skip to main content
survey
Open Access

Multioccupant Activity Recognition in Pervasive Smart Home Environments

Published:09 December 2015Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Human activity recognition in ambient intelligent environments like homes, offices, and classrooms has been the center of a lot of research for many years now. The aim is to recognize the sequence of actions by a specific person using sensor readings. Most of the research has been devoted to activity recognition of single occupants in the environment. However, living environments are usually inhabited by more than one person and possibly with pets. Hence, human activity recognition in the context of multioccupancy is more general, but also more challenging. The difficulty comes from mainly two aspects: resident identification, known as data association, and diversity of human activities. The present survey article provides an overview of existing approaches and current practices for activity recognition in multioccupant smart homes. It presents the latest developments and highlights the open issues in this field.

References

  1. Giovanni Acampora, Diane J. Cook, Parisa Rashidi, and Athanasios V. Vasilakos. 2013. A survey on ambient intelligence in healthcare. Proc. IEEE 101, 12 (Dec. 2013), 2470--2494. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2013.2262913Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Hande Alerndar, Halil Ertan, Ozlern D. Incel, and Cem Ersoy. 2013. ARAS human activity datasets in multiple homes with multiple residents. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare (PervasiveHealth’13). 232--235. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.4108/icst.pervasivehealth.2013.252120 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Anon. 2014. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Retrieved October 13, 2014 from http://www.cdc.gov/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Christopher M. Bishop. 2006. Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning (Information Science and Statistics). Springer-Verlag, New York. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Ann Bookman, M. Harrington, L. Pass, and E. Reisner. 2007. Family Caregiver Handbook: Finding Elder Care Resources in Massachusetts. (2007). Retrieved October 15, 2014 from http://web.mit. edu/workplacecenter/hndbk/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Abdelhamid Bouchachia and Charlie Vanaret. 2014. GT2FC: An online growing interval type-2 self-learning fuzzy classifier. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 22, 4 (Aug. 2014), 999--1018. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2013.2279554Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Marie Chan, Eric Campo, Daniel Estève, and Jean-Yves Fourniols. 2009. Smart homes—Current features and future perspectives. Maturitas 64, 2 (Oct. 2009), 90--97. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.maturitas.2009.07.014Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Rong Chen and Yu Tong. 2014. A two-stage method for solving multi-resident activity recognition in smart environments. Entropy 16, 4 (April 2014), 2184--2203. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/e16042184Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Yi-ting Chiang, J. Y. J. Hsu, Ching-Hu Lu, and Li-Chen Fu. 2010. Interaction models for multiple-resident activity recognition in a smart home. In Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS’10). 3753--3758. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/IROS.2010.5650340Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Diane J. Cook. 2009. Multi-agent smart environments. J. Ambient Intell. Smart Env. 1, 1 (Jan. 2009), 51--55. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/AIS-2009-0007 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Diane J. Cook, Aaron Crandall, Geetika Singla, and Brian Thomas. 2010. Detection of social interaction in smart spaces. Cybern. Syst. 41, 2 (Feb. 2010), 90--104. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01969720903584183 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Erin Y. Cornwell and Linda J. Waite. 2009. Social disconnectedness, perceived isolation, and health among older adults. J. Health Soc. Behav. 50, 1 (March 2009), 31--48. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/002214650905000103Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Aaron S. Crandall and Diane J. Cook. 2009. Coping with multiple residents in a smart environment. J. Ambient Intell. Smart Env. 1, 4 (Dec. 2009), 323--334. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/AIS-2009-0041 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Aaron S. Crandall and Diane J. Cook. 2008a. Resident and caregiver: Handling multiple people in a smart care facility. In Proceedings of the AAAI Fall Symposium—AI in Eldercare: New solutions to Old Problems (2008). 39--47. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1.1.329.4737Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Aaron S. Crandall and Diane J. Cook. 2008b. Attributing events to individuals in multi-inhabitant environments. In Proceedings of the IET 4th International Conference on Intelligent Environments (August 2008). 1--8. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1049/cp:20081164Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Aaron S. Crandall and Diane J. Cook. 2010. Using a hidden Markov model for resident identification. In Proceedings of th 6th International Conference on Intelligent Environments (IE’10). 74--79. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/IE.2010.21 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Scott Davidoff, Min Kyung Lee, John Zimmerman, and Anind Dey. 2006. Socially-aware requirements for a smart home. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Intelligent Environments. 41--44. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1.1.104.5771Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Youtian Du, Feng Chen, and Wenli Xu. 2007. Human interaction representation and recognition through motion decomposition. IEEE Signal Process. Lett. 14, 12 (Dec. 2007), 952--955. DOI:http://dx. doi.org/10.1109/LSP.2007.908035Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Youtian Du, Feng Chen, Wenli Xu, and Yongbin Li. 2006. Recognizing interaction activities using dynamic Bayesian network. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR’06). 618--621. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ICPR.2006.977 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Nathan Eagle. 2008. Behavioral inference across cultures: Using telephones as a cultural lens. IEEE Intell. Syst. 23, 4 (July 2008), 62--64. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/MIS.2008.58 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Laura Fratiglioni, Hui-Xin Wang, Kjerstin Ericsson, Margaret Maytan, and Bengt Winblad. 2000. Influence of social network on occurrence of dementia: A community-based longitudinal study. Lancet 355, 9212 (April 2000), 1315--1319. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02113-9Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Jane Gross. 2007. A Grass-Roots Effort to Grow Old at Home. N. Y. Times (August 2007).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Tao Gu, Zhanqing Wu, Xianping Tao, H. K. Pung, and Jian Lu. 2009a. epSICAR: An emerging patterns based approach to sequential, interleaved and concurrent activity recognition. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications (PerCom’09). 1--9. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/PERCOM.2009.4912776 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Tao Gu, Zhanqing Wu, Liang Wang, Xianping Tao, and Jian Lu. 2009b. Mining emerging patterns for recognizing activities of multiple users in pervasive computing. In Proceedings of the 6th Annual International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Systems: Networking Services (MobiQuitous’09). 1--10. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.4108/ICST.MOBIQUITOUS2009.6818Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Chien-Chang Hsu and Liang-Zong Wang. 2008. A smart home resource management system for multiple inhabitants by agent conceding negotiation. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics (SMC’08). 607--612. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ICSMC. 2008.48 11344Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Kuo-Chung Hsu, Yi-Ting Chiang, Gu-Yang Lin, Ching-Hu Lu, Jane Yung-Jen Hsu, and Li-Chen Fu. 2010. Strategies for inference mechanism of conditional random fields for multiple-resident activity recognition in a smart home. In Trends in Applied Intelligent Systems, Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer, Berlin, 417--426. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Derek Hao Hu, Xian-Xing Zhang, Jie Yin, Vincent Wenchen Zheng, and Qiang Yang. 2009. Abnormal activity recognition based on HDP-HMM models. In Proceedings of the 21st International Joint Conference on Artifical Intelligence (IJCAI’09). Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., 1715--1720. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Shehroz S. Khan, Michelle E. Karg, Jesse Hoey, and Dana Kulic. 2012. Towards the detection of unusual temporal events during activities using HMMs. In Proceedings of the Conference on Ubiquitous Computing (UbiComp’12). ACM, New York, 1075--1084. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2370216.2370444 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Eunju Kim, S. Helal, and D. Cook. 2010. Human activity recognition and pattern discovery. IEEE Pervasive Comput. 9, 1 (Jan. 2010), 48--53. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/MPRV.2010.7 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Jinyan Li, Guimei Liu, and Limsoon Wong. 2007. Mining statistically important equivalence classes and delta-discriminative emerging patterns. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (SIGKDD’07). ACM, New York, 430--439. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1281192.1281240 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Wenhui Liao and Qiang Ji. 2009. Learning Bayesian network parameters under incomplete data with domain knowledge. Pattern Recognit. 42 (2009), 3046--3056. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Zhi-Hao Lin and Li-Chen Fu. 2007. Multi-user preference model and service provision in a smart home environment. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Automation Science and Engineering (CASE’07). 759--764. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/COASE.2007.4341737Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Ching-Hu Lu, Yung-Ching Lin, and Li-Chen Fu. 2008. Hide and not easy to seek: A hybrid weaving strategy for context-aware service provision in a smart home. In IEEE Asia-Pacific Services Computing Conference (APSCC’08). 595--600. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/APSCC.2008.77 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Iain McCowan, Daniel Gatica-Perez, Samy Bengio, Guillaume Lathoud, Mark Barnard, and Dong Zhang. 2005. Automatic analysis of multimodal group actions in meetings. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 27, 3 (March 2005), 305--317. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2005.49 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Ahmed Nait Aicha, Gwenn Englebienne, and Ben Kröse. 2013. How lonely is your grandma?: Detecting the visits to assisted living elderly from wireless sensor network data. In Proceedings of the Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing Adjunct Publication (UbiComp’13). ACM, New York, 1285--1294. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2494091.2497283 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Pradeep Natarajan and Ramakant Nevatia. 2007. Coupled hidden semi Markov models for activity recognition. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Motion and Video Computing (WMVC’07). IEEE, 10. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/WMVC.2007.12 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Nam Nguyen, Svetha Venkatesh, and Hung Bui. 2006. Recognising behaviours of multiple people with hierarchical probabilistic model and statistical data association. In Proceedings of the 17th British Machine Vision Conference (BMVC’06). The British Machine Vision Association and Society for Pattern Recognition, 1239--1248.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. Daniel O. Olguin, Benjamin N. Waber, Taemie Kim, Akshay Mohan, Koji Ara, and Alex Pentland. 2009. Sensible organizations: Technology and methodology for automatically measuring organizational behavior. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part B Cybern. 39, 1 (Feb. 2009), 43--55. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TSMCB.2008.2006638 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Markus Prossegger and Abdelhamid Bouchachia. 2014. Multi-resident activity recognition using incremental decision trees. In Adaptive and Intelligent Systems, Abdelhamid Bouchachia (Ed.). Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer International Publishing, 182--191.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Iulian Pruteanu-Malinici and Lawrence Carin. 2008. Infinite hidden Markov models for unusual-event detection in video. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 17, 5 (May 2008), 811--822. DOI:http://dx.doi. org/10.1109/TIP.2008.919359 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Barry Reisberg, Sanford I. Finkel, John Overall, and Hellmut Erzigkeit. 2001. The Alzheimer's disease activities of daily living international scale (ADL-IS). Int. Psychogeriatr. IPA 13, 2 (June 2001), 163--181.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Daniele Riboni, Linda Pareschi, Laura Radaelli, and Claudio Bettini. 2011. Is ontology-based activity recognition really effective? In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops (PERCOM Workshops’11). 427--431. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/PERCOMW.2011.5766927Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  43. Susanne Smith Roley et al. 2008. Occupational therapy practice framework: Domain and practice 2nd ed. Am. J. Occup. Ther. Off. Publ. Am. Occup. Ther. Assoc. 62, 6 (Dec. 2008), 625--683.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Fariba Sadri. 2011. Ambient intelligence: A survey. ACM Comput. Surv. 43, 4 (Oct. 2011), 36:1--36:66. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1978802.1978815 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. Sumit Sanghai, Pedro Domingos, and Daniel Weld. 2005. Relational dynamic Bayesian networks. J. Artif. Intell. Res. 24, 2005 (2005), 759--797.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  46. Jehad A. M. Sarkar, Young-Koo Lee, and Sungyoung Lee. 2010. ARHMAM: An activity recognition system based on hidden Markov minded activity model. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Uniquitous Information Management and Communication (ICUIMC’10). ACM, New York, 71:1--71:9. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2108616.2108702 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. Geetika Singla, Diane J. Cook, and Maureen Schmitter-Edgecombe. 2010. Recognizing independent and joint activities among multiple residents in smart environments. J. Ambient Intell. Humaniz. Comput. 1, 1 (March 2010), 57--63. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12652-009-0007-1Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  48. Eliot R. Smith and Diane M. Mackie. 1999. Social Psychology. Routledge, London.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. Charles Sutton and Andrew McCallum. 2006. An introduction to conditional random fields for relational learning. In Introduction to Statistical Relational Learning. MIT Press, 93--128.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. Charles Sutton, Andrew McCallum, and Khashayar Rohanimanesh. 2007. Dynamic conditional random fields: Factorized probabilistic models for labeling and segmenting sequence data. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 8 (May 2007), 693--723. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  51. Tanzeem Choudhury and Alex Pentland. 2004. Characterizing social networks using the sociometer. In Proceedings of NAACOS 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  52. Tim L. M. van Kasteren. 2011. Activity Recognition for Health Monitoring Elderly Using Temporal Probabilistic Models. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Amsterdam.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  53. Tim L. M. van Kasteren, Gwenn Englebienne, and Ben J. A. Kröse. 2011. Hierarchical activity recognition using automatically clustered actions. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Ambient Intelligence (AmI’11). 82--91. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  54. Tim L. M. van Kasteren, Gwenn Englebienne, and Ben J. A. Kröse. 2010. Human activity recognition from wireless sensor network data: Benchmark and software. In Activity Recognition in Pervasive Intelligent Environments, Liming Chen, Chris D. Nugent, Jit Biswas, and Jesse Hoey (Eds.), Atlantis Ambient and Pervasive Intelligence. Atlantis Press, 165--186.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. Tim L. M. van Kasteren, Athanasios Noulas, Gwenn Englebienne, and Ben Kröse. 2008. Accurate activity recognition in a home setting. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing (UbiComp’08). ACM, 1--9. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1409635.1409637 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  56. Kristof Van Laerhoven, Nicky Kern, Hans W. Gellersen, and Bernt Schiele. 2003. Towards a wearable inertial sensor network. In Proceedings of the IEE Eurowearable Conference (2003). 125--130. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1049/ic:20030158Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  57. Liang Wang, Tao Gu, Xianping Tao, Hanhua Chen, and Jian Lu. 2011. Recognizing multi-user activities using wearable sensors in a smart home. Pervasive Mob. Comput. 7, 3 (June 2011), 287--298. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pmcj.2010.11.008 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  58. Liang Wang, Tao Gu, Xianping Tao, and Jian Lu. 2009. Sensor-based human activity recognition in a multi-user scenario. In Ambient Intelligence, Manfred Tscheligi et al. (Eds.). Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer, Berlin, 78--87. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  59. Daniel H. Wilson and Chris Atkeson. 2005. Simultaneous tracking and activity recognition (STAR) using many anonymous, binary sensors. In Pervasive Computing, Hans-W. Gellersen, Roy Want, and Albrecht Schmidt (Eds.). Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer, Berlin, 62--79. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Multioccupant Activity Recognition in Pervasive Smart Home Environments

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in

      Full Access

      • Published in

        cover image ACM Computing Surveys
        ACM Computing Surveys  Volume 48, Issue 3
        February 2016
        619 pages
        ISSN:0360-0300
        EISSN:1557-7341
        DOI:10.1145/2856149
        • Editor:
        • Sartaj Sahni
        Issue’s Table of Contents

        Copyright © 2015 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 9 December 2015
        • Accepted: 1 September 2015
        • Revised: 1 June 2015
        • Received: 1 February 2015
        Published in csur Volume 48, Issue 3

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • survey
        • Research
        • Refereed

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader