skip to main content
research-article

Localness of Location-based Knowledge Sharing: A Study of Naver KiN “Here”

Published:17 July 2018Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

In location-based social Q8A services, people ask a question with a high expectation that local residents who have local knowledge will answer the question. However, little is known about the locality of user activities in location-based social Q8A services. This study aims to deepen our understanding of location-based knowledge sharing by investigating the following: general behavioral characteristics of users, the topical and typological patterns related to geographic characteristics, geographic locality of user activities, and motivations of local knowledge sharing. To this end, we analyzed a 12-month period Q8A dataset from Naver KiN “Here,” a location-based social Q8A mobile app, in addition to a supplementary survey dataset obtained from 285 mobile users. Our results reveal several unique characteristics of location-based social Q8A. When compared with conventional social Q8A sites, users ask and answer different topical/typological questions. In addition, those who answer have a strong spatial locality wherein they primarily have local knowledge in a few regions, in areas such as their home and work. We also find unique motivators such as ownership of local knowledge and a sense of local community. The findings reported in the article have significant implications for the design of Q8A systems, especially location-based social Q8A systems.

References

  1. Lada A. Adamic, Jun Zhang, Eytan Bakshy, and Mark S. Ackerman. 2008. Knowledge sharing and yahoo answers: Everyone knows something. In Proceedings of the International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee (WWW’08). ACM, 665--674. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Philip Berke and Edward John Kaiser. 2006. Urban Land Use Planning. University of Illinois Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Mark Bilandzic, Marcus Foth, and Alexander De Luca. 2008. CityFlocks: Designing social navigation for urban mobile information systems. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Designing Interactive (DIS’08). ACM, 174--183. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. KT Corporation’s Research Center. 2015. Mobile Trend 2015. (7 2015). Retrieved from http://www.digieco.co.kr/KTFront/report/report_issue_trend_view.action?board_seq=103498board_id=issue_trend.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Minsoo Choy, Jae-Gil Lee, Gahgene Gweon, and Daehoon Kim. 2014. Glaucus: Exploiting the wisdom of crowds for location-based queries in mobile environments. In Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Karen Church, Joachim Neumann, Mauro Cherubini, and Nuria Oliver. 2010. SocialSearchBrowser: A novel mobile search and information discovery tool. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI’10). ACM, 101--110. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Karen Church, Joachim Neumann, Mauro Cherubini, and Nuria Oliver. 2010. The “map trap”?: An evaluation of map versus text-based interfaces for location-based mobile search services. In Proceedings of the International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee (WWW’10). ACM, 261--270. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Karen Church and Barry Smyth. 2009. Understanding the intent behind mobile information needs. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI’09). ACM, 247--256. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Thomas H. Davenport and Laurence Prusak. 1998. Working Knowledge: How Organizations Manage What They Know. Harvard Business Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Benjamin Edelman. 2012. Earnings and ratings at Google Answers. Econ. Inquiry 50, 2 (2012), 309--320.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Fredrik Espinoza, Per Persson, Anna Sandin, Hanna Nyström, Elenor Cacciatore, and Markus Bylund. 2001. Geonotes: Social and navigational aspects of location-based information systems. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing (UbiComp’01). Springer-Verlag, 2--17. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. M. Ester, H. P. Kriegel, J. Sander, and X. Xu. 1996. A density-based algorithm for discovering clusters in large spatial databases with noise. In Proceedings of the SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD’96), Vol. 96. ACM, 226--231. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Martin Ester, Hans-Peter Kriegel, Jörg Sander, and Xiaowei Xu. 1996. A density-based algorithm for discovering clusters in large spatial databases with noise. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, Vol. 96. 226--231. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Andrea Forte, Michael Dickard, Rachel Magee, and Denise E. Agosto. 2014. What do teens ask their online social networks?: Social search practices among high school students. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work 8 Social Computing. ACM, 28--37. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Shravan Gaonkar, Jack Li, Romit Roy Choudhury, Landon Cox, and Al Schmidt. 2008. Micro-blog: Sharing and querying content through mobile phones and social participation. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Mobile Systems, Applications, and Services (MobiSys’08). ACM, 174--186. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Brent J. Hecht and Darren Gergle. 2010. On the “localness” of user-generated content. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW’10). ACM, 229--232. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Andreas Henrich and Volker Luedecke. 2007. Characteristics of geographic information needs. In Proceedings of the ACM Workshop on Geographical Information Retrieval (GIR’07). ACM, 1--6. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. John B. Horrigan and Maeve Duggan. 2015. Home Broadband 2015. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/2015/12/21/home-broadband-2015/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Gary Hsieh and Scott Counts. 2009. Mimir: A market-based real-time question and answer service. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’09). ACM, 769--778. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Gary Hsieh, Robert E. Kraut, and Scott E. Hudson. 2010. Why pay?: Exploring how financial incentives are used for question 8 answer. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 305--314. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Rosie Jones, Wei V. Zhang, Benjamin Rey, Pradhuman Jhala, and Eugene Stipp. 2008. Geographic intention and modification in web search. Int. J. Geogr. Info. Sci. 22, 3 (2008), 229--246. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Soojung Kim, Jung Sun Oh, and Sanghee Oh. 2007. Best-answer selection criteria in a social Q8A site from the user-oriented relevance perspective. Proc. Amer. Soc. Info. Sci. Technol. 44, 1 (2007), 1--15.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Robert E. Kraut, Paul Resnick, Sara Kiesler, Moira Burke, Yan Chen, Niki Kittur, Joseph Konstan, Yuqing Ren, and John Riedl. 2012. Building Successful Online Communities: Evidence-based Social Design. Mit Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Juhi Kulshrestha, Farshad Kooti, Ashkan Nikravesh, and P. Krishna Gummadi. 2012. Geographic dissection of the twitter network. In Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (ICWSM’12). The AAAI Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Cliff Lampe, Rebecca Gray, Andrew T. Fiore, and Nicole Ellison. 2014. Help is on the way: Patterns of responses to resource requests on facebook. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. ACM, New York, NY, 3--15. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Uichin Lee, Hyanghong Kang, Eunhee Yi, Mun Yi, and Jussi Kantola. 2012. Understanding mobile Q8A usage: An exploratory study. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’12). ACM, 3215--3224. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Uichin Lee, Jihyoung Kim, Eunhee Yi, Juyup Sung, and Mario Gerla. 2013. Analyzing crowd workers in mobile pay-for-answer Q8A. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’13). ACM, 533--542. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Michael D. Lieberman and Jimmy Lin. 2009. You are where you edit: Locating wikipedia contributors through edit histories. In Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (ICWSM’09). The AAAI Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Pamela J. Ludford, Reid Priedhorsky, Ken Reily, and Loren Terveen. 2007. Capturing, sharing, and using local place information. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’07). ACM, 1235--1244. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Lena Mamykina, Bella Manoim, Manas Mittal, George Hripcsak, and Björn Hartmann. 2011. Design lessons from the fastest Q8A site in the west. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’11). ACM, 2857--2866. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. David W. McMillan and David M. Chavis. 1986. Sense of community: A definition and theory. J. Commun. Psychol. 14, 1 (1986), 6--23.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Meredith Ringel Morris, Jaime Teevan, and Katrina Panovich. 2010. What do people ask their social networks, and why?: A survey study of status message Q8A behavior. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’10). ACM, 1739--1748. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Kevin Kyung Nam, Mark S. Ackerman, and Lada A. Adamic. 2009. Questions in, knowledge in?: A study of Naver’s question answering community. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’09). ACM, 779--788. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Jeffrey Nichols and Jeon-Hyung Kang. 2012. Asking questions of targeted strangers on social networks. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW’12). ACM, 999--1002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Nathaniel Ostashewski and Doug Reid. 2015. Gamification in Education and Business. Springer International Publishing, 187--200.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Sangkeun Park, Yongsung Kim, Uichin Lee, and Mark Ackerman. 2014. Understanding localness of knowledge sharing: A study of Naver KiN “here.” In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Human-computer Interaction with Mobile Devices 8 Services (MobileHCI’14). 13--22. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Sharoda A. Paul, Lichan Hong, and Ed H. Chi. 2012. Who is authoritative? Understanding reputation mechanisms in quora. arXiv Preprint arXiv:1204.3724 (2012).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Daphne R. Raban and F. Maxwell Harper. 2008. New media and innovative technologies. Motivations for Answering Questions Online, Tal Samuel-Azran and Dan Caspi (Eds.). Ben Gurion University of the Negev Press, 73--91.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Daphne Ruth Raban. 2008. The incentive structure in an online information market. J. Amer. Soc. Info. Sci. Technol. 59, 14 (2008), 2284--2295. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Shilad W. Sen, Heather Ford, David R. Musicant, Mark Graham, Oliver S. B. Keyes, and Brent Hecht. 2015. Barriers to the localness of volunteered geographic information. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 197--206. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Chirag Shah, Jung Sun Oh, and Sanghee Oh. 2008. Exploring characteristics and effects of user participation in online social Q8A sites. First Monday 13, 9 (2008).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Timothy Sohn, Kevin A. Li, William G. Griswold, and James D. Hollan. 2008. A diary study of mobile information needs. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’08). ACM, 433--442. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. G Sterling. 2012. Study: 43 percent of total Google search queries are local. Retrieved from http://searchengineland.com/study-43-percent-of-total-google-search-queries-have-local-intent-135428.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Juyup Sung, Jae-Gil Lee, and Uichin Lee. 2013. Booming up the long tails: Discovering potentially contributive users in community-based question answering services. In Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (ICWSM’13). The AAAI Press, 13--22.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. Jaime Teevan, Amy Karlson, Shahriyar Amini, A. J. Bernheim Brush, and John Krumm. 2011. Understanding the importance of location, time, and people in mobile local search behavior. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Human Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services (MobileHCI’11). ACM, 77--80. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. Gang Wang, Konark Gill, Manish Mohanlal, Haitao Zheng, and Ben Y. Zhao. 2013. Wisdom in the social crowd: An analysis of Quora. In Proceedings of the International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee (WWW’13). International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee, 1341--1352. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. Sheng Wang and Raymond A. Noe. 2010. Knowledge sharing: A review and directions for future research. Human Resource Manage. Rev. 20, 2 (2010), 115--131.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. Weiqing Wang, Hongzhi Yin, Ling Chen, Yizhou Sun, Shazia Sadiq, and Xiaofang Zhou. 2015. Geo-SAGE: A geographical sparse additive generative model for spatial item recommendation. In Proceedings of the 21th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD’15). ACM, New York, NY, 1255--1264. Retrieved from Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  49. Sarita Yardi and Danah Boyd. 2010. Tweeting from the town square: Measuring geographic local networks. In Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (ICWSM’10). AAAI Press, 194--201.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. Hongzhi Yin, Bin Cui, Ling Chen, Zhiting Hu, and Chengqi Zhang. 2015. Modeling location-based user rating profiles for personalized recommendation. ACM Trans. Knowl. Discov. Data 9, 3, Article 19 (Apr. 2015). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  51. Zhijun Yin, Liangliang Cao, Jiawei Han, Chengxiang Zhai, and Thomas Huang. 2011. Geographical topic discovery and comparison. In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on World Wide Web (WWW’11). ACM, New York, NY, 247--256. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  52. Jun Zhang, Mark S. Ackerman, Lada Adamic, and Kevin Kyung Nam. 2007. QuME: A mechanism to support expertise finding in online help-seeking communities. In Proceedings of the 20th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. ACM, 111--114. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Localness of Location-based Knowledge Sharing: A Study of Naver KiN “Here”

            Recommendations

            Comments

            Login options

            Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

            Sign in

            Full Access

            • Published in

              cover image ACM Transactions on the Web
              ACM Transactions on the Web  Volume 12, Issue 3
              August 2018
              207 pages
              ISSN:1559-1131
              EISSN:1559-114X
              DOI:10.1145/3240924
              Issue’s Table of Contents

              Copyright © 2018 ACM

              Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

              Publisher

              Association for Computing Machinery

              New York, NY, United States

              Publication History

              • Published: 17 July 2018
              • Accepted: 1 February 2018
              • Revised: 1 November 2017
              • Received: 1 June 2015
              Published in tweb Volume 12, Issue 3

              Permissions

              Request permissions about this article.

              Request Permissions

              Check for updates

              Qualifiers

              • research-article
              • Research
              • Refereed

            PDF Format

            View or Download as a PDF file.

            PDF

            eReader

            View online with eReader.

            eReader