skip to main content
research-article

Bearing an Open “Pandora's Box”: HCI for Reconciling Everyday Food and Sustainability

Published:10 October 2016Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

The sustainability of food is a significant global concern with a drastic change required to mitigate complex social, environmental, and economic issues like climate change and food security for an ever increasing population. In this article, we set out to understand the place of food in people's lives, their mundane yet surprisingly complex ways of sourcing their food, and the processes of transition, past and ongoing, that shape these choices. Our goal is to understand the potential role for digital interactions in supporting the various ways that food consumption can be made more sustainable. To inform this exercise, we specifically set out to contrast the journeys of committed sustainable “food pioneers” with more conventional mainstream consumers recruited in branches of a UK supermarket. This contrast highlights for both groups the various values, and “meaningfulness” attached to foods and meals in people's lives, and suggests ways in which food choice and pro-sustainable practices can be supported at least in part by new digital technologies.

References

  1. S. Abbar, Y. Mejova, and I. Weber. 2015. You tweet what you eat: studying food consumption through twitter. In Proceedings of CHI 2015, Seoul, 3197--3206. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. P. J. Atkins and I. Bowler. 2001. Food in Society: Economy, Culture, Geography. Hodder Arnold, London, UK.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. F. Bartiaux. 2008. Does environmental information overcome practice compartmentalisation and change consumers’ behaviours? J. Cleaner Prod. 16, (2008), 1170--1180.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. M. K. Blake, J. Mellor, and L. Crane. 2010. Buying local food: Shopping practices, place, and consumption networks in defining food as “local”. Ann. Assoc. Amer. Geog. 100, 2(2010), 409--426.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. E. Blevis and S. C. Morse. 2009. SUSTAINABLY OURS: Food, dude. Interactions 16, 2 (2009), 58--62. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. G. Brown, P. Kraftl, J. Pickerill, and C. Upton. 2012. Holding the future together: Towards a theorization of the spaces and times of transition. Environ. Plan. A 44, (2012), 1607--1623.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. M. Bucci, C. Calefato, S. Colombetti, M. Milani, and R. Montanari. 2010. Fridge fridge on the wall: what can i cook for us all?: An HMI study for an intelligent fridge. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces. ACM, 415--415. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. J. H. Choi, M. Foth, and G. Hearn, (Eds.). 2014. Eat, Cook, Grow: Mixing Human-Computer Interactions with Human-Food Interactions. The MIT Press, 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. A. K. Clear, M. Hazas, J. Morley, A. Friday, and O. Bates. 2013. Domestic food and sustainable design: A study of university student cooking and its impacts. In Proceedings of CHI. ACM, 2447--2456. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. A. K. Clear, A. Friday, M. Rouncefield, and A. Chamberlain. 2015. Supporting sustainable food shopping. IEEE Pervasive Comput. 4 (2015), 28--36.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. R. Comber, J. Hoonhout, A. van Halteren, P. Moynihan, and P. Olivier. 2013. Food practices as situated action: Exploring and designing for everyday food practices with households. In Proceedings of CHI. ACM, 2457--2466. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. R. Crocker and S. Lehmann, (Eds). 2013. Motivating Change: Sustainable Design and Behaviour in the Built Environment. Earthscan Routledge, Abingdon, UK.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. DEFRA. 2016. Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, Food Statistics Pocketbook 2015, In Year Update, published 31 March 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. P. Dourish. 2010. HCI and environmental sustainability: The politics of design and the design of politics. In Proceedings of the ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference (DIS 2010), Aarhus, Denmark. ACM, 1--10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. G. Farr-Wharton, J. Choi, and M. Foth. 2014a. Food talks back: Exploring the role of mobile applications in reducing domestic food waste. Proceedings of OzChi. 352--361. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. G. Farr-Wharton, J. Hee-Jeong Choi, and M. Foth. 2014b. Technicolouring the fridge: Reducing food waste through uses of colour-coding and cameras. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia (MUM'14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 48--57. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2677972.2677990 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. E. Ganglbauer, G. Fitzpatrick, and Guldpfennig. 2015. Why and what did we throw out? Probing on Reflection through the Food Waste Diary. In Proceedings of CHI 2015, Seoul, 1105--1114. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. E. Ganglbauer, G. Fitzpatrick, and R. Comber. 2013. Negotiating food waste: Using a practice lens to inform design. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 20, 2 (2013), 11, 1--11:25. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. A. Giddens. 2009. The Politics of Climate Change. Polity, Cambridge, UK.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. A. Grimes and R. Harper. 2008. (April). Celebratory technology: New directions for food research in HCI. In Proceedings of CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 467--476. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. M. Håkansson and P. Sengers. 2013. Beyond being green: Simple living families and ICT, In Proceedings of Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI), ACM, 2725--2734. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. S. Heitlinger, N. Bryan-Kinns, and J. Jefferies. 2014. The talking plants: An interactive system for grassroots urban food-growing communities. In Proceedings of Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA’14). ACM, New York, NY, 459--462. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. C. C. Hinrichs. 2014. Transitions to sustainability: A change in thinking about food systems change. Agric. Human Values 31, (2014), 143--155.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. L. Holloway, M. Kneafsey, L. Venn, R. Cox, E. Dowler, and H. Tuomainen. 2007. Possible food economies: A methodological framework for exploring food production-consumption relationships. Soc. Rur. 47, 1(2007), 1--19.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. T. Jackson. 2009. Prosperity Without Growth: Economics for a Finite Planet. Sustainable Development Commission, London, UK.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. V. Kalnikaite et al. 2011. How to nudge in situ: Designing lambent devices to deliver salient information in supermarkets. In Proceedings of Ubicomp. ACM, 11--20. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. L. Li, N. Chen, W. Wang, and J. Baty. 2009. LocalBuy: A system for serving communities with local food. In Proceedings of Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’09). ACM, 2823--2828. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. A. Light, I. Wakeman, J. Robinson, A. Basu, and D. Chalmers. 2010. Chutney and relish: Designing to augment the experience of shopping at a farmers’ market. Proceedings of the 22nd Conference of the Computer-Human Interaction Special Interest Group of Australia on Computer-Human Interaction. ACM, 208--215. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. N. Longhurst. 2015. Towards an ‘alternative’ geography of innovation: Alternative milieu, socio-cognitive protection and sustainability experimentation, Environ. Innov. Soc. Transit., 17, (2010), 183--198.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. L. McKie. 1999. Older people and food: independence, locality and diet, Brit. Food J. 101, 7(1999), 528--536.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. A. Meah and M. Watson. 2011. Saints and slackers: Challenging discourses about the decline of domestic cooking, Sociol. Res. Online, 16, 2(2011), 6.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. A. Murcott. 1995. Raw, cooked and proper meals at home, In Marshall, D. (Ed) Food Choice and the Consumer, CAB Direct, Oxfordshire, UK, 219--235.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. P. North. 2014. Ten square miles surrounded by reality? Materialising alternative economies using local currencies. Antipode 46, 1(2014), 246--265.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. J. Norton, S. Nayebaziz, S. Burke, B. J. Pan, and B. Tomlinson. 2014. Plant guild composer: An interactive online system to support back yard food production. In Proceedings of the Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA’14). ACM, New York, NY, 523--526. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. W. Odom. 2010. “Mate, we don't need a chip to tell us the soil's dry”: Opportunities for designing interactive systems to support urban food production. In Proceedings of DIS. ACM, 232--235. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. P. Olivier, G. Xu, A. Monk, and J. Hoey. 2009. Ambient kitchen: Designing situated services using a high fidelity prototyping environment. In Proceedings of Pervasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments. ACM. 1--47. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. P. Olivier and P. Wright. 2015. Digital civics: Taking a local turn. Interactions 22, 4(2015), 61--63. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. K. O’Neill. 2014. Situating the ‘alternative’ within the conventional’—Local food experiences from the east riding of Yorkshire. J. Rur. Stud. 35, (2014), 112--122.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. M. Phillips and J. Dickie. 2014. Narratives of transition/non-transition towards low carbon futures within English rural communities. J. Rural Stud. 34, (2014), 79--95.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. M. Sahakian and H. Wilhite. 2014. Making practice theory practicable: Towards more sustainable forms of consumption, J. Consumer Cult. 14, 1(2014), 25--44.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  41. E. Shove. 2003. Comfort, Cleanliness and Convenience: The Social Organization of Normality. Berg, Oxford, UK.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. M. S. Silberman, et al. 2014. Next steps for sustainable HCI. Interactions 21, 5 (2014), 66--69. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. R. Slocum. 2004. Polar bears and energy-efficient lightbulbs: Strategies to bring climate change home, Environ. Plan. D, 22, 3(2014), 413--438.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  44. A. Tukker, G. Huppes, and J. Guinèe, et al. 2006. Environmental Impact of Products (EIPRO): Analysis of the Life Cycle Environmental Impacts Related to the Final Consumption of the EU-25. Main Report. European Commission, Joint Research Centre (DG JRC), Institute for Prospective Technological Studies.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. P. Tukkinen and J. Lindqvist. 2015. Understanding motivations for using grocery shopping applications. IEEE Pervasive Computing 14, 4 (2015), 38--44.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. A. Woodruff, J. Hasbrouck, and S. Augustin. 2008. A bright green perspective on sustainable choices. In Proceedings of CHI. ACM, 313--332. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Bearing an Open “Pandora's Box”: HCI for Reconciling Everyday Food and Sustainability

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    Full Access

    • Published in

      cover image ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction
      ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction  Volume 23, Issue 5
      November 2016
      235 pages
      ISSN:1073-0516
      EISSN:1557-7325
      DOI:10.1145/3007191
      Issue’s Table of Contents

      Copyright © 2016 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 10 October 2016
      • Revised: 1 July 2016
      • Accepted: 1 July 2016
      • Received: 1 October 2015
      Published in tochi Volume 23, Issue 5

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader