skip to main content
research-article

Applying Seamful Design in Location-Based Mobile Museum Applications

Published:24 August 2016Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

The application of mobile computing is currently altering patterns of our behavior to a greater degree than perhaps any other invention. In combination with the introduction of power-efficient wireless communication technologies, such as Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE), designers are today increasingly empowered to shape the way we interact with our physical surroundings and thus build entirely new experiences. However, our evaluations of BLE and its abilities to facilitate mobile location-based experiences in public environments revealed a number of potential problems. Most notably, the position and orientation of the user in combination with various environmental factors, such as crowds of people traversing the space, were found to cause major fluctuations of the received BLE signal strength. These issues are rendering a seamless functioning of any location-based application practically impossible. Instead of achieving seamlessness by eliminating these technical issues, we thus choose to advocate the use of a seamful approach, that is, to reveal and exploit these problems and turn them into a part of the actual experience. In order to demonstrate the viability of this approach, we designed, implemented, and evaluated the Ghost Detector—an educational location-based museum game for children. By presenting a qualitative evaluation of this game and by motivating our design decisions, this article provides insight into some of the challenges and possible solutions connected to the process of developing location-based BLE-enabled experiences for public cultural spaces.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

References

  1. Apple-Insider. 2013. First look: Using iBeacon location awareness at an Apple Store. (December 2013). http://appleinsider.com/articles/13/12/06/first-look-using-ibeacon-locati on-awareness-at-an-apple-store.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Stanimir Arnaudov, Tobias Eble, Andreas Gapel, Oliver Gerl, Lieberknecht Sebastian, Peter George Meier, Tsutomu Miyashita, Stephanie Orclic, Volker Scholz, and Tomoya Tachikawa. 2008. An Augmented Reality Museum Guide. DNP Digitalcom Co. Ltd. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Steve Benford, Andy Crabtree, Martin Flintham, Adam Drozd, Rob Anastasi, Mark Paxton, Nick Tandavanitj, Matt Adams, and Ju Row-Farr. 2006. Can you see me now? ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI) 13, 1 (2006), 100--133. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Steve Benford, Mike Fraser, Gail Reynard, Boriana Koleva, and Adam Drozd. 2002. Staging and evaluating public performances as an approach to CVE research. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Collaborative Virtual Environments. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Gregor Broll and Steve Benford. 2005. Seamful design for location-based mobile games. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Entertainment Computing. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Felix Busching, Sebastian Schildt, and Lars Wolf. 2012. DroidCluster: Towards smartphone cluster computing - The streets are paved with potential computer clusters. In 32nd International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems Workshops. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Matthew Chalmers, Ian MacColl, and Marek Bell. 2003. Seamful design: Showing the seams in wearable computing. In Proceedings of Electrical Institution Engineers Eurowearable.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. John W. Creswell. 2013. Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design. Sage Publications.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Fred D. Davis. 1989. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly 13, 3 (1989), 319--340. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Stavros Demetriadis, Evangelos Triantafillou, and Andreas Pombortsis. 2003. A phenomenographic study of students’ attitudes toward the use of multiple media for learning. In Proceedings of the 8th Annual Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Ramsey Faragher and Rob Harle. 2014. An analysis of the accuracy of Bluetooth low energy for indoor positioning applications. Ub Proceedings of the 27th International Technical Meeting of the Satellite Division of the Institute of Navigation.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Ramsey M. Faragher and Robert K. Harle. 2015. Towards an efficient, intelligent, opportunistic smartphone indoor positioning system. Navigation 65, 1 (2015), 55--72.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. William Gaver, Thomas Moran, Allan MacLean, Lennart Lövstrand, Paul Dourish, Kathleen Carter, and William Buxton. 1992. Realizing a video environment: EuroPARC’s RAVE system. In Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'92). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Paul Golding. 2011. Connected Services: A Guide to the Internet Technologies Shaping the Future of Mobile Services and Operators. Wiley.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Carles Gomez, Joaquim Oller, and Paradells Josep. 2012. Overview and evaluation of Bluetooth low energy: An emerging lowpower wireless technology. Sensors 12.9 (2012), 11734--11753.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Gustavo Ramirez González, Mario Munoz Organero, and Kloos Carlos Delgado 2008. Early infrastructure of an internet of things in spaces for learning. In Advanced Learning Technologies.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Rachel Jacobs, Steve Benford, and Eva Luger. 2015. Behind the scenes at HCI’s turn to the arts. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Vicki Jones and Jun H. Jo. 2004. Ubiquitous learning environment: An adaptive teaching system using ubiquitous technology. In Beyond the Comfort Zone: Proceedings of the 21st ASCILITE Conference.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Sandor Kamath and Joakim Lindh. 2012. Measuring Bluetooth low energy power consumption. Application Note AN092 (2012), 1--23.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Heng Liu, Tao Mei, Li Houqiang, Jiebo Luo, and Shipeng Li. 2013. Robust and accurate mobile visual localization and its applications. ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications and Applications 9 (2013), Article No. 51. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Marshall McLuhan. 1964. Understanding Media: The Extension of Man. Routledge.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Antii Oulasvirta. 2004. SeamfulSystems: What are they and how can we design them? In TeliaSonera Haninge Seamfulness Workshop.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Eleonora Rosati. 2013. What happens after digitization? Exploitation of cultural content and licensing models. Mobile Collections (2013).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. James She, Jon Crowcroft, Hao Fu, and Flora Li. 2014. Convergence of interactive displays with smart mobile devices for effective advertising: A survey. ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications and Applications 10 (2014), Article No. 17. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Greg Sterling. 2014. Magnetic positioning? The arrival of indoor GPS. Opus Research Report (2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Kirsty Styles. 2013. 7 in 10 people in the UK now own a smartphone. (2013). http://mobilemarketingmagazine.com/7-10-people-uk-now-ownsmartphone/#TqVM MUtyozRhvMjp.99.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Timothy Teo. 2008. A path analysis of pre-service teachers’ attitudes to computer use: Applying and extending the technology acceptance model in an educational context. Interactive Learning Environments 18.1 (2008), 65--79.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Thomas Tullis and William Albert. 2008. Measuring the User Experience: Collecting, Analyzing, and Presenting Usability Metrics (Interactive Technologies). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Jaroslav Vancat and Daniel Riha. 2012. The Development of Visual Literacy in Art Education. Inter-Disciplinary Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Marynel Vázquez, Aaron Steinfeld, Scott E. Hudson, and Jodi Forlizzi. 2014. Spatial and other social engagement cues in a child-robot interaction: Effects of a sidekick. In Proceedings of the 2014 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Leonard Wein. 2014. Visual recognition in museum guide apps: Do visitors want it? In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Mark Weiser. 1991. The computer for the 21st century. Scientific American 265.3 (1991), 94--104.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Mark Weiser. 1993. The world is not a desktop. Interactions 1.1 (1993), 7--8. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Alex West. 2013. Smartphone, the key for Bluetooth low energy technology. (2013). http://www.bluetooth.com/Pages/Smartphones.aspx.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Keiichi Yamazaki, Yamazaki Akiko, Okada Mai, Kuno Yoshinori, Kobayashi Yoshinori, Hoshi Yosuke, Pitsch Karola, Luff Paul, vom Lehn Dirk, and Heath Christian. 2009. Revealing Gauguin: Engaging visitors in robot guide’s explanation in an art museum. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Yifang Yin, Beomjoo Seo, and R. Zimmerman. 2015. Content vs. context: Visual and geographic information use in video landmark retrieval. ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications and Applications 11.3 (2015), 39. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Applying Seamful Design in Location-Based Mobile Museum Applications

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in

      Full Access

      • Published in

        cover image ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications, and Applications
        ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications, and Applications  Volume 12, Issue 4
        August 2016
        219 pages
        ISSN:1551-6857
        EISSN:1551-6865
        DOI:10.1145/2983297
        Issue’s Table of Contents

        Copyright © 2016 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 24 August 2016
        • Accepted: 1 May 2016
        • Revised: 1 April 2016
        • Received: 1 September 2015
        Published in tomm Volume 12, Issue 4

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader