Mahesh M. Subedar
Abstract
Blur is an important attribute in the study and modeling of the human visual system. In the blur discrimination experiments, just-noticeable additional blur required to differentiate from the reference blur level is measured. The past studies on blur discrimination have measured the sensitivity of the human visual system to blur using two-dimensional (2D) test patterns. In this study, subjective tests are performed to measure blur discrimination thresholds using stereoscopic 3D test patterns. Specifically, how the binocular disparity affects the blur sensitivity is measured on a passive stereoscopic display. A passive stereoscopic display renders the left and right eye images in a row interleaved format. The subjects have to wear circularly polarized glasses to filter the appropriate images to the left and right eyes. Positive, negative, and zero disparity values are considered in these experiments. A positive disparity value projects the objects behind the display screen, a negative disparity value projects the objects in front of the display screen, and a zero disparity value projects the objects at the display plane. The blur discrimination thresholds are measured for both symmetric and asymmetric stereo viewing cases. In the symmetric viewing case, the same level of additional blur is applied to the left and right eye stimulus. In the asymmetric viewing case, different levels of additional blur are applied to the left and right eye stimuli. The results of this study indicate that, in the symmetric stereo viewing case, binocular disparity does not affect the blur discrimination thresholds for the selected 3D test patterns. As a consequence of these findings, we conclude that the models developed for 2D blur discrimination can be used for 3D blur discrimination. We also show that the Weber model provides a good fit to the blur discrimination threshold measurements for the symmetric stereo viewing case. In the asymmetric viewing case, the blur discrimination thresholds decreased, and the decrease in threshold values is found to be dominated by eye observing the higher blur.
- Payman Aflaki, Miska M. Hannuksela, J. Hakkinen, Paul Lindroos, and Moncef Gabbouj. 2010. Subjective study on compressed asymmetric stereoscopic video. In International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP). IEEE, 4021--4024.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Albert J. Ahumada. 2002. Classification image weights and internal noise level estimation. J. Vision 2, 1 (2002), 8.Google ScholarCross Ref
- C. C. Chen, K. P. Chen, C. H. Tseng, S. T. Kuo, and K. N. Wu. 2009. Constructing a metrics for blur perception with blur discrimination experiments. Proc. SPIE, Image Quality and System Performance VI 724219 (2009).Google ScholarCross Ref
- Mark A. Georgeson, Keith A. May, Tom C. A. Freeman, and Gillian S. Hesse. 2007. From filters to features: Scale--space analysis of edge and blur coding in human vision. J. Vision 7, 13 (2007), 7.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Glenn Hagele. 2013. Dominant Eye Test. Retrieved from http://www.usaeyes.org/lasik/lasik-monovision-dominant-eye.htm.Google Scholar
- J. R. Hamerly and C. A. Dvorak. 1981. Detection and discrimination of blur in edges and lines. J. Opt. Soc. Am. 71, 4 (1981), 448--452.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Robert T. Held, Emily A. Cooper, and Martin S. Banks. 2012. Blur and disparity are complementary cues to depth. Curr. Biol. 22, 5 (2012), 426--431.Google ScholarCross Ref
- David M. Hoffman, Ahna R. Girshick, Kurt Akeley, and Martin S. Banks. 2008. Vergence--accommodation conflicts hinder visual performance and cause visual fatigue. J. Vision 8, 3 (2008), 33.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Joseph J. Kane. 1990. Instrumentation for monitor calibration. SMPTE J. 99, 9 (1990), 744--752.Google ScholarCross Ref
- P. Ewen King-Smith, Scott S. Grigsby, Algis J. Vingrys, Susan C. Benes, and Aaron Supowit. 1994. Efficient and unbiased modifications of the QUEST threshold method: Theory, simulations, experimental evaluation and practical implementation. Vision Res. 34, 7 (1994), 885--912.Google ScholarCross Ref
- George Mather and David R. R. Smith. 2002. Blur discrimination and its relation to blur-mediated depth perception. Perception 31, 10 (2002), 1211--1220.Google ScholarCross Ref
- David F. McAllister. 1993. Stereo Computer Graphics and Other True 3D Technologies. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ. Google ScholarDigital Library
- William H. McIlhagga and Keith A. May. 2012. Optimal edge filters explain human blur detection. J. Vision 12, 10 (2012), 9.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Walter R. Miles. 1930. Ocular dominance in human adults. J. Gen. Psychol. 3, 3 (1930), 412--430.Google ScholarCross Ref
- A. K. Pääkkönen and M. J. Morgan. 1994. Effects of motion on blur discrimination. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 11, 3 (1994), 992--1002.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Denis G. Pelli. 1997. The VideoToolBox software for visual psychophysics: Transforming numbers into movies. Spatial Vision 10, 4 (1997), 437--442.Google ScholarCross Ref
- PhotoResearch. 2014. PR-650 SpectraScan Colorimeter. Retrieved from http://www.photoresearch.com/current/pr650.asp.Google Scholar
- Gavriel Salvendy. 2012. Handbook of Human Factors and Ergonomics. John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY.Google Scholar
- Lucie Sawides, Pablo de Gracia, Carlos Dorronsoro, Michael Webster, and Susana Marcos. 2011. Adapting to blur produced by ocular high-order aberrations. J. Vision 11, 7 (2011).Google ScholarCross Ref
- Mahesh Subedar and Lina J. Karam. 2014. Study of blur discrimination for 3D stereo viewing. In IS&T/SPIE Electronic Imaging. International Society for Optics and Photonics, 90110T--90110T.Google Scholar
- Bruce H. Walker. 2000. Optical Design for Visual Systems. Vol. 45. SPIE Press.Google Scholar
- A. B. Watson and A. J. Ahumada. 2011. Blur clarified: A review and synthesis of blur discrimination. J. Vision 11, 5 (2011).Google ScholarCross Ref
- Andrew B. Watson and Denis G. Pelli. 1983. QUEST: A Bayesian adaptive psychometric method. Atten. Percept. Psychophys. 33, 2 (1983), 113--120.Google ScholarCross Ref
- R. J. Watt and M. J. Morgan. 1983. The recognition and representation of edge blur: Evidence for spatial primitives in human vision. Vision Res. 23, 12 (1983), 1465--1477.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Roger J. Watt. 1990. Visual Processing: Computational, Psychophysical and Cognitive Research. Psychology Press.Google Scholar
- Michael A. Webster, Mark A. Georgeson, and Shernaaz M. Webster. 2002. Neural adjustments to image blur. Nat. Neurosci. 5, 9 (2002), 839--840.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Michael A. Weissman and Andrew J. Woods. 2011. A simple method for measuring crosstalk in stereoscopic displays. In IS&T/SPIE Electronic Imaging. International Society for Optics and Photonics, 786310--786310.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- 3D Blur Discrimination
Recommendations
Binocular vision based objective quality assessment method for stereoscopic images
Human visual system (HVS) can perceive the difference between two retinal images to create a mental image with depth perception, which is the result of two binocular interactions, i.e., binocular fusion and suppression. According to perceptual ...
Method and experiments of subliminal cueing for real-world images
Unconscious attention shift triggered by a subliminal cue has been shown to be automatic; however, whether it can be brought into effect for images of real-world scenes remains to be investigated. We present a subliminal cueing method that flashes ...
No-reference stereoscopic 3D image quality assessment via combined model
Currently, stereoscopic 3D image has been widely applied in many fields. However, it may suffer from various quality degradations during the acquisition and transmission. Therefore, an effective 3D image quality assessment (IQA) method has great ...
Comments