skip to main content
research-article

Mediated Atmospheres: A Multimodal Mediated Work Environment

Published:30 June 2017Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Atmosphere - the sensorial qualities of a space, shaped by the composition of light, sound, objects, people, etc. - has remarkable influence on our experiences and behavior. Manipulating it has been shown to be powerful, affecting cognitive performance, mood and even physiology, our work envisions and implements a smart office prototype, capable of digitally transforming its atmosphere - creating what we call Mediated Atmospheres (MA) - using computationally controlled lighting, video projection and sound. Additionally, we equipped this space with a modular real-time data collection infrastructure, integrating a set of biosignal sensors. Through a user study (N=29) we demonstrate MA's effects on occupants’ ability to focus and to recover from a stressful situation. Our evaluation is based on subjective measurements of perception, as well as objective measurements, extracted from recordings of heart rate variability and facial features. We compare multiple signal processing approaches for quantifying changes in occupant physiological state. Our findings show that MA significantly (p<0.05) affect occupants’ perception as well as physiological response, which encouragingly correlate with occupants’ perception. Our findings is a first step towards personalized control of the ambient atmosphere to support wellbeing and productivity.

References

  1. Matthew Aldrich, Nan Zhao, and Joseph Paradiso. 2010. Energy efficient control of polychromatic solid state lighting using a sensor network. Tenth International Conference on Solid State Lighting 7784 (2010), 778408--778408--15.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Matthew Matthew Henry Aldrich. 2014. Experiential lighting: development and validation of perception-based lighting controls. (2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Judith Amores Fernandez. 2016. Essence: olfactory interfaces for unconscious influence of mood and cognitive performance. (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. A A Bak and D E Grobbee. 1990. A randomized study on coffee and blood pressure. Journal of human hypertension 4, 3 (1990), 259--264.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Louise Barkhuus and Anind Dey. 2003. Is context-aware computing taking control away from the user? Three levels of interactivity examined. In International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing. Springer, 149--156.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Robert A Baron. 1994. The physical environment of work settings: Effects on task performance, interpersonal relations, and job satisfaction. Research in organizational behavior 16 (1994), 1.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Hrvoje Benko, Andrew D. Wilson, and Federico Zannier. 2014. Dyadic Projected Spatial Augmented Reality. In Proceedings of the 27th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology (UIST). 645--655. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Gary G Berntson. 1997. and interpretive caveats. Psychophysiology 34 (1997), 623--648.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. P. R. Boyce, Jennifer A. Veitch, G. R. Newsham, C. C. Jones, J. Heerwagen, M. Myer, and C. M. Hunter. 2006. Lighting quality and office work: Two field simulation experiments. Lighting Research and Technology 38, 3 (2006), 191--223.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Nancy H Chen, Jason Nawyn, Maria Thompson, Julie Gibbs, and Kent Larson. 2013. Context-aware tunable office lighting application and user response. In SPIE Optical Engineering+ Applications, Vol. 8835. International Society for Optics and Photonics, 883507.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Luca Chittaro and Riccardo Sioni. 2014. Affective computing vs. Affective placebo: Study of a biofeedback- controlled game for relaxation training. International Journal of Human Computer Studies 72, 8-9 (2014), 663--673. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Hwan-Hee Choi, Jeroen J. G. van Merriënboer, and Fred Paas. 2014. Effects of the Physical Environment on Cognitive Load and Learning: Towards a New Model of Cognitive Load. Educational Psychology Review 26, 2 (2014), 225--244.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. B Cimprich. 1990. Attentional fatigue and restoration in individuals with cancer. Ph.D. Dissertation. Michigan: University of Michigan.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Bernadine Cimprich. 1993. Development of an intervention to restore attention in cancer patients. Cancer nursing 16, 2 (1993), 83--92.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Geo Clausen and David P Wyon. 2008. The combined effects of many different indoor environmental factors on acceptability and office work performance. HVAC8R Research 14, 1 (2008), 103--113.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Diane J. Cook, Aaron S. Crandall, Brian L. Thomas, and Narayanan C. Krishnan. 2013. CASAS: A smart home in a box. Computer 46, 7 (2013), 62--69. arXiv:NIHMS150003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Fernando De la Torre, Wen-Sheng Chu, Xuehan Xiong, Francisco Vicente, Xiaoyu Ding, and Jeffrey Cohn. 2015. Intraface. In Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition (FG), 2015 11th IEEE International Conference and Workshops on, Vol. 1. IEEE, 1--8.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. ETS. 2016. The GRE Tests. (2016). http://www.ets.org/gre/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Mark Feldmeier and Joseph A. Paradiso. 2010. Personalized HVAC control system. In Internet of Things (IOT), 2010. IEEE, 1--8.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Abe Fettig. 2005. Twisted network programming essentials. O’Reilly Media, Inc. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Mariana G Figueiro, G. C. Brainard, and R. White Lockley, S. W., V. L. Revell. 2008. Light and human health: An overview of the impact of optical Radiation on visual, circadian, neuroendocrine, and neurobehavioral responses. Technical Report. arXiv:arXiv:1011.1669v3Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Mariana G. Figueiro, Brittany Wood, Barbara Plitnick, and Mark S. Rea. 2011. The impact of light from computer monitors on melatonin levels in college students. Neuroendocrinology Letters 32, 2 (2011), 158--163. DOI:https://doi.org/NEL320211A03{pii}Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Monika Frontczak and Pawel Wargocki. 2011. Literature survey on how different factors influence human comfort in indoor environments. Building and Environment 46, 4 (2011), 922--937.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Gensler. 2013. 2013 U.S. Workplace Survey Key Findings. Technical Report.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. V F Gladwell, D K Brown, Joanna L Barton, M P Tarvainen, P Kuoppa, J Pretty, J M Suddaby, and G R H Sandercock. 2012. The effects of views of nature on autonomic control. European journal of applied physiology 112, 9 (2012), 3379--3386.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Joshua J. Gooley, Kyle Chamberlain, Kurt A. Smith, Sat Bir S Khalsa, Shantha M W Rajaratnam, Eliza Van Reen, Jamie M. Zeitzer, Charles A. Czeisler, and Steven W. Lockley. 2011. Exposure to room light before bedtime suppresses melatonin onset and shortens melatonin duration in humans. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 96, 3 (2011).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. D Gromala. 2001. Meditation Chamber. SIGGRAPH 2001 Conf. Abstracts and Applications, ACM Press (2001), 127.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Sharaf Hameed, Jyri Pakarinen, Kari Valde, and Ville Pulkki. 2004. Psychoacoustic cues in room size perception. In Audio Engineering Society Convention 116. Audio Engineering Society, 1--7.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Terry Hartig and Henk Staats. 2003. Guest Editors’ introduction: Restorative environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology 23, 2 (2003), 103--107.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Gerald Häubl and Kyle B Murray. 2003. Preference construction and persistence in digital marketplaces: The role of electronic recommendation agents. Journal of Consumer Psychology 13, 1-2 (2003), 75--91.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Thomas R Herzog, P Maguire, and Mary B Nebel. 2003. Assessing the restorative components of environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology 23, 2 (2003), 159--170.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. W.A. Wijnand IJsselsteijn, Willem Oosting, I.M. Ingrid Vogels, Yvonne Y.A.W. de Kort, Evert van Loenen, De Kort, Van Loenen, W.A. Wijnand IJsselsteijn, Willem Oosting, I.M. Ingrid Vogels, Yvonne Y.A.W. de Kort, and Evert van Loenen. 2006. Looking At or Looking Out : Exploring Monocular Cues to Create a See-Through Experience with a Virtual Window. Proc. of PRESENCE (2006), 87--95.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Hiroshi Ishii, Craig Wisneski, Scott Brave, Andrew Dahley, Matt Gorbet, Brygg Ullmer, and Paul Yarin. 1998. ambientROOM: Integrating Ambient Media with Architectural Space. In Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems: Making the Impossible Possible (CHI’98). 173--174. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. H 1 Ising and B Kruppa. 2004. Health effects caused by noise: evidence in the literature from the past 25 years. Noise and Health 6, 22 (2004), 5.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Sang-joong Jung, Heung-sub Shin, and Wan-young Chung. 2014. Driver fatigue and drowsiness monitoring system with embedded electrocardiogram sensor on steering wheel. IET Intelligent Transport Systems 8, 1 (2014), 43--50.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. Peter H Kahn, Batya Friedman, Brian Gill, Jennifer Hagman, Rachel L Severson, Nathan G Freier, Erika N Feldman, and Sybil Carre. 2008. A plasma display window ? The shifting baseline problem in a technologically mediated natural world. Journal of Environmental Psychology 28 (2008), 192--199.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. Stephen Kaplan. 1995. The restorative effects of nature: Toward an integrative framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology 16, 1995 (1995), 169--182. DOI:https://doi.org/02724944/95/030169+14Âğ12.00/0Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Wolfgang Klimesch. 1999. EEG alpha and theta oscillations reflect cognitive and memory performance: A review and analysis. Brain Research Reviews 29, 2-3 (1999), 169--195.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. Igor Knez. 1995. Effects of indoor lighting on mood and cognition. Journal of Environmental Psychology 15, 1 (1995), 39--51.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. Enrique Leon, Graham Clarke, Victor Callaghan, Faiyaz Doctor, Enrique Leon, Graham Clarke, Victor Callaghan, and Faiyaz Doctor. 2010. Affect-aware behaviour modelling and control inside an Intelligent Environment. Pervasive and Mobile Computing Journal 6, 4 (2010), 1--44. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Remco Magielse and Philip R. Ross. 2011. A design approach to socially adaptive lighting environments. In Proceedings of the 9th ACM SIGCHI Italian Chapter International Conference on Computer-Human Interaction Facing Complexity - CHItaly. ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 171. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Nicola Mammarella, Beth Fairfield, and Cesare Cornoldi. 2007. Does music enhance cognitive performance in healthy older adults ? The Vivaldi effect. Aging clinical and experimental research 19, 5 (2007), 394--399.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Janetta Mitchell McCoy and Gary W Evans. 2002. The potential role of the physical environment in fostering creativity. Creativity Research Journal 14, 3-4 (2002), 409--426.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  44. Ravi Mehta, Rui Juliet Zhu, and Amar Cheema. 2012. Is noise always bad? Exploring the effects of ambient noise on creative cognition. Journal of Consumer Research 39, 4 (2012), 784--799.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  45. Martina T Mitterschiffthaler, Cynthia H Y Fu, Jeffrey A Dalton, Christopher M Andrew, and Steven C R Williams. 2007. Functional MRI study of happy and sad âĂŞ affective states induced by classical music. Human brain mapping 28, 11 (2007), 1150--1162.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. M. S. Mott, D. H. Robinson, A. Walden, J. Burnette, and A. S. Rutherford. 2012. Illuminating the Effects of Dynamic Lighting on Student Learning. SAGE Open 2, 2 (2012), 2158244012445585--.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. Michael Mozer, Robert Dodier, Debra Miller, Marc Anderson, J Anderson, D Bertini, M Bronder, M Colagrosso, R Cruickshank, and B Daugherty. 2005. The adaptive house. In IEE Seminar Digests, Vol. 11059. IET, v1--39.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  48. Jifei Ou, Gershon Dublon, Chin-Yi Cheng, Felix Heibeck, Karl Willis, and Hiroshi Ishii. 2016. Cilllia: 3D Printed Micro-Pillar Structures for Surface Texture, Actuation and Sensing. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 5753--5764. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  49. Margherita Pasini, Rita Berto, Margherita Brondino, Rob Hall, and Catherine Ortner. 2014. How to measure the restorative quality of environments: The PRS-11. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 159 (2014), 293--297.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  50. Charith Perera, Arkady Zaslavsky, Peter Christen, and Dimitrios Georgakopoulos. 2014. Context aware computing for the internet of things: A survey. IEEE Communications Surveys and Tutorials 16 (2014), 414--454.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  51. R Raskar, G Welch, M Cutts, and A Lake. 1998. The office of the future: A unified approach to image-based modeling and spatially immersive displays. Proceedings of the 25th … (1998), 1--10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  52. D Schmidt, Michael Stal, Hans Rohnert, and F Bushmann. 2000. Patterns for Concurrent and Networked Objects, volume 2 of Pattern-Oriented Software Architecture. (2000). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  53. Holger Schnädelbach, Kevin Glover, and Ainojie Alexander Irune. 2010. ExoBuilding : Breathing Life into Architecture. In proceedings of the 6th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. 442--451. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  54. Vipul Singhvi, Andreas Krause, Carlos Guestrin, James H Garrett Jr, and H Scott Matthews. 2005. Intelligent Light Control using Sensor Networks. In Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on Embedded networked sensor systems. 218--229. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  55. Anne-mie Sponselee, Yvonne De Kort, and Anneloes Meijnders. 2004. Healing Media : The moderating role of presence in restoring from stress in a mediated environment. Presence January (2004), 197--203.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  56. Steelcase Global Report. 2016. Engagement and the Global Workplace. Technical Report.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  57. Mika P Tarvainen, Juha-Pekka Niskanen, Jukka A Lipponen, Perttu O Ranta-Aho, and Pasi A Karjalainen. 2014. Kubios HRVâĂŞheart rate variability analysis software. Computer methods and programs in biomedicine 113, 1 (2014), 210--220. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  58. Carolyn M. Tennessen and Bernadine Cimprich. 1995. Views to nature: Effects on attention. Journal of Environmental Psychology 15, 1 (1995), 77--85.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  59. Martin Tomitsch, Thomas Grechenig, Andrew Vande Moere, and Sheldon Renan. 2008. Information sky: Exploring the visualization of information on architectural ceilings. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Visualisation. 100--105. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  60. Mikko P Tulppo, Timo H Mäkikallio, Tapio Seppänen, Raija T Laukkanen, and Heikki V Huikuri. 1998. Vagal modulation of heart rate during exercise: effects of age and physical fitness. American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology 274, 2 (1998), H424--H429.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  61. Jay Vidyarthi, Bernhard E Riecke, and Diane Gromala. 2012. Sonic Cradle : Designing for an Immersive Experience of Meditation by Connecting Respiration to Music. In Proc. DIS 2012. 408--417. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  62. Glenn F Wilson and Christopher A Russell. 2003. Real-time assessment of mental workload using psychophysiological measures and artificial neural networks. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 45, 4 (2003), 635--644.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  63. Hy Y Wu. 2012. An empirical study of UK living labs. Proceedings of International Association for Management of Technology IAMOT (2012), 1--21. http://cswww.essex.ac.uk/staff/vic/papers/misc/2012Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  64. Zephyr. 2016. Bioharness 3. (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  65. Nan Zhao, Matthew Aldrich, Christoph F Reinhart, and Joseph A Paradiso. 2015. A Multidimensional Continuous Contextual Lighting Control System Using Google Glass. In Proceedings of the 2nd ACM International Conference on Embedded Systems for Energy-Efficient Built Environments. ACM, 235--244. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Mediated Atmospheres: A Multimodal Mediated Work Environment

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    Full Access

    • Published in

      cover image Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies
      Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies  Volume 1, Issue 2
      June 2017
      665 pages
      EISSN:2474-9567
      DOI:10.1145/3120957
      Issue’s Table of Contents

      Copyright © 2017 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 30 June 2017
      • Accepted: 1 May 2017
      • Revised: 1 April 2017
      • Received: 1 February 2017
      Published in imwut Volume 1, Issue 2

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader