skip to main content
research-article
Public Access

Stein's Method for Mean Field Approximations in Light and Heavy Traffic Regimes

Published:13 June 2017Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Mean-field analysis is an analytical method for understanding large-scale stochastic systems such as large-scale data centers and communication networks. The idea is to approximate the stationary distribution of a large-scale stochastic system using the equilibrium point (called the mean-field limit) of a dynamical system (called the mean-field model). This approximation is often justified by proving the weak convergence of stationary distributions to its mean-field limit. Most existing mean-field models concerned the light-traffic regime where the load of the system, denote by ρ, is strictly less than one and is independent of the size of the system. This is because a traditional mean-field model represents the limit of the corresponding stochastic system. Therefore, the load of the mean-field model is ρ= limN→ ∞ ρ(N), where ρ(N) is the load of the stochastic system of size N. Now if ρ(N)→ 1 as N→ ∞ (i.e., in the heavy-traffic regime), then ρ=1. For most systems, the mean-field limits when ρ=1 are trivial and meaningless. To overcome this difficulty of traditional mean-field models, this paper takes a different point of view on mean-field models. Instead of regarding a mean-field model as the limiting system of large-scale stochastic system, it views the equilibrium point of the mean-field model, called a mean-field solution, simply as an approximation of the stationary distribution of the finite-size system. Therefore both mean-field models and solutions can be functions of N. This paper first outlines an analytical method to bound the approximation error based on Stein's method and the perturbation theory. We further present two examples: the M/M/N queueing system and the supermarket model under the power-of-two-choices algorithm. For both applications, the method enables us to characterize the system performance under a broad range of traffic loads. For the supermarket model, this is the first paper that rigorously quantifies the steady-state performance of the-power-of-two-choices in the heavy-traffic regime. These results in the heavy-traffic regime cannot be obtained using the traditional mean-field analysis and the interchange of the limits.

References

  1. R. Atar. A diffusion regime with nondegenerate slowdown. Operations Research, 60(2):490--500, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. A. D. Barbour and L. H. Chen. An Introduction to Stein's Method, volume 4. World Scientific, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. C. Bordenave, D. Mcdonald, and A. Proutiere. A particle system in interaction with a rapidly varying environment: Mean field limits and applications. Networks and Heterogeneous Media (NHM), 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. L. Bortolussi, J. Hillston, D. Latella, and M. Massink. Continuous approximation of collective system behaviour: A tutorial. Perform. Eval., 70(5):317--349, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. A. Braverman and J. G. Dai. High order steady-state diffusion approximation of the Erlang-C system. arXiv preprint arXiv:1602.02866, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. A. Braverman and J. G. Dai. Stein's method for steady-state diffusion approximations of M/Ph/nGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. M$ systems. Adv. in Appl. Probab., accepted.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. A. Braverman, J. G. Dai, and J. Feng. Stein's method for steady-state diffusion approximations: An introduction through the Erlang-A and Erlang-C models. Stoch. Syst., 6(2):301--366, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. F. Cecchi, S. C. Borst, J. S. van Leeuwaarden, and P. A. Whiting. Mean-field limits for large-scale random-access networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1611.09723, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. A. Chaintreau, J.-Y. Le Boudec, and N. Ristanovic. The age of gossip: spatial mean field regime. In Proc. Ann. ACM SIGMETRICS Conf., pages 109--120, Seattle, Washington, USA, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. J. G. Dai. On positive Harris recurrence of multiclass queueing networks: a unified approach via fluid limit models. Ann. Appl. Probab., 5(1):49--77, 1995.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. P. Eschenfeldt and D. Gamarnik. Join the shortest queue with many servers. the heavy traffic asymptotics. arXiv preprint arXiv:1502.00999, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. P. Eschenfeldt and D. Gamarnik. Supermarket queueing system in the heavy traffic regime. Short queue dynamics. arXiv preprint arXiv:1610.03522, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. N. Gast and B. Gaujal. A mean field approach for optimization in discrete time. Discrete Event Dynamic Systems, 21(1):63--101, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. P. W. Glynn and A. Zeevi. Bounding stationary expectations of Markov processes. In Markov processes and related topics: a Festschrift for Thomas G. Kurtz, pages 195--214. Institute of Mathematical Statistics, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. I. Gurvich et al. Diffusion models and steady-state approximations for exponentially ergodic markovian queues. Adv. in Appl. Probab., 24(6):2527--2559, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. S. Halfin and W. Whitt. Heavy-traffic limits for queues with many exponential servers. Operations research, 29(3):567--588, 1981. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. H. K. Khalil. Nonlinear systems. Prentice Hall, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. M. Mitzenmacher. The Power of Two Choices in Randomized Load Balancing. PhD thesis, University of California at Berkeley, 1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. D. Mukherjee, S. C. Borst, J. S. van Leeuwaarden, and P. A. Whiting. Universality of power-of-d load balancing in many-server systems. arXiv preprint arXiv:1612.00723, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. R. Srikant and L. Ying. Communication Networks: An Optimization, Control and Stochastic Networks Perspective. Cambridge University Press, 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. C. Stein. A bound for the error in the normal approximation to the distribution of a sum of dependent random variables. In Proc. Sixth Berkeley Symp. Math. Stat. Prob., pages 583--602, 1972.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. C. Stein. Approximate computation of expectations. Lecture Notes-Monograph Series, 7:i--164, 1986.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. A. Stolyar. Pull-based load distribution in large-scale heterogeneous service systems. Queueing Syst., 80(4):341--361, 2015. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. A. Stolyar. Tightness of stationary distributions of a flexible-server system in the Halfin-Whitt asymptotic regime. Stoch. Syst., 5(2):239--267, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. J. N. Tsitsiklis and K. Xu. On the power of (even a little) resource pooling. Stoch. Syst., 2(1):1--66, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. N. D. Vvedenskaya, R. L. Dobrushin, and F. I. Karpelevich. Queueing system with selection of the shortest of two queues: An asymptotic approach. Problemy Peredachi Informatsii, 32(1):20--34, 1996.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. W. Whitt. How multiserver queues scale with growing congestion-dependent demand. Operations Research, 51(4):531--542, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Q. Xie, X. Dong, Y. Lu, and R. Srikant. Power of d choices for large-scale bin packing: A loss model. In Proc. Ann. ACM SIGMETRICS Conf., 2015. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. L. Ying. On the approximation error of mean-field models. In Proc. Ann. ACM SIGMETRICS Conf., Antibes Juan-les-Pins, France, 2016. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. L. Ying, R. Srikant, and X. Kang. The power of slightly more than one sample in randomized load balancing. Mathematics of Operations Research, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Stein's Method for Mean Field Approximations in Light and Heavy Traffic Regimes

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in

      Full Access

      • Published in

        cover image Proceedings of the ACM on Measurement and Analysis of Computing Systems
        Proceedings of the ACM on Measurement and Analysis of Computing Systems  Volume 1, Issue 1
        June 2017
        712 pages
        EISSN:2476-1249
        DOI:10.1145/3107080
        Issue’s Table of Contents

        Copyright © 2017 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 13 June 2017
        Published in pomacs Volume 1, Issue 1

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader