated crowdsourcing during disasters: Managing the tasks of spontaneous volunteers through public displays. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Thomas W. Malone, Robert Laubacher and Chrysanthos Dellarocas. 2010. The collective intelligence genome. MIT Sloan Management Review 51, 3: 21.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Jörg Müller, Florian Alt, Daniel Michelis and Albrecht Schmidt. 2010. Requirements and design space for interactive public displays. In Proceedings of the international conference on Multimedia, ACM, 1285-1294. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Prayag Narula, Philipp Gutheim, David Rolnitzky, Anand Kulkarni and Bjoern Hartmann. 2011. MobileWorks: A Mobile Crowdsourcing Platform for Workers at the Bottom of the Pyramid. In AAAI Workshop on Human Computation, 121-123. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Eric Paulos, R. J. Honicky and Ben Hooker. 2008. Citizen science: Enabling participatory urbanism. In Handbook of Research on Urban Informatics: The Practice and Promise of the Real-Time City Markus Foth (eds.). IGI Global, Hershey, PA, 414-436.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Yvonne Rogers, Helen Sharp and Jenny Preece. 2011. Interaction design: beyond human-computer interaction. John Wiley 8 Sons. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Jakob Rogstadius, Vassilis Kostakos, Aniket Kittur, Boris Smus, J, Laredo and Maja Vukovic. 2011. An Assessment of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation on Task Performance in Crowdsourcing Markets. In International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, 321-328.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Reijo Savolainen. 2006. Time as a context of information seeking. Library 8 Information Science Research 28, 1: 110-127.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Clay Shirky. 2010. Cognitive surplus: How technology makes consumers into collaborators. Penguin.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Rannie Teodoro, Pinar Ozturk, Mor Naaman, Winter Mason and Janne Lindqvist. 2014. The motivations and experiences of the on-demand mobile workforce. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work 8 Social Computing, ACM, 236-247. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Jacob Thebault-Spieker, Loren G. Terveen and Brent Hecht. 2015. Avoiding the South Side and the Suburbs: The Geography of Mobile Crowdsourcing Markets. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work 8 Social Computing, ACM, 265-275. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Mirjam A. Tuk, Peeter W.J. Verlegh, A. Smidts and Daniel H.J. Wigboldus. 2009. Sales and sincerity: The role of relational framing in word-of-mouth marketing. Journal of Consumer Psychology 19, 1: 38-47.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  42. Rajan Vaish, Keith Wyngarden, Jingshu Chen, Brandon Cheung and Michael S. Bernstein. 2014. Twitch crowdsourcing: crowd contributions in short bursts of time. In Proceedings of the 32nd annual ACM conference on Human factors in computing systems, 3645-3654. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Heli Väätäjä, Teija Vainio, Esa Sirkkunen and Kari Salo. 2011. Crowdsourced news reporting: supporting news content creation with mobile phones. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Human Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services, ACM, 435-444. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Maja Vukovic, Soundar Kumara and Ohad Greenshpan. 2010. Ubiquitous crowdsourcing. In Proceedings of the 12th ACM international conference adjunct papers on Ubiquitous computing - Adjunct, ACM, 523-526. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. Jeroen Vuurens, Arjen A. P. de Vries and Carsten Eickhoff. 2011. How much spam can you take? an analysis of crowdsourcing results to increase accuracy. In Proc. ACM SIGIR Workshop on Crowdsourcing for Information Retrieval (CIR11), 21-26.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. CrowdPickUp: Crowdsourcing Task Pickup in the Wild

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in

      Full Access

      • Published in

        cover image Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies
        Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies  Volume 1, Issue 3
        September 2017
        2023 pages
        EISSN:2474-9567
        DOI:10.1145/3139486
        Issue’s Table of Contents

        Copyright © 2017 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 11 September 2017
        • Accepted: 1 July 2017
        • Revised: 1 May 2017
        • Received: 1 February 2017
        Published in imwut Volume 1, Issue 3

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader