skip to main content
research-article

Tariff Agent: Interacting with a Future Smart Energy System at Home

Published:03 August 2016Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Smart systems are becoming increasingly ubiquitous and consequently transforming our lives. The level of system autonomy plays a vital role in the development of smart systems as it profoundly affects how people and these systems interact with each other. However, to date, there are very few studies on human interaction with such systems. This paper presents findings from two field studies where two different prototypes for automating energy tariff-switching were developed and evaluated in the wild. Both prototypes offer flexible autonomy by which users can shift the system's level of autonomy among three options: suggestion-only, semi-autonomy, and full autonomy, whenever they like. Our findings based on thematic analysis show that flexible autonomy is a promising way to sustain users' engagement with smart systems, despite their occasional mistakes. The findings also suggest that users take responsibility for the undesired outcomes of automated actions when delegation of autonomy can be adjusted flexibly.

References

  1. A. T. Alan, E. Costanza, J. Fischer, S. D. Ramchurn, T. Rodden, and N. R. Jennings. 2014. A field study of human-agent interaction for electricity tariff switching. In Proceedings of the 2014 International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems (AAMAS'14). International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, Richland, SC, 965--972. http://dl.acm.org/citation. cfm?id=2617388.2617400 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. A. T. Alan, S. D. Ramchurn, T. Rodden, E. Costanza, J. Fischer, and N. R. Jennings. 2015. Managing energy tariffs with agents: A field study of a future smart energy system at home. In Adjunct Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing and Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers (UbiComp/ISWC'15 Adjunct). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1551--1558. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2800835.2801626 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. L. Barkhuus and A. Dey. 2003. Is context-aware computing taking control away from the user? Three levels of interactivity examined. In Ubiquitous Computing (Ubicomp) 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. J. Bourgeois, J. van der Linden, G. Kortuem, B. A. Price, and C. R. Rimmer. 2014. Conversations with my washing machine: An in-the-wild study of demand shifting with self-generated energy. In Proceedings of the 2014 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing (UbiComp'14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 459--470. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2632048.2632106 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. V. Braun and V. Clarke. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual. Res. Psychol. 3, 2 (2006), 77--101.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. E. Costanza, J. E. Fischer, J. A. Colley, T. Rodden, S. D. Ramchurn, and N. R. Jennings. 2014. Doing the laundry with agents: A field trial of a future smart energy system in the home. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 813--822. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557167 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. S. Darby. 2006. The Effectiveness of Feedback on Energy Consumption: A Review for DEFRA of the Literature on Metering, Billing and Direct Displays. Technical Report. Environmental Change Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. http://www.eci.ox.ac.uk/research/energy/electric-metering.php.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. C. DiSalvo, P. Sengers, and H. Brynjarsdóttir. 2010. Mapping the landscape of sustainable HCI. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'10). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1975--1984. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1753326.1753625 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. C. Fischer. 2008. Feedback on household electricity consumption: A tool for saving energy? Energy Eff. 1, 1 (2008), 79--104. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12053-008-9009-7Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. J. Froehlich, L. Findlater, and J. Landay. 2010. The design of eco-feedback technology. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'10). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1999--2008. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1753326.1753629 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. M. Gupta, S. S. Intille, and K. Larson. 2009. Adding GPS-control to traditional thermostats: An exploration of potential energy savings and design challenges. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Pervasive Computing (Pervasive'09). Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 95--114. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-01516-8_8 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. E. Horvitz. 1999. Principles of mixed-initiative user interfaces. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'99). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 159--166. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/302979.303030 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. N. R. Jennings, L. Moreau, D. Nicholson, S. D. I. Ramchurn, S. Roberts, T. Rodden, and A. Rogers. 2014. Human-agent collectives. Commun. ACM 57, 12 (Dec. 2014), 80--88. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2629559 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. A. Kerne, E. Koh, S. M. Smith, A. Webb, and B. Dworaczyk. 2008. combinFormation: Mixed-initiative composition of image and text surrogates promotes information discovery. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. 27, 1, Article 5 (Dec. 2008), 45 pages. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1416950.1416955 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. D. J. C. MacKay. 2009. Sustainable Energy—Without the Hot Air (1st ed.). UIT Cambridge Ltd., Cambridge, UK.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. J. Pierce and E. Paulos. 2010. Materializing energy. In Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (DIS'10). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 113--122. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1145/1858171.1858193 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. J. Pierce and E. Paulos. 2012. Beyond energy monitors: Interaction, energy, and emerging energy systems. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 665--674. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2207676.2207771 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. S. D. Ramchurn, P. Vytelingum, A. Rogers, and N. R. Jennings. 2012. Putting the ‘smarts’ into the smart grid: A grand challenge for artificial intelligence. Commun. ACM 55, 4 (April 2012), 86--97. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2133806.2133825 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. T. Rodden, J. Fischer, N. Pantidi, K. Bachour, and S. Moran. 2013. At home with agents: Exploring attitudes towards future smart energy infrastructures. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1173--1182. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1145/2470654.2466152 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Y. Rogers, K. Connelly, L. Tedesco, W. Hazlewood, A. Kurtz, R. E. Hall, J. Hursey, and T. Toscos. 2007. Why it's worth the hassle: The value of in-situ studies when designing ubicomp. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing (UbiComp'07). Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 336--353. http://dl.acm.org/ citation.cfm?id=1771592.1771612 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. C. Sas, S. Whittaker, S. Dow, J.i Forlizzi, and J. Zimmerman. 2014. Generating implications for design through design research. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1971--1980. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557357 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. P. Scerri, D. Pynadath, and M. Tambe. 2002. Towards adjustable autonomy for the real-world. Journal of Artif. Intell. Res. 17 (2002), 171--228. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. T. Schwartz, G. Stevens, L. Ramirez, and V. Wulf. 2013. Uncovering practices of making energy consumption accountable: A phenomenological inquiry. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 20, 2, Article 12 (May 2013), 30 pages. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2463579.2463583 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. R. E. Slavin, J. S. Wodarski, and B. L. Blackburn. 1981. A group contingency for electricity conservation in master-metered apartments. J. Appl. Behav. Anal. 14, 3 (1981), 357--97. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1901/jaba.1981.14-357Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. N. Stout, A. R. Dennis, and T. M. Wells. 2014. The buck stops there: The impact of perceived accountability and control on the intention to delegate to software agents. AIS Trans. Hum.-Comput. Interact. 6, 1 (2014), 1--15. http://aisel.aisnet.org/thci/vol6/iss1/15.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Y. A. A. Strengers. 2011. Designing eco-feedback systems for everyday life. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'11). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2135--2144. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1979252 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. N. C. Truong, J. McInerney, L. Tran-Thanh, E. Costanza, and S. D. Ramchurn. 2013. Forecasting multi-appliance usage for smart home energy management. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Third International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI'13). AAAI Press, 2908--2914. http://dl.acm.org/ citation.cfm?id=2540128.2540547 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. R. Yang and M. W. Newman. 2013. Learning from a learning thermostat: Lessons for intelligent systems for the home. In Proceedings of the 2013 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing (UbiComp'13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 93--102. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1145/2493432.2493489 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. R. Yang, M. W. Newman, and J. Forlizzi. 2014. Making sustainability sustainable: Challenges in the design of eco-interaction technologies. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 823--832. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557380 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. J. Zimmerman, K. Rivard, I. Hargraves, A. Tomasic, and K. Mohnkern. 2009. User-created forms as an effective method of human-agent communication. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'09). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1869--1878. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1145/1518701.1518988 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Tariff Agent: Interacting with a Future Smart Energy System at Home

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    Full Access

    • Published in

      cover image ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction
      ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction  Volume 23, Issue 4
      September 2016
      199 pages
      ISSN:1073-0516
      EISSN:1557-7325
      DOI:10.1145/2983309
      Issue’s Table of Contents

      Copyright © 2016 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 3 August 2016
      • Accepted: 1 May 2016
      • Revised: 1 March 2016
      • Received: 1 October 2015
      Published in tochi Volume 23, Issue 4

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader