skip to main content
research-article

Digging Wikipedia: The Online Encyclopedia as a Digital Cultural Heritage Gateway and Site

Published:10 March 2017Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

The online encyclopedia Wikipedia is both a cultural reference to store, refer to, and organize digitized and digital information, as well as a key contemporary digital heritage endeavor in itself. Capitalizing on this dual nature of the project, this article introduces Wikipedia as a digital gateway to and site of an active engagement with cultural heritage. We have developed the open source and freely available analysis architecture Contropedia to examine already existing volunteer user-generated participation around cultural heritage and to promote further engagement with it. Conceptually, we employ the notion of memory work, as it helps to treat Wikipedia's articles, edit histories, and discussion pages as a rich resource to study how cultural heritage is received and (re)worked in and across languages and cultures. Contropedia's architecture allows for the study of the negotiations around and appreciation of cultural heritage without assuming an unchallenged and universal understanding of cultural heritage. The analysis facilitated by Contropedia thus sheds light on the contentious articulation of perspectives on tangible and intangible heritage grounded by conflicting conceptions of events, ideas, places, or persons. Technologically, Contropedia combines techniques based on mining article edit histories and analyzing discussion patterns in talk pages to identify and visualize heritage-related disputes within an article, and to compare these across language versions. In terms of digital heritage, Contropedia presents a powerful tool that opens up a core resource to cultural heritage studies. Moreover, it can form part of a conceptually grounded, technically advanced, and practically enrolled infrastructure for public education that opens up the dynamic formation of both knowledge about cultural heritage and new forms of digital cultural heritage that show a considerable amount of friction.

References

  1. A. Appadurai. 1986. The Social Life of Things: Commodities in Cultural Perspective. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. G. J. B. Ashworth Graham and J. E. Tunbridge. 2007. Pluralising Pasts: Heritage, Identity and Place in Multicultural Societies. Pluto Press, London, UK.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. J. Assmann. 2011. Cultural Memory and Early Civilization: Writing, Remembrance, and Political Imagination. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. P. Bao, B. Hecht, S. Carton, M. Quaderi, M. Horn, and D. Gergle. 2012. Omnipedia: Bridging the Wikipedia language gap. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’12). ACM, New York, NY, 1075--1084. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. T. Benton. 2010. Understanding Heritage and Memory. Manchester University Press, Manchester, UK.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. E. Borra, E. Weltevrede, P. Ciuccarelli, A. Kaltenbrunner, D. Laniado, G. Magni, M. Mauri, R. Rogers, and T. Venturini. 2015. Societal controversies in Wikipedia articles. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’15). New York, NY, 193--196. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. G. C. Bowker. 2009. Afterword (Memories Are Made of This). Memory Studies 2, 1, 119--121. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. J. Brown and T. Hay-Edie. 2013. COMPACT: Engaging Local Communities in the Stewardship of World Heritage. UNDP, New York, NY.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. P. Burke. 2012. A Social History of Knowledge II. From the Encyclopaedia to Wikipedia. Polity Press, Cambridge, England.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. M. P. Callon Lascoumes and Y. Barthe. 2009. Acting in an Uncertain World: An Essay on Technical Democracy. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. B. Cassin. 2001. Politics of memory on treatments of hate. Javnost—The Public 8, 3, 9--22.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. P. Connerton. 1989. How Societies Remember. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Council of Europe. 1998. Cultural Heritage and Its Educational Implications: A Factor for Tolerance, Good Citizenship and Social Integration. Council of Europe Publishing, Strasbourg, France.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. R. Darnton. 1987. The Business of Enlightenment. A Publishing History of the Encyclopédie, 1775--1800. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. A. Erll, A. Nünning, and S. B. Young. 2008. Cultural Memory Studies an International and Interdisciplinary Handbook. De Gruyter, Berlin, Germany.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. W. Ernst. 2013. Digital Memory and the Archive. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. F. Flöck, D. Laniado, F. Stadthaus, and M. Acosta. 2015. Towards better visual tools for exploring Wikipedia article development. The use case of Gamergate controversy. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Wikipedia, a Social Pedia: Research Challenges and Opportunities.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. R. Fredheim, G. Howanitz, and M. Makhortykh. 2014. Scraping the monumental: Stepan Bandera through the lens of quantitative memory studies. Digital Icons 12, 25--53.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. E. Giaccardi. 2012. Heritage and Social Media: Understanding Heritage in a Participatory Culture. Routledge, New York, NY.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. J. Giles. 2005. Internet Encyclopaedias Go Head to Head. Nature 438, 7070, 900--901. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. D. Gillman. 2010. The Idea of Cultural Heritage. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. M. Halbwachs. 1992. On Collective Memory. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. R. Harrison. 2009. Understanding the Politics of Heritage. Manchester University Press, Manchester, UK.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. B. Hecht and D. Gergle. 2010. The Tower of Babel meets Web 2.0: User-generated content and its applications in a multilingual context. In Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’10). ACM, New York, NY, 291--300. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. J. Heer and B. Shneiderman. 2012. Interactive dynamics for visual analysis. Communications of the ACM 55, 4, 45--54. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. A. Huyssen. 2003. Present Pasts: Urban Palimpsests and the Politics of Memory. Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. A. Kaltenbrunner and D. Laniado. 2012. There is no deadline. time evolution in Wikipedia discussions. In Proceedings of the 8th Annual International Symposium on Wikis and Open Collaboration (WikiSym’12). ACM, New York, NY, Article No. 6. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. F. Karimi, L. Bohlin, A. Samoilenko, M. Rosvall, and A. Lancichinetti. 2015. Mapping bilateral information interests using the activity of Wikipedia editors. Palgrave Communications 1, 15041. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. J. E. Katz, W. Labar, and E. Lynch. 2011. Creativity and Technology. Social Media, Mobiles and Museums. New Museums Publications, Edinburgh, Scotland.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. T. F. King. 2013. Cultural Resource Laws and Practice. Rowman 8 Littlefield, Lanham, MD.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. A. Kuhn. 2010. Memory texts and memory work: Performances of memory in and with visual media. Memory Studies 3, 4, 298--313. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. D. Laniado, R. Tasso, Y. Volkovich, and A. Kaltenbrunner. 2011. When the Wikipedians talk: Network and tree structure of Wikipedia discussion pages. In Proceedings of the 5th International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media. 177--184.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. B. Latour. 2005. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. B. Latour and S. Woolgar. 1979. Laboratory Life: The Social Construction of Scientific Facts. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. C. Lohmeier and C. Pentzold. 2014. Making mediated memory work: Cuban-Americans, Miami media and the doings of diaspora memories. Media, Culture and Society 36, 6, 776--789. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. A. Lowenhaupt-Tsing. 2005. Friction: An Ethnography of Global Connection. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. D. Lowenthal. 1985. The Past Is a Foreign Country. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. M. Mauri, A. Pini, D. Ciminieri, and P. Ciuccarelli. 2013. Weaving data, slicing views: A design approach to creating visual access for digital archival collections. In Proceedings of the Biannual Conference of the Italian Chapter of SIGCHI (CHItaly’13). ACM, New York, NY, 1--8. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. N. Marres. 2015. “Why map issues? on controversy analysis as a digital method. Science, Technology 8 Human Values 40, 5: 655--686.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. P. Massa and F. Scrinzi. 2013. Manypedia: Comparing language points of view of Wikipedia communities. First Monday 18, 1. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  41. M. Mesgari, C. Okoli, M. Mehdi, F. Å. Nielsen, and A. Lanamäki. 2015. “The sum of all human knowledge”: A systematic review of scholarly research on the content of Wikipedia. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 66, 2, 219--245. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. M. Messner, and J. South. 2011. Legitimizing Wikipedia: How US national newspapers frame and use the online encyclopedia in their coverage. Journalism Practice 5, 2, 145--160. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  43. Rob Roblimo Miller. 2004. Wikipedia Founder Jimmy Wales Responds. Slashdot. Retrieved February 10, 2017, from https://slashdot.org/story/04/07/28/1351230/wikipedia-founder-jimmy-wales-responds.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. M. Miquel-Ribé and D. Laniado. 2016. Cultural identities in wikipedias. In Proceedings of the 2016 7th International Conference on Social Media and Society (SMSociety’16). ACM, New York, NY, Article No. 26. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. J. K. Olick and J. Robbins. 1998. Social memory studies: From ‘collective memory’ to the historical sociology of mnemonic practices. Annual Review of Sociology 24, 1, 105--140. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  46. M. O’Neil. 2009. Cyberchiefs: Autonomy and Authority in Online Tribes. Pluto Press, London, UK.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. J. Parikka. 2012. What Is Media Archaeology? Polity Press, Cambridge, England.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. C. Pentzold. 2009. Fixing the floating gap: The online encyclopaedia Wikipedia as a global memory place. Memory Studies 2, 2, 255--272. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  49. H. S. Rad and D. Barbosa. 2012. Identifying controversial articles in Wikipedia: A comparative study. In Proceedings of the 8th Annual International Symposium on Wikis and Open Collaboration. ACM, New York, NY, Article No. 7. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  50. R. Rogers 2013a. Wikipedia as cultural reference. In Digital Methods, R. Rogers (Ed.). MIT Press, Cambridge, MA 165--202.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. R. Rogers. 2013b. Digital Methods. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  52. R. Samuel. 2012. Theatres of Memory: Past and Present in Contemporary Culture. Verso, London, England.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  53. C. Sandis. 2014. Cultural Heritage Ethics: Between Theory and Practice. Open Book Publishers, Cambridge, England.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  54. L. Smith. 2006. Uses of Heritage. Routledge, New York, NY.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. I. Stengers. 2010. Cosmopolitics. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  56. B. Stvilia, M. B. Twidale, L. C. Smith, and L. Gasser. 2008. Information quality work organization in Wikipedia. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 59, 6, 983--1001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  57. B. Suh, E. H Chi, B. A Pendleton, and A. Kittur. 2007. Us vs. them: Understanding social dynamics in Wikipedia with revert graph visualizations. In Proceedings of the 2007 IEEE Symposium on Visual Analytics Science and Technology (VAST’07). IEEE, Los Alamitos, CA, 163--170. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  58. R. Sumi, T. Yasseri, A. Rung, A. Kornai, and J. Kertesz. 2011. Characterization and prediction of edit wars in Wikipedia. In Proceedings of the 2011 ACM Web Science Conference (WebSci’11). ACM, New York, NY, 1--3.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  59. N. Tkacz. 2015. Wikipedia and the Politics of Openness. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  60. R. Terdiman. 1993. Present Past: Modernity and the Memory Crisis. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  61. M. Thelwall and D. Stuart. 2007. RUOK? Blogging communication technologies during crises. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 12, 2, 523--548. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  62. J. van Dijck. 2007. Mediated Memories in the Digital Age. Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  63. J. van Dijck. 2013. The Culture of Connectivity: A Critical History of Social Media. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  64. N. van House and E. F. Churchill. 2008. Technologies of memory: Key issues and critical perspectives. Memory Studies 1, 3, 295--310. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  65. T. Venturini. 2010. Diving in magma: How to explore controversies with actor-network theory. Public Understanding of Science 19, 3, 258--273. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  66. T. Venturini. 2012. Building on faults: How to represent controversies with digital methods. Public Understanding of Science 21, 7, 796--812. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  67. T. Venturini and B. Latour. 2010. The social fabric: Digital traces and quali-quantitative methods. In Proceedings of Future En Seine 2009. 87--101.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  68. E. Weltevrede. 2016. Repurposing Digital Methods. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Amsterdam, Netherlands.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  69. E. Weltevrede and E. Borra. 2016. Platform affordances and data practices: The value of dispute on Wikipedia. Big Data and Society. 3, 1, 1--16. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  70. J. V. Wertsch. 2002. Voices of Collective Remembering. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  71. Wikipedia. 2014. Reliability of Wikipedia. Wikipedia. Retrieved February 10, 2017, from http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Reliability_of_Wikipedia8oldid=610364858.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  72. Wikipedia Contributors. 2015a. Wikipedia:No original research. Wikipedia. Retrieved February 10, 2017, from https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:No_original_research8oldid=659033878Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  73. Wikipedia Contributors. 2015b. Wikipedia:Verifiability. Wikipedia. Retrieved February 10, 2017, from https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Verifiability8oldid=661003929Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  74. Wikipedia Contributors. 2015c. Wikipedia:Neutral point of view. Wikipedia. Retrieved February 10, 2017, from https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view8oldid=661296435Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  75. Wikipedia Contributors. 2015d. Wikipedia:Consensus. Wikipedia. Retrieved February 10, 2017, from https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Consensus8oldid=661460154Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  76. Wikipedia Contributors. 2016. Wikipedia:Manual of style/linking. Wikipedia. Retrieved February 10, 2017, from https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Linking8oldid=714366671Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  77. T. Yasseri, A. Spoerri, M. Graham, and J. Kertesz. 2014. The most controversial topics in Wikipedia: A multilingual and geographical analysis. In Global Wikipedia: International and Cross-Cultural Issues in Online Collaboration, P. Fichman and N. Hara (Eds.). Rowman 8 Littlefield, Lanham, MD, 35--48.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  78. T. Yasseri, R. Sumi, A. Rung, A. Kornai, and J. Kertész. 2012. Dynamics of conflicts in Wikipedia. PLoS ONE 7, 6, e38869.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  79. E. Zachte. 2016. Wikipedia Statistics. Retrieved February 10, 2017, from http://stats.wikimedia.org/EN/Sitemap.htm.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Digging Wikipedia: The Online Encyclopedia as a Digital Cultural Heritage Gateway and Site

            Recommendations

            Comments

            Login options

            Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

            Sign in

            Full Access

            • Published in

              cover image Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage
              Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage   Volume 10, Issue 1
              Special Issue on Digital Infrastructure for Cultural Heritage, Part 1
              April 2017
              131 pages
              ISSN:1556-4673
              EISSN:1556-4711
              DOI:10.1145/3034773
              Issue’s Table of Contents

              Copyright © 2017 ACM

              Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

              Publisher

              Association for Computing Machinery

              New York, NY, United States

              Publication History

              • Published: 10 March 2017
              • Accepted: 1 October 2016
              • Revised: 1 September 2016
              • Received: 1 April 2015
              Published in jocch Volume 10, Issue 1

              Permissions

              Request permissions about this article.

              Request Permissions

              Check for updates

              Qualifiers

              • research-article
              • Research
              • Refereed

            PDF Format

            View or Download as a PDF file.

            PDF

            eReader

            View online with eReader.

            eReader